Currently I'm using Magento 1.9.01 and PHP 5.3.28. In ASP .NET I'm trying to retrieve the catalog tree by using the SOAP API using the following code:
var magentoService = new MagentoService.Mage_Api_Model_Server_Wsi_HandlerPortTypeClient();
var sessionId = magentoService.login(userName, apiKey);
var categoryTree = magentoService.catalogCategoryTree(sessionId, "", "");
The errror I get is "Internal Error. Please see log for details."
And in the logs I can see the following:
Argument 1 passed to Mage_Catalog_Model_Category_Api::_nodeToArray() must be an instance of Varien_Data_Tree_Node, null given
From what I've read it can be a bug with PHP 5.4 or greater, but not the version I'm using... So if someone has any idea how to solve this, it will be greatly appreaciated.
Seems pretty straight forward, though the error thrown suggests a much bigger problem. First make sure that the variables are exactly as you specified in your Magento installation (pay attention to caps). Second you can't pass empty strings, instead try "Null".
Good luck
Related
I am trying the fusionauth-node-client and following the wiki https://fusionauth.io/docs/v1/tech/client-libraries/node. But I am getting the following error
const client = new FusionAuthClient('6b87a398-39f2-4692-927b-13188a81a9a3', 'http://localhost:9011');
^
TypeError: FusionAuthClient is not a constructor
at Object.<anonymous>
I have pasted the exact code mentioned in the doc still it is not working. Can anyone help me in identifying what I am missing here.
I dug around in the library and noticed that we are exporting several objects and our example is no longer correct.
To get the client you need to change your syntax a little bit to get the correct object.
const {FusionAuthClient} = require('fusionauth-node-client');
This translates to: require the library fusionauth-node-client and give me the FusionAuthClient from inside it. There are also a RESTClient and JWTManager available in the library but you shouldn't need either of those to code with FusionAuth.
I will also update our example to correct this discrepancy.
I am trying to update an item on podio through their Java API. It worked fine for a while, but now, but after some time it gave me this error:
APIException [status=Conflict, error=conflict, description=A newer version exists , parameters=null]
Right now, if I sent another request to update the item that had this error, it will return the same error. I don't understand.
What does this error mean? and how do i solve it? Is that item going to give me the same error error forever?
Here's a snippet of my code:
List<FieldValuesUpdate> fields = new ArrayList<>();
String valueSubId = "value";
fields.add(new FieldValuesUpdate(1234567890, valueSubId, something.getName()));
fields.add(new FieldValuesUpdate(1234567891, valueSubId, something.getCode()));
fields.add(new FieldValuesUpdate(1234567892, valueSubId, something.getAddress()));
fields.add(new FieldValuesUpdate(1234567893, valueSubId, something.getStatus()));
ItemUpdate itemUpdate = new ItemUpdate(null, fields);
int itemId = 123444;
podioItemApi.updateItem(itemId, itemUpdate, true, false);
Looks like you are trying to create item and adding fields but your app is updated and maybe some of fields doesn't exist anymore.
Please send full http request and response for your call, that will definitely help understanding what's happening.
Had the same issue as well.
And as mentioned earlier, it has to do with the revision provided. Using the Java API, the revision is set automatically. Therefore, if an entry has been updated manually it will have a revision of >0, while example by JayDoe will leave it at 0 which is the conflict.
I decided not to hack the API, but use it the way an update workflow is meant to be used. reading the entry first, then setting its revision into the ItemUpdate object.
I am new to S3 and need to use it for image storage. I found a half dozen versions of an s2wrapper for cf but it appears that the only one set of for v4 is one modified by Leigh
https://gist.github.com/Leigh-/26993ed79c956c9309a9dfe40f1fce29
Dropped in the com directory and created a "test" page that contains the following code:
s3 = createObject('component','com.S3Wrapper').init(application.s3.AccessKeyId,application.s3.SecretAccessKey);
but got the following error :
So I changed the line 37 from
variables.Sv4Util = createObject('component', 'Sv4').init(arguments.S3AccessKey, arguments.S3SecretAccessKey);
to
variables.Sv4Util = createObject('component', 'Sv4Util').init(arguments.S3AccessKey, arguments.S3SecretAccessKey);
Now I am getting:
I feel like going through Leigh code and start changing things is a bad idea since I have lurked here for year an know Leigh's code is solid.
Does any know if there are any examples on how to use this anywhere? If not what I am doing wrong. If it makes a difference I am using Lucee 5 and not Adobe's CF engine.
UPDATE :
I followed Leigh's directions and the error is now gone. I am addedsome more code to my test page which now looks like this :
<cfscript>
s3 = createObject('component','com.S3v4').init(application.s3.AccessKeyId,application.s3.SecretAccessKey);
bucket = "imgbkt.domain.com";
obj = "fake.ping";
region = "s3-us-west-1"
test = s3.getObject(bucket,obj,region);
writeDump(test);
test2 = s3.getObjectLink(bucket,obj,region);
writeDump(test2);
writeDump(s3);
</cfscript>
Regardless of what I put in for bucket, obj or region I get :
JIC I did go to AWS and get new keys:
Leigh if you are still around or anyone how has used one of the s3Wrappers any suggestions or guidance?
UPDATE #2:
Even after Alex's help I am not able to get this to work. The Link I receive from getObjectLink is not valid and getObject never does download an object. I thought I would try the putObject method
test3 = s3.putObject(bucketName=bucket,regionName=region,keyName="favicon.ico");
writeDump(test3);
to see if there is any additional information, I received this :
I did find this article https://shlomoswidler.com/2009/08/amazon-s3-gotcha-using-virtual-host.html but it is pretty old and since S3 specifically suggests using dots in bucketnames I don't that it is relevant any longer. There is obviously something I am doing wrong but I have spent hours trying to resolve this and I can't seem to figure out what it might be.
I will give you a rundown of what the code does:
getObjectLink returns a HTTP URL for the file fake.ping that is found looking in the bucket imgbkt.domain.com of region s3-us-west-1. This link is temporary and expires after 60 seconds by default.
getObject invokes getObjectLink and immediately requests the URL using HTTP GET. The response is then saved to the directory of the S3v4.cfc with the filename fake.ping by default. Finally the function returns the full path of the downloaded file: E:\wwwDevRoot\taa\fake.ping
To save the file in a different location, you would invoke:
downloadPath = 'E:\';
test = s3.getObject(bucket,obj,region,downloadPath);
writeDump(test);
The HTTP request is synchronous, meaning the file will be downloaded completely when the functions returns the filepath.
If you want to access the actual content of the file, you can do this:
test = s3.getObject(bucket,obj,region);
contentAsString = fileRead(test); // returns the file content as string
// or
contentAsBinary = fileReadBinary(test); // returns the content as binary (byte array)
writeDump(contentAsString);
writeDump(contentAsBinary);
(You might want to stream the content if the file is large since fileRead/fileReadBinary reads the whole file into buffer. Use fileOpen to stream the content.
Does that help you?
This code section i am getting error any ideas ?
public IEnumerable<LOBinfo> getLobinfo()
{
// var obj = from n in lobj.LOBinfoes select n;
return lobj.LOBinfoes.Select(m=>m).ToList();
// return obj.ToList();
}
I am not even using USING keyword ?
This issue been for a while and i referred many articles in stackoverflow itself but things looking bad for me .
Thank you for your suggestions
Underlying provider failed to open means, that at some point a database could not be reached, due to wrong connection settings for example or a previous failure etc...
The code you show here is allright, except for the fact you write a useless .Select you can drop the .Select(m=>m) and just leave the .ToList there.
Further, to find out what is causing your crash post the exact error message as well as the inner exception. (and the inner exception's inner exception and so on...)
Next to that the part "lobj.LOBinfoes" is probably a repository or something? You might as well post the code of that and the code of your data access object as well.
Few month back I was working on some Odata WCF project and I had some problems with parsing custom headers for token auth (apiKey).
At that time, being quite a noob (still am!), I posted this SO question: JayData oData request with custom headers
Today I am working on a new project with Jaydata Odata server and client library and this:
application.context.prepareRequest = function (r) {
r[0].headers['apikey'] = '123456';
};
was working fine till I had to do a MERGE request. I found out that somehow MERGE request was overriding my headers so I investigated further.
It appears at first that in the oDataProvider.js (~line 617) in the _saveRest method the headers are not inherited:
request = {
requestUri: this.providerConfiguration.oDataServiceHost + '/',
headers: {
MaxDataServiceVersion: this.providerConfiguration.maxDataServiceVersion
}
};
but a few lines later we get:
this.context.prepareRequest.call(this, requestData);
which "should" call my own prepareRequest, but doesnt... Instead it still points to:
//Line 11302 jaydata.js
prepareRequest: function () { },
which of course does... nothing! Funnilly enough, when you execute a simple GET the same code supposedly on the same context instance works and points to my prepareRequest override.
I can assert with enough confidence that somehow the context between GET/MERGE is not the same instance. I cant see, however, any place where the context instance is reassigned.
Has anyone got a clue?
PS: this is NOT a CORS issue. My OPTIONS is passing fine and manually feeding the headers in oDataProvider works.
More
I followed the lead on different context instances and found something interesting. calling EntitySet.save() ends up calling the EntityContext constructor. see trace:
$data.Class.define.constructor (jaydata.js:10015)
EntityContext (VM110762:7)
Service (VM110840:8)
storeToken.factory (jaydata.js:14166)
$data.Class.define._getContextPromise (jaydata.js:13725)
$data.Class.define._getStoreContext (jaydata.js:13700)
$data.Class.define._getStoreEntitySet (jaydata.js:13756)
$data.Class.define.EntityInstanceSave (jaydata.js:13837)
$data.Entity.$data.Class.define.save (jaydata.js:9774)
(anonymous function) (app.js:162) // My save()
That explains why I get two different instances...
Hack
Replacing the prepareRequest function direcly in the class definition works, but its ugly!
for now I can cope with this:
$data.EntityContext.prototype.prepareRequest = function (r) {
r[0].headers['apikey'] = '12345';
};
This works fine as long as you only need to talk to a single endpoint.
Final word based on my experience
As much as I like JayData, it is obvious that they created a monster and its getting out of their hands (poor forum, no community, half-documented,...).
I chose JD because I was lazy and wanted to keep working with my old WCF DataService. Switching to Web API seemed wrong or too much work for me.
Also as a .net dev I liked strong typing of my entities and the ability to work with a concrete model generated from the JD tools. However, in the end, I was adding confusion. Every time my server side model changed I had to fetch the new metadata and scaffold a new entityModel.
I ended up by switching to Web Api and migrated my data service layer to Breeze. And seriously! its a breeze to work with it!
The documentation is absolutely brilliant and here on S.O you can always count on Ward or Jay Tarband to reply with a very high amount of professionalism.
In the end I realize this should probably be more a wiki than a Question.....