I have the following relations in my database:
Invoice InvoiceMeal
--------------------- ---------------------------
| InvoiceId | Total | | Id | InvoiceId | MealId |
--------------------- ---------------------------
| 1 | 22.32 | | 1 | 1 | 3 |
--------------------- ---------------------------
| 2 | 12.18 | | 2 | 1 | 2 |
--------------------- ---------------------------
| 3 | 27.76 | | 3 | 2 | 2 |
--------------------- ---------------------------
Meal Type
----------------------------------- -------------------
| Id | Name | TypeId | | Id | Name |
----------------------------------- -------------------
| 1 | Hamburger | 1 | | 1 | Meat |
----------------------------------- -------------------
| 2 | Soja Beans | 2 | | 2 | Vegetarian |
----------------------------------- -------------------
| 3 | Chicken | 2 |
-----------------------------------
What I want to query from the database is InvoiceId and Total of all Invoices which consist of at least two Meals where at least one of the Meals is of Type Vegetarian. I have the following SQL query and it works:
SELECT
i."Id", i."Total"
FROM
public."Invoice" i
WHERE
(SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM public."InvoiceMeal" im
WHERE im."InvoiceId" = i."Id" AND
(SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM public."Meal" m, public."Type" t
WHERE im."MealId" = m."Id" AND
m."TypeId" = t."Id" AND
g."Name" = 'Vegetarian') > 0
) >= 2;
My problem with this query is that I can not easily modify the condition that there must at least one vegetarien Meal. I want to be able, for example, to change it to at least two vegetarian meals. How can I achieve this with my query?
I would approach this by joining the tables together and using aggregation. The having clause can handle the conditions:
select i.Id, i.Total
from InvoiceMeal im join
Invoice i
on i.InvoiceId = im.InvoiceId join
Meal m
on im.mealid = m.mealid join
Type t
on m.typeid = t.typeid
group by i.Id, i.Total
having count(distinct im.mealid) >= 2 and
sum(case when t.name = 'Vegetarian' then 1 else 0 end) > 0;
I also see no reason to put double quotes around column names. That just makes the query harder to write and read.
Related
I have three tables store, gender, age_group each of these tables have ids. I need to generate table data for each one all possible combinations of the three.
ex. store_id = (1,2,3) gender_id = (1,2,3) age_group_id = (1,2,3)
so that i have a table that looks like this:
|store_id|gender_id|age_group_id|
|:------:|:-------:|:----------:|
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 3 | 2 | 3 |
etc. continuing on until each combination is populated, any suggestions on best approach to do this in SQL
Cross join the three tables:
select
s.Id as store_id,
g.Id as gender_id,
a.Id as age_group_id
from store s
cross join gender g
cross join age_group a
How do I correctly join a table on two columns. My issue is that the result is not correct as it only joins on a single column.
This question started of in this other question: SQL query returns product of results instead of sum . I am creating a new question as there is an other issue I am trying to solve.
I join a table of materials on a table which contains multiple supply and disposal movements. Each movement references a material id. I would like to join the material on each movement.
My query:
SELECT supply_material_refer, disposal_material_refer, material_id, material_name
FROM "construction_sites"
JOIN projects ON construction_sites.project_refer = projects.project_id
JOIN addresses ON construction_sites.address_refer = addresses.address_id
cross join lateral ( select *
from (select row_number() over () as rn, *
from supplies
where supplies.supply_project_refer = projects.project_id) as supplies
full join (select row_number() over () as rn, *
from disposals
where disposals.disposal_project_refer = projects.project_id
) as disposals
on (supplies.rn = disposals.rn)
) as combined
LEFT JOIN materials material ON combined.disposal_material_refer = material.material_id
OR combined.supply_material_refer = material.material_id
WHERE (projects.project_name = 'Project 15')
ORDER BY construction_site_id asc;
The result of the query:
+-----------------------+-------------------------+-------------+---------------+
| supply_material_refer | disposal_material_refer | material_id | material_name |
+-----------------------+-------------------------+-------------+---------------+
| 1 | 1 | 1 | Materialtest |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | Materialtest |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | Dirt |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | Materialtest |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | Materialtest |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | Dirt |
| 1 | (null) | 1 | Materialtest |
| 4 | (null) | 4 | Stones |
+-----------------------+-------------------------+-------------+---------------+
An example line I have issues with:
+------------------------+-------------------------+-------------+---------------+
| supply_material_refer | disposal_material_refer | material_id | material_name |
+------------------------+-------------------------+-------------+---------------+
| 2 | 1 | 1 | Materialtest |
+------------------------+-------------------------+-------------+---------------+
A prefered output would be like:
+------------------------+----------------------+-------------------------+------------------------+
| supply_material_refer | supply_material_name | disposal_material_refer | disposal_material_name |
+------------------------+----------------------+-------------------------+------------------------+
| 2 | Dirt | 1 | Materialtest |
+------------------------+----------------------+-------------------------+------------------------+
I have created a sqlfiddle with dummy data: http://www.sqlfiddle.com/#!17/863d78/2
To my understanding the solution would be to have a disposal_material column and and supply_material column for the material names. I do not know how I can achieve this goal though...
Thanks for any help!
I have a Zoo, each Zoo has many Cages, each Cage has many Animals.
Zoo:
+----+
| Id |
+----+
| 1 |
| 2 |
+----+
Cage:
+----+-------+
| Id | ZooId |
+----+-------+
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 2 |
| 4 | 2 |
| 5 | 2 |
+----+-------+
Animal:
+----+--------+----------+
| Id | CageId | IsHungry |
+----+--------+----------+
| 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 3 | 1 | 0 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 |
| 5 | 3 | 0 |
| 6 | 4 | 0 |
| 7 | 5 | 0 |
+----+--------+----------+
I'm trying to design a query to show each Zoo, the number of cages in that Zoo, and whether or not the Zoo has hungry Animals.
Here is the results I expect:
+-------+-----------+--------------+
| ZooID | CageCount | AnyoneHungry |
+-------+-----------+--------------+
| 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 3 | 0 |
+-------+-----------+--------------+
I can get the number of Cages in a Zoo:
SELECT
[c].[ZooId],
COUNT(*) AS [NumCages]
FROM [Cage] [c]
GROUP BY [c].[ZooId]
ORDER BY [NumCages] DESC
I can determine if a Cage has a hungry animal or not:
SELECT CASE WHEN EXISTS (
SELECT NULL
FROM [Animal] [a]
WHERE [a].[CageId] = #CageId AND [a].[IsHungry] = 1
) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
But I'm having trouble combining these two into a single query that runs efficiently (in this universe zoos are very popular and have millions of cages and animals).
SELECT
[c].[ZooId],
COUNT(*) AS [CageCount],
MAX(CONVERT(INT, [x].[AnyoneHungry])) AS [AnyoneHungry]
FROM [Cage] [c]
INNER JOIN (
SELECT [a].[CageId], MAX(CONVERT(INT, [a].[IsHungry])) AS [AnyoneHungry]
FROM [Animal] [a]
GROUP BY [a].[CageId]
) [x] on [x].[CageId] = [c].[Id]
GROUP BY [c].[ZooId]
I feel like I'm missing something and it should be possible do run this query using a simpler statement.
This should do
SELECT
Z.Id,
COUNT(DISTINCT C.Id) AS CageCount,
COALESCE(MAX(CAST(A.IsHungry AS INT)), 0) AS AnyHungry /*The cast is only required if A.IsHungry is BIT and not INT*/
FROM Zoo Z
LEFT JOIN Cage C ON Z.Id = C.ZooId
LEFT JOIN Animal A ON C.Id = A.CageId
GROUP BY Z.Id
If you only need the zoo id and hungry animals:
SELECT c.zooid,
COUNT(DISTINCT C.Id) as CageCount,
COALESCE(MAX(CONVERT(int, a.IsHungry)), 0) AS AnyHungry
FROM Cage C LEFT JOIN
Animal A
ON c.Id = a.CageId AND a.IsHungry = 1
GROUP BY c.zooid;
I need to select cid, project, and owner from rows in the table below where one or more rows for a cid/project combination has an owner of 1.
cid | project | phase | task | owner
-----------------------------------
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2
1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1
2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1
3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2
My output table should look like the this:
cid | project | phase | task | owner
-----------------------------------
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1
1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2
1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1
2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1
The below query is what I came up with. It does seem to test okay, but my confidence is low. Is the query an effective way to solve the problem?
select task1.cid, task1.project, task1.owner
from
(select cid, project, owner from table) task1
right join
(select distinct cid, project, owner from table where owner = 1) task2
on task1.cid = task2.cid and task1.project = task2.project
(I did not remove the phase and task columns from the sample output so that it would be easier to compare.)
You can simply use a IN clause
select cid, project, owner
from table
where cid in (select distinct id from table where owner = 1)
or a inner join with a subquery
select a.cid, a.project, a.owner
from table a
INNER JOIN ( select distinct cid , project
from table where owner = 1
) t on t.cid = a.cid and t.project = a.project
I have a query that looks like this:
select id, extension, count(distinct(id)) from publicids group by id,extension;
This is what the results looks like:
id | extension | count
-------------+-------------------------+-------
18459154909 | 12333 | 1
18459154909 | 9891114 | 1
18459154919 | 43244 | 1
18459154919 | 8776232 | 1
18766145025 | 12311 | 1
18766145025 | 1122111 | 1
18766145201 | 12422 | 1
18766145201 | 14141 | 1
But what I really want is for the results to look like this:
id | extension | count
-------------+-------------------------+-------
18459154909 | 12333 | 2
18459154909 | 9891114 | 2
18459154919 | 43244 | 2
18459154919 | 8776232 | 2
18766145025 | 12311 | 2
18766145025 | 1122111 | 2
18766145201 | 12422 | 2
18766145201 | 14141 | 2
I'm trying to get the count field to show the total number of records that have the same id.
Any suggestions would be appreciated
I think you want to count distincts extentions, not ids.
Run this query:
select id
, extension
(select count(*) from publicids p1 where p.id = p1.id ) distinct_id_count
from publicids p
group by id,extension;
This is more or less the same as Pastor's answer. Depending on what the optimizer does it might be faster with higher record count source tables.
select p.id, p.extension, p2.id_count
from publicids p
inner join (
select id, count(*) as id_count
from publicids group by id
) as p2 on p.id = p2.id