Summing a filtered column in DataTables - datatables

I'm trying to sum the results of filtered columns in DataTables. I've viewed the questions asked on their website and folks have had success using this method.
However, similar code for me produces 'Uncaught TypeError: undefined is not a function."
data = table._('td:nth-child(10)', {"filter": "applied"});
where 'table' is:
var table = $('#dataTable').DataTable({
// my initialization data
});

_ (the underscore function) seems to be deprecated in dataTables 1.10.x. In theory it should work with $('#dataTable').dataTable() (the old constructor) but this does not give the expected result (as least not for me).
But see this -> http://datatables.net/plug-ins/api/sum()
jQuery.fn.dataTable.Api.register( 'sum()', function () {
return this.flatten().reduce( function ( a, b ) {
return (a*1) + (b*1); // cast values in-case they are strings
});
});
var table = $("#example").DataTable();
$("#example").on('search.dt', function() {
console.log(table.column( 0, {page:'current'} ).data().sum() );
});
would give the same functionality in dataTables 1.10.x as you want in the question header.
see demo -> http://jsfiddle.net/6qLwkwud/
table.column( 0, {"filter": "applied"} ).data().sum() works perfectly well also.

Related

How can I save part of a string in an alias using Cypress?

I'm trying to save just a number from a string I get from a paragraph but when I try to asign an alias to it and then check the value it returns undefined. I've tried a few solutions I found but none of those seem to work for me. These are two ways I tried (I tried another one similar to the second one but using split, had same result). The console.log inside of the 'then' doesn't show in the console, and when I try the alias after the code is when I get undefined.
cy.get('p')
.eq(1)
.should('have.text', '/[0-9]+/g')
.as('solNumber')
cy.get('p')
.eq(1)
.invoke('text')
.then((text)=>{
var fullText = text;
var pattern = /[0-9]+/g;
var number = fullText.match(pattern);
console.log(number);
})
.as('solNumber')
Please convert with + operator and return the numeric value if you want numeric type to be stored.
cy.get('p').eq(1)
.invoke('text')
.then(fullText => {
const number = fullText.match(/[0-9]+/);
return +number // text to numeric
})
.as('solNumber')
cy.get('#solNumber')
.should('eq', 42) // numeric type
});
Running your 2nd code on this,
<p>21</p>
<p>42</p>
gives the correct outcome
cy.get('p')
.eq(1)
.invoke('text')
.then((text)=>{
var fullText = text;
var pattern = /[0-9]+/g;
var number = fullText.match(pattern);
console.log(number); // logs 42
})
.as('solNumber')
cy.get('#solNumber')
.should('eq', '42') // passes
So, you need to inspect the DOM, it looks like it's not what you expect.
The first attempt you were passing a jquery element to the .should() and although some chainers change the subject yours did not so it saved the jquery element as solNumber.
The second attempt invokes the .text() which was passed to the .then() it logs the number correctly. However, you did not return anything at the end of the .then() block, therefore, solNumber should hold the entire paragraph.
This should help you out to extract the specific number and save it as an alias.
cy.get('p')
.invoke('text')
.invoke('trim')
.then(paragraph => {
const matcher = /some/
expect(paragraph).to.match(matcher) // check number is there
const indexOfText = paragraph.match(matcher) // get index of match text
return paragraph.substring(indexOfText.index, indexOfText.index + indexOfText[0].length) // return substring
})
.as('savedText')
cy.get('#savedText')
.then(cy.log) // will print out the number you seek

columnSummary is not added

I am trying to add columnSummary to my table using Handsontable. But it seems that the function does not fire. The stretchH value gets set and is set properly. But it does not react to the columnSummary option:
this.$refs.hot.hotInstance.updateSettings({stretchH: 'all',columnSummary: [
{
destinationRow: 0,
destinationColumn: 2,
reversedRowCoords: true,
type: 'custom',
customFunction: function(endpoint) {
console.log("TEST");
}
}]
}, false);
I have also tried with type:'sum' without any luck.
Thanks for all help and guidance!
columnSummary cannot be changed with updateSettings: GH #3597
You can set columnSummary settings at the initialization of Handsontable.
One workaround would be to somehow manage your own column summary, since Handsontable one could give you some headeache. So you may try to add one additional row to put your arithmetic in, but it is messy (it needs fixed rows number and does not work with filtering and sorting operations. Still, it could work well under some circumstances.
In my humble opinion though, a summary column has to be fully functionnal. We then need to set our summary row out of the table data. What comes to mind is to take the above mentioned additional row and take it away from the table data "area" but it would force us to make that out of the table row always looks like it still was in the table.
So I thought that instead of having a new line we could just have to add our column summary within column header:
Here is a working JSFiddle example.
Once the Handsontable table is rendered, we need to iterate through the columns and set our column summary right in the table cell HTML content:
for(var i=0;i<tableConfig.columns.length;i++) {
var columnHeader = document.querySelectorAll('.ht_clone_top th')[i];
if(columnHeader) { // Just to be sure column header exists
var summaryColumnHeader = document.createElement('div');
summaryColumnHeader.className = 'custom-column-summary';
columnHeader.appendChild( summaryColumnHeader );
}
}
Now that our placeholders are set, we have to update them with some arithmetic results:
var printedData = hotInstance.getData();
for(var i=0;i<tableConfig.columns.length;i++) {
var summaryColumnHeader = document.querySelectorAll('.ht_clone_top th')[i].querySelector('.custom-column-summary'); // Get back our column summary for each column
if(summaryColumnHeader) {
var res = 0;
printedData.forEach(function(row) { res += row[i] }); // Count all data that are stored under that column
summaryColumnHeader.innerText = '= '+ res;
}
}
This piece of code function may be called anytime it should be:
var hotInstance = new Handsontable(/* ... */);
setMySummaryHeaderCalc(); // When Handsontable table is printed
Handsontable.hooks.add('afterFilter', function(conditionsStack) { // When Handsontable table is filtered
setMySummaryHeaderCalc();
}, hotInstance);
Feel free to comment, I could improve my answer.

Why does this gives me error: "DataTables warning: table id=example - Requested unknown parameter 'id'

I am trying to implement add row in jquery datatable ie when the user clicks on add row button, it adds a new row
I tried to follow this example: https://datatables.net/examples/api/add_row.html
But it gives me error as:
DataTables warning: table id=example - Requested unknown parameter 'id' for row >4, column 0. For more information about this error, please see >http://datatables.net/tn/4
When I press OK to the error it adds row but no data is added.
I have created my sample at this fiddle:
https://jsfiddle.net/aman1981/x7jstfw1/30/
Below is just the part of adding row:
var t = $('#example').DataTable();
var counter = 1;
$('#addRow').on( 'click', function () {
t.row.add( [
counter +'.1',
counter +'.2'
] ).draw( false );
counter++;
} );
Thanks for looking into.
The simplest fix is to add the data like you did with Allan and Bob, as an object.
$('#addRow').on( 'click', function () {
t.row.add( {
"id": counter +'.1',
"name": counter +'.2'
} ).draw( false );
See the fiddle here: https://jsfiddle.net/x7jstfw1/31/

API returns array of JSON for only one result

Currently working on an API which given an address returns information about is. Some of the rows in our tables are duplicates, however being as there is over 15 million I cant go and find the duplicates. Instead I have opted to use
var query = `SELECT TOP 1 * from my_TABLE where..conditions`;
This ensures that only one row of the duplicates are returned.
The problem is when this is sent back as a JSON it comes as an array with one object.
In the Server.js file
// create Request object
var request = new sql.Request();
// query to the database
request.query(query, function (err, result) {
if (err) {
console.log("Error while querying database :- " + err);
res.send(err);
}
else {
res.send(result)
}
Returns this:
[{
Address:'our info'
}]
is there a way to have it respond with
{
Address:'our info'
}
Because from DB you've get list of object anyway, even there is only 1 item.
It works as you expected when you try to return json with the first element of your array.

"update" query - error invalid input synatx for integer: "{39}" - postgresql

I'm using node js 0.10.12 to perform querys to postgreSQL 9.1.
I get the error error invalid input synatx for integer: "{39}" (39 is an example number) when I try to perform an update query
I cannot see what is going wrong. Any advise?
Here is my code (snippets) in the front-end
//this is global
var gid=0;
//set websockets to search - works fine
var sd = new WebSocket("ws://localhost:0000");
sd.onmessage = function (evt)
{
//get data, parse it, because there is more than one vars, pass id to gid
var received_msg = evt.data;
var packet = JSON.parse(received_msg);
var tid = packet['tid'];
gid=tid;
}
//when user clicks button, set websockets to send id and other data, to perform update query
var sa = new WebSocket("ws://localhost:0000");
sa.onopen = function(){
sa.send(JSON.stringify({
command:'typesave',
indi:gid,
name:document.getElementById("typename").value,
}));
sa.onmessage = function (evt) {
alert("Saved");
sa.close;
gid=0;//make gid 0 again, for re-use
}
And the back -end (query)
var query=client.query("UPDATE type SET t_name=$1,t_color=$2 WHERE t_id = $3 ",[name, color, indi])
query.on("row", function (row, result) {
result.addRow(row);
});
query.on("end", function (result) {
connection.send("o");
client.end();
});
Why this not work and the number does not get recognized?
Thanks in advance
As one would expect from the initial problem, your database driver is sending in an integer array of one member into a field for an integer. PostgreSQL rightly rejects the data and return an error. '{39}' in PostgreSQL terms is exactly equivalent to ARRAY[39] using an array constructor and [39] in JSON.
Now, obviously you can just change your query call to pull the first item out of the JSON array. and send that instead of the whole array, but I would be worried about what happens if things change and you get multiple values. You may want to look at separating that logic out for this data structure.