Syntax Error - Missing Operator - Cannot determine what is missing - sql

What is wrong with the SQL statement? I get a message that there is a syntax error (missing operator). From the ASSIGNMENT TABLE I am wanting to select all rows where ASSN_TRANS_STATE_NUM = '1'. For each of these rows I then want to get the project name from the PROJECTS table. I also want to get each of the Task names from the TASKS table. I did get this to work earlier (not sure what change I made that broke it) but even when it did work it was not correct. It was reporting every task for each of the projects, instead of just giving me the tasks specific to a project.
SELECT
TRANS.PROJ_UID,
PROJ.PROJ_NAME,
TRANS.TASK_UID,
TASKS.TASK_NAME,
TRANS.ASSN_TRANS_STATE_ENUM,
TRANS.ASSN_TRANS_APPROVER_RES_UID
FROM dbo_MSP_ASSIGNMENT_TRANSACTIONS TRANS
INNER JOIN dbo_MSP_PROJECTS PROJ ON PROJ.PROJ_UID = TRANS.PROJ_UID
INNER JOIN dbo_MSP_TASKS TASKS ON TASKS.TASK_UID = TRANS.TASK_UID
WHERE TRANS.ASSN_TRANS_STATE_ENUM = 1;

It will be dbo. rather than dbo_. I guess it should help
SELECT
TRANS.PROJ_UID,
PROJ.PROJ_NAME,
TRANS.TASK_UID,
TASKS.TASK_NAME,
TRANS.ASSN_TRANS_STATE_ENUM,
TRANS.ASSN_TRANS_APPROVER_RES_UID
FROM dbo.MSP_ASSIGNMENT_TRANSACTIONS TRANS
INNER JOIN dbo.MSP_PROJECTS PROJ ON PROJ.PROJ_UID = TRANS.PROJ_UID
INNER JOIN dbo.MSP_TASKS TASKS ON TASKS.TASK_UID = TRANS.TASK_UID
WHERE TRANS.ASSN_TRANS_STATE_ENUM = 1;

Related

SQL Server : multi-join with tuple IN clause

I'm trying to join 4 tables that have a somewhat complex relationship. Because of where this will be used, it needs to be contained in a single query, but I'm having trouble since the primary query and the IN clause query both join 2 tables together and the lookup is on two columns.
The goal is to input a SalesNum and SalesType and have it return the Price
Tables and relationships:
sdShipping
SalesNum[1]
SalesType[2]
Weight[3]
sdSales
SalesNum[1]
SalesType[2]
Zip[4]
spZones
Zip[4]
Zone[5]
spPrices
Zone[5]
Price
Weight[3]
Here's my latest attempt in T-SQL:
SELECT
spp.Price
FROM
spZones AS spz
LEFT OUTER JOIN
spPrices AS spp ON spz.Zone = spp.Zone
WHERE
(spp.Weight, spz.Zip) IN (SELECT ship.Weight, sales.Zip
FROM sdShipping AS ship
LEFT OUTER JOIN sdSales AS sales ON sales.SalesNum = ship.SalesNum
AND sales.SalesType = ship.SalesType
WHERE sales.SalesNum = (?)
AND ship.SalesType = (?));
SQL Server Management Studio says I have an error in my syntax near ',' (appropriately useless error message). Does anybody have any idea whether this is even allowed in Microsoft's version of SQL? Is there perhaps another way to accomplish it? I've seen the multi-key IN questions answered on here, but never in the case where both sides require a JOIN.
Many databases do support IN on tuples. SQL Server is not one of them.
Use EXISTS instead:
SELECT spp.Price
FROM spZones spz LEFT OUTER JOIN
spPrices spp
ON spz.Zone = spp.Zone
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM sdShipping ship LEFT JOIN
sdSales sales
ON sales.SalesNum = ship.SalesNum AND
sales.SalesType = ship.SalesType
WHERE spp.Weight = ship.Weight AND spz.Zip = sales.Zip AND
sales.SalesNum = (?) AND
ship.SalesType = (?)
);

MS Access 2016 Error: "Multi-level group by not allowed"

i'm stuck at another point in my little Access 2016 Database. My code looks like the following and i know it probably isn't the cleanest solution but i'm kinda new to this and i tried to educate myself and get some help here already.
I'm trying to play around with the reports now a little bit and i am using this test query which returns all entries of two tables joined together.
As far as i could find out I have this one subquery included that returns the prvious day inventory for each record and that is most likely the cause of my error. I found a possible solution with adding SELECT * FROM at the beginning of my code but i get a Syntax error when i do that and i'm not sure how to solve this problem.
here's my code
SELECT Stations.StationName, Product.ProductName, GasInventoryTransactions.TransactionDate, (SELECT TOP 1 Dupe.ActualInventory FROM GasInventory AS Dupe WHERE Dupe.StationID = Stations.StationID AND Dupe.ProductID = Product.ProductID AND Dupe.InventoryDate < GasInventory.InventoryDate ORDER BY Dupe.InventoryDate DESC) AS PreviousDayInventory, GasInventory.ActualInventory, GasInventoryTransactions.GasSales, GasInventoryTransactions.GasDelivery, [PreviousDayInventory]+[GasDelivery]-[GasSales] AS BookBalance, GasInventory.ActualInventory, [ActualInventory]-[BookBalance] AS OverShort
FROM (Stations INNER JOIN (Product INNER JOIN GasInventory ON Product.[ProductID] = GasInventory.[ProductID]) ON Stations.[StationID] = GasInventory.[StationID]) INNER JOIN GasInventoryTransactions ON GasInventory.[InventoryDate] = GasInventoryTransactions.[TransactionDate];
thanks for your help!

SQLite Table alias with period inside parentheses is not found

I am working on a open source ORM, and have ended up with the following generated Statement
SELECT "Task"."id"
,"Task"."title"
,"Task"."projectId"
,"Project"."id" AS "Project.id"
,"Project"."title" AS "Project.title"
,"Project"."userId" AS "Project.UserId"
,"Project.User"."id" AS "Project.User.id"
,"Project.User"."username" AS "Project.User.username"
FROM "Task" AS "Task"
LEFT OUTER JOIN ("Project" AS "Project"
INNER JOIN "User" AS "Project.User" ON "Project"."userId" = "Project.User"."id"
AND "Project.User"."username" = 'test01' ) ON "Task"."projectId" = "project"."id";
which produces the following error
no such column: Project.User.id
Thanks to help from a previous question here I was able to solve it by removing the periods from the alias inside the parentheses
SELECT "Task"."id"
,"Task"."title"
,"Task"."projectId"
,"Project"."id" AS "Project.id"
,"Project"."title" AS "Project.title"
,"Project"."userId" AS "Project.UserId"
,"Project_User"."id" AS "Project.User.id"
,"Project_User"."username" AS "Project.User.username"
FROM "Task" AS "Task"
LEFT OUTER JOIN ("Project" AS "Project"
INNER JOIN "User" AS "Project_User" ON "Project"."userId" = "Project_User"."id"
AND "Project_User"."username" = 'test01' ) ON "Task"."projectId" = "project"."id";
However, since I am working on an ORM the format of the the SQL statement is important and having the periods in those inner aliases would help a lot. I have discovered the following SQL works.
SELECT "Task"."id"
,"Task"."title"
,"Task"."projectId"
,"Project"."id" AS "Project.id"
,"Project"."title" AS "Project.title"
,"Project"."userId" AS "Project.UserId"
,"Project.User"."id" AS "Project.User.id"
,"Project.User"."username" AS "Project.User.username"
FROM "Task" AS "Task"
LEFT OUTER JOIN ("Project" AS "Project"
INNER JOIN "User" AS "Project.User" ON "Project"."userId" = "Project.User"."id"
AND "Project.User"."username" = 'test01' ) "Project.User" ON "Task"."projectId" = "project"."id";
But I do not understand why, or how to scale this to a solution that has many nested joins of a similar nature.
All columns and tables exist with the names given, and no other problems are getting in the way (I assume this mainly based on the failure of the first example and the success of the second.) The initial error only happens in sqlite, all over dialects I have tried seem to not have an issue.
My question is, a, why does the third example work and, b, would it scale to even deeper joins with aliases with periods?

ORA-00918: column ambigously defined, using DB Link

When I execute the query below I get the following error message :
ORA-00918: column ambigously defined
ORA-02063: preceding line from ABC
Query:
SELECT
dos.*,
cmd.*,
cmd_r.*,
adr_inc.*,
adr_veh.*,
loc.*,
fou_d.*,
fou_r.*, --Works if I comment this line
mot.*
FROM
DOSSIERS#ABC dos
LEFT JOIN CMDS#ABC cmd ON cmd.DOS_CODE_ID = dos.dos_code_id
LEFT JOIN CMDS_RECCSTR#ABC cmd_r ON cmd_r.DOS_CODE_ID = dos.DOS_CODE_ID AND cmd_r.CMD_CODE_ID = cmd.CMD_CODE_ID AND cmd_r.CMD_DT_CREAT = cmd.CMD_DT_CREAT
LEFT JOIN HISTO_ADR#ABC adr_inc ON adr_inc.DOS_CODE_ID = dos.DOS_CODE_ID
LEFT JOIN HISTO_ADR#ABC adr_veh ON adr_veh.DOS_CODE_ID = dos.DOS_CODE_ID
LEFT JOIN LOC#ABC loc ON dos.DOS_CODE_ID = loc.DOS_CODE_ID
LEFT JOIN FOURNISS#ABC fou_d ON fou_d.PAY_CODE_ID = loc.PAY_CODE_ID_D AND fou_d.FOU_CODE_ID = loc.FOU_CODE_ID_D
LEFT JOIN FOURNISS#ABC fou_r ON fou_r.PAY_CODE_ID = loc.PAY_CODE_ID_R AND fou_r.FOU_CODE_ID = loc.FOU_CODE_ID_R
LEFT JOIN REF_MOT#ABC mot ON mot.RMR_CODE_ID = cmd_r.RMR_CODE_ID
WHERE
dos.REF_EXT = 'XXXXXXX'
If I comment fou_r.* in SELECT it works.
The following queries don't work neither:
SELECT *
FROM ... ;
SELECT (SELECT count(xxx) FROM ...)
FROM ...;
I looked at similar issues on SO but they were all using complex queries or was using many SELECT inside WHERE. Mine is simple that is why I don't understand what could be wrong.
Current Database: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
Target Database (refers to db link ABC target): Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bi
Client: Toad for Oracle 9.7.2.5
You seem to be hitting bug 13589271. I can't share details from MOS, but there isn't much to share anyway. It's related to the remote table having a column with a 30-character name though, as you have in your remote FOURNIUSS table.
Unfortunately simply aliasing the column in your query, like this:
fou_d.COLUMN_WITH_30_CHARACTERS_NAME alias_a,
fou_r.COLUMN_WITH_30_CHARACTERS_NAME alias_b,
... doesn't help and still gets the same error, as the alias is applied by the local database and the problem seems to be during the remote access. What does seem to work is using an in-line view to apply a column alias before the join:
...
LEFT JOIN LOC#ABC loc ON dos.DOS_CODE_ID = loc.DOS_CODE_ID
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT PAY_CODE_ID, FOU_CODE_ID, COLUMN_WITH_30_CHARACTERS_NAME alias_a FROM FOURNISS#ABC
) fou_d ON fou_d.PAY_CODE_ID = loc.PAY_CODE_ID_D AND fou_d.FOU_CODE_ID = loc.FOU_CODE_ID_D
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT PAY_CODE_ID, FOU_CODE_ID, COLUMN_WITH_30_CHARACTERS_NAME alias_b FROM FOURNISS#ABC
) fou_r ON fou_r.PAY_CODE_ID = loc.PAY_CODE_ID_R AND fou_r.FOU_CODE_ID = loc.FOU_CODE_ID_R
LEFT JOIN REF_MOT#ABC mot ON mot.RMR_CODE_ID = cmd_r.RMR_CODE_ID
...
This even works if you give the column the same alias in both inline views. The downside is that you have to explicitly list all of the columns from the table (or at least those you're interested in) in order to be able to apply the alias to the problematic one, but having done so you can still use fou_d.* and fou_r.* in the outer select list.
I don't have an 11.2.0.2 database but I've run this successfully in an 11.2.0.3 database which still showed the ORA-00918 error from your original code. It's possible something else in 11.2.0.2 will stop this workaround being effective, of course. I don't see the original problem in 11.2.0.4 at all, so upgrading to that terminal patch release might be a better long-term solution.
Using * is generally considered a bad practice anyway though, not least because you're going to get a lot of duplicated columns from the joins (lots of dos_code_id in each row, for example); but you're also likely to be getting other data you don't really want, and anything that consumes this result set will have to assume the column order is always the same in those tables - any variation, or later addition or removal of a column, will cause problems.

SQL - updating Oracle 10g database from a complex query

trying to update a single column based on criteria. The rows that need to be updated are returned by the query
SELECT
it.objectid,
it.versionnumber,
it.itemnumber "Item Number",
it.itemtype,
itcovprem.basisofsettlement,
itcovprem.coverage "Coverage"
FROM
itemcoveragesandpremiums itcovprem,
items it,
policies pl
WHERE
pl.objectid = it.parentobjectid AND
pl.policytype in ('H','F') AND
it.objectid = itcovprem.itemobjectid AND
it.itemtype in ('SHOA','SHOB','SHOC','SHOD','SHOK','SHOL') and
it.versionnumber = itcovprem.itemversionnumber AND
((itcovprem.coverage like ('A - Dwg Bldg%')) or
(itcovprem.coverage like ('#42 - Repl Cost Plus%')) or
(itcovprem.coverage like ('#42 - Limited GRC%'))) and
it.effectivedate >= TO_DATE('01-JAN-2006', 'DD-MON-YYYY') and
exists (select * from itemcoveragesandpremiums icp where icp.itemobjectid = it.objectid and icp.itemversionnumber = it.versionnumber and icp.coverage like ('#42%')) and
itcovprem.basisofsettlement not in ('LGRC')
I've tried a few options to convert this to an update query, but no joy.
I get Error - line 3 - SQL command not properly ended when using
update itemcoveragesandpremiums
set basisofsettlement = 'LGRC'
from itemcoveragesandpremiums as itcovprem
inner join items as it
on it.objectid = itcovprem.itemobjectid and it.versionnumber = itcovprem.itemversionnumber
inner join policies as pl
on pl.objectid = it.parentobjectid
where [cut, rest of query was below]
I get Error - line 6 - missing right parenthesis when trying use an inline query
update
(
SELECT
itcovprem.basisofsettlement as OLD
FROM
itemcoveragesandpremiums as itcovprem inner join items as it on it.objectid = itcovprem.itemobjectid and it.versionnumber = itcovprem.itemversionnumber inner join policies AS pl on pl.objectid = it.parentobjectid
WHERE [query snipped]
) t
set t.old = 'LGRC'
Seems that SQL*Plus just wants to stop looking at the update before it gets to the meat of my select query. I'm not sure if I'm formatting it incorrectly or going at it from the wrong direction. Any advice?
In your first attempt, the error at line 3 is because update doesn't support a from or join clause. In your second attempt the immediate error at line 6 is because you're trying to alias a table with as itcovprem; but you can only use as for column aliases, not for table aliases. (The first attempt is trying to do that too, but it isn't getting as far as encountering that problem). But you can't generally update an inline-view with joins anyway, so it would still error with that - something like an ORA-01779.
You would need to do something like:
update itemcoveragesandpremiums
set basisofsettlement = 'LGRC'
where (itemobjectid, itemversionnumber, basisofsettlement, coverage) in (
select it.objectid,
it.versionnumber,
itcovprem.basisofsettlement,
itcovprem.coverage
from ...
)
Assuming that itemobjectid, itemversionnumber, basisofsettlement, coverage identifies a row sufficiently such that you don't risk updating anything you shouldn't. It might be safer to add a rowid to the select and use that for the update instead to avoid ambiguity:
update itemcoveragesandpremiums
set basisofsettlement = 'LGRC'
where rowid in (
select itcovprem.rowid as target_rowid
from ...
)