I've been searching for this answer and haven't had any luck. My problem is that whenever I
Select top 1000 from tblX it defaults the database to Master and I have to manually change to the correct DB. I know on my VDM at work when doing this, it adds a Use command which specifies the correct database and gives me a connection instantly. I've read that you can change the default database, but I will be switching back and forth between many databases. So I want my connection defaulted to which ever database the selected table is from.
You can use [db name].dbo.[table name]
You could always change the default schema for you user. But this is not my preffered approach. You should always use two part name naming or in your case 3 part according to the 70-461 Training kit.
Related
In app config file. I used initial catalog ='jana' as database name.
Then i run it use it for some times.
Then later i changed initial catalog ='siva' as database name . That i changed database name alone and saved it. Whenever i run this 'siva' as initial catalog , select queries is using 'siva' database at the same time inserting /updating queries using my previous database 'jana'. Its really weird.
thanks for considering my query. I rectified mistake by myself.
Actually while inserting/updating queries , i have used databasename.dbo.tablename for all queries. That is the cause whenever i used different database , the one which i used on creating was always affected.
Hope u understand my scenario.
Thanks for all.
I have used mysql for some projects and recently I moved to postgresql. In mysql when I alter a table or a field the corresponding query will be displayed in the page. But such a feature was not found in postgresql(kindly excuse me if I'm wrong). Since the query was readily available it was very helpful for me to test something in the local database(without explicitly typing the query), copy the printed query and run it in the server. Now it seems like I've to manually do all the trick. Even though I'm familiar with the query operations,at times it can be pretty time consuming process. Can anybody help me? How can I get the corresponding query to get displayed in postgresql(like in mysql) whenever a change is made to the table?
If you use SELECT * FROM ... there should not be any reason for your output to not include newly added columns, no matter how you get your results - would that be psql in command line, PgAdmin3 or any other IDE.
After you add new columns, it is possible that these changes are still in open transaction in other window or SQL command - be sure to COMMIT such transaction. Note that your changes to data or schema will not be visible to any other database clients until transaction commits.
If your IDE still does not show changes, maybe you need to refresh list of tables or if that option is not available, restart your IDE. If that does not work still, maybe you should use better IDE.
If you have used SELECT field1, field2, ... FROM ... then you must add new fields into your SELECT statement(s) - but this would be true for any other SQL implementation, MySQL included.
You could use the LISTEN / NOTIFY mechanism in PostgreSQL to notify your client on altering the database schema.
My scenario:
I can change the ordinal position of a column in a table.Is there a way to change the ordinal position of a column in a table without recreating the table?
No, you have to recreate the table if you wish to achieve this. (SQL SERVER)
Even when you do this in SSMS, you will see that the script that is generated also recreates the table.
Not in SQL Server - Not sure about other RDBMSs.
You can create a View with the desired ordinal positions but the only time I can think that would be useful is if you are using SELECT * which is a practice that should be avoided anyway.
Hi it depends on the database system you use.
For example in some it is possible to remove and add a column and you can do it in a procedure part where you also can refill it.
But in general it shouldn't matter as you can define the returned data order in your select statement. Is not that enough for you?
Without recreating the Table is Not possible. However, if your concern is about loosing the data here is an option provided by SQl Server Management Studio.
Note: I have used Sql Server 2019 Developer Edition.
Right Click on the Table name and Choose Design Option
Using your Cursor Drag the position of your Column to your desired Position
SQlServer Table Design Options
If you want to do it at script level, You can see the idea below provided by SSMS
Enable the "Auto Generate Change Script" Option available in Tools Menu --> Options --> Designers --> Table and Database Designers.
Enabling the Auto Generate Change Script Option
When you drag the Column in SSMS it will automatically creates the Script for you.
The High level Idea in the auto generated Script is,
Creating a Table with Temp_YourTableName with desired Order of Columns
Copying all the Data from the Original Table to new Temp_YourTableName
Drop the Original Table
Renaming the Temp_YourTableName to Original YourTableName
of course doing everything with Transaction scope to avoid any data loss while the script is executing.
I found a good reason why some time we need to do this here. Interestingly, it is based on Context and not to do anything with Technical.
Say for example, Original Address Table Contains, Street Address 1, City, State, Zip and Country columns. If the requirement Changes to include a new Columns like Street Address 2 this would be meaning full.
Im having trouble identifying my databases as correct and valid version of my model. I have a GUID-id for my model I could use, but where do I put it? I dont want an entire table with only one row for this GUID. Is there any metadata-repository for databases (SQL Server 2008) or is there any other methods of identifying databases except their names? I could name the database to my model-GUID but it doesnt seem right...
The scenario is like this: I have a Entity Framework-model and I identify it by a GUID. I let the user pick a database-connectionstring and now I want to verify that its a valid database (which has been created from my app). I want to do this every time the app starts just to be sure. What Im doing now is checking that a certain table with a certain name exists but thats not good enough. I want to be 99% sure.
Edit: I would prefer to set this value from the DDL-script which is already setting up the database and I want to be able to get it from a SqlCommand in ado.net.
Use an Extended database property
In script:
USE preet;
GO
EXEC sys.sp_addextendedproperty
#name = N'myVersion',
#value = N'999-abc-123-nop';
GO
and
In the UI
I have made an update statement in a table in SQL 2008 which updated the table with some wrong data.
I didn't have a backup for the DB.
It's some important dates which got updated.
Is there anyway where i can recover the old data from the table.
Thanks
SNA
Basically no unless you want to use a commercial log reader and try go through it with a fine tooth comb. No backup of the database can be an 'update resume, leave town' scenario - harsh but it just should not happen.
Andrew basically has called it. I just want to add a few ideas you can consider if you are desperate:
Are there any reports or printouts lying around? Perhaps you can reconstruct the data from there.
Was this data entered via a web application? If so, there is a remote chance you can find the original data in the web server logs, depending upon how the app was constructed, etc.
Does this app interface (pass data to) any other applications? They may have a buffered copy of data...
Can the data be derived from any other existing data? Is there an audit log table, or another date in your schema based on this one, from which you can reconstruct the original date?
Edit:
Some commenters are mentioning that is is a good idea to test your update/delete statements before running them. For this to become habit, it helps if you have an easy method. I usually create my DELETE statements like this:
--delete --select *
from [User]
where UserID=27
To run the select in order to test your query, highlight everything from select onwards. To then run the delete if you are satisfied with the filter criteria, highlight everything from delete onwards. The two dashes in front of delete are so that if the query accidentally gets run, it will just crash due to invalid syntax.
You can use a similar construct for UPDATE statements, although it is not quite as clean.
SQL server keeps log for every transation.So you can recover your modified data from the log as well without backup.
Select [PAGE ID],[Slot ID],[AllocUnitId],[Transaction ID]
,[RowLog Contents 0], [RowLog Contents 1],[RowLog Contents 3],[RowLog Contents 4]
,[Log Record]
FROM sys.fn_dblog(NULL, NULL)
WHERE
AllocUnitId IN
(Select [Allocation_unit_id] from sys.allocation_units allocunits
INNER JOIN sys.partitions partitions ON (allocunits.type IN (1, 3)
AND partitions.hobt_id = allocunits.container_id) OR (allocunits.type = 2
AND partitions.partition_id = allocunits.container_id)
Where object_id=object_ID('' + 'dbo.student' + ''))
AND Operation in ('LOP_MODIFY_ROW','LOP_MODIFY_COLUMNS')
And [Context] IN ('LCX_HEAP','LCX_CLUSTERED')
Here is the artcile, that explains step by step, how to do it.
http://raresql.com/2012/02/01/how-to-recover-modified-records-from-sql-server-part-1/
Imran
Thanks for all the responses.
The problem was actually accidentally ---i missed to select the where condition in the update statement.---Rest !.
It was a quick 5 minutes task --Like just changing the date to test for one customer data--so we didn't think of taking a backup.
Yes of course you are true ..This is a lesson.
Now onwards i will be careful to write "my update statements in a transaction." or "test my update statements"
Thanks once again--for spending your time to give some insight rather ignoring the question since the only answer is "NO".
Thanks
SNA
Always take a backup before major UPDATE statements, even if it's not used, there's the peace of mind
Especially with Red Gate's Object Level Restore, one can restore individual table/row now given a backup file
Good luck, I'd suggest finding an old copy elsewhere (DEV/QA) etc...
Isn't it possible to do a rollback on an UPDATE statement?
Late one but hopefully useful…
If database is in full recovery mode then all transactions are logged in transaction log and can be retrieved. Problem is that this is not natively supported because this is not the main purpose of the transaction log.
Options are:
Commercial tools such as Apex Log (more expensive, more options) or Quest Toad (less expensive, less options for this purpose main focus is on SQL Server management)
Trying to do this yourself, like user1059637 pointed out. Problem with this approach is that it can’t read transaction log backups and is more tedious.
It comes down to how much your data is worth to you in terms of time and $.