Any idea why this doesn't work then (based on your examples on forum it should!) Thanks.
select result.low
from (
select top 1 country as low, count()
from customers c, orders o
where c.customerid=o.customerid
group by country
order by count()
) as result
as has been stated there are several issues
select result.low
from (
select top 1 country as low, count() -- count() needs an argument and needs to be aliased
from customers c, orders o -- old style join
where c.customerid=o.customerid
group by country -- column `country` may need qualifying
order by count() -- count() needs an argument
) as result
so the query should probably be
select top 1 country as low
from customers c
join orders o
on c.customerid=o.customerid
group by c.country
order by count(*)
Related
I am trying to select which co-ordinates from OA table are NOT found in the CUSTOMER address table.
SELECT DISTINCT
OA.CO_ORDS
FROM
CUSTOMER
INNER JOIN
OA ON customer.address=oa.co_ords
ORDER BY ID ASC;
Returns the co-ordinates which ARE in the customer table. How do I return those that are not in the customer table?
Am I also able to COUNT how many of customers are is in each co-ordinate (The co-ords are not specific and not accurate, this is purely for query testing only)
SELECT DISTINCT
OA.CO_ORDS
FROM
CUSTOMER
INNER JOIN
OA ON customer.address=oa.co_ords
ORDER BY ID ASC;
We can use NOT EXISTS to find those co-ordinates which don't appear in the customer table:
SELECT co_ords
FROM oa
WHERE
NOT EXISTS
(SELECT 1 FROM customers
WHERE address = oa.co_ords)
ORDER BY id;
In order to count how many customers belong to a certain co-ordinate, we can use COUNT with GROUP BY, something like this:
SELECT c.address, COUNT(*)
FROM customers c
JOIN oa
ON c.address = oa.co_ords
GROUP BY c.address;
It could be better to count a specific column instead of *.
It could also be better to use an IN clause instead of JOIN the tables:
SELECT c.address, COUNT(*)
FROM customers c
WHERE address IN
(SELECT co_ords FROM oa)
GROUP BY c.address;
Such details depend on your exact table structure, you should please try this out or provide more details.
You could also do:
SELECT co_ords
FROM oa
MINUS
SELECT address
FROM customers;
which can sometimes be faster than doing an anti-join. Note that MINUS does a distinct on the resultset.
I'm an entry level trying to learn more about SQL,
I have a question "can we use order by in subquery?" I did look for some article says no we could not use.
But on the other hand, I saw examples using top(n) with order by in subquery:
select c.CustomerId,
c.OrderId
from CustomerOrder c
inner join (
select top 2
with TIES CustomerId,
COUNT(distinct OrderId) as Count
from CustomerOrder
group by CustomerId
order by Count desc
) b on c.CustomerId = b.CustomerId
So now I'm bit confused.
Could anyone advise?
Thank you very much.
Yes, you are right we cannot use order by in a inner query. Because it is acting as a table. A table in itself needs to be sorted when queried for different purposes.
In your query itself the inner query is select some records using Top 2. Eventhough these are top 2 records only, they form a table with 2 records which is enough for it to recognized as a table and join it with another table
The right query will be:-
SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT c.CustomerId, c.OrderId, DENSE_RANK() OVER(ORDER BY b.count DESC) AS RANK
FROM CustomerOrder c
INNER JOIN
(SELECT CustomerId, COUNT(distinct OrderId) as Count
FROM CustomerOrder GROUP BY CustomerId) b
ON c.CustomerId = b.CustomerId
) a
WHERE RANK IN (1,2);
Hope I have answered your question.
Yes we can use order by clause in sub query, for example i have a table named as product (check the screen shot of table http://prntscr.com/f15j3z). Chek this query on your side and revert me in case of any doubt.
select p1.* from product as p1 where product_id = (select p2.product_id from product as p2 order by product_id limit 0,1)
yes we can use order by in subquery,but it is pointless to use it.
It is better to use it in the outer query.There is no use of ordering the result of subquery, because result of inner query will become the input for outer query and it does not have to do any thing with the order of the result of subquery.
At http://www.dofactory.com/sql/sandbox I'm experimenting with submitting my own SQL queries against their sample database to become better at SQL. What I want to do is to select all countries from Customer that have exactly the fewest number of tuples. Here is my query attempt:
SELECT a.Country
FROM [Customer] a, (SELECT COUNT(*) AS Tot
FROM [Customer]
GROUP BY Country) b
GROUP BY a.Country
HAVING COUNT(*) = MIN(b.Tot)
However, the website returns an empty table instead of the correct result which is (Ireland, Norway, Poland). The correct result is easily realized by grouping the table by country and using COUNT(*), and then looking at the countries that have the smallest COUNT(*) value out of all COUNT(*) values. I would like some advice on how to generate the correct result without any assumptions about the table's data.
I would do this using SELECT TOP 1 WITH TIES:
SELECT TOP 1 WITH TIES c.Country
FROM Customer c
GROUP BY c.Country
ORDER BY COUNT(*) ASC;
Two notes:
When using table aliases, make them abbreviations for the tables. This makes the query much easier to follow.
Never use commas in the FROM clause. Always use proper, explicit JOIN syntax.
Learned somtihing new(WITH TIES) from Gordon Linoff, again...
Here my solution without it...
Select a.Country from [Customer] a
group by a.Country
having count(*) = (select min(b.Tot) from (SELECT COUNT(*) AS Tot FROM [Customer] GROUP BY Country) b)
If you are not using sql 2012 then,
declare #Fewer int=2
;With CTE as
(
select c.*
,ROW_NUMBER()over(partition by countryid order by customerid)rn
from dbo.Customers C
)
select * from cte
where rn<=#Fewer
I have this query in sql
select cartlines.id,cartlines.pageId,cartlines.quantity,cartlines.price
from orders
INNER JOIN
cartlines on(cartlines.orderId=orders.id)where userId=5
I want to get rows distinct by pageid ,so in the end I will not have rows with same pageid more then once(duplicate)
any Ideas
Thanks
Baaroz
Going by what you're expecting in the output and your comment that says "...if there rows in output that contain same pageid only one will be shown...," it sounds like you're trying to get the top record for each page ID. This can be achieved with ROW_NUMBER() and PARTITION BY:
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY c.pageId ORDER BY c.pageID) rowNumber,
c.id,
c.pageId,
c.quantity,
c.price
FROM orders o
INNER JOIN cartlines c ON c.orderId = o.id
WHERE userId = 5
) a
WHERE a.rowNumber = 1
You can also use ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY ... along with TOP 1 WITH TIES, but it runs a little slower (despite being WAY cleaner):
SELECT TOP 1 WITH TIES c.id, c.pageId, c.quantity, c.price
FROM orders o
INNER JOIN cartlines c ON c.orderId = o.id
WHERE userId = 5
ORDER BY ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY c.pageId ORDER BY c.pageID)
If you wish to remove rows with all columns duplicated this is solved by simply adding a distinct in your query.
select distinct cartlines.id,cartlines.pageId,cartlines.quantity,cartlines.price
from orders
INNER JOIN
cartlines on(cartlines.orderId=orders.id)where userId=5
If however, this makes no difference, it means the other columns have different values, so the combinations of column values creates distinct (unique) rows.
As Michael Berkowski stated in comments:
DISTINCT - does operate over all columns in the SELECT list, so we
need to understand your special case better.
In the case that simply adding distinct does not cover you, you need to also remove the columns that are different from row to row, or use aggregate functions to get aggregate values per cartlines.
Example - total quantity per distinct pageId:
select distinct cartlines.id,cartlines.pageId, sum(cartlines.quantity)
from orders
INNER JOIN
cartlines on(cartlines.orderId=orders.id)where userId=5
If this is still not what you wish, you need to give us data and specify better what it is you want.
Please note that I have seen a similar query here, but think my query is different enough to merit a separate question.
Suppose that there is a database with the following tables:
customer_table with customer_ID (key field), customer_name
orders_table with order_ID (key field), customer_ID, product_ID
Now suppose I would like to find the names of all the customers who have ordered more than 10 different types of product, and the number of types of products they ordered. Multiple orders of the same product does not count.
I think the query below should work, but have the following questions:
Is the use of count(distinct xxx) generally allowed with a "group by" statement?
Is the method I use the standard way? Does anybody have any better ideas (e.g. without involving temporary tables)?
Below is my query
select T1.customer_name, T1.customer_ID, T2.number_of_products_ordered
from customer_table T1
inner join
(
select cust.customer_ID as customer_identity, count(distinct ord.product_ID) as number_of_products_ordered
from customer_table cust
inner join order_table ord on cust.customer_ID=ord.customer_ID
group by ord.customer_ID, ord.product_ID
having count(distinct ord.product_ID) > 10
) T2
on T1.customer_ID=T2.customer_identity
order by T2.number_of_products_ordered, T1.customer_name
Isn't that what you are looking for? Seems to be a little bit simpler. Tested it on SQL Server - works fine.
SELECT customer_name, COUNT(DISTINCT product_ID) as products_count FROM customer_table
INNER JOIN orders_table ON customer_table.customer_ID = orders_table.customer_ID
GROUP BY customer_table.customer_ID, customer_name
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT product_ID) > 10
You could do it more simply:
select
c.id,
c.cname,
count(distinct o.pid) as `uniques`
from o join c
on c.id = o.cid
group by c.id
having `uniques` > 10