I am pulling back one months of data using:
$page = 1;
$filter = array('page' => $page,'limit' => 250,'min_date_created' => $startDate );
$orders = Bigcommerce::getOrders($filter);
I am passing in $startDate as 2014-01-06 (which works for the orders).
The order has approx 600 so I need to page through the results.
I am using:
$filterCount = array ('status_id' => 2 ,'min_date_created' => $startDate);
$count = Bigcommerce::getOrdersCount($filterCount);
I should then be able to divide $count by 250 to give me my number of pages. However $count is always 8773 no matter how I play around with $filterCount.
Am I doing something dumb here ?
Mr Warby.
You want to call getOrders with your filter parameters instead of getOrdersCount as that resource always returns the total number of orders.
Looking at your code you are using the PHP Library.
Looking at the getCount method it doesn't take a 'filter' argument.
public static function getCount($path)
{
$response = self::connection()->get(self::$api_path . $path);
if ($response == false || is_string($response)) {
return $response;
}
return $response->count;
}
As you said I would use $reponse->count / 250 to give you your pages.
Instead of +1 to this I would use $pages = ceil($reponse->count / 250) then inside your FOR statement use LESS THAN EQUAL TOO and this will always give you the correct amount of pages.
When looping through the pages check for no reponse as your are filtering it between dates the actual pages needed is likely to be a lot less. if an empty object is received you could then break the loop. (I think they are sorted oldest -> newest).
Hope this helps.
Related
My use case is to allow the user to select a ticker from a long list of about 8000 companies. I fetch all the companies when the component mounts, so I don't really need the async feature of react-select. The problem really is displaying and scrolling through the 8000 items (as described in several open issues like this one).
My thought is why display 8000 entries when the user can't do anything meaningful with such a big list anyway. Instead why not show a maximum of 5 matches. As the user types more, the matches keep getting better. Specifically:
When the input is blank, show no options
When the input is a single character, there will still be hundreds of matches, but show only the first 5
As the user keeps on typing, the number of matches will reduce, but still limited to 5. However they will be more relavant.
I am not seeing this solution mentioned anywhere, so was wondering if it makes sense. Also wanted to find out what's the best way to implement it with react-select. I have tried the following two approaches - can you think of a better way:
Approach 1: Use Async React Select
Although I don't need async fetching, I can use this feature to filter down the options. It seems to work very well:
const filterCompanies = (value: string) => {
const inputValue = value.trim().toLowerCase();
const inputLength = inputValue.length;
let count = 0;
return inputLength === 0
? []
: companies.filter(company => {
const keep =
count < 5 &&
(company.ticker.toLowerCase().indexOf(inputValue) >= 0 ||
company.name.toLowerCase().indexOf(inputValue) >= 0);
if (keep) {
count += 1;
}
return keep;
});
};
const promiseOptions = (inputValue: string) =>
Promise.resolve(filterCompanies(inputValue));
return (
<AsyncSelect<Company>
loadOptions={promiseOptions}
value={selectedCompany}
getOptionLabel={option => `${option.ticker} - ${option.name}`}
getOptionValue={option => option.ticker}
isClearable={true}
isSearchable={true}
onChange={handleChange}
/>
);
Approach 2: Use filterOption
Here I am using the filterOption to directly filter down the list. However it does not work very well - the filterOption function is very myopic - it gets only one candidate option at a time and needs to decide if that matches or not. Using this approach I cannot tell whether I have crossed the limit of showing 5 options or not. Net result: with blank input I am showing all 8000 options, as user starts typing, the number of options is reduced but still pretty large - so the sluggishness is still there. I would have thought that filterOption would be the more direct approach for my use case but it turns out that it is not as good as the async approach. Am I missing something?
const filterOption = (candidate: Option, input: string) => {
const { ticker, name } = candidate.data;
const inputVal = input.toLowerCase();
return (
ticker.toLowerCase().indexOf(inputVal) >= 0 ||
name.toLowerCase().indexOf(inputVal) >= 0
);
};
return (
<ReactSelect
options={companies}
value={selectedCompany}
filterOption={filterOption}
getOptionLabel={option => `${option.ticker} - ${option.name}`}
getOptionValue={option => option.ticker}
isClearable={true}
isSearchable={true}
onChange={handleChange}
/>
);
you can try using react-window to replace the menulist component
ref : https://github.com/JedWatson/react-select/issues/3128#issuecomment-431397942
I have a situation where my user is presented with a grid, and it, by default, will just get the first 15 results. However they may type in a name and search for an item across all pages.
Alone, either of these works fine, but I am trying to figure out how to make them work as a single query. This is basically what it looks like...
// find a filter if the user is searching
var filters = request.Filters.ToFilters();
// determine the name to search by
var name = filters.Count > 0 ? filters[0] : null;
// we need to be able to catch some query statistics to make sure that the
// grid view is complete and accurate
RavenQueryStatistics statistics;
// try to query the items listing as quickly as we can, getting only the
// page we want out of it
var items = RavenSession
.Query<Models.Items.Item>()
.Statistics(out statistics) // output our query statistics
.Search(n => n.Name, name)
.Skip((request.Page - 1) * request.PageSize)
.Take(request.PageSize)
.ToArray();
// we need to store the total results so that we can keep the grid up to date
var totalResults = statistics.TotalResults;
return Json(new { data = items, total = totalResults }, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
The problem is that if no name is given, it does not return anything; Which is not the desired result. (Searching by 'null' doesn't work, obviously.)
Do something like this:
var q= RavenSession
.Query<Models.Items.Item>()
.Statistics(out statistics); // output our query statistics
if(string.IsNullOrEmpty(name) == false)
q = q.Search(n => n.Name, name);
var items = q.Skip((request.Page - 1) * request.PageSize)
.Take(request.PageSize)
.ToArray();
I need a wordpress loop that for every post checks a meta numeric variable previously assigned to each of the taxonomies of the post and returns the sum of these meta variables.
To do so, I think I need a dynamic variable name for the total. I mean something like:
variablerelatedtopost = metataxonomy1 + metataxonomy2 + ... + metataxonomyn
echo variablerelatedtopost
How can I do that? Is it possible to generate a dynamic numeric variable via loop? and HOW can I refer to it in a general way, without adressing it with its name?
Thanks everyone! And sorry for possible English mistakes :P
EDIT: I just realized the code by Alex is not what I wanted. I need a variable which changes name at every post and which value is always = 0. Is there a solution?
can you not just add a counter to your loop like this?
//Total should start # 0 before the loop
$total = 0;
// The Query
$the_query = new WP_Query($args);
// The Loop
while ( $the_query->have_posts() ) : $the_query->the_post();
$amount = get_post_meta($post->ID, 'the_meta_data_field', true);
$total = $total + $amount;
endwhile;
//echo total
echo $total;
I found the solution to my problem: an array which increases its lenght at every cicle of the loop. I know it's simple but since I'm just a beginner it took me a while to think about it. I post the code here so maybe it can help someone (and if you find bugs or have improvements, please tell me)
//Before the loop, empty array
$totale = array();
// WP Loop
while ( $loop->have_posts() ) : $loop->the_post();
$totale[] = 0;
$indice = (count($totale)) - 1;
// $termvariable was previously set up as a term meta value
if( has_term( 'numberofterm', 'nameoftaxonomy' ) ) {
$totale[$indice] = $termvariable + $totale[$indice];
}
I am looking for a way to return the value of a precise column in the first result of a query.
The query result contains always 1 row containing the following columns :
ID
PW
RANK
I am trying to only get the rank value in order to push it into a session variable.
I tried messing with :
$row-> $query->row();
But then I don't know how to get only the value of the rank column. Ideally, I would want to get that value, then return it to allow my controller to set it in the session variable ( doing it in the model would be easier but would break the MVC pattern, right ?)
How can I do this ?
Thanks
Have the controller call a function in the model that return that value. Let's say the model has a function name get_rank()
public function get_rank($id)
{
// assumes your ID is an int
$id = (int)$id;
// avoid wasting a query
if ($id < 1) return FALSE;
// build query
$this->db->select('rank');
$this->db->from('YOUR_TABLE');
$this->db->where('id', $id);
// maybe some sorting / limiting here if you need it
// get result
$rs = $this->db->get();
if ($rs->num_rows() > 0)
{
// just get the first row
$row = $rs->row();
return $row->rank;
}
return FALSE;
}
I'm having an issue where I'm building an ORM query based on several conditions from a $_POST. The final query looks fine and returns records in a direct SQL query (phpmyadmin) but in my application does not return any records. here is the code...
$records = ORM::factory('record')->where(array('date >='=>$_POST['fromdate'],'date <='=>$_POST['todate']));
if ($_POST['agent'] != '0') $records->where(array('ccp_id'=>$_POST['agent']));
if ($_POST['supervisor'] != '0') {
$ccps = ORM::factory('employee')->where(array('supervisor_id'=>$_POST['supervisor'],'active'=>'1'))->find_all();
foreach ($ccps as $ccp) {
$agents[] = $ccp->id;
}
// echo kohana::debug($agents);
$records->in('ccp_id',$agents);
}
if ($_POST['lead'] != '0') $records->where(array('lead_id'=>$_POST['lead']));
if ($_POST['reasons'] != '[]') {
$reasons = explode(',',str_replace(array('[',']','"'),'',$_POST['reasons']));
$records->in('reason_id',$reasons);
}
$records->find_all();
$records->loaded is false. If I change out the find_all() with count_all() I get an accurate count.
With sample data in the $_POST I have this query in $records->last_query()
SELECT `records`.*
FROM (`records`)
WHERE `date` >= '2010-10-10'
AND `date` <= '2010-11-09'
AND `ccp_id` IN ('E128092','E128093','E124874','E124414','E129056','E137678','E078952','E112701','E084457','E098047','E099221','E001131','E120892')
AND `lead_id` = 'E110873'
AND `reason_id` IN (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24)
ORDER BY `records`.`id` ASC
this returns 4 records in phpmyadmin and (4) for count_all().
I do not understand why this is happening. Any insights would be helpful. Thank you.
In your last line you should have
$records = $records->find_all();
instead of
// this actually returns you the resultset and resets the query builder object
$records->find_all()
$records is a Database_Result and has no loaded property. Use count($records) or iterate it with foreach statement to get ORM objects.
Just a note: It's probably better not to wipe out the ORM object ( $results = $records->find_all() instead of $records = $records->find_all()) if you wish to use $records->count_all() or other calls later in your code. Just an issue I ran into.