MultiScaleImageSource GetTileLayers Explanation - wcf

I have been doing reading on MultiScaleImage source, and finding anything useful has proven to be quite difficult, thus I turn to the experts here. The specific knowledge I would like to have pertains to the GetTileLayers method. I know this method is used to get the image tiles. But I have no idea where this method is called from, or where the parameters come from or how I would use it if I subclassed the MultiScaleTileSource Class. Any insight into this method or the MSI model would be amazing but I have 3 main questions:
1. Where should/is the method GetTileLayers called from?
2. How should I change this method if I wanted to draw png's from a non-local URI?
3. Where can I find some reading to help with this?

In order to create a custom tile source, you would subclass MultiScaleTileSource and override the GetTileLayers method, as shown in the example below, which defines an image consisting of 1000*1000 tiles of size 256x256 pixels each.
public class MyTileSource : MultiScaleTileSource
{
public MyTileSource()
: base(1000 * 256, 1000 * 256, 256, 256, 0)
{
}
protected override void GetTileLayers(
int tileLevel, int tilePositionX, int tilePositionY,
IList<object> tileImageLayerSources)
{
// create an appropriate URI for tileLevel, tilePositionX and tilePositionY
// and add it to the tileImageLayerSources collection
var uri = new Uri(...);
tileImageLayerSources.Add(uri);
}
}
Now you would assign an instance of your MyTileSource class to your MultiScaleImage control:
MultiScaleImage msImage = ...
msImage.Source = new MyTileSource();

Related

Render glitch with custom block boundaries minecraft

I'm creating a mod for Minecraft. Recently, I've tried to make a custom block, and I'm having two issues with it.
My main issue is that the block is rendering incorrectly. I want the block to be smaller in size than a full block. I successfully changed the block boundaries with setBlockBounds(), and while that did make the block render smaller and use the smaller boundaries, it causes other rendering issues. When I place the block, the floor below is becomes invisible and I can see through it, either to caves below, blocks behind it, or the void if there is nothing there. How do I fix that block not rendering? Here's a screenshot:
Additionally, my goal for this block is to emit an "aura" that gives players around it speed or some other potion effect. I have the basic code for finding players around the block and giving them speed, but I can't find a way to activate this method every tick or every X amount of ticks to ensure that it gives players within the box speed in a reliable manner. There are already some blocks in the normal game that do this, so it must be possible. How can I do this?
For your first issue, you need to override isOpaqueCube to return false. You'll also want to override isFullCube for other parts of the code, but that isn't as important for rendering. Example:
public class YourBlock {
// ... existing code ...
/**
* Used to determine ambient occlusion and culling when rebuilding chunks for render
*/
#Override
public boolean isOpaqueCube(IBlockState state) {
return false;
}
#Override
public boolean isFullCube(IBlockState state) {
return false;
}
}
Here's some info on rendering that mentions this.
Regarding your second problem, that's more complicated. It's generally achieved via a tile entity, though you can also use block updates (which is much slower). Good examples of this are BlockBeacon and TileEntityBeacon (for using tile entities) and BlockFrostedIce (for block updates). Here's some (potentially out of date) info on tile entities.
Here's an (untested) example of getting an update each tick this with tile entities:
public class YourBlock {
// ... existing code ...
/**
* Returns a new instance of a block's tile entity class. Called on placing the block.
*/
#Override
public TileEntity createNewTileEntity(World worldIn, int meta) {
return new TileEntityYourBlock();
}
}
/**
* Tile entity for your block.
*
* Tile entities normally store data, but they can also receive an update each
* tick, but to do so they must implement ITickable. So, don't forget the
* "implements ITickable".
*/
public class TileEntityYourBlock extends TileEntity implements ITickable {
#Override
public void update() {
// Your code to give potion effects to nearby players would go here
// If you only want to do it every so often, you can check like this:
if (this.worldObj.getTotalWorldTime() % 80 == 0) {
// Only runs every 80 ticks (4 seconds)
}
}
// The following code isn't required to make a tile entity that gets ticked,
// but you'll want it if you want (EG) to be able to set the effect.
/**
* Example potion effect.
* May be null.
*/
private Potion effect;
public void setEffect(Potion potionEffect) {
this.effect = potionEffect;
}
public Potion getEffect() {
return this.effect;
}
#Override
public void readFromNBT(NBTTagCompound compound) {
super.readFromNBT(compound);
int effectID = compound.getInteger("Effect")
this.effect = Potion.getPotionById(effectID);
}
public void writeToNBT(NBTTagCompound compound) {
super.writeToNBT(compound);
int effectID = Potion.getIdFromPotion(this.effect);
compound.setInteger("Effect", effectID);
}
}
// This line needs to go in the main registration.
// The ID can be anything so long as it isn't used by another mod.
GameRegistry.registerTileEntity(TileEntityYourBlock.class, "YourBlock");

How do I map a texture onto an Entity in a Minecraft Plugin

I'm trying to write a plugin to brand cattle and thought it would be pretty easy, but I'm stuck looking for the information that would help me do this.
Where can I find information that will help me map a texture (from a png, for example) onto an Entity. While there's information about built-in textures for Players etc, I haven't found a resource that would help me understand how I could get something to render on the side of an Entity.
I'm guessing that I'd use something like the following calls...
Minecraft.getMinecraft().renderEngine.bindTexture(new ResourceLocation("tc:textures/gui/my-icon.png"));
Minecraft.getMinecraft().ingameGUI.drawTexturedModalRect(etc);
Not certain how I'd enforce them into the drawing of a cow or a horse.
This isn't possible while using Bukkit, since Bukkit is server-side and can't change textures. There's one exception, though: Servers can send players resource packs. However, there does not appear to be a way to create a unique texture based off of any data, so you'd have to make all cows look the same. It wouldn't really do what you want. (Players are another exception, but protocol-wise, their skins are arbitrary anyways).
However, if you want to use Minecraft Forge, this is far more manageable. You can subclass the entity and change some of the rendering code. Perhaps you can also have an item of some sort (a branding iron, maybe) to convert existing cows into branded cows (they would still spawn as normal cows). I'm not too much of a Forge dev, but something like this should work (though I haven't tested it). This is more of an outline; things like converting the entity and creating an item I'll leave to you.
Here's a basic outline for an entitiy that tracks a texture between the server and the client:
import net.minecraft.entity.passive.EntityCow;
import net.minecraft.util.ResourceLocation;
public class EntityBrandedCow extends EntityCow {
#Override
protected void entityInit() {
super.entityInit();
// Data watcher lets you track data between the server and client
// without handling packets yourself
// http://wiki.vg/Entities
this.dataWatcher.addObject(14, "minecraft:textures/entity/cow/cow.png");
}
public void setTexture(ResourceLocation texture) {
this.dataWatcher.updateObject(14, texture.toString());
}
public ResourceLocation getTexture() {
return new ResourceLocation(this.dataWatcher.getWatchableObjectString(14));
}
}
You'll need to register a custom renderer for your new entity. This would go in the client proxy.
RenderingRegistry.registerEntityRenderingHandler(EntityBrandedCow.class, new RenderBrandedCow(Minecraft.getRenderManager(), new ModelCow(), .7f));
And here's such a render you can use:
import net.minecraft.util.ResourceLocation;
import net.minecraft.client.model.ModelBase;
import net.minecraft.entity.Entity;
import net.minecraft.client.model.ModelBase;
import net.minecraft.client.renderer.entity.RenderLiving;
import net.minecraft.client.renderer.entity.RenderManager;
public class RenderBrandedCow extends RenderLiving {
public RenderBrandedCow(RenderManager manager, ModelBase model, float shadowSize) {
super(manager, model, shadowSize);
}
#Override
protected ResourceLocation getEntityTexture(Entity entity) {
return ((EntityBrandedCow)entity).getTexture();
}
}
That renderer only changes the texture, and doesn't actually overlay anything. This, among other things, means that texture packs won't change branded cows without creating additional textures. An alternative would be to create a second layer. (This is based off of the way sheep wool works - see net.minecraft.client.renderer.entity.layers.LayerSheepWool and net.minecraft.client.renderer.RenderSheep). You can change the renderer to this:
import net.minecraft.client.model.ModelBase;
import net.minecraft.client.renderer.entity.RenderLiving;
import net.minecraft.client.renderer.entity.RenderManager;
public class RenderBrandedCow extends RenderCow {
public RenderBrandedCow(RenderManager manager, ModelBase model, float shadowSize) {
super(manager, model, shadowSize);
this.addLayer(new LayerCowBrand(this));
}
}
And here's the start of some kind of layer rendering code. This won't work on its own; you'll need to write a ModelBrand (see ModelSheep1 for the basis of that).
public class LayerCowBrand implements LayerRenderer {
private final BrandedCowRenderer renderer;
private final ModelBrand model = new ModelBrand();
public LayerCowBrand(BrandedCowRenderer renderer) {
this.renderer = renderer;
}
public void doRenderLayer(EntityBrandedCow entity, float p_177162_2_, float p_177162_3_, float p_177162_4_, float p_177162_5_, float p_177162_6_, float p_177162_7_, float p_177162_8_) {
// It's common to write a second method with the right parameters...
// I don't know off my hand what the parameters here are.
this.renderer.bindTexture(entity.getTexture());
this.model.setModelAttributes(this.sheepRenderer.getMainModel());
this.model.setLivingAnimations(p_177162_1_, p_177162_2_, p_177162_3_, p_177162_4_);
this.model.render(p_177162_1_, p_177162_2_, p_177162_3_, p_177162_5_, p_177162_6_, p_177162_7_, p_177162_8_);
}
public boolean shouldCombineTextures() {
// I don't know
return true;
}
public void doRenderLayer(EntityLivingBase p_177141_1_, float p_177141_2_, float p_177141_3_, float p_177141_4_, float p_177141_5_, float p_177141_6_, float p_177141_7_, float p_177141_8_) {
// This is the actual render method that implements the interface.
this.doRenderLayer((EntityBrandedCow)p_177141_1_, p_177141_2_, p_177141_3_, p_177141_4_, p_177141_5_, p_177141_6_, p_177141_7_, p_177141_8_);
}
}
Hopefully this at least lets you get started. As I said, I'm not a forge dev, but this should be the basics. If you want to ask more questions about forge, post here on Stack Overflow using minecraft-forge (Gaming Stack Exchange also has a minecraft-forge tag but that's for mod usage, not development).

How do I use Strategy Pattern in this context?

Let me begin by saying I am a mathematician and not a coder. I am trying to code a linear solver. There are 10 methods which I coded. I want the user to choose which solver she wishes to use, like options.solver_choice='CG'.
Now, I have all 10 methods coded in a single class. How do I use the strategy pattern in this case?
Previously, I had 10 different function files which I used to use in the main program using a switch case.
if options.solver_choice=='CG'
CG(A,x,b);
if options.solver_choice=='GMRES'
GMRES(A,x,b);
.
.
.
This isn't the most exact of answers, but you should get the idea.
Using the strategy pattern, you would have a solver interface that implements a solver method:
public interface ISolver {
int Solve();
}
You would implement each solver class as necessary:
public class Solver1 : ISolver {
int Solve() {
return 1;
}
}
You would then pass the appropriate solver class when it's time to do the solving:
public int DoSolve(ISolver solver) {
return solver.solve();
}
Foo.DoSolve(new Solver1());
TL;DR
As I've always understood the strategy pattern, the idea is basically that you perform composition of a class or object at run-time. The implementation details vary by language, but you should be able to swap out pieces of behavior by "plugging in" different modules that share an interface. Here I present an example in Ruby.
Ruby Example
Let's say you want to use select a strategy for how the #action method will return a set of results. You might begin by composing some modules named CG and GMRES. For example:
module CG
def action a, x, b
{ a: a, x: x, b: b }
end
end
module GMRES
def action a, x, b
[a, x, b]
end
end
You then instantiate your object:
class StrategyPattern
end
my_strategy = StrategyPattern.new
Finally, you extend your object with the plug-in behavior that you want. For example:
my_strategy.extend GMRES
my_strategy.action 'q', nil, 1
#=> ["q", nil, 1]
my_strategy.extend GMRES
my_strategy.action 'q', nil, 1
#=> {:a=>"q", :x=>nil, :b=>1}
Some may argue that the Strategy Pattern should be implemented at the class level rather than by extending an instance of a class, but this way strikes me as easier to follow and is less likely to screw up other instances that need to choose other strategies.
A more orthodox alternative would be to pass the name of the module to include into the class constructor. You might want to read Russ Olsen's Design Patterns in Ruby for a more thorough treatment and some additional ways to implement the pattern.
Other answers present the pattern correctly, however I don't feel they are clear enough. Unfortunately the link I've provided does the same, so I'll try to demonstrate what's the Strategy's spirit, IMHO.
Main thing about strategy is to have a general procedure, with some of its details (behaviours) abstracted, allowing them to be changed transparently.
Consider an gradient descent optimization algorithm - basically, it consists of three actions:
gradient estimation
step
objective function evaluation
Usually one chooses which of these steps they need abstracted and configurable. In this example it seems that evaluation of the objective function is not something that you can do in more than one way - you always just ... evaluate the function.
So, this introduces two different strategy (or policy) families then:
interface GradientStrategy
{
double[] CalculateGradient(Function objectiveFunction, double[] point);
}
interface StepStrategy
{
double[] Step(double[] gradient, double[] point);
}
where of course Function is something like:
interface Function
{
double Evaluate(double[] point);
}
interface FunctionWithDerivative : Function
{
double[] EvaluateDerivative(double[] point);
}
Then, a solver using all these strategies would look like:
interface Solver
{
double[] Maximize(Function objectiveFunction);
}
class GradientDescentSolver : Solver
{
public Solver(GradientStrategy gs, StepStrategy ss)
{
this.gradientStrategy = gs;
this.stepStrategy = ss;
}
public double[] Maximize(Function objectiveFunction)
{
// choosing starting point could also be abstracted into a strategy
double[] currentPoint = ChooseStartingPoint(objectiveFunction);
double[] bestPoint = currentPoint;
double bestValue = objectiveFunction.Evaluate(bestPoint);
while (...) // termination condition could also
// be abstracted into a strategy
{
double[] gradient = this.gradientStrategy.CalculateGradient(
objectiveFunction,
currentPoint);
currentPoint = this.stepStrategy.Step(gradient, currentPoint);
double currentValue = objectiveFunction.Evaluate(currentPoint);
if (currentValue > bestValue)
{
bestValue = currentValue;
bestPoint = currentPoint;
}
else
{
// terminate or step back and reduce step size etc.
// this could also be abstracted into a strategy
}
}
return bestPoint;
}
private GradientStrategy gradientStrategy;
private StepStrategy stepStrategy;
}
So the main point is that you have some algorithm's outline, and you delegate particular, general steps of this algorithm to strategies or policies. Now you could implement GradientStrategy which works only for FunctionWithDerivative (casts down) and just uses function's analytical derivative to obtain the gradient. Or you could have another one implementing stochastic version of gradient estimation. Note, that the main solver does not need to know about how the gradient is being calculated, it just needs the gradient. The same thing goes for the StepStrategy - it can be a typical step policy with single step-size:
class SimpleStepStrategy : StepStrategy
{
public SimpleStepStrategy(double stepSize)
{
this.stepSize = stepSize;
}
double[] Step(double[] gradient, double[] point)
{
double[] result = new double[point.Length];
for (int i = 0;i < result.Length;++i)
{
result[i] = point[i] + this.stepSize * gradient[i];
}
return result;
}
private double stepSize;
}
, or a complicated algorithm adjusting the step-size as it goes.
Also think about the behaviours noted in the comments in the code: TerminationStrategy, DeteriorationPolicy.
Names are just examples - they're probably not the best, but I hope they give the intent. Also, usually best to stick with one version (Strategy or Policy).
PHP Examples
You'd define your strategies that implement only singular method called solve()
class CG
{
public function solve($a, $x, $y)
{
//..implementation
}
}
class GMRES
{
public function solve($a, $x, $y)
{
// implementation..
}
}
Usage:
$solver = new Solver();
$solver->setStratery(new CG());
$solver->solve(1,2,3); // the result of CG
$solver->setStrategy(new GMRES());
$solver->solve(1,2,3); // the result of GMRES
class Solver
{
private $strategy;
public function setStrategy($strategy)
{
$this->strategy = $strategy;
}
public function solve($a, $x, $y)
{
return $this->strategy->solve($a, $x, $y);
}
}

Controller selection

In my title screen, i have a code saying that the first controller using A is the PlayerIndex.one.
Here is the code:
public override void HandleInput(InputState input)
{
for (int anyPlayer = 0; anyPlayer <4; anyPlayer++)
{
if (GamePad.GetState((PlayerIndex)anyPlayer).Buttons.A == ButtonState.Pressed)
{
FirstPlayer = (PlayerIndex)anyPlayer;
this.ExitScreen();
AddScreen(new Background());
}
}
}
My question is: How can i use the "FirstPlayer" in other classes? (without this, there is no interest in this code)
I tried the Get Set thing but i can't make it work. Does i need to put my code in another class? Do you use other code to make this?
Thanks.
You can make a static variable say : SelectedPlayer,
and assign first player to it!
then you can call the first player through this class,
for example
class GameManager
{
public static PlayerIndex SelectedPlayer{get;set;}
..
..
..
}
and right after the loop in your code, you can say:
GameManager.SelectedPlayer = FirstPlayer;
I hope this helps, if your code cold be clearer that would be easier to help :)
Ok, so to do this properly you're going to have to redesign a little.
First off, you should be checking for a new gamepad input (i.e. you should be exiting the screen only when 'A' has been newly pressed). To do this you should be storing previous and current gamepad states:
private GamePadState currentGamePadState;
private GamePadState lastGamePadState;
// in your constructor
currentGamePadState = new GamePadState();
lastGamePadState = new GamePadState();
// in your update
lastGamePadState = currentGamePadState;
currentGamePadState = GamePad.GetState(PlayerIndex.One);
Really what you need to do is modify your class that deals with input. The basic functionality from your HandleInput function should be moved into your input class. Input should have a collection of functions that test for new/current input. For example, for the case you posted:
public Bool IsNewButtonPress(Buttons buton)
{
return (currentGamePadState.IsButtonDown(button) && lastGamePadState.IsButtonUp(button));
}
Then you can write:
public override void HandleInput(InputState input)
{
if (input.IsNewButtonPress(Buttons.A)
{
this.ExitScreen();
AddScreen(new Background());
}
}
Note: this will only work for one controller. To extend the implementation, you'll need to do something like this:
private GamePadState[] currentGamePadStates;
private GamePadState[] lastGamePadStates;
// in your constructor
currentGamePadStates = new GamePadState[4];
currentGamePadStates[0] = new GamePadState(PlayerIndex.One);
currentGamePadStates[1] = new GamePadController(PlayerIndex.Two);
// etc.
lastGamePadStates[0] = new GamePadState(PlayerIndex.One);
// etc.
// in your update
foreach (GamePadState s in currentGamePadStates)
{
// update all of this as before...
}
// etc.
Now, you want to test every controller for input, so you'll need to generalise by writing a function that returns a Bool after checking each GamePadState in the arrays for a button press.
Check out the MSDN Game State Management Sample for a well developed implementation. I can't remember if it supports multiple controllers, but the structure is clear and can easily be adapted if not.

AspectJ - Doubt

An aspect can be used to measure the performance of method invocations,
as illustrated in the example below:
public aspect MonitorRequests {
void around() : monitoredRequestO {
PerfStats stats = getPerfStats(thisDoinPointStaticPart);
long start = System-currentTimeMillisO;
proceedO;
stats.ecunter++;
stats.time += System.currentTimeMillisC)-start;
}
pointcut monitoredRequestO :
execution(void HttpServ1et.do*(..)) && if(enabled);
// can expose stats via JMX, dump method, getstats etc.
public static class PerfStats { _. }
private Map<StaticPart,PerfStats> perfStatMap • //...
private boolean enabled;
}
By default, an aspect instance is associated with the Java Virtual Machine, rather with
specific execution flows, similar to a static class.
Another aspect below uses percflow() to associate an aspect instance differently from
the default:
public aspect MonitorDatabaseRequests
percflow(monitoredRequest() && !cflowbelow(mon-5toredRequest()) {
void around() : monitoredRequestO {
PerfStats stats = getPerfStats(thisJoinPointStaticPart);
long time.= System.currentTimeMi 11 i s O ;
proceed();
stats.counter++;
stats.databaseTime += accumulatedoatabaseTime;
stats.time 4= System.currentTimeMi 11 isO-time;
}
}
What is the difference that adding the percflow() declaration makes in this example
I'm confused how percflow works and how this is different from not using it....
percflow is the aspect instantiation model. See here:
http://eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/progguide/quick-aspectAssociations.html
This means that one instance of this aspect is created for every cflow entered.
The first aspect is a singleton and so it must store a map for all of the performance stats it keeps track of. The second aspect is instantiated as needed, so performance stats are implicitly stored and associated with the proper dynamic call graph.