Are there alternatives to embsysregview? [closed] - eclipse-plugin

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
http://embsysregview.sourceforge.net/
I'd like to avoid using eclipse if I can. Tried googling - nothing came up.

The debuggers of most commercial vendors will provide that functionality, for example Kiel MDK-ARM, IAR EWB, Rowley Associates CrossWorks.
Keil and IAR both provide code-size limited evaluation versions that you can use for non-commercial and evaluation purposes (i.e. you can't sell or distribute a product built using it), Rowley have a 30 day evaluation licence (as does IAR in addition to teh code limited version). For a full licence Rowley is by far the least expensive - largely because they use GCC rather than a proprietary compiler, but the debugger is their own and not based on GDB (and all the better for it!).
If you need free tools, CooCox CoIDE appears to do exactly what you want (and probably more). It is Eclipse based, so may not meet your requirements, but all the integration is already done for you, so it is less of a kit-of-parts than assembling Eclipse with CDT and various other plug-ins. In particular the embedded target debugging is integrated, and that is probably the most difficult part to get information on for Eclipse in my experience.

Related

How to test <script>alert("XSSTest")</script> [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I need to pass (alert("XSSTest")) this string in all the field to test-penetration testing. even i dont have much idea about this. Presently am doing this entering this text/script manually to each and every field of my web application. Can any one suggest me is there is any tool which can ease this task. I even heard there are many plugin for FF browser available for the same.
You have many options to automate XSS testing.
You can use free and commercial softwares to acheive this. I listed some popular tools below:
Commercial (there may be a trial version)
NetSparker
Acunetix
IBM AppScan
Freeware
Xenotix
BurpSuite
ZedProxy
x5s
Mozilla Firefox AddOn:
XSS Me
Now bear in mind that if you have the source code of the application that you want to test, you may do also static code analysis. This also depends on the technology you are using. Find below some tools for this:
FindBugs
PMD
IBM AppScan (Source)
Of course the lists may continue for many more other tools.

Source code analyzing tool for COBOL on VMS/VAX Platform [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Can someone please recommend a tool for analyzing, improving, finding "dead code", provide statistics etc. for a source code on COBOL language on VMS/VAX OS and RDB Database?
Thanks.
Some compilers have options for locating dead code, so you may already have the tools you desire. Please keep in mind that there are going to be situations where the code is dead and you cannot tell via static source code analysis.
if a = 1
move 'error' to out-message
end-if
If a can never be 1 then this is dead code. Static source code analysis may not find more complicated instances of this scenario, particularly if the value of a comes from outside the program being analyzed - perhaps a database.
A cursory scan of the static source code analysis tools listed on Wikipedia shows the commercial products are pricy (thousands of euros). The open source tools don't appear to provide much COBOL coverage. You might want to check those out for yourself as I admit I didn't do a thorough evaluation but instead just scanned their documentation.
COBOL is a difficult language to parse.
I have never used it, but the DecSet suite of products includes a product called PCA - Performance and Coverage Analyser. This may be what you are looking for.

Free UML Drawing Tools [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
What are the best free uml drawing tools?
All the ones I have found require membership payments and only offer limited functionality based to public users on a trial basis...rubbish!
For my (very simple) needs I used ArgoUML. I'm not an expert about, but I found it enough easy to use. It's open source and, on the web page, you can find a good user guide.
Have a look at StarUML ( http://staruml.sourceforge.net/en/ )
It's free, open source, and incredibly fully featured.
For a full list, check out the ones marked as Open Source here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Unified_Modeling_Language_tools
But I'd really recommend StarUML!
For my first two software engineering courses, I used the stand alone version of UMLet, but it is just for diagrams. It exports to standard graphics, or pdf. They also have an eclipse plugin version, but I never used it.
For a no frill drawing tool, I find Google Docs (drawings) pretty good. Note that printing works better under Mozilla than Chrome, strangely enough. In Chrome, I cannot get dashed lines to print.
Try UMLet. Supports Eclipse IDE.

Lisp on embedded platforms [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
Are there any open source Lisp compilers suitable for real-time embedded applications? I.e. with incremental garbage collection, customisable memory handling, small footprint, etc.
Edit:
To clarify, by "compiler" I meant native code, not bytecode interpreter (though the suggested interpreting implementations for microcontrollers are interesting for being a lot smaller than what I thought possible!).
Take a look at Picobit and the code, which is a Scheme for microcontrollers. There is also tinyscheme, but I don't know how suitable it is for embedding into smaller processors.
There are some implementations that compile to C code, e.g. ECL (Embeddable Common Lisp). There is also a very recent library that compiles a subset of Common Lisp to a subset of C++ for the Arduino.
You mentioned "real-time" so nonchalantly, but getting real-time with garbage collection is not trivial. There do exist real-time garbage collectors, but I am not aware of any Lisp implementations using them yet.
There is also Hedgehog Lisp from Oliotalo, licensed under LGPLv2.1, with standard library licensed under BSD.

software documentation templates [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Does anyone know any source of examples and templates for software requirements, build environment description and other kind of documentations that are common for software development?
Thanks!
The ReadySet templates from tigris are quite comprehensive though you need to know html or have a good html editor to use them.
The IEEE provides standards for software documentation. For instance, high level requirements are defined in IEEE 830-1993 Software Requirements Specification.
This is a standard I've learned in school (using a book called Software Engineering - an object oriented perspective by Eric J. Braude, but I would not specifically recommend it.) It's more suited to a traditional waterfall development model though.
Googling the standard number should get you a couple of interesting links.
(The IEEE 830-1993 standard is superseded by IEEE 830-1998.)
The arc42 project is about a free Software Architecture Documentation template similar to the Software Architecture Document of the Rational Unified Process (commercial).
The state of Texas has a fine framework for the whole system development cycle.