I have a table like
EID Name Desc
1 DMK Den (Obsolete)
2 KMPL K descforce
3 SFFSS system force (Obsolete)
4 QEMPL Yes
5 BGRNK BoardGMP
6 JIGG J G (obsolete)
How do i retrive EID,Name WHERE Desc is not (Obsolete). Result table looks like
EID Name Desc
2 KMPL K descforce
4 QEMPL Yes
5 BGRNK BoardGMP
How to specify that in WHERE clause of sql query?
You are looking for the not like clause. In MS Access, this uses * as a wildcard, so the query is:
select t.*
from table as t
where [desc] not like "*obsolete*";
I forget if like in Access is case sensitive, so you might need:
select t.*
from table as t
where lcase([desc]) not like "*obsolete*";
Related
I want to group by data present table. but the problem in all names is similar not the same.
id name subject_id
---------------------------------
1 Ganeash 1
2 Ganesha P 2
3 Shree Ganesh Pai 1
4 Gaanesh shree G 1
5 Ramesh shri 2
In this data everywhere Ganesh is common so the output should contain.
name count
-------------
Ganesh 4
Ramesh 1
If I use soundex function.
postgres=# SELECT soundex('hello world!');
ERROR: function soundex(unknown) does not exist
LINE 1: SELECT soundex('hello world!');
^
HINT: No function matches the given name and argument types. You might need to add explicit type casts.
You can also use CASE
select name,count(*) from (
select case when name like '%Ganesh%' THEN 'Ganesh'
when name like '%Ramesh%' THEN 'Ramesh' end as name
from test) a
group by name
Check Demo Here
Output
It is pretty simple, you just need to split the text field into an array of words and then unnest the arrays into rows. Then you manipulate the rows using standard SQL (count(), GROUP BY, etc.):
SELECT count(*),
unnest(regexp_split_to_array(name, E'\\s+')) AS name2
FROM names
GROUP BY name2
ORDER BY 1 DESC
Say I have a table in an sql database like
name age shoesize
---------------------
tom 20 NULL
dick NULL 4
harry 30 5
and I want an SQL statement that selects names that have age == X, or as a fallback, if no such names exist, use those with shoe size == Y. In other words, in this table, for X=20,Y=4 I should only get 'tom', while for X=25,Y=4 I should get only 'dick'. I can't do that with
SELECT name FROM table WHERE age = 20 OR shoe size = 4;
because that will select both tom and dick. I'm currently using
SELECT COALESCE ((SELECT name FROM tab WHERE age = 20),(SELECT name FROM tab WHERE shoesize = 4));
but is there a neater way? Also using coalesce like this doesn't allow me to get the whole row - i.e. I can't use SELECT * FROM tab, I can only select a single name.
You can use ORDER BY and FETCH FIRST 1 ROW ONLY or some similar clause:
SELECT name
FROM tab
ORDER BY (CASE WHEN age = X THEN 1
WHEN shoesize = Y THEN 2
ELSE 3
END)
FETCH FIRST 1 ROW ONLY;
Some databases spell FETCH FIRST 1 ROW ONLY like LIMIT or TOP or even something else.
This is how my query results look like currently. How can I get the MAX() value for each unique id ?
IE,
for 5267139 is 8.
for 5267145 is 4
5267136 5
5267137 8
5267137 2
5267139 8
5267139 5
5267139 3
5267141 4
5267141 3
5267145 4
5267145 3
5267146 1
5267147 2
5267152 3
5267153 3
5267155 8
SELECT DISTINCT st.ScoreID, st.ScoreTrackingTypeID
FROM ScoreTrackingType stt
LEFT JOIN ScoreTracking st
ON stt.ScoreTrackingTypeID = st.ScoreTrackingTypeID
ORDER BY st.ScoreID, st.ScoreTrackingTypeID DESC
GROUP BY will partition your table into separate blocks based on the column(s) you specify. You can then apply an aggregate function (MAX in this case) against each of the blocks -- this behavior applies by default with the below syntax:
SELECT First_column, MAX(Second_column) AS Max_second_column
FROM Table
GROUP BY First_column
EDIT: Based on the query above, it looks like you don't really need the ScoreTrackingType table at all, but leaving it in place, you could use:
SELECT st.ScoreID, MAX(st.ScoreTrackingTypeID) AS ScoreTrackingTypeID
FROM ScoreTrackingType stt
LEFT JOIN ScoreTracking st ON stt.ScoreTrackingTypeID = st.ScoreTrackingTypeID
GROUP BY st.ScoreID
ORDER BY st.ScoreID
The GROUP BY will obviate the need for DISTINCT, MAX will give you the value you are looking for, and the ORDER BY will still apply, but since there will only be a single ScoreTrackingTypeID value for each ScoreID you can pull it out of the ordering.
I am trying to sort the numbers,
MH/122020/101
MH/122020/2
MH/122020/145
MH/122020/12
How can I sort these in an Access query?
I tried format(mid(first(P.PFAccNo),11),"0") but it didn't work.
You need to use expressions in your ORDER BY clause. For test data
ID PFAccNo
-- -------------
1 MH/122020/101
2 MH/122020/2
3 MH/122020/145
4 MH/122020/12
5 MH/122021/1
the query
SELECT PFAccNo, ID
FROM P
ORDER BY
Left(PFAccNo,9),
Val(Mid(PFAccNo,11))
returns
PFAccNo ID
------------- --
MH/122020/2 2
MH/122020/12 4
MH/122020/101 1
MH/122020/145 3
MH/122021/1 5
you have to convert your substring beginning with pos 11 to a number, and the number can be sorted.
How about this ?
SELECT
tmpTbl.yourFieldName
FROM
tmpTbl
ORDER BY
CLng(Mid([tmpTbl].[yourFieldname],InStrRev([tmpTbl].[yourFieldname],"/")+1));
Given the following data in my test_table, column DATETIMESTAMP:
XXX123
YYY000
XXX-1234
my Statement:
SELECT CInt(Mid(datetimestamp,4)) AS Ausdr1
FROM test_data
ORDER BY 1;
sorts my data. please hange 4 to 11 and it will work for you
I have a table with columns like (in sql server 2000)
MailCode Mode Name Group
-------- ----- --------- -------
1 1 abc 0
1 1 def 0
1 1 qwe 1
2 2 aaw 0
2 2 aad 0
I want to group the Name field based on the rest of the fileds so that the result looks like this (there should be only one unique mailCode, Mode and group combination)
MailCode Mode Names Group
--------- ------ ------------ -------
1 1 abc, def 0
1 1 qwe 1
2 2 aaw, aad 0
How can I create the sql query for this?
I had a similar problem where I had to concatenate a field in the select, my solution at the time was to create a procedure that returned the result and called it like this
select x as field1, y as field2, dbo.procedure as field3
SQL Server 2000 solution
Luckily, COALESCE is supported in 2000, so you can use the COALESCE trick to create a comma delimited list of values, demonstrated in this link. Because of the variable usage, you'll need to create a function/procedure and call it within the main query. Basically, just replace the STUFF() in the query below with the function call.
SQL Server 2005+ solution:
SELECT x.mailcode,
x.mode,
STUFF((SELECT y.name
FROM TABLE y
WHERE y.mailcode = x.mailcode
AND y.mode = x.mode
AND y.gropu = x.group
GROUP BY y.mailcode, y.mode, y.group
FOR XML PATH(', ')), 1, 1, '') AS name,
x.group
FROM TABLE x
GROUP BY x.mailcode, x.mode, x.group
I can't think of a simple query that will get the result you're looking for, but some logic along these lines should get you where you want:
1) Loop through distinct MailCode, Mode, Group Rows
A) select all names in group
A.1) Loop through names
A.2) Concatenate them together into temp variable
B) insert all data (MailCode, Mode, Group, temp variable) into temp table
Fair waring, looping in SQL tends to have a huge performance hit when it comes to large datasets. I unfortunately don't know a better way to do it.