In my case I'm using a UITextField as the accessory that I don't need to show all the time. I've confirmed the change happens after the orientation notification events fire. I guess a hack would be to resize the accessory to zero height, but I'm reticent to do this.
Wondering if anyone has encountered this and found a solution?
Have entered a bug report and provided a sample project. For those with higher privileges, it is searchable on bugreport.apple.com as ID 16771757. I have also copied it to a Dropbox account accessible as https://www.dropbox.com/s/o28vo04ig3yhgz6/ID16771757.zip.
Thank you for reading.
iOS calls such methods for input accessory view instance:
[inputAccessoryView setAlpha:1]; when owner of accessory view becomes first responder (internal method call -[UIPeripheralHost(UIKitInternal) executeTransition:]);
[inputAccessoryView setHidden:NO]; when interface rotation finished (internal method call -[UIPeripheralHost finishRotationOfKeyboard:]);
That's why your input accessory view becomes visible after interface rotation event.
Solution depends on behaviour that you expect:
Let's imagine that input accessory view height = 44 ->
Now you hide input accessory view and set owner as first responder:
If you expect inputAccessoryView.frame.size.height equals 0 then solution for hiding input accessory view is set it to nil: inputAccessoryView = nil;
If you expect inputAccessoryView.frame.size.height equals 44 then solution for hiding input accessory view is override setHidden: method for it:
- (void)setHidden:(BOOL)hidden {
[super setHidden:self.customIsHiddenFlag];
}
where customIsHiddenFlag property that you need use for implementing logic of showing/hiding accessory view;
or override setAlpha: method:
- (void)setAlpha:(CGFloat)alpha {
[super setAlpha:(self.customIsHiddenFlag ? 0 : 1)];
}
These solutions work for iOS 7.
For iOS 6 you could use your base solution inputAccessoryView.hidden = YES and it works because iOS doesn't call setHidden:NO automatically when interface rotation is fired.
It seems that you are right and it's a bug cause of different behaviour on iOS6 and iOS7. If Apple wants to show input accessory view forcedly then they should call setHidden:NO not only after interface rotation but also when owner becomes first responder.
From Apple's documentation on inputAccessoryView:
… Subclasses that want to attach custom controls to either a system-supplied input view (such as the keyboard) or a custom input view (one you provide in the inputView property) should redeclare this property as readwrite and use it to manage their custom accessory view. [emphasis mine]
So the correct way to hide the accessory view would be redeclaring the property as readwrite:
#property (nonatomic, readwrite) UIView *inputAccessoryView;
removing the accessory view from superview and setting the property to nil when appropriate:
- (IBAction)hideAccessoryView:(UIButton *)sender
{
[self.inputAccessoryView removeFromSuperview];
self.inputAccessoryView = nil;
}
This is correct with regard to the docs but if you look at the view hierarchy, there's a UIPeripheralHostView (UIKit private class) that does not change its size. This most likely means that throwing out the accessory view will not be reflected by keyboard size — it'll stay the same. Keep this in mind if you plan to calculate any offsets to adjust to on-screen keyboard.
That said, the best way for you to move forward might be using a completely transparent view as the accessory view and have your custom view (UITextField in this case) as a subview. That way you will get both complete control over your custom view and consistent behaviour of your app on current and future versions of iOS.
Edit:
Here's a screenshot showing a slightly modified version of your bug report app with UIPeripheralHostView highlighted:
You can see how size of the view stays the same after the accessory view has been removed.
When you add an accessory view, you "pass" it to the system for layout. It is more than likely, when Apple performs layout on the keyboard view, it also layouts the accessory view and sets it to visible. Setting the accessory as hidden can also have other side effects, such as the keyboard height being incorrectly calculated, thus causing incorrect inset calculation.
From my experience, it is best to remove the accessory and add it again when necessary. Resizing the accessory view will cause other issues related to keyboard size. If you want to hide and show quickly, subclass the view that includes the accessory view, and implement internally the setting and removing of accessory view.
Related
I am trying to create a custom NSView that hosts a CALayer hierarchy to perform efficient display. This NSView is then embedded within a NSTableCellView that is displayed by a View-Based NSOutlineView.
The problem is that whenever I expand or collapse an item, all rows are being moved, but the layer's content remains displayed at the position it was before changing the outline.
Scrolling the NSOutlineView seems to refresh the layers and they resync with their rows at that point.
I have debugged this behavior using Instruments and it seems that the scrolling provokes a layout operation which updates the layers with a setPosition: call that should have occured when expanding or collapsing items.
Here is some sample code for a simple layer hosting NSView subclass.
#interface TestView : NSView
#end
#implementation TestView
- (instancetype)initWithFrame:(NSRect)frameRect
{
self = [super initWithFrame:frameRect];
CAShapeLayer* layer = [CAShapeLayer layer];
layer.bounds = self.bounds;
layer.position = CGPointMake(NSMidX(self.bounds), NSMidY(self.bounds));
layer.path = [NSBezierPath bezierPathWithOvalInRect:self.bounds].CGPath;
layer.fillColor = [NSColor redColor].CGColor;
layer.delegate = self;
self.layer = layer;
self.wantsLayer = YES;
return self;
}
#end
I have tried a lot of potential solutions to this problem but I couldn't find any interesting method that gets called on the NSView instance that could be overriden to call [self.layer setNeedsDisplay] or [self.layer setNeedsLayout]. I also tried various setters on the CALayer itself such as :
layer.autoresizingMask = kCALayerWidthSizable | kCALayerHeightSizable;
layer.needsDisplayOnBoundsChange = YES;
self.layerContentsRedrawPolicy = NSViewLayerContentsRedrawOnSetNeedsDisplay;
Can anyone help me figure out how to make this layer display properly inside a NSOutlineView?
I ended up answering my question. The problem wasn't in the way my TestView was implemented. I simply missed one of the steps for enabling CoreAnimation support within the application. The relevant reference is within the Core Animation Programming Guide.
Basically, in iOS Core Animation and layer-backing is always enabled by default. On OS X, it has to be enabled this way :
Link against the QuartzCore framework
Enable layer support for one or more of your NSView objects by doing one of the following
In your nib files, use the View Effects inspector to enable layer support for your views. The inspector displays checkboxes for the selected view and its subviews. It is recommended that you enable layer support in the content view of your window whenever possible
For views you create programmatically, call the view’s setWantsLayer: method and pass a value of YES to indicate that the view should use layers.
Once I enable layer support on any of the NSOutlineView's parents, the various glitches are solved.
It is difficult to read the NSOutlineView reference documents and find the information about cell reuse that is likely giving you fits here.
You may have looked at outlineViewItemDidCollapse: but it's kind of a useless for our issue, because it doesn't have a pointer to an NSView, and that's because it's older than view-based outline views.
Perhaps the one helpful mention, buried within the NSOutlineViewDelegate protocol, down in the section on view-based NSOutlineView methods, there is a single mention within outlineView:didRemoveRowView:forRow: that:
The removed rowView may be reused by the table, so any additionally inserted views should be removed at this point.
In other words, when you call the outline view's makeViewWithIdentifier:owner:, for a cellView or rowView with a particular ID you often get a recycled view. Especially often because of collapse. Incidentally, that method is from the NSTableView superclass, and in that reference, there's also this comment:
This method may also return a reused view with the same identifier that is no longer available on screen. If a view with the specified identifier can’t be instantiated from the nib file or found in the reuse queue, this method returns nil.
So you have the option of altering the view hierarchy or niling properties in didRemoveRowView:forRow. However, buried within a third cocoa reference, that for NSView, there is within the commentary on prepareForReuse, this comment:
This method offers a way to reset a view to some initial state so that it can be reused. For example, the NSTableView class uses it to prepare views for reuse and thereby avoid the expense of creating new views as they scroll into view. If you implement a view-reuse system in your own code, you can call this method from your own code prior to reusing them.
So, TL;DR, you need to implement prepareForReuse.
The pertinent references are (mostly) the superclasses of both NSOutlineView and NSTableCellView.
And, FWIW, there was a similar question here, where the questioner seems to indicate things are even worse than I think, in that NSOutlineView is more creative behind the scenes than NSTableView.
In my own work with outline views and embedded NSTextViews, I've seen wildly terrible rendering hiccups relating to expand/collapse/scroll that I seem to have managed in just the NSOutlineViewDelegate methods. On iOS they did everyone the favor of renaming makeViewWithIdentifier to the more explicit dequeueReusableCellViewWithIdentifier.
You shouldn't have to enable layer backing for any of the ancestor views (like the outline view).
In my experience, the layer immediately assigned to a view (as opposed to sublayers) doesn't need its bounds, position, or autoresizing mask to be set. It is automatically made to track the bounds of the view. In fact, I would avoid setting those properties, just in case that breaks the automatic synchronization with the view's bounds rect.
So, the question is: how are you arranging for the view to move or resize with its superview? Are you using auto layout? If so, did you turn off its translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints? If yes to both, what constraints are you setting on the view? If no to either, how did you position the view within its superview? What frame did you set? Also, is the superview configured to autoresize its subviews (probably yes, since that's the default)? What is your view's autoresizingMask?
You could also override -setFrameOrigin: and -setFrameSize: in your custom view class and call through to super. Also, add logging to show when that's happening and what the new frame rect is. Is your view being moved as you expect when you expand or collapse rows?
Imagine, there is a UIViewController with a UIScrollView in it. At the top of the view there is an UIImageView, some UILabels and other things. Furthermore, there is a UITableView which content is Dynamic Prototypes. I attach a picture to make it clear:
I haven't got a static amount of cells in the UITableView so it could be scrollable. My problem is the following: the UITableView scrolls in itself but I want to scroll the whole View. What is the best possibility to do that?
Possible solutions I've founded today
1) The first thing is: I create a UITableViewController and declare a header section in which I include all my labels, images etc. programmatically (I would love to use the interface builder for that...)
2) Another solution is to calculate the height of the view. I tried the best to do it like this way - but: without success. If this is the best way to do that: Can anybody give an example?
I would ditch the UIScrollView and just use a UITableView. You can add a UIView object as the tableHeaderView of the UITableView just by dragging it in in Interface Builder. Now since everything is part of the UITableView hierarchy, everything will scroll together as expected.
You could also try setting delaysContentTouches to NO on your scrollView. Depending on your setup, this may make the scroll view respond to the touch first instead of the table view.
From Apples UIScrollView Docs:
delaysContentTouches
A Boolean value that determines whether the scroll view delays the
handling of touch-down gestures.
#property(nonatomic) BOOL delaysContentTouches
Discussion
If the value of this property is YES, the scroll view delays handling
the touch-down gesture until it can determine if scrolling is the
intent. If the value is NO , the scroll view immediately calls
touchesShouldBegin:withEvent:inContentView:. The default
value is YES.
You'll have to (as you've mentioned) add the UIView containing the image and buttons to the actual UITableView. Embedding it in the scroll view will produce the undesired behavior that you're seeing.
I would recommend returning the UIView as the header view for the first section of your table view. You can do this by implementing the UITableViewDelegate method:
- (UIView *)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView viewForHeaderInSection:(NSInteger)section;
If you maintain an IBOutlet to the view containing your image/labels, you can return it here.
this is same demo i hope its helps you from iphone sorce code library
http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#samplecode/iPhoneCoreDataRecipes/Introduction/Intro.html
thank you
I have a situation whereby I am adding a view from another viewcontroller to an existing viewcontroller. For example:
//set up loading page
self.myLoadingPage = [[LoadingPageViewController alloc]init ];
self.myLoadingPage.view.frame = self.view.bounds;
self.myLoadingPage.view.hidden = YES;
[self.view addSubview:self.myLoadingPage.view];
Is it possible to set 'self.myLoadingPage' to be the first responder? This is the case whereby the loadingpage view size does not cover the entire size of the existing view and users can still interact with the superview (which is not the desired behaviour). I want to just enable the subview in this case.
When I had a similar problem, I made an invisible UIView that covered the entire screen, I added the large invisible UIView on top of the main view and made the loading view a subview of the invisible UIView.
The simplest solution is to override hitTest method in your loading view to return TRUE. This top view is first in the responder chain, the hitTest method gets called which NORMALLY returns TRUE if the point is within the view and will therefore be handled, returning TRUE regardless means you get the touch event and effectively block the message being resent to the next responder.
Interesting question. I found a similar post with a quote from the Apple Developer Forums on this issue:
To truly make this view the only thing
on screen that can receive touches
you'd need to either add another view
over top of everything else to catch
the rest of the touches, or subclass a
view somewhere in your hierarchy (or
your UIWindow itself) and override
hitTest:withEvent: to always return
your text view when it's visible, or
to return nil for touches not in your
text view.
This would seem to indicate there isn't a terribly straightforward solution (unless there was an API change regarding this made after October, 2010.)
Alternatively, I suppose you could go through all the other subviews in your superview and individually set their userInteractionEnabled properties to NO (but that would probably prove more cumbersome than the quoted solutions).
I would love to see other ways to allow this.
I have a UIPopoverController containing a UITableView. The popover is resized in its view controller's -viewDidAppear function to fit the contents of the table. While the popover resizes properly, its arrow is usually no longer pointing at the original CGRect. Is there a way to force the popover to reposition itself after a resize so that its arrow is pointing at its intended target?
EDIT: I can't set the size of the popover in -viewDidLoad since the table view does not load its data until -viewDidAppear is called, and as a result I do not know what size the popover should be until then. In addition, I resize the popover when one of the table view cells is clicked to display another view and this also results in the arrow no longer pointing at its intended target.
I think this may be the wrong way to go about it, since you're having to re-do the built-in behaviour that positions the arrow to begin with.
I don't resize popover content in viewDidAppear. I set the contentSizeForViewInPopover property in the view controller's viewDidLoad method, e.g.:
- (void)viewDidLoad
{
[super viewDidLoad];
self.contentSizeForViewInPopover = CGSizeMake(320, 155); // sized for a 3-row UITableView
}
(Quick warning: if you're developing a universal app, this code will cause a run-time crash on devices running 3.1.x and below.)
You can also set the content size for the popover controller before you present it, which should take care of your problem. Check out the popoverContentSize property.
According to this answer, you can call presentPopoverFromRect:inView: on the popover again and it will reposition the arrow. I haven't tested this myself.
I have made a very simple web browser app using a web view. Now I need to get the app so that when the iPhone is rotated, the text of the page is rotated as well.
How do I do this?
I am very confused by the auto-resize dialog, so it is possible I have done something wrong there.
Any help would be appreciated!
I think you sholud rotate UIWebView widget, not its contents. Contents should rotate as well. To support rotating add following code to your view controller:
- (BOOL)shouldAutorotateToInterfaceOrientation:
(UIInterfaceOrientation)interfaceOrientation {
return YES;
}
Rotated widget might look different then expected. Adjust struts and springs in Interface Builder.
I think you need to give us some sample code in order to determine what goes wrong. It is as Jacek says, the only think you should need to do is to support auto rotation on the UIWebView itself. The content should be rotated automatically.
I think you are confused by device orientation and view frame.
In most cases UIViews do change with respect to the orientation change. But to clarify - it is not because of the orientation change, but the layout change.
Only UIViewControllers need to consider device orientation - UIViews do NOT. When the device orientation changes, the UIViewController captures the event from its instance methods:
– willRotateToInterfaceOrientation:duration:
– willAnimateRotationToInterfaceOrientation:duration:
– didRotateFromInterfaceOrientation:
The UIViewController then re-layout the views - leading to reframing of the UIViews. In many cases, iOS can helps you in simplifying the relayout process by setting the UIViewAutoresizeMask. For example:
myWebview.autoresizeMask = UIVIewAutoresizeMaskFlexibleHeight | UIVIewAutoresizeMaskFlexibleHeight;
implies that when webview's superview changed its bounds, the webview will change accordingly.
As a summary, UIView only takes care of its frame / bounds etc.