NPM/Bower/Composer - differences? - npm

Can someone explain to me the difference between NPM, Bower and Composer.
They are all package managers - correct?
But when should each one be used?
Also, each one appears to have a json file that accompanies it, does this store all the packages you require so they can be installed by cmd line? Why do you need this file?

[update, four years later]
bower is deprecated, and should not be used anymore for new projects. To a large extent, it has been subsumed into node dependency management (from their website: "While Bower is maintained, we recommend using Yarn and Webpack or Parcel for front-end projects").
yarn came out of the wood as a better npm (fixing several of npm flaws), and this is really what you should use now, as it is the new de-facto standard if you are doing front-end or node development. It does consume the same package.json as npm, and is almost entirely compatible with it.
I wouldn't use composer at this point (because I wouldn't use php), although it seems to still be alive and popular
[original answer]
npm is nodejs package manager. It therefore targets nodejs environments, which usually means server-side nodejs projects or command-line projects (bower itself is a npm package). If you are going to do anything with nodejs, then you are going to use npm.
bower is a package manager that aims at (front-end) web projects. You need npm and nodejs to install bower and to execute it, though bower packages are not meant specifically for nodejs, but rather for the "browser" environment.
composer is a dependency manager that targets php projects. If you are doing something with symfony (or plain old php), this is likely the way to go
Summing it up:
doing node? you do npm
doing php? try composer
front-end javascript? try bower
And yes, the "json" files describe basic package information and dependencies. And yes, they are needed.
Now, what about the READMEs? :-)
https://github.com/bower/bower
https://www.npmjs.org/doc/cli/npm.html
https://getcomposer.org/doc/00-intro.md

Related

NPM v5: Generate lockfile alongside `yarn.lock`?

I maintain a starter kit that bundles a Yarn yarn.lock file.
Now that NPM v5 is released and recommends committing its own package-lock.json, I'd like to include both.
Is it possible to generate both files without actually installing anything, solely for the purpose of committing the locks?
Note: The reason for including both is that, as a starter kit, the end-user may choose to use Yarn or NPM. I have no control over their environment, so I'd like to support both out-the-box.

NPM: Updating modules within modules

In my NodeJS projects I use of course some external modules, those modules relies on other packages. Some of the developer maintaining those modules are very slow at updating the modules they use in their own project. Even when the issue is regarding security.
Is it possible to bump up a NPM modules within a modules?
You can change the package.json file within those npm packages you wish to update the dependencies for, but really this isn't an ideal solution. Any time an npm install is performed you'll lose those changes. Best to, if possible, fork the Git repos for those packages and make the changes yourself.

NPM to existing project?

I have an online site and Im going to overhaul it. While I cannot find any information about if I can use npm and some kind of package manager (e.g Webpack) on live site which is on shared host (which has latest Node.js, npm support etc), Im going to develope it locally and worry about "publishing" it later on.
Is there a way to somehow covert my current downloaded project to npm project or Im better off just starting a new project? This is rather confusing, I've never used npm before.
Im using WordPress, everything is run with PHP atm but Im going to overhaul it and use Node.js.
NPM can be used to collect and manage Javascript dependencies for the browser so as to create a stand alone front-end JS app. BUT, bower is probably a better choice.
NPM is designed to manage Javascript dependencies for projects that use NodeJS or use the CommonJS module format for requiring modules.
Bower is specifically a package manager (like npm or composer) but it is meant to manage browser based javascript dependencies.
Currently, javascript doesn't have a formally defined module/import system, so a number of competing require() functions are been produced. NodeJS comes with a require() function that searches the npm/ folder for modules. Browserify is a pre-processor that can scan the npm folder for a dependency and all of its dependencies and bundle them into 1 file for a browser to download (because browser's don't have a require() function because the JS standard doesn't have define one)
I might be rambling here, but you should probably look at bower, and then - at some point in the future - look at either browserify or requirejs to combine and optimize all the JS plugins for your front-end app.
Edit for clarity:
Basically there are 2 engines to run your JS application: the browser or NodeJS. NodeJS needs npm, the browser has no idea what npm is. If you want to write a clean, single page app, all JS front-end for a PHP backend, you don't need NodeJS, and therefore don't need npm. Using npm will prematurely complicate the development of a front-end browser app because it will force you to decide on a require() implementation (Browserify or Requirejs) right from the start.

Starting an ExpressJS app using my favourite tools

I'm a front end dev who wants make a blog/portfolio site using express js.
I've used codekit in the past to compile,minify & autoprefix my JADE/SASS files, and to minify my JS files, but I have no idea where to start when going full stack. I've been reading up on gulp (as I assume this will do all the things that codekit does) but I don't understand fully what I need.
Do I need bower aswell? Do I control all the gulp plugins using NPM?
How do I get all this to work with Zurb Foundation 6?
If you are planning to use Express, then Gulp is a good choice. Like you said, gulp can automatically do all the stuff you need; also is very customizable. You don't need Bower to use it, personally I don't use Bower but I use Gulp. All the packages are managed by Node Package Manager (npm). Finally I don't know about support of Zurb Foundation 6. By a quick research I see there is a npm plugin for version 5, but I think there's not one for version 6.
Here's a link with all npm packages and a guide to begin using Gulp:
https://css-tricks.com/gulp-for-beginners/
https://www.npmjs.com/
I hope my answer help you.

What is new in spm.js

Just learned that there exists another package manager: Static Package Manager or spm.js - http://spmjs.io/. From brief reviewing of the documentation the tool seems very similar to "old good" Bower.
Is it so? What is different about spm.js that Bower or npm don't provide?
spm.js, bower, volo, component, jspm, npm + browserify etc. all serve front-end developers and the end result you get is very similar. Here are some differences to consider:
spm.js manages binaries via the publish command similar to npm, where as bower fetches from git endpoints (however there's discussion to change this)
spm.js packages are CommonJS packages and it's recommended to use it with the module loader sea.js, bower is indifferent about module loaders, npm isn't optimized for front-end dev yet, however browserify helps
Both spm.js and sea.js are popular within the Chinese developer community as they're driven by the great folks at Alipay. Though there's English docs, most discussion on github happen in Chinese (e.g. discussion on positioning & the future)