Im now getting this error ....Warning 1 Could not copy "obj\x86\Debug\HANGMAN-SHAPES V100.exe" to "bin\Debug\HANGMAN-SHAPES V100.exe". Beginning retry 1 in 1000ms. The process cannot access the file 'bin\Debug\HANGMAN-SHAPES V100.exe' because it is being used by another process. HANGMAN-SHAPES V100
The error is pretty self-explanatory; the file is in use - maybe you have a debugging session still running? In any case you can terminate the process from the processes tab in the task manager.
Related
I have an SSIS package with for each loop > sequence container. The sequence container is trying to read file from For each loop and process its data. The requirement was to not fail the entire package when any exception happened in processing a file but to continue processing the next file until all the files were processed from the for each loop. For this, I have set the Propagate variable for the sequence container to False. I have also added email step on On Error event of Sequence container. The package is running as expected and able to process all files even when any exception happened with any file. But I would like the status of my SSIS package to be failed finally since one of the files got failed. How can I achieve that ?
Did you try this options?
(SSIS version in russian on the left side but it's sequence container)
View -> Properties window -> Then click on your sequence container and it will show you ther properties of sequence container.
If i were you first of all i would try property "FailPackageOnFailture" - it should cover your question if i get it right.
P.S. Also you can see the whole properties of your project when you click on a free place in your project
UPDATED (after comments and more clear understanding task):
The idea is - set this param Maximum ErrorCount for SQ as max as you want - in this case it wont stop the package because 1 of the files was failed in SQ and next file will process, but it should stop package after SQ will finish his work because you don't change MaximumErrorCount for package.
Important - a value of zero sets the error count threshold to infinity and package or task never get's Failure
I am getting below error in t24 when executing Auth Routine.
FATAL ERROR IN (SENSITIVE ROUTINES CALLED IN LOCAL RTNS
the error appears when the routine gets executed and completed.
i have also tried to call a mainline routine which post OFS,
the problem is the code gets executed successfully, the OFS response is also retured.
but when the routine gets end, it shows this error.
I know some but wanna share everyone this issue was solved, please check below capture
Just add 1 line SENSITIVITY = '' after execute OFS.GLOBUS.MANAGER, all version routine when face this this issue we can do this way no need to create main routine.
I am having some trouble running a simple tHiveCreateTable job in Talend OS for Big Data (Print of the job where I am getting this error).
The Hive connection is fine and the job worked until Ranger was activated in the cluster.
After ranger, I started getting the following log:
[statistics] connecting to socket on port 3345
[statistics] connected
Error while processing statement: Cannot modify mapred.job.name at runtime. It is not in list of params that are allowed to be modified at runtime
[statistics] disconnected
This error occurs either using Tez or MapReduce for the job, throwing an exception in the following line of the automatically generated code:
// For MapReduce Mode
stmt_tHiveCreateTable_1.execute("set mapred.job.name=" + queryIdentifier);
Do you know any solution or workarround for this?
Thanks in advance
It is possible to disable changing mapreduce.job.name and hive.query.name at runtime by Talend7 jobs.
Edit the file
{talend_install_dir}/plugins/org.talend.designer.components.localprovider_7.1.1.20181026_1147/components/templates/Hive/SetQueryName.javajet
and comment out lines 6 and 11 like that:
// stmt_<%=cid %>.execute("set mapred.job.name=" + queryIdentifier_<%=cid %>);
// stmt_<%=cid %>.execute("set hive.query.name=" + queryIdentifier_<%=cid %>);
It solved this issue for me.
I have implemented a loop job in pentaho kettle. This job has "Simple evaluation" entry that checks if it should rerun the previous transformation or not based on a condition. The variable used in condition, is being set using "Set variable" step in previous transformation. The problem is that first time job runs perfectly, but when server is restarted, job stuck and throws error:
Unexpected error occurred while launching entry.
This error comes for both transformation and "Simple evaluation", and then job stuck in loop forever.
So I have two questions here:
Why does this error occur?
If an error occurs, transformation should stop but it is forwarding the flow to "Simple evaluation" and vice versa.
Below is the image of job :
I have erlang application. In this application i run process with spawn(?MODULE, my_foo, [my_param1, my_param2, my_param3]).
And my_foo:
my_foo(my_param1, my_param2, my_param3) ->
...
some code here
...
ok.
When i open etop i see that this my_foo/3 function status: proc_lib:sync_wait/2
Than i try to put exit(self(), normal) in the end of my function, but i see same behavior: proc_lib:sync_wait/2 in etop.
How can i kill or exit process correctly?
Thank you.
Note that exit(Pid, Reason) and exit(Reason) do NOT do the same thing if Pid is the process itself. exit/1 tells the current process to exit - from the inside if you like - while exit/2 sends an exit signal to the process, even if the process is itself. So when you do exit(self(), normal) you are actually sending the normal exit signal to yourself, which is ignored.
In this case putting the exit call at the end of the function should not make any difference as the process automatically dies (with reason normal) when the function with which it was started ends. It seems like the process is suspended somewhere before that.
proc_lib:sync_wait/2 is called inside proc_lib:start/start_link and sits and waits for the spawned process to do proc_lib:init_ack/1/2 to return the return value for start. It would appear that your process does not call init_ack.
Based on the limited information that you give in the question I would suspect that your process hasn't finished running yet.
Normally you don't need to add exit/2 to your process. It will exit automatically when the function has finished running.
You probably have a long running call in some code here that has not finished running. I recommend that you add logging information and see where you are stuck.