I've got some JS tests written in mocha/chai and I would like to run them in a project scaffolded using the webapp generator.
I've put my tests inside the "test" folder from Yeoman's structure and the tests are running fine. But the issue is that the grunt test command is only showing the test results in the console, not in the browser.
I'm looking for a way to run the command and have the tests shown in the browser. How can I do that?
Thanks for any help!
Please consider this part of connect's configuration (more precisely, this is a sub-task of connect):
test : {
options : {
middleware : function(connect) {
return [
require('connect-livereload')(),
mountFolder(connect, '.tmp'),
mountFolder(connect, 'test')
];
},
port : grunt.option('port') ? Number(grunt.option('port')) + 1 : 9001
}
}
The above will make files from the specified folders available through http.
.tmp is where my transpiled coffeescript and SCSS is landing as regular JS/CSS
test is where my tests reside together with a very simple index.html file which wires all JS/CSS together, including mocha.js and mocha.css
Later in my Gruntfile I register the test task:
grunt.registerTask('test', function(target) {
var tasks = [
'clean:server',
'coffee',
'jst',
'connect:test'
];
if (target === 'browser') {
tasks.push('open:test');
tasks.push('watch');
} else {
tasks.push('mocha');
}
grunt.task.run(tasks);
});
The part which is relevant to your problem is 'connect:test' which makes it possible to access the tests through the browser, and this one:
if (target === 'browser') {
tasks.push('open:test');
tasks.push('watch');
} else {
tasks.push('mocha');
}
As long as you don't specify browser as your test target, the tests will run headlessly in the console. But if you go like grunt test:browser, Grunt will open a browser thanks to open:test. For your reference, I also include my open:test config:
test : {
path : 'http://localhost:<%= connect.test.options.port %>'
}
Related
I've currently managed to implement Cucumber BDD tests within a Vitejs + Vue 3 as follows:
I start and run the development server with:
$ yarn dev
And then in a separate window I run the Cypress test runner:
$ yarn cy:run
Which corresponds to:
...,
"scripts": {
...
"cy:run": "cypress run -q",
...
},
...
In my package.json. The output of this, is 1 test passing.
So far, so good. I then came across the #cypress/vite-dev-server package, and implemented it with the cucumber preprocessor inside /cypress/plugins/index.ts as follows:
/// <reference types="cypress" />
const path = require('path')
const { startDevServer } = require('#cypress/vite-dev-server')
const browserify = require('#cypress/browserify-preprocessor')
const cucumber = require('cypress-cucumber-preprocessor').default
/**
* #type {Cypress.PluginConfig}
*/
module.exports = (on: Cypress.PluginEvents, config: Cypress.PluginConfigOptions) => {
on('dev-server:start', options => {
return startDevServer({
options,
viteConfig: {
configFile: path.resolve(__dirname, '..', '..', 'vite.config.ts')
}
})
})
const cucumberOptions = {
...browserify.defaultOptions,
typescript: require.resolve('typescript')
}
on('file:preprocessor', cucumber(cucumberOptions))
return config
}
So, it looks like the #cypress/vite-dev-server package doesn't accept what I am trying to do with Cypress & Cucumber.
Has anyone managed to get Cypress & Cucumber BDD working with Vite in a seamless fashion?
I've also looked at the wait-on module, running the following:
yarn dev & wait-on http://localhost:8099
But it doesn't seem to be waiting, only the Vite server runs? So I can't then run the cypress command I need ...
The #cypress/vite-dev-server is for component testing, not e2e testing. The cypress-cucumber-preprocessor on the other hand is for compiling e2e specs.
In e2e testing, the app runs independently from tests, so you can use vite for running the dev server, but it has nothing to do with tests. If you want to use vite config for compiling tests you can use cypress-vite instead of cypress-cucumber-preprocessor.
I've added the Cypress Vue Component Test runner to an existing Vue app and I want all the test files to be in the same directory as the components. However, whatever I put in my cypress.json file seems to be ignored and cypress always wants to look in the default integration folder.
In my cypress.json file I have:
{
"component": {
"componentFolder": "src",
"testFiles": "**/*.spec.ts",
"testMatch": [
"**/src/**/*.spec.[jt]s?(x)"
]
},
}
but when I run
npm run cy:run:chrome
I get:
> vue-myapp#0.1.0 cy:run:chrome
> cypress run --browser chrome
Can't run because no spec files were found.
We searched for any files inside of this folder:
/Users/richardshergold/Projects/vue-myapp/cypress/integration
You can change the default folder that Cypress looks in for tests using integrationFolder in your cypress.json. This value defaults to cypress/integration.
Even when adding a testFiles field, Cypress will restrict that search to the integrationFolder value.
...
"integrationFolder": "/path/to/tests/folder",
...
I have a website with 2 domains like Page1.com and Page2.com. In my manifest.json file i have set the name to Page 1, but when the website is build and published to Page1.com and to Page2.com i want to change the name to be the same as the domain name. But how can i do this in my build step? Today i se Page 1 when i visit Page2.com.
I have tried to change the meta, application-name in my code to get the correct name, but this don't work.
My vue.config
const manifestJSON = require('./public/manifest.json')
module.exports = {
pluginOptions: {
i18n: {
locale: 'en',
fallbackLocale: 'en',
localeDir: 'locales',
enableInSFC: true
}
},
runtimeCompiler: true,
pwa: {
themeColor: manifestJSON.theme_color,
name: manifestJSON.short_name,
msTileColor: manifestJSON.background_color,
appleMobileWebAppCapable: 'yes',
appleMobileWebAppStatusBarStyle: 'black',
workboxPluginMode: 'InjectManifest',
workboxOptions: {
swSrc: 'service-worker.js',
exclude: [
/_redirects$/
]
}
}
}
This site is build with VueJs and use Netlify as host.
So the manifest file is generated by vue-cli every time you build your app. So you shouldn't be using it to seed the vue-config file.
The one file that you could use the way you have shown here would be your package.json file - but it won't hold the values you are looking for.
Your Vue.config file is where you would enter, manually, the pwa info like theme and background color, etc.
To get back to your initial question, you could create two separate build scripts in your package.json, one for page1 and one for page2, and use environment variables to specify the name you ant to use:
"scripts": {
"page1": "env SITE_NAME='Page 1' npm run prod",
"page2": "env SITE_NAME='Page 2' npm run prod",
...
}
Then in your vue.config file, you can use the variable to build your pwa object:
pwa: {
name: process.env.SITE_NAME,
...
}
Finally, you can build your apps by calling
npm run page1
Be careful though: every build will overwrite your public folder! Depending on your context, how/when you build each app, you may have to take additional steps to generate two separate output folders.
The easiest way is to use process.argv to get a command line argument.
For example if you command to run the file is:
node file.js
Then using:
node file.js env_variable_str
Will have process.argv[process.argv.length - 1] === "env_variable_str"
In my case the manifest had to change not just the value but also add/remove a key depending on the argument. So I made a template (manifest_template.json) and used a "build helper" to create the correct manifest based on my argument in the public/ folder. Then I chained this command with npm run build and had another chaining command which made the zip folder.
My workflow: create manifest.json in public -> npm run build -> make zip with correct name
Let me know if you want to see the code!
I´m trying to setup a build workflow using the aforementioned technologies, but I´m getting the following error, which seems very generic upon running tests on karma:
TypeError: 'undefined' is not an object (evaluating 'a.Sifter=b()')
This happens even without adding any ECMSA6 specific feature. The same workflow works fine without the transpiling phase in the workflow.
What I tried was to set the babeljs after a concatenation phase and before executing a uglifying on it, like the following snippet:
var defaultTasks = [
"sass:prod", // compile scss sources
"cleanAll", // clean folders: preparing for copy
"copyAll", // copying bower files
"cssmin:customVendor", // minify and concat 'customized from vendor' css
"concat:vendorStyles", // concat vendors's css + minified 'customized from vendor' and distribute as 'css/vendor.css'
"uglify:rawVendors", // minifies unminified vendors
"concat:vendorScripts", // concat vendors's scripts and distribute as 'scripts/vendor.js'
"ngAnnotate:app", // ng-annotates app's scripts
"concat:appScripts", // concat app's (customized from vendor's + ng-annotated + customer's)
"babel",// uses babeljs to convert brandnew ES6 javascript into ES5 allowing for old browsers
"uglify:app" // minify app script and distribute as 'scripts/app.js'
];
if (!skipTest) {
defaultTasks.push("karma:target"); // run tests on minified scripts
}
The imporant definitions are shown:
babel: {
options: {
"presets": ['es2015']
},
dist: {
files: {
"<%= concat.appScripts.dest %>": "<%= concat.appScripts.dest %>"
}
}
},
uglify: {
options: {
mangle: {
except: [
"jQuery", "angular", "tableau", "LZString", "moment", "Moment", "Modernizr",
"app", "modules"
]
}
},
app: {
files: [{
src: ["<%= concat.appScripts.dest %>"],
dest: "<%= app.dist %>/scripts/app.js"
}]
}
},
I´ve tested the transpile a bit, running the default logic from babel url, and it works well, converting basic stuff.
Is there any better workflow that I could use to still run the tests against the same code that would be executed for real?
Thanks
In the end, the workflow was correct.
I just need to modify the filesets a bit in order to avoid transpiling the selectize.js file (which wasn´t really needed).
However, not sure why it was breaking
That solved to me, so I´m closing the question, but perhaps might be useful for someone else.
I am writing automation test scripts using Protractor and now I need to set up the CI for this using Jenkins.
Tasks it needs to perform are:
Starting the selenium standalon server.
Starting the test using conf.js file.
Stopping the selenium standalone server.
Can anyone help in this regard?
I created a small bash script to do this.
# start selenium
./node_modules/protractor/bin/webdriver-manager start > /dev/null 2>&1 &
# wait until selenium is up
while ! curl http://localhost:4444/wd/hub/status &>/dev/null; do :; done
# run the build
grunt cibuild --force
# stop selenium
curl -s -L http://localhost:4444/selenium-server/driver?cmd=shutDownSeleniumServer > /dev/null 2>&1
This script is invoked from a free-style project in jenkins (Build > Execute shell)
Then the test result report is generated by reading the protractor test results. Hence, you have to produce junit reports from protractor, (look here) :
onPrepare: function() {
// The require statement must be down here, since jasmine-reporters
// needs jasmine to be in the global and protractor does not guarantee
// this until inside the onPrepare function.
require('jasmine-reporters');
jasmine.getEnv().addReporter(
new jasmine.JUnitXmlReporter('xmloutput', true, true));
},
To make the report visible in jenkins i add a post build action in the job: Publish JUnit test result report:
Alternatively, you could run this as a Grunt Task. First install grunt on Jenkins. Install the NPM packages for protractor_webdriver and protractor. Setup the configuration file to point the the node_module path and config file paths.
http://sideroad.secret.jp/articles/grunt-on-jenkins/
Then install protractor node modules. The Gruntfile would look similar to this. I created a test directory where the conf and spec files would be located.
module.exports = function (grunt) {
grunt.initConfig({
protractor_webdriver: {
your_target: {
options: {
path: 'node_modules/protractor/bin/',
command: 'webdriver-manager start'
}
}
},
protractor: {
options: {
configFile: "node_modules/protractor/referenceConf.js", // Default config file
keepAlive: true, // If false, the grunt process stops when the test fails.
noColor: false, // If true, protractor will not use colors in its output.
args: {
// Arguments passed to the command
}
},
your_target: {
options: {
configFile: "test/conf.js", // Target-specific config file
args: {} // Target-specific arguments
}
}
}
});
grunt.registerTask('p:test', [
'protractor_webdriver',
'protractor'
]);
});
The newest protractor allows you to run the selenium standalone server directly from the conf.js (or whatever protractor entry point you have).
comment out (or delete) the seleniumAddress: 'http://localhost:4444/wd/hub', line, and replace it with seleniumServerJar: './node_modules/protractor/selenium/latest.jar'.
latest.jar isn't installed by default, I created it as a symlink to the latest version installed via npm install protractor --save. This gives longer life to my conf.js files in the same directory.
Within the ./node_modules/protractor/selenium/ folder I ran ln -s selenium-server-standalone-2.48.2.jar latest.jar
You can use Gulp which is far simpler.
After installing gulp in Jenkins System , you may install the npm dependencies(npm install) & run gulp tasks directly as windows batch command in Jenkins as below:
In the background to make selenium server up and running and providing various other parameters , you may use packages like 'gulp-angular-protractor' in the gulpfile.js as below:
gulpfile.js
'use strict';
var gulp = require('gulp'),
gulpProtractorAngular = require('gulp-angular-protractor'),
gulpStart = gulp.Gulp.prototype.start,
currentStartTaskName;
gulp.Gulp.prototype.start = function (task) {
currentStartTaskName = task;
gulpStart.apply(this, arguments);
};
function executeWebTests(suiteName, appName) {
return gulp.src([])
.pipe(gulpProtractorAngular({
'configFile': './conf.js',
'debug': false,
'autoStartStopServer': true,
args: [
'--suite', suiteName,
'--capabilities.browserName', 'chrome',
'--params.APPNAME', appName,
'--params.SUITENAME', currentStartTaskName,
'--capabilities.platformName', 'Windows'],
keepAlive: false
}))
.on('error', function (e) {
console.log('Ended with below ERROR::',e);
process.exit(1);
})
.on('end', function () {
console.log('Test complete');
process.exit();
});
}
gulp.task('RegressionSuiteTask', function () {
executeWebTests('regressionTests,','Application_Name');
});
conf.js
suites: {
regressionTests: ['testCases/**/*.js']//will run all specs in subfolders
},
I know this already resolved and want to target for beginner to create Jenkins job and running test. I suggest to use selenium-server-standalone jar in configuration file and call configuration file from Jenkins.
conf.js
..
exports.config = {
//seleniumAddress: 'http://localhost:4444/wd/hub',
seleniumServerJar: 'node_modules/protractor/node_modules/webdriver-manager/selenium/selenium-server-standalone-3.5.3.jar',
....
//html reporter logic
.....
Creating Jenkins Job
Install node js on Jenkins Server
Install Html Publisher Plugin for end to end testing report
Create Freestyle Project or whatever your needs
Go to Build Section -> Add build step and choose Execute Windows
batch command if Jenkins server in Windows otherwise choose Execute
Shell for Linux
Call conf.js (install packages and call your configuration file)
For reporting Got to Post-Build Actions Section -> Add Publish Html
Reports and call your report file (file assuming from root of your
project)
However you can customize execution command using gulp or similar other packages. Thanks