Deploy Java EE application without starting - apache

I am using Apache Geronimo. I need a way to deploy an EAR application on an application server without starting the EAR module automatically.
When I deploy my EAR, it is automatically started. I need a way to specify, that it should only be deployed but not started.
Is there a way to do this?

In the past I've opened and closed gates to certain EJBs with the use of JMX.
The cool part:
100% Control your beans from outside using JConsole or your own JMX client.
The drawback:
Every bean instance has to be registered in the MBean Server which is not that cool as you are usually having multiple instances of the same bean.
The solution to this topic was having a #Singleton EJB working as a MBean/controller for all the instances of one EJB.

Related

How to share an ignite instance among jetty webapps

The docs state:
https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/javadoc/org/apache/ignite/startup/servlet/ServletStartup.html
Servlet-based startup may be used in any web container like Tomcat,
Jetty and etc. Depending on the way this startup is deployed the
Ignite instance can be accessed by either all web applications or by
only one. See web container class loading architecture:
But then points to a dead link regarding Jetty.
I'm using Jetty. How would this be done (sharing the ignite instance among all web applications)?
Link to Jetty classloading
Link to Ignite web configuration
The latter describes web session clustering but you don't have to enable that to use Ignite. I think these docs should cover your case.
To share Ignite instance between web apps, you will need:
Put Ignite libraries into server's main lib/ directory, and not under your web app directory
Instantiate Ignite using Jetty API, as per the documentation that you referenced
code:
Server service = new Server();
service.addListener("localhost:8090");
ServletHttpContext ctx = (ServletHttpContext)service.getContext("/");
ServletHolder servlet = ctx.addServlet("Ignite", "/IgniteStartup",
"org.apache.ignite.startup.servlet.ServletStartup");
servlet.setInitParameter("cfgFilePath", "config/default-config.xml");
servlet.setInitOrder(1);
servlet.start();
This assumes you are starting Jetty programmatically, i.e. with your own code. Your mileage may vary if you don't.

Scheduling in jboss7 (and in wildfly) without using EJB

I want to use scheduling in jboss7 (and in wildfly) but I don't want to use any EJB. I know the EJB #Schedule can be used but I have a web application and the same WAR should be used in Tomcat too so EJB is out of the question.
What can I use for scheduling?
Thanks,
V.

web service(jax-ws) and weblogic

i have web service(cxf integated with spring(jax-ws)) project which it was deployed on Weblogic(12.1.1).
Another project as client was deployed same application server in another machine.
My problem is that at least 23 second of time for sending info from server to client.(this time is more long),but this time very fast when request is called by Soap Ui.
how can i config weblogic for improvement this problem.
I was searching a lot finally i found solution of my problem.
JaxWSProxyFactoryBean is object of cxf client to communicate with cxf server.
This Object have a property is named Bus,if this property not set in config cxf client,performance wont be better

Glassfish, EJB Load balancing

I'm having a problem with ejb load balancing inside glassfish 3 cluster.
I have one ear project witch contains EJB module and WEB module. All my EJB's are stateless and remote in EJB module. In WEB module I have one servlet which suppose to lookup for ejb and print on which instance in cluster he get ejb.
I'm calling EJB from servlet like this:
Properties props = System.getProperties();
props.setProperty("com.sun.appserv.iiop.endpoints", "10.8.10.202:23700,10.8.10.203:23700,10.8.10.204:23700,10.8.10.205:23700");
InitialContext ic = new InitialContext();
EJBRemote ejb = (EJBRemote) ic.lookup("java:global/app-name-ear/app-ejbs/EJB!com.tt.EJBRemote");
Problem is that my request always ends up on first instance of 4 possible.
How I can achieve load balancing in my case? Do I need stand alone client (web-app in separate project)? How glassfish cluster knows that there are another instances where my servlet can lookup for EJB?
Your issue is that you don't have enough load. and the way you look up EJBs is odd.
To look up remote EJB, rather than the properties in a servlet. but the CORBA / IIOP URL in the JNDI resources of the server. (in the admin console)
When you load balance, with IIOP each lookup binds to one instance and only switches to another instance for failover.
essentially you don't have enough load on the system to trigger the other instances of the EJB. Perhaps reduce the pool size to one to simulate high load.

Multiple war in Tomcat 7 using a shared embedded ActiveMQ

I'm working on a project where I have several war files inside a tomcat 7 have to communicate with a single embedded activeMQ (5.5.1) broker inside the same Tomcat.
I'm wondering what was the best practice to manage this and how to start and stop the broker properly.
Actually I try tu use a global JNDI entry in server.xml and in each war gets my activemq connection with a lookup. The first connection to the broker implicitly starts it. But with this method I run into various problems like instance already existing or locks in data store.
Should I use instead an additional war which uses a BrokerFactory to start the broker explicitly? In this case how to make sure that this war executes first in Tomcat ? And how do I stop my broker and where?
Thanks for the help.
from the docs...
If you are using the VM transport and wish to explicitly configure an
Embedded Broker there is a chance that you could create the JMS
connections first before the broker starts up. Currently ActiveMQ will
auto-create a broker if you use the VM transport and there is not one
already configured. (In 5.2 it is possible to use the waitForStart and
create=false options for the connection uri)
So to work around this if you are using Spring you may wish to use the
depends-on attribute so that your JMS ConnectionFactory depends on the
embedded broker to avoid this happening. e.g.
see these pages for more information...
http://activemq.apache.org/vm-transport-reference.html
http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-embed-a-broker-inside-a-connection.html
http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-restart-embedded-broker.html