I need to generate a report of below format. The header repeats only per page.
ItemNr | ItemGenDesc | FulfilmentBin | onHand
-----------------------------------------------
CAP100 Capacitor FulFil1 5
binPriority | binBackup | binBackupQty | binMin | binMax
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1 bkBUSLOT2 100 1 5
2 bkBUSLOT3 150 2 6
CAP400 Transistor FulFil12 20
CAP500 Transistor FulFil14 30
binPriority | binBackup | binBackupQty | binMin | binMax
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1 bkBUSLOT5 250 5 9
My SQL output is as below
I tried to work with 2 tablix and somehow I got the output coming up in preview mode but when I export to PDF, I get blank lines between each item. I am guessing that's because the binPriority grid (detail grid) is hidden when the itemnr count <=1. Also the tablix1 row header appears for every grouping but I want row header to appear once per page.
Can anyone suggest what are the ways to generate this type of report?
Thanks.
Update 1 : Sorry CAP500 in the report should be Radiator. My typo mistake. The report should be grouped by ItemNumber and it is sorted by binPriority. So it will print binpriority=0 in the master grid and then in the detail grid it will print in the order of binPriority. The OnHand that is shown in the master grid is relevant to binPriority= 0.
You can achieve your specified layout with a single Tablix. This is fairly simple if you don't mind Columns 2-4 in your Group heading lining up with Columns 1-3 in your Detail. Since horizontal page real estate isn't really an issue (only 6 columns counting the blank column to the left of your Detail columns), I would take this route.
I'm not sure how much you know about SSRS, so forgive me if this explanation is too rudimentary. Others with less experience than you might find it helpful as well.
Right Click the Detail Row on your Tablix.
Select Add Group => Row Group => Parent Group.
Set the Group By value to ItemNumber and check the "Add Group Header" box.
This creates a Group By Column, which I would delete for your specified layout. Make sure to only delete the Column, not the Row Group.
In the Grouping Window (down at the bottom by default), right click the ItemNumber Row Group and select Group Properties.
On the Sorting tab/menu, set the Sort By value to binPriority.
Right Click your new Row Group Row on the Tablix and select Insert Row => Inside Group Above. You'll need to do this twice so you have 3 Row headings in the Row Group.
Insert 3 more columns for a total of 6 columns in your Tablix.
Put your ItemNr, ItemGenDesc, FulfilmentBin, onHand Labels and Values in the first two Rows, first 4 Columns of your Row Group.
Put your binPriority, binBackup, binBackupQty, binMin, binMax Labels in the Last Row, Last 5 columns of your Row Group.
Put your binPriority, binBackup, binBackupQty, binMin, binMax Values in the Last 5 columns of your Detail Row.
Related
I have a splitform and what I want to do is open report on filter I use in this spltiform. What's important is that in this splitform you can do the correction of the row (you can't edit the previous row, but it creates two additional rows - one is negative and the other is to edit and I have one column which stores the ID of corrected row - CorrectedRowID). So I can't create report based on that table, so I created a query which groups this data by CorrectedRowID and it takes the last row of each ID so I have only the newest row of every ID. Then based on that query I created report.
On the splitform I have button which opens the report. But what I want is that when I have filter in this splitform and I click on the button Open Form it opens the report already on the filters. I have used this code in this button in VBA:
Private Sub Command282_Click()
DoCmd.OpenReport "tb_ewid_WNT1_raport", acViewPreview, , Me.filter
End Sub
When I create a normal report (not based on query) filter works great, but when I put some filter on the data in this splitform on one column it asks me for the value of the column on which I want to filter my data.
The query returns the newest rows of each ID. For example:
ID
Name
Quantity
Price
CorrectedRowID
IsCorrection
1
bread
4
1,5
1
No
2
milk
3
2,3
2
No
3
bread
-4
1,5
1
Yes
4
bread
11
1,5
1
Yes
In this case query will return this, so for each CorrectedRowID it returns the highest ID:
ID
Name
Quantity
Price
CorrectedRowID
IsCorrection
2
milk
3
2,3
2
No
4
bread
11
1,5
1
Yes
I created the report based on this query. And I also created a button on splitform which uses the code I wrote up. When I filter my data and when I click on this button it asks me for the value for some column (it's not the same every time). The values that it asks for are combo boxes which take the values from not the same table. The query uses JOIN.
Where did I make mistake?
I have a database where all of the input from the user (through a userform) gets stored. In the database, each column is a different category for the type of data (ex. date, shift, quantity, etc) and the data from the userform input gets put into its corresponding category. For some of the data, all the data is the same except for the quantity. I was wondering how I could combine these rows into one and add the quantities to each other for the whole database (ex. combining the first and third data entries). I have tried playing around with a couple different loops but can't seem to figure anything out.
Period Date Line Shift Type Quantity
4 x 2 4/3/18 A 3 14 18
4 x 2 4/3/18 A 3 13 12
4 x 2 4/3/18 A 3 14 15
Thank you!
If you're looking to modify the underlying database, you might be able to query the data into the format you want by including all the other columns in a GROUP BY statement, save the result to another table, then replace the original table with the properly formatted one.
If you have the data in Excel and you just want to view it with the duplicate rows summed, a Pivot Table would be a good choice. You can select all the other columns as rows for the Pivot Table and sum of Quantity as the values.
I have a table that looks like so:
Is there any way I can display it like this in SSRS?
1 2 3 4
1 2.091 0.918 0.9 1.718
2 0.647 0.964 0.6 2.264
3 0.804 0.789 0.6 1.9
I tried using a matrix but it stops after showing the first column and doesn't expand to show the rest.
Attempt:
Results:
Another attempt:
Results:
to get something similar to the result you're looking for you need to write a query like:
select id
,row_number() over(partition by SubscaleNumber order by SubscaleNumber ) SubscaleNumber
, item
from yourtable
then the matrix should work fine.
You need to set the Row and Column grouping to get this matrix-style output.
When you click in your table you should see the brackets for the Row and Column groups. If you don't have a column group, add one.
Go into the properties of each group and make sure they are grouped by the column you want.
Start from scratch with a table or matrix.
Add a Row group on id
Add a Column Group on Item.
I'm trying to create a query that will insert new records to a table or update already existing records, but I'm getting stuck on the filtering and grouping for the criteria I want.
I have two tables: tbl_PartInfo, and dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE.
I'm want to select from dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE based upon the combination of CUST_ORDER_ID, CUST_ORDER_LINE_NO, and REVISION_ID. Each customer order can have multiple lines, and each line can have multiple revision. I'm trying to select the unique combinations of each order and it's connected lines, but take the connected information for the row with the highest value in the revision column.
I want to insert/update from dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE the following columns:
CUST_ORDER_ID
PART_ID
USER_ORDER_QTY
UNIT_PRICE
I want to insert/update them into tbl_PartInfo as the following columns respectively:
JobID
DrawingNumber
Quantity
UnitPrice
So if I have the following rows in dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE (PART_ID omitted for example)
CUST_ORDER_ID CUST_ORDER_LINE_NO REVISION_ID USER_ORDER_QTY UNIT_PRICE
SCabc 1 1 0 100
SCabc 1 2 4 150
SCabc 1 3 4 125
SCabc 2 3 2 200
SCxyz 1 1 0 0
SCxyz 1 2 3 50
It would return
CUST_ORDER_ID CUST_ORDER_LINE_NO (REVISION_ID) USER_ORDER_QTY UNIT_PRICE
SCabc 1 3 4 125
SCabc 2 3 2 200
SCxyz 1 2 3 50
but with PART_ID included and without REVISION_ID
So far, my code is just for the inset portion as I was trying to get the correct records selected, but I keep getting duplicates of CUST_ORDER_ID and CUST_ORDER_LINE_NO.
INSERT INTO tbl_PartInfo ( JobID, DrawingNumber, Quantity, UnitPrice, ProductFamily, ProductCategory )
SELECT dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE.CUST_ORDER_ID, dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE.PART_ID, dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE.USER_ORDER_QTY, dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE.UNIT_PRICE, dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE.CUST_ORDER_LINE_NO, Max(dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE.REVISION_ID) AS MaxOfREVISION_ID
FROM dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE, tbl_PartInfo
GROUP BY dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE.CUST_ORDER_ID, dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE.PART_ID, dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE.USER_ORDER_QTY, dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE.UNIT_PRICE, dbo_CUST_BOOK_LINE.CUST_ORDER_LINE_NO;
This has been far more complicated that anything I've done so far, so any help would be greatly appreciated. Sorry about the long column names, I didn't get to choose them.
I did some research and think I found a way to make it work, but I'm still testing it. Right now I'm using three queries, but it should be easily simplified into two when complete.
The first is an append query that takes the two columns I want to get distinct combo's from and selects them and using "group by," while also selecting max of the revision column. It appends them to another table that I'm using called tbl_TempDrop. This table is only being used right now to reduce the number of results before the next part.
The second is an update query that updates tbl_TempDrop to include all the other columns I wanted by setting the criteria equal to the three selected columns from the first query. This took an EXTREMELY long time to complete when I had 700,000 records to work with, hence the use of the tbl_TempDrop.
The third query is a basic append query that appends the rows of tbl_TempDrop to the end destination, tbl_PartInfo.
All that's left is to run all three in a row.
I didn't want to include the full details of any tables or queries yet until I ensure that it works as desired, and because some of the names are vague since I will be using this method for multiple query searches.
This website helped me a little to make sure I had the basic idea down. http://www.techonthenet.com/access/queries/max_query2_2007.php
Let me know if you see any flaws with the ideology!
I am creating a report using MS Report Builder 3.0. For this report, I have a stored procedure built that filters down to the specific rows needed, and then I use a row group to group on a particular field (pass_no). The table that is displayed is 2 columns and 3 rows within the row group. The basic description of what I want to accomplish is instead of the rows running onto the next page, I want the rows to continue on the same page in a new set of 2 columns. Think of it like a newspaper where the text continues in a new column rather than running down onto the next page.
For the example I'm going to use here, there are 12 rows of data returned by the SP, and 8 unique values in the pass_no column which is what my row group is grouped on. So in the report I end up with 8 groups of 3 rows. I'm aiming to have the table display 6 pass_no values (so 6 groups of 3 rows) before, for lack of better terminology, starting a new table.
My first approach at this has been to create a column group and set the grouping expression to the following:
=Floor((RowNumber(Nothing) - 1) / 6)
While this works in creating a new set of 2 columns, the split for the new columns is based on the row number from the raw data returned by the SP rather than the number of rows sets created by the row group. So because there are 12 rows returned, and the 6th and 7th rows have the same pass_no value, the second set of columns duplicates that 1 set of data. Also, the top 6 rows of the second column set are blank with the second set of values appearing below the first set.
If I add an additional column group where it is also grouping by pass_no, then I don't get the duplicate values, but I do get a pair of columns for each pass_no as well (as would be expected). I've tried modifying the expression above a bit and changed Nothing to the row group name and have tried the table name, but neither of them have yielded the desired result.
I can't alter the SP to do the grouping there because there are other column values that are not identical and I pull that data into a cell value expression within the table using Join(LookupSet()).
I have also considered creating 2 tables and applying a filter to the table so the first table only displays the first 6 results and the second table displays the remaining results, but that also looks at the raw data rather than the groupings and TOP N can't be used on pass_no as it's a text value, not an integer. This would also cause problems if I need to go to 3 tables.
So long story short, is there a way to do a table break rather than a page break or to overflow columns onto the same page rather than onto a new page?
Here's the pertinent portions of the Dataset:
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!2/5082b/1
PASS_NO MASTERTRAN TRANS_NO DESCRIPTION IS_MOD
7913019000 4931019000 4931019000 General Admission Adult 0
7914019000 4932019000 4932019000 Sea Turtle Hosp Adult 0
7914019000 4932019000 4933019000 2:00 PM SEA TURTLE HOSP 1
7916019000 4934019000 4934019000 Sea Turtle Hosp Child 0
7916019000 4934019000 4935019000 2:00 PM SEA TURTLE HOSP 1
7917019000 4934019000 4934019000 Sea Turtle Hosp Child 0
7917019000 4934019000 4935019000 2:00 PM SEA TURTLE HOSP 1
7918019000 4934019000 4934019000 Sea Turtle Hosp Child 0
7918019000 4934019000 4935019000 2:00 PM SEA TURTLE HOSP 1
7922019000 4936019000 4936019000 General Admission Child 0
7923019000 4936019000 4936019000 General Admission Child 0
7924019000 4936019000 4936019000 General Admission Child 0
I think your data presents a bit of a problem.
As you've already figured out, typically for this sort of setup you'd set up a row group with an expression like:
=(RowNumber(Nothing) - 1) Mod 6
And a column group expression like:
=Ceiling(RowNumber(Nothing) / 6)
This would create a six row tablix that would grow horizontally as required.
See this SO question for a similar example.
However, you currently have the requirement of also grouping by another column - pass_no in your case. Normally you can approximate a group-level row number with an expression like:
=RunningValue(Fields!pass_no.Value, CountDistinct, "DataSet1")
Unfortunately, when you try to add this into one of the grouping expressions like:
=Ceiling(RunningValue(Fields!pass_no.Value, CountDistinct, "DataSet1") / 6)
You get the following error:
A group expression for the tablix 'Tablix1' includes the aggregate
function RunningValue. RunningValue cannot be used in group
expressions.
Based on all this, my recommendation is to try and get a Dataset that has one row per pass_no value and base the tablix on this, with the above row/column grouping expressions, i.e. no need to group on multiple pass_no rows. So in your example it would have eight rows. You could then have a separate Dataset with all the individual rows and use a lookupset function to concatenate the description, etc.
Your other option is to try and get everything on one Dataset only, including the aggregates as required. This might not be possible, but for description at least you can leverage any of the various techniques here to get a delimited list. Once you have this list you can replace the delimiter with vbCrLf to split it back over multiple rows.
All this is a very long-winded way of saying that I don't know if your requirement is possible with your data, but if you look at having at least one Dataset with one row per pass_no you should be able to make it work.