I have form with some dynamic input that need to be filled. The problem is that to fill the form I need to visit another page to get data that depends on input on the previous page. So after I got a data and then backed to form, the form is already changed so I need to keep that form open while I getting a data for it. So question is how to make it?
You could probably create two casper instances. Where your first instance will have first page, and when required create another instance and get the data from it. Store data in casper's global scope.
Make waitFor until your variable value set # first instance.
Maybe with casper.back() and casper.forward() :
https://github.com/n1k0/casperjs/blob/master/tests/suites/casper/history.js
I suppose your previous form will be saved in the previous step.I hope so, try it.
Edit :
getData(newPage) was an example of your own casper method, you could try something like that :
var password ="wtoc95a";
casper.getData = function (newPage, previousPageInputData) {
//visit another page
casper.open(newPage)
//or casper.open(newPage+previousPageInputData) if the new page opened use the previous input
.then(function() {
//here you do what you want using "input" argument of the previous page
//just return the data you need to fill the form
});
return dataNeeded;
};
And in your form :
this.fill('form[id="signup_frm"]', {
nick_name: "pseudo",
e_mail: "mail",
password: "password",
password2: password,
input : casper.getData(arg1,arg2)
http://docs.casperjs.org/en/1.1-beta2/extending.html
Related
I have an user entity in the system and the following route fetches it from server and displays its details:
routerConfiguration.map([
// ...
{route: 'user/:id', name: 'user-details', moduleId: './user-details'}
]);
Now I want to display an edit form for the displayed user. I have the following requirements:
Edit form should have a separate URL address, so it can be sent to others easily.
When user clicks the Edit button on the user's details page, the edit form should use an already loaded instance of the user (i.e. it should not contact the API again for user details).
When user clicks the Edit button on the user's details page and then the Back button in the browser, he should see the details page without edit form again.
1st attempt
I tried to define the edit form as a separate page:
routerConfiguration.map([
// ...
{route: 'user/:id/edit', name: 'user-edit', moduleId: './user-edit'}
]);
This passes the #1 and #3 requirement but it has to load the user again when the edit form is opened.
I don't know any way to smuggle some custom data between the routes. It would be perfect if I could pass the preloaded user instance to the edit route and the edit component would use it or load a new one if it is not given (e.g. user accesses the URL directly). I have only found how to pass strings to the routes in a slighlty hacky way.
2nd attempt
I decided to display the edit form in a modal and show it automatically when there is a ?action=edit GET parameter. The code inspired by this and this question:
export class UserDetails {
// constructor
activate(params, routeConfig) {
this.user = /* fetch user */;
this.editModalVisible = params.action == 'edit';
}
}
and when the user clicks the Edit button, the following code is executed:
displayEditForm() {
this.router.navigateToRoute('user/details', {id: this.user.id, action: 'edit'});
this.editModalVisible = true;
}
This passes #1 (the edit url is user/123?action=edit) and #2 (the user instance is loaded only once). However, when user clicks the Back browser button, the URL changes as desired from user/123?action=edit to user/123 but I have no idea how to detect it and hide the edit form (the activate method is not called again). Therefore, this solution fails the #3 requirement.
EDIT:
In fact, I have found that I can detect the URL change and hide the edit form with event aggregator:
ea.subscribe("router:navigation:success",
(event) => this.editModalVisible = event.instruction.queryParams.action == 'edit');
But still, I want to know if there is a better way to achieve this.
The question is
How to cope with this situation in a clean and intuitive way?
How about adding a User class that will serve as the model and use dependency injection to use it in your view-models?
export class User {
currentUserId = 0;
userData = null;
retrieve(userId) {
if (userId !== this.currentUserId) {
retrieve the user data from the server;
place it into this.userData;
}
return this.userData;
}
}
I have two forms on two different views. I would like to post the form input to the second view, and then back to the first form upon posting the second form.
I have set up a test with a route that looks like this :
Route::get('/test1', function() {
return View::make('test1');
});
Route::post('/test2', function() {
$flash = Input::get();
return View::make('test2')->with('flash', $flash);
});
Route::post('/test1', function() {
return View::make('test1')->with('flash', $flash);
});
I am only able to pass $flash once. I'm misunderstanding why I cannot pass it again. I feel like I have to extract it again?
You need to add a form field in /test2 and resubmit the $flash data in order to pass it to /test1 via POST. It's a new request, the app will lose the $flash var otherwise.
A different approach could be to store $flash in a session with Session::put('flash', $flash); and accessing it in the next request.
The best method is to store your data in session. It will be available across multiple request . Using Input::flash() will only be available until the next request. See the Laravel docs for Input::flash() and Session
I am looking for a way to set the page of a jqGrid to x...
My use case is someone is using my grid...
They click on a patient to edit that patient (I am not using jqGrids modal edit screen... to many modal windows already)...
When the save what they did to that patient, I want to redirect the browser back to the screen where they clicked on that patient, and back to the SAME PAGE...
The thing to keep in mind.
I am using asp.net MVC4. I call the first page via an action method. The url variable of my grid is another action in the same controller. That action is what I send my page and row variables down to. I am sure that this can be done, However, I have no idea of how to achieve it. So far I have tried to set the page variable and rows variable in my document.ready before I call the jqGrid...
tbl.jqGrid({
loadBeforeSend: function () {
page: pageFromTemp;
rows: rowFromTemp
}
});
basically I have tried different ways to do it. The above is just one of them.
I have tried to reload the grid in the document.ready. But that doesn't make any sense. Why reload the grid when you haven't given it any of the parameters it needs...
I have tried to set the variable in the beforeRequest event. I have a function that I try and set it in...
beforeRequest: function () {
if ((rowFromTemp != "") && (pageFromTemp != "")) {
$(this).trigger('reloadGrid', [{ page: pageFromTemp, rowNum: rowFromTemp, url: '/Encounters/GetAjaxPagedGridData/' }]);
//$.extend($(this).setGridParam({ page: pageFromTemp })),
//$.extend($(this).setGridParam({ rowNum: rowFromTemp })),
//$.extend($(this).setGridParam({ url: '/Encounters/GetAjaxPagedGridData/' }))
//$.trigger('reloadGrid', [{ page: pageFromTemp, rowNum: rowFromTemp, url: '/Encounters/GetAjaxPagedGridData/'}]);
}
},
But that doesn't work either. I am obviously missing something. What am I doing wrong...
Got it to change to the right page using loadComplete and $("frTable").trigger({})
But now I am getting a flashing Loading screen which indicates to me that it is still loading the data...
If I set a breakpoint in my code, I can confirm that it is loading the data. I am not doing something right here.
Load the grid in document ready, have it's datatype set to local, have it's url unassigned, and have it hidden. When you want to have it load, trigger the load after setting the parameters and then show it to the user.
I am using extjs 4.1.1a for developing some application.
I had a form consisting of two combo-boxes and an item-selector.
Based on the value selected in first combo-box , the itemselector will load its data from database. This is working fine.
My problem is, if i reselect the first combo-box the new data will be displayed in itemselector along with previous data displayed in itemseletor .That is previous data displayed in itemselector will remain there itself.
for example: name "test1" consists of ids 801,2088,5000. on selecting test1 in firstcombobox itemselector must show output as below.
and if "test2" consists of ids 6090,5040. on selecting test2 in firstcombobox itemselector must show output as below.
problem is. for first time if i select "test1" from firstcombobox , output will come as expected. if i reselect "test2" from firstcombobox , output will come as below.
as you can see, previous data displayed (marked in red rectagle) remains there itself with new data displayed (marked with green rectangle).
I want for every reselection of first combobox, previously displayed data in itemselector to be erased before printing new data on itemselector.
How can I reset the itemselector for every reselection of first combobox?
You should remove all items from the store of the itemselector by the removeAll command. After that you should load the store of the itemselector.
itemselector.store.removeAll();
itemselector.store.load();
Any solutions above solve my problem.
i found solution from Sencha Forum.
https://www.sencha.com/forum/showthread.php?142276-closed-Ext-JS-4.0.2a-itemselector-not-reloading-the-store
in the itemselector.js file, change the line marked below.
populateFromStore: function(store) {
var fromStore = this.fromField.store;
// Flag set when the fromStore has been loaded
this.fromStorePopulated = true;
// THIS LINE BELOW MUST BE CHANGED!!!!!!!!!!!!
fromStore.loadData(store.getRange()); //fromStore.add(store.getRange());
// setValue waits for the from Store to be loaded
fromStore.fireEvent('load', fromStore);
},
You need to insert...
this.reset();
at the head of the function that is inserting the data.
As an example...
Ext.override( Ext.ux.ItemSelector, {
setValue: function(val) {
this.reset();
if (!val) return;
val = val instanceof Array ? val : val.split(this.delimiter);
var rec, i, id;
for (i = 0; i < val.length; i++) {
var vf = this.fromMultiselect.valueField;
id = val[i];
idx = this.toMultiselect.view.store.findBy(function(record){
return record.data[vf] == id;
});
if (idx != -1) continue;
idx = this.fromMultiselect.view.store.findBy(function(record){
return record.data[vf] == id;
});
rec = this.fromMultiselect.view.store.getAt(idx);
if (rec) {
this.toMultiselect.view.store.add(rec);
this.fromMultiselect.view.store.remove(rec);
}
}
}
});
are u got it?
when u select that combobox frist stoe of item selector is null after store load with ur pass the para meters
for example
store.load(null),
store.proxey.url='jso.php?id='+combobox.getrawvalue(),
store.load();
like that so when ur select a value in ur combobox that time ur used a listeners to ur combobox in that listners ur used above code , select ur some value in combobox that time frist store is get null after ur pass some values to json.php then store load with responce so that time old data is remove and new data load in that store
if u post ur code i will give correct code
I ran into the same issue with ExtJS 4.2.1. I got it to work by calling reload() on the data store and then setValue() with an empty string on the item selector in the data store's reload() callback.
Ext.create("Ext.form.field.ComboBox", {
// Other properties removed for brevity
listeners: {
change: function(field, newValue, oldValue, eOpts) {
Ext.getStore("ExampleStore").reload({
callback: function() {
Ext.getCmp("ExampleItemSelector").setValue("");
}
});
}
}
});
Ext.create("Ext.data.Store", {
storeId: "ExampleStore",
// Other properties removed for brevity
});
Ext.create("Ext.form.FormPanel", {
// Other properties removed for brevity
items:[{
xtype: "itemselector",
id: "ExampleItemSelector",
// Other properties removed for brevity
}]
});
For any folks that are curious, I'm fairly convinced there's a bug in the item selector's populateFromStore() function. When the function is called, it blindly adds all of the values from the bound store (store) to the internal store (fromStore). I suspect there should be a call to fromStore.removeAll() prior to the call to fromStore.add(). Here's the relevant code from ItemSelector.js.
populateFromStore: function(store) {
var fromStore = this.fromField.store;
// Flag set when the fromStore has been loaded
this.fromStorePopulated = true;
fromStore.add(store.getRange());
// setValue waits for the from Store to be loaded
fromStore.fireEvent('load', fromStore);
},
EDIT 12/18/2013
If you've configured any callback events on the item selector (e.g. change), you may want to disable the events temporarily when you call setValue(""). For example:
var selector = Ext.getCmp("ExampleItemSelector");
selector.suspendEvents();
selector.setValue("");
selector.resumeEvents();
I had the same problem and finally I decided to modify the extjs source code, not considering it a big issue as extjs itself its saying in the start of the file
Note that this control will most likely remain as an example, and not as a core Ext form
control. However, the API will be changing in a future release and so should not yet be
treated as a final, stable API at this time.
Based on that, as jstricker guessed (and sadly I didn't read and took me a while to arrive to the same conclusion), adding fromStore.removeAll() before fromStore.add() solves the problem.
Outside of the problem (but I think it can be interesting as well), additionally, I also added listConfig: me.listConfig in the MultiSelect configuration (inside createList), that way it's possible to format each item additional options (such as images, etc.) setting in the 'itemselector' the option listConfig as it's explained in the (irrealistic) documentation.
Need to reset the store used in ItemSelector that can be done by setting Empty object like below. Also need to call clearValue() method of ItemSelector component.
store.setData({});
ItemSelectorComponent.clearValue();
I'm trying to work on the "different permissions based on workflow state" issue but I'm struggling with the fact that it seems impossible to get the id of the current object 'at any time' that is necessary in order to get the permission of that object. What I mean is that I manage to get it from the client state following jquery bbq docs like:
$.bbq.getState().id
BUT it looks like this is doable only AFTER a complete page load. I investigated this by placing some alert in the main view events, like:
openerp.web.PageView = openerp.web.PageView.extend({
on_loaded: function(data) {
this._super(data);
alert('page load ' + $.bbq.getState().id);
},
do_show: function() {
this._super();
alert('page show ' + $.bbq.getState().id);
},
reload: function() {
this._super();
alert('page reload ' + $.bbq.getState().id);
},
on_record_loaded: function(record) {
this._super(record);
alert('record loaded ' + $.bbq.getState().id);
}
});
and I found that when you open the page view (by clicking on an item in a search view, for instance) you get always "undefined".
Then, you get it into "reload" and "on_record_loaded" when passing from an object to another using paged navigation. And then, you miss it again when you click on the "edit" button.
In the form view I successfully got it only on the 1st load because it seems that some caching is in-place. So that, if I place a pdb into web client's fields_view_get and I do this into the form "init_view":
var ids = [];
if ($.bbq.getState().id){
ids = [parseInt($.bbq.getState().id)];
}
console.log(ids);
return this.rpc("/web/view/load", {
"model": this.model,
"view_id": this.view_id,
"view_type": "form",
toolbar: this.options.sidebar,
context: context,
ids: ids,
}, this.on_loaded);
I get it only the 1st time that the page gets loaded. The same happen if I take ids from
this.dataset.ids
I looked anywhere at the core web module and I can't find a proper API for this and it looks weird (above all on dataset) that we don't have a proper way for getting/working on the current record/s. Even the context and the session do not have any information about that.
Probably I should store this into the view itself on 1st load...
Thanks in advance for any pointers.
try:
this.view.datarecord.id
OpenERP 7 in form view:
debugged using google chrome
Try the combination of the
this.dataset.ids and this.dataset.index
like
curr_id = this.dataset.ids[this.dataset.index]
this might solve your problem.