I know conditions are used in table joining. But I met a specific situation and the SQL codes writes like "Table A join table B ON TRUE"
What will happen based on the "ON TRUE" condition? Is that just a total cross join without any condition selection?
Actually, the original expression is like:
Table A LEFT outer join table B on TRUE
Let's say A has m rows and B has n rows. Is there any conflict between "left outer join" and "on true"? Because it seems "on true" results a cross join.
From what I guess, the result will be m*n rows. So, it has no need to write "left outer join", just a "join" will give the same output, right?
Yes. That's the same thing as a CROSS JOIN.
In MySQL, we can omit the [optional] CROSS keyword. We can also omit the ON clause.
The condition in the ON clause is evaluated as a boolean, so we could also jave written something like ON 1=1.
UPDATE:
(The question was edited, to add another question about a LEFT [OUTER] JOIN b which is different than the original construct: a JOIN b)
The "LEFT [OUTER] JOIN" is slightly different, in that rows from the table on the left side will be returned even when there are no matching rows found in the table on the right side.
As noted, a CROSS JOIN between tables a (containing m rows) and table b containing n rows, absent any other predicates, will produce a resultset of m x n rows.
The LEFT [OUTER] JOIN will produce a different resultset in the special case where table b contains 0 rows.
CREATE TABLE a (i INT);
CREATE TABLE b (i INT);
INSERT INTO a VALUES (1),(2),(3);
SELECT a.i, b.i FROM a LEFT JOIN b ON TRUE ;
Note that the LEFT JOIN will returns rows from table a (a total of m rows) even when table b contains 0 rows.
A cross join produces a cartesian product between the two tables, returning all possible combinations of all rows. It has no on clause because you're just joining everything to everything.
Cross join does not combine the rows, if you have 100 rows in each table with 1 to 1 match, you get 10.000 results, Innerjoin will only return 100 rows in the same situation.
These 2 examples will return the same result:
Cross join
select * from table1 cross join table2 where table1.id = table2.fk_id
Inner join
select * from table1 join table2 on table1.id = table2.fk_id
Use the last method
The join syntax's general form:
SELECT *
FROM table_a
JOIN table_b ON condition
The condition is used to tell the database how to match rows from table_a to table_b, and would usually look like table_a.some_id = table_b.some_id.
If you just specify true, you will match every row from table_a with every row of table_b, so if table_a contains n rows and table_b contains m rows the result would have m*n rows.
Most(?) modern databases have a cleaner syntax for this, though:
SELECT *
FROM table_a
CROSS JOIN table_b
The difference between the pure cross join and left join (where the condition is forced to be always true, as when using ON TRUE) is that the result set for the left join will also have rows where the left table's rows appear next to a bunch of NULLs where the right table's columns would have been.
Related
As far as I understand in a left outer join between two tables (say a & b) all the rows of the table on the left side of the join are retrieved regardless of the values in the rows on the right table. Then why do we need an 'ON' clause specifying a condition, something like this:
select * from a LEFT OUTER JOIN b on a.some_column1 = b.some_column2;
Why is there a need for the statement "a.some_column1 = b.some_column2".
A left join would return all the rows from table a, and for each row the matching row in table b, if it exists - if it doesn't, nulls would be returned instead of b's columns. The on clause defines how this matching is done.
An on clause is required since you are "joining", and you need to tell which columns you want to join by. Otherwise you would use traditional from without any where condition to all possible row combinations. But you wanted a join, right?
Yeah, that's pretty much it is.
As far as I understand in a left outer join between two tables (say a & b) all the rows of the table on the left side of the join are retrieved regardless of the values in the rows on the right table.
That is correct in the sense that it says something about what left join on returns, but it isn't a definition of what it returns. left join on returns inner join on rows plus (union all) unmatched left table rows extended by nulls.
inner join on returns the rows of cross join that satisfy the on condition--which could be any condition on the columns. cross join returns every combination of a row from the left table & a row from the right table.
What do you expect outer join without on to mean? In standard SQL outer & inner join have to have an on. inner join on a true condition is the same as cross join. Which has no unmatched left table rows. So if you want outer join with no on to mean outer join on a true condition then, since there are no unmatched rows in the inner join on that condition, the result is also just cross join. (MySQL allows inner join to be used without an on, but it just means cross join.)
I have two sql to join two table together:
select top 100 a.XXX
,a.YYY
,a.ZZZ
,b.GGG
,b.JJJ
from table_01 a
left join table_02 b
on a.XXX = b.GGG
and b.JJJ = "abc"
and a.YYY between '01/08/2009 13:18:00' and '12/08/2009 13:18:00'
select top 100 a.XXX
,a.YYY
,a.ZZZ
,b.GGG
,b.JJJ
from table_01 a
left join table_02 b
on a.XXX = b.GGG
where b.JJJ = "abc"
and a.YYY between '01/08/2009 13:18:00' and '12/08/2009 13:18:00'
The outcome of them is different but I don't understand the reason why.
I would be grateful if I can get some help here.
Whenever you are using LEFT JOIN, all the conditions about the content of the right table should be in the ON clause, otherwise you are effectively converting your LEFT JOIN to an INNER JOIN.
The reason for that is that when a LEFT JOIN is used, all the rows from the left table will be returned. If they are matched by the right table, the values of the matching row(s) will be returned as well, but if they are not matched with any row on the right table, then the right table will return a row of null values.
Since you can't compare anything to NULL (not even another NULL) (Read this answer to find out why), you are basically telling your database to return all rows that are matched in both tables.
However, when the condition is in the ON clause, Your database knows to treat it as a part of the join condition.
I am trying to run a left join on 2 tables. I do not have a group by and the only where condition i have is on the second table. But, the returned rows are less than the first table. isn't the left join suppose to bring all the data from the first table?
Here is my SQL:
select *
from tbl_a A left join tbl_b B
ON
A.Cnumber=B.Cnumber
and A.CDNUmber=B.CDNumber
and abs(A.duration - B.Duration)<2
and substr(A.text,1,3)||substr(A.text,5,8)||substr(A.text,9,2)=substr(B.text,1,8)
where B.fixed = 'b580'
There are 140,000 records in table A but the result returned is less than 100,000 records. What is the problem and how can I solve it?
As soon as you put a condition in the WHERE clause that references the right table and doesn't accommodate the NULLs that will be produced when the join is unsuccessful, you've transformed it (effectively) back into an INNER JOIN.
Try:
where B.fixed = 'b580' OR B.fixed IS NULL
Or add this condition to the ON clause for the JOIN.
You should add the where clause to the join:
select *
from tbl_a A left join tbl_b B
ON
A.Cnumber=B.Cnumber
and A.CDNUmber=B.CDNumber
and abs(A.duration - B.Duration)<2
and substr(A.text,1,3)||substr(A.text,5,8)||substr(A.text,9,2)=substr(B.text,1,8)
and B.fixed = 'b580'
If you use where statemen all records where b is not existing will not returned.
Can you tell me if inner join and equi-join are the same or not ?
An 'inner join' is not the same as an 'equi-join' in general terms.
'equi-join' means joining tables using the equality operator or equivalent. I would still call an outer join an 'equi-join' if it only uses equality (others may disagree).
'inner join' is opposed to 'outer join' and determines how to join two sets when there is no matching value.
Simply put: an equi-join is a possible type of inner-joins
For a more in-depth explanation:
An inner-join is a join that returns only rows from joined tables where a certain condition is met. This condition may be of equality, which means we would have an equi-join; if the condition is not that of equality - which may be a non-equality, greater than, lesser than, between, etc. - we have a nonequi-join, called more precisely theta-join.
If we do not want such conditions to be necessarily met, we can have
outer joins (all rows from all tables returned), left join (all rows
from left table returned, only matching for right table), right join
(all rows from right table returned, only matching for left table).
The answer is NO.
An equi-join is used to match two columns from two tables using explicit operator =:
Example:
select *
from table T1, table2 T2
where T1.column_name1 = T2.column_name2
An inner join is used to get the cross product between two tables, combining all records from both tables. To get the right result you can use a equi-join or one natural join (column names between tables must be the same)
Using equi-join (explicit and implicit)
select *
from table T1 INNER JOIN table2 T2
on T1.column_name = T2.column_name
select *
from table T1, table2 T2
where T1.column_name = T2.column_name
Or Using natural join
select *
from table T1 NATURAL JOIN table2 T2
The answer is No,here is the short and simple for readers.
Inner join can have equality (=) and other operators (like <,>,<>) in the join condition.
Equi join only have equality (=) operator in the join condition.
Equi join can be an Inner join,Left Outer join, Right Outer join
If there has to made out a difference then ,I think here it is .I tested it with DB2.
In 'equi join'.you have to select the comparing column of the table being joined , in inner join it is not compulsory you do that . Example :-
Select k.id,k.name FROM customer k
inner join dealer on(
k.id =dealer.id
)
here the resulted rows are only two columns rows
id name
But I think in equi join you have to select the columns of other table too
Select k.id,k.name,d.id FROM customer k,dealer d
where
k.id =d.id
and this will result in rows with three columns , there is no way you cannot have the unwanted compared column of dealer here(even if you don't want it) , the rows will look like
id(from customer) name(from Customer) id(from dealer)
May be this is not true for your question.But it might be one of the major difference.
The answer is YES, But as a resultset. So here is an example.
Consider three tables:
orders(ord_no, purch_amt, ord_date, customer_id, salesman_id)
customer(customer_id,cust_name, city, grade, salesman_id)
salesman(salesman_id, name, city, commission)
Now if I have a query like this:
Find the details of an order.
Using INNER JOIN:
SELECT * FROM orders a INNER JOIN customer b ON a.customer_id=b.customer_id
INNER JOIN salesman c ON a.salesman_id=c.salesman_id;
Using EQUI JOIN:
SELECT * FROM orders a, customer b,salesman c where
a.customer_id=b.customer_id and a.salesman_id=c.salesman_id;
Execute both queries. You will get the same output.
Coming to your question There is no difference in output of equijoin and inner join. But there might be a difference in inner executions of both the types.
I have a very basic LEFT OUTER JOIN to return all results from the left table and some additional information from a much bigger table. The left table contains 4935 records yet when I LEFT OUTER JOIN it to an additional table the record count is significantly larger.
As far as I'm aware it is absolute gospel that a LEFT OUTER JOIN will return all records from the left table with matched records from the right table and null values for any rows which cannot be matched, as such it's my understanding that it should be impossible to return more rows than exist in the left table, but it's happening all the same!
SQL Query follows:
SELECT SUSP.Susp_Visits.SuspReason, SUSP.Susp_Visits.SiteID
FROM SUSP.Susp_Visits LEFT OUTER JOIN
DATA.Dim_Member ON SUSP.Susp_Visits.MemID = DATA.Dim_Member.MembershipNum
Perhaps I have made a mistake in the syntax or my understanding of LEFT OUTER JOIN is incomplete, hopefully someone can explain how this could be occurring?
The LEFT OUTER JOIN will return all records from the LEFT table joined with the RIGHT table where possible.
If there are matches though, it will still return all rows that match, therefore, one row in LEFT that matches two rows in RIGHT will return as two ROWS, just like an INNER JOIN.
EDIT:
In response to your edit, I've just had a further look at your query and it looks like you are only returning data from the LEFT table. Therefore, if you only want data from the LEFT table, and you only want one row returned for each row in the LEFT table, then you have no need to perform a JOIN at all and can just do a SELECT directly from the LEFT table.
Table1 Table2
_______ _________
1 2
2 2
3 5
4 6
SELECT Table1.Id,
Table2.Id
FROM Table1
LEFT OUTER JOIN Table2 ON Table1.Id=Table2.Id
Results:
1,null
2,2
2,2
3,null
4,null
It isn't impossible. The number of records in the left table is the minimum number of records it will return. If the right table has two records that match to one record in the left table, it will return two records.
In response to your postscript, that depends on what you would like.
You are getting (possible) multiple rows for each row in your left table because there are multiple matches for the join condition. If you want your total results to have the same number of rows as there is in the left part of the query you need to make sure your join conditions cause a 1-to-1 match.
Alternatively, depending on what you actually want you can use aggregate functions (if for example you just want a string from the right part you could generate a column that is a comma delimited string of the right side results for that left row.
If you are only looking at 1 or 2 columns from the outer join you might consider using a scalar subquery since you will be guaranteed 1 result.
Each record from the left table will be returned as many times as there are matching records on the right table -- at least 1, but could easily be more than 1.
Could it be a one to many relationship between the left and right tables?
LEFT OUTER JOIN just like INNER JOIN (normal join) will return as many results for each row in left table as many matches it finds in the right table. Hence you can have a lot of results - up to N x M, where N is number of rows in left table and M is number of rows in right table.
It's the minimum number of results is always guaranteed in LEFT OUTER JOIN to be at least N.
If you need just any one row from the right side
SELECT SuspReason, SiteID FROM(
SELECT SUSP.Susp_Visits.SuspReason, SUSP.Susp_Visits.SiteID, ROW_NUMBER()
OVER(PARTITION BY SUSP.Susp_Visits.SiteID) AS rn
FROM SUSP.Susp_Visits
LEFT OUTER JOIN DATA.Dim_Member ON SUSP.Susp_Visits.MemID = DATA.Dim_Member.MembershipNum
) AS t
WHERE rn=1
or just
SELECT SUSP.Susp_Visits.SuspReason, SUSP.Susp_Visits.SiteID
FROM SUSP.Susp_Visits WHERE EXISTS(
SELECT DATA.Dim_Member WHERE SUSP.Susp_Visits.MemID = DATA.Dim_Member.MembershipNum
)
Pay attention if you have a where clause on the "right side' table of a query containing a left outer join...
In case you have no record on the right side satisfying the where clause, then the corresponding record of the 'left side' table will not appear in the result of your query....
It seems as though there are multiple rows in the DATA.Dim_Member table per SUSP.Susp_Visits row.
if multiple (x) rows in Dim_Member are associated with a single row in Susp_Visits, there will be x rows in the resul set.
Since the left table contains 4935 records, I suspect you want your results to return 4935 records. Try this:
create table table1
(siteID int,
SuspReason int)
create table table2
(siteID int,
SuspReason int)
insert into table1(siteID, SuspReason) values
(1, 678),
(1, 186),
(1, 723)
insert into table2(siteID, SuspReason) values
(1, 678),
(1, 965)
select distinct t1.siteID, t1.SuspReason
from table1 t1 left join table2 t2 on t1.siteID = t2.siteID and t1.SuspReason = t2.SuspReason
union
select distinct t2.siteID, t2.SuspReason
from table1 t1 right join table2 t2 on t1.siteID = t2.siteID and t1.SuspReason = t2.SuspReason
The only way your query would return more number of rows than the left table ( which is SUSP.Susp_Visits in your case), is that the condition (SUSP.Susp_Visits.MemID = DATA.Dim_Member.MembershipNum) is matching multiple rows in the right table, which is DATA.Dim_Member. So, there are multiple rows in the DATA.Dim_Member where identical values are present for DATA.Dim_Member.MembershipNum. You can verify this by executing the below query:
select DATA.Dim_Member.MembershipNum, count(DATA.Dim_Member.MembershipNum) from DATA.Dim_Member group by DATA.Dim_Member.MembershipNum
Simply, LEFT OUTER JOIN is the Cartesian product within each join key, along with the unmatched rows of the left table
(i.e. for each key_x that has N records in table_L and M records in table_R the result will have N*M records if M>0, or N records if M=0)