I have a question that I hope can be answered and I don't know of any other place to do it so I hope you guys can help.
I have a account that I want to move from my one dedicated server to a new dedicated server. Now I have done this using WHM account transfer, and the domain is showing on the new server. But when I do a ping to the domain, the IP address is still the same as the old server. But after the transfer was complete, it said in WHM that the IP address was updated to the new servers address. Is there something I'm missing or I did wrong?
Please help. I'm a virgin with this (My first time hahaha)
See how your domain mytracer.mobi is resolving right now.
mytracer.mobi. 86400 IN NS ns.dns2.co.za.
mytracer.mobi. 86400 IN NS ns.dns1.co.za.
mytracer.mobi. 86400 IN NS ns.otherdns.com.
mytracer.mobi. 86400 IN NS ns.otherdns.net.
;; Received 138 bytes from 199.249.126.1#53(b2.mobi.afilias-nst.org) in 18 ms
mytracer.mobi. 7260 IN A 196.38.40.144
;; Received 47 bytes from 197.242.144.5#53(ns.dns2.co.za) in 272 ms
It is using the name servers as shown with NS records and still pointing to your old server IP 196.38.40.144.
So you will have to change/edit the A record with new server IP 154.0.160.35 from your name server end. Thant means A record should change where your name servers are pointing to.
I hope this will resolve your confusion.
Related
Under Route 53 I have registered a domain name domain.name and created a hosted zone which, by default, has the NS and SOA records.
In Certificates I have requested a public certificate for the domain name domain.name in the us-east-1 region (N. Virginia).
Under the new certificate, I see the notice Add the following CNAME record to your DNS configuration and it has name _1abc2cd5ac5ee12c1234f1234c123b1c.domain.name. and value _e8f2db123456789c2b1a1234ab123456.abcdefghij.acm-validations.aws.
When, under the new domain.name certificate, I click Request Record in Route 53 I see the Success message and this leads me to see the CNAME record under Route 53 with Record name _1abc2cd5ac5ee12c1234f1234c123b1c.domain.name and value _e8f2db123456789c2b1a1234ab123456.abcdefghij.acm-validations.aws.
From this point on the certificate status persistently shows Pending validation (for >3 hours now.)
While I notice that the name property appears to have a trailing period on the certificate page, but does not have the trailing period on the record name, I cannot see anything else which would cause this to fail validation.
As described on this SO post the problem was that when I deleted and created a new hosted zone the DNS names were incorrect.
To solve this I copied the Name servers from under my Registered domains entry and updated the name server addresses for the NS record of my hosted zone.
I am trying to create a SAP RFC connection to a new system.
AFAIK the firewall (in this case to port 3321) is open.
I get this message at the client:
RFC_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE (rc=1): key=RFC_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE, message=
LOCATION SAP-Gateway on host ax-swb-q06.prod.lokal / sapgw21
ERROR timeout during allocate
TIME Thu Jul 26 16:45:48 2018
RELEASE 753
COMPONENT SAP-Gateway
VERSION 2
RC 242
MODULE /bas/753_REL/src/krn/si/gw/gwr3cpic.c
LINE 2210
DETAIL no connect of TP sapdp21 from host 10.190.10.32 after 20 sec
COUNTER 3
[MSG: class=, type=, number=, v1-4:=;;;]
And this message on the SAP server
Any clue what needs to be done, to get RFC working?
With this little info no one can know what the issue is here.
But it is something related to your network and SAP system configuration.
I guess your firewall does some network address translation (NAT) and the new IP behind the firewall does not match anymore with the known one. SAP is doing some own IP / host name security checks.
If not already done, check with opening the ports 3221, 3321 and 4821 in the firewall. Also check the SAP gateway configuration which IP addresses and host names are configured to be valid ones for it (look at what is traced in the beginning of the gateway trace file dev_rd at ABAP side).
Also consider if maybe the usage of a SAProuter would be the better option for your needs.
it works in my case if ashost is the host name, and not an IP address!
Do not ask me why, but this fails:
Connection(user='x', passwd='...', ashost='10.190.10.32', sysnr='21', client='494')
But this works:
Connection(user='x', passwd='...', ashost='ax-swb-q06.prod.lokal', sysnr='21', client='494')
This is strange, since DNS resolution happens before TCP communication.
It seems that the ashost value gets used inside the connection. Strange. For most normal protocols (http, ftp, pop3, ...) this does not matter. Or you get at least a better error message.
I have 2 routers in my network.
A) The one issued by my ISP (limited settings, had even to ask to get portforwarding settings), which is alo my modem.
B) My own router (wher i set my DHCP etc)
Now the generated resolve.txt on raspberrian and archlinux list:
domain local
nameserver <IP of A>
nameserver <IP of B>
As in understand it this is the order it will try to use when resolving names, but her it schould try my internal B before trying to resolve using A.
PS: Both subnetmasks are 255.255.255.0
Router A has 192.168.0.1
Router B has 192.168.1.1
All devices are in the 192.168.1.### range.
PPS: Archlinux is setup to use networkmanager, not a manual configured dhcpcd
NetworkManager may use dnsmasq for dhcp and to handle dns lookups.
I noticed that dnsmasq reverses the order of nameservers. Look at your logs. That would show up better in log if we also set dnsmasq to call dns servers in parallel:
#/etc/dnsmasq.conf
#all-servers
#/etc/dnsmasq.d/laptop.conf
all-servers
log-queries=extra
log-async=100
log-dhcp
#/etc/dnsmasq.d/servers.conf
server=66.187.76.168
server=162.248.241.94
server=165.227.22.116
/var/log/dnsmasq.log--
Mar 14 02:14:20 dnsmasq[3216]: 71700 127.0.0.1/38951 cached firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com is <CNAME>
Mar 14 02:14:20 dnsmasq[3216]: 71700 127.0.0.1/38951 forwarded firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com to 165.227.22.116
Mar 14 02:14:20 dnsmasq[3216]: 71700 127.0.0.1/38951 forwarded firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com to 162.248.241.94
Mar 14 02:14:20 dnsmasq[3216]: 71700 127.0.0.1/38951 forwarded firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com to 66.187.76.168
...order of calls is reversed in log lines!
I got rid of systemd-resolved to rely on dnsmasq.
I'm trying to setup my own DNS server to be able to customize it. Now, I have it working (for the most part) by having a record of
*.technolobuzz.tk. IN A 184.153.205.110
That works when I do "www." or even a random "no.", but if I try to do "blog." in my web browser, I get server not found. So, I don't know what I'm doing wrong to have only certain domains work. (I'm doing this so I can use Wordpress multisite, and .TK doesn't offer wildcards.)
The format you are using is correct, however have you upated the serial number of the record you have set?
example.com. 86400 IN SOA example.com. hostmaster.example.com. (
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2005100804 ; Serial YYYYMMDDXX
10800 ; Refresh
3600 ; Retry
3600000 ; Expire
86400 ) ; minimum
IN NS ns1.example.com.
IN NS ns2.example.com.
IN MX 10 mail.example.com.
IN A 192.168.1.1
mail IN A 192.168.1.1
ns1 IN A 192.168.1.1
ns2 IN A 10.0.0.2
*.example.com. IN A 192.168.1.1
Every time you update your record you need to also update the serial number so tha the changes are propogated out (ie after the TTL expires it knows the record has changed).
I have exim mailserver on my dedication server.
I'm trying to send about 800 mails at once with zend_mail
But only about 200 of them sending
I have no php errors in error_log
I tried to log if it too slow and exceed max time execution
2010-10-12 15:16:32 - Going to send 795 letters
2010-10-12 15:16:37 - 100 letters done
2010-10-12 15:16:41 - 200 letters done
And then nothing. I can't find how to catch the error throwed by Zend_Mail. So i looked in exim_mainlog and found there some errors near this time
1P5cDN-0000fo-27 no immediate delivery: more than 10 messages received in one connection
H=localhost [127.0.0.1] Warning: Sender rate 479.5 / 1h
Does it mean i should interrupt connection every 10 letters or I have to change some cofig for exim?
The main problem is - i can't test a lot, because my subscriber got tests mails and if i test with a few mails it works fine
This is not an issue with Zend_Mail, but with the Exim configuration. The default number of delivery processes that Exim starts when receiving messages via SMTP is 10. This is controlled by the configuration option smtp_accept_queue_per_connection
http://wiki.exim.org/FAQ/General_Debugging/Q0049
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch14.html