Basically I have some attachments listed in the Generic Object Services (GOS) and I need to download all of them to my computer.
I need to know how do download these attachments programatically from my program/report.
I've never actually had to do this myself, but I think this is how it's done:
Get the list of attachments by calling cl_binary_relation=>read_links passing in the ID of the object that the attachments are attached to. The it_relation_options table should be filled with a relation like so:
la_relat-sign = 'I'.
la_relat-option = 'EQ'.
la_relat-low = 'ATTA'. "Attachements
APPEND la_relat TO lt_relat.
This tells read_links to get the related objects classed as attachments.
Once you've successfully got the attachment details, you should be able to loop over the results table and pass each to the SO_OBJECT_READ function module (if that doesn't work try SO_DOCUMENT_READ_API1). This expects a folder id and a document id; in the results of read_links these may be concatenated together into one string (with the object type, e.g. SOFM at the front).
SO_OBJECT_READ will give you the binary content. You can then call SO_OBJECT_DOWNLOAD with (I think) filetype = 'BIN'.
Hope that helps!
Related
I am creating a print out for BOM using advanced pdf. I am trying to get get the value of the Start Date from the work order but in the print out, it is empty. I set this using ${record.startdate}. Is this correct? Is there another internal id for start date and end date in the work order?
Thanks!
If the object passed to the pdf generator name is "record" offcourse you can reference is as it is. It depends on the passed parameter name. If you are modifying existing html check the rest of the script and you will see if its 'record' or not.
You can reference with ${record.startDate} and ${record.endDate}
All the available fields for the object can be found here.
I am trying to create a Lua program using Sublime and Corona. I want to fetch a webpage, use a pattern to extract certain text from the page, and then save the extracted text into a table. I am using the network.request method provided by Corona
The problem: The extracted text is not saving into the global variable I created. Whenever I try to reference it or print it outside of the function it returns nil. Any ideas why this is happening?
I have attached a screen shot of my event.response output. This is what I want to be saved into my Lua table
Event.response Output
Here is my code:
local restaurants = {}
yelpString = ""
--this method tells the program what to do once the website is retrieved
local function networkListener( event )
if ( event.isError ) then
print( "Network error: ", event.response )
else
yelpString = event.response
--loops through the website to find the pattern that extracts
restaurant names and prints it out
for i in string.gmatch(yelpString, "<span >(.-)<") do
table.insert(restaurants, i)
print(i)
end
end
end
-- retrieves the website
network.request( "https://www.yelp.com/search?
cflt=restaurants&find_loc=Cleveland%2C+OH%2C+US", "GET", networkListener )
This sounds like a scoping problem. From the output you give, it looks like networkListener is being called, and you are successfully adding the text into the restaurants table. Moreover, since you define restaurants as a table, it should be a table when you reference it, not nil. So by deduction, the issue must be that you are trying to access the restaurants table from somewhere where it is not in scope.
If you declare restaurants as "local" in the top level of a file (i.e. not within a function or a block), it will be accessible to the whole file, but it won't be accessible to anything outside the file. So the table.insert(restaurants, i) in your code will work, but if you try to reference restaurants from somewhere outside the file, it will be nil. I'm guessing this is the cause of the problems that you are running into.
For more details on scope, have a look at the Programming in Lua book. The book is for Lua 5.0, but the scoping rules for local variables have not changed in later versions of Lua (as of this writing, the latest is Lua 5.3).
I would like to let the user choose a save option while selecting a file type. The selection works fine as in the below example. However after the user has selected a file type to be saved, I have not found a possibility to check which type he has selected.
Please note: Both file type choices have the same extension. The difference between the two is the display name.
var fsp = new FileSavePicker();
fsp.FileTypeChoices.Add("my file type", new List<string> {".extension"});
fsp.FileTypeChoices.Add("my file type (special)",new List<string>{".extension"});
StorageFile sf = await fsp.PickSaveFileAsync();
// How to know here which FileTypeChoice the user has selected
Has anyone an idea how I can get the selected FileTypeChoice?
I don't think you can. The problem here is that the only difference between the two is the display name. I'd highly recommend using similar but distinct file extensions. What you have here is a distinction without any evidence. This makes it impossible for either the system or the user to distinguish between Type A and Type B.
I have a custom content type with 3 FileFields (plone.app.blob.field.FileField) and I want to get their url's, so i can put them on my custom view and people will be able to download these files.
However, when using Clouseau to test and debug, I call :
context.getFirst_file().absolute_url()
Where getFirst_file() is the accessor to the first file (field called 'first_file').
The url returned is 'http://foo/.../eat.00001', where 'eat.00001' is the object of my custom type that contains the file fields...
The interesting thing is, if I call:
context.getFirst_file().getContentType()
It returns 'application/pdf', which is correct since it's a pdf file.
I'm pretty lost here, any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance!
File fields do not support a absolute_url method; instead, through acquisition you inherit the method from the object itself, hence the results you see. Moreover, calling getFirst_field() will return the actual downloadable contents of the field, not the field itself which could provide such information.
Instead, you should use the at_download script appended to the object URL, followed by the field id:
First File
You can also re-use the Archetypes widget for the field, by passing the field name to the widget method:
<metal:field use-macro="python:context.widget('first_field', mode='view')">
First File
</metal:field>
This will display the file size, icon (if available), the filename and the file mime type.
In both these examples, I assumed the name of the field is 'first_field'.
I've tried many variations.
Send To Library - That creates a Zipped file in the Drop Off Library, then it doesn't route via the rules in Content Organizer
API - I've tried to do an Export, Import, but always receive the same error. This is per this MSDN documentation: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.office.documentmanagement.documentsets.documentset.create.aspx
Sample snippet:
byte[] exportedFile = set.Export();
DocumentSet.Import(exportedFile, DocSetNameToCreate, targetFolder, dsCt.Id, properties, web.CurrentUser);
Error Received:
DocID: Site prefix not set.
Finally got it to run. This is related to the Document ID Feature. Make sure it is activated in each site. Let is run over night (timer jobs need to run). Then the content organizer will successfully move and unpackage your document sets.
You don't have to activate the document id feature, just ensure that in the property bag of the root web of the destination site collection (where the document set will be imported again) exists a property named "docid_msft_hier_siteprefix" with an value of "" (empty string).
Use this powershell-script:
$site = Get-SPSite http://host/sites/yoursite
$properties = $site.RootWeb.Properties
if ($properties["docid_msft_hier_siteprefix"] -eq $null)
{
$properties["docid_msft_hier_siteprefix"] = ""
$properties.Update()
}
Note that i use the old property bag RootWeb.Properties instead of the new hashtable RootWeb.AllProperties, thats because the class Microsoft.Office.DocumentManagement.Internal.OobProvider still uses that.
So why is it failing when a document set is imported? The function DocumentSet.ImportProperties() catches an ArgumentException while trying to set the document id of the document set list item (so there's no problem if the document id column doesn't exist yet).
But they missed that the function OobProvider.GetSitePrefix() which is called through the function OobProvider.GenerateDocumentId() throws an InvalidOperationException if the property bag doesn't contain the prefix property.