I want to get first value in a field in Oracle when another corresponding field has max value.
Normally, we would do this using a query and a subquery. The subquery ordering by a field and the outer query with where rownum<=1.
But, I cannot do this because the table aliases persist only one level deep and this query is a part of another big query and I need to use some aliases from the outermost query.
Here's the query structure
select
(
select a --This should get first value of a after b's are sorted desc
from
(
select a,b from table1 where table1.ID=t2.ID order by b desc
)
where rownum<=1
)
) as "A",
ID
from
table2 t2
Now this is not gonna work because alias t2 wont be available at innermost query.
Real world analogy that comes to my mind is I have a table containing records for all employees of a company, their salaries(including past salaries) and the date from which the salary was effective. So, for each employee, there will multiple records. Now, I want to get latest salaries for all the employees.
With SQL server, I could have used SELECT TOP. But that's not available with Oracle and since where clauses execute before order by, I cannot use where rownum<=1 and order by in same query and expect correct results.
How do I do this?
Using your analogy of employees and their salaries, if I understand what you are trying to do, you could do something like this (haven't tested):
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT employee_id,
salary,
effective_date,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY employee_id ORDER BY effective_date DESC) rowno
FROM employees
)
WHERE rowno=1
I would much rather see you connect the subquery up with a JOIN instead of embedding it in the SELECT. Cleaner SQL. Then you can use the windowing function that roartechs suggests.
Select t2.whatever, t1.a
From table2 t2
Inner Join (
Select tfirst.ID, tfirst.a
From (
Select ID, a,
ROW_NUMBER() Over (Partition BY ID ORDER BY b DESC) rownumber
FROM table1
) tfirst
WHERE tfirst.rownumber=1
) t1 on t2.ID=t1.ID
Related
I have a table like as shown below
What I would like to do is get the minimum of each subject. Though I am able to do this with row_number function, I would like to do this with groupby and min() approach. But it doesn't work.
row_number approach - works fine
SELECT * FROM (select subject_id,value,id,min_time,max_time,time_1,
row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY subject_id ORDER BY value) AS rank
from table A) WHERE RANK = 1
min() approach - doesn't work
select subject_id,id,min_time,max_time,time_1,min(value) from table A
GROUP BY SUBJECT_ID,id
As you can see just the two columns (subject_id and id) is enough to group the items together. They will help differentiate the group. But why am I not able to use the other columns in select clause. If I use the other columns, I may not get the expected output because time_1 has different values.
I expect my output to be like as shown below
In BigQuery you can use aggregation for this:
SELECT ARRAY_AGG(a ORDER BY value LIMIT 1)[SAFE_OFFSET(1)].*
FROM table A
GROUP BY SUBJECT_ID;
This uses ARRAY_AGG() to aggregate each record (the a in the argument list). ARRAY_AGG() allows you to order the result (by value) and to limit the size of the array. The latter is important for performance.
After you concatenate the arrays, you want the first element. The .* transforms the record referred to by a to the component columns.
I'm not sure why you don't want to use ROW_NUMBER(). If the problem is the lingering rank column, you an easily remove it:
SELECT a.* EXCEPT (rank)
FROM (SELECT a.*,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY subject_id ORDER BY value) AS rank
FROM A
) a
WHERE RANK = 1;
Are you looking for something like below-
SELECT
A.subject_id,
A.id,
A.min_time,
A.max_time,
A.time_1,
A.value
FROM table A
INNER JOIN(
SELECT subject_id, MIN(value) Value
FROM table
GROUP BY subject_id
) B ON A.subject_id = B.subject_id
AND A.Value = B.Value
If you do not required to select Time_1 column's value, this following query will work (As I can see values in column min_time and max_time is same for the same group)-
SELECT
A.subject_id,A.id,A.min_time,A.max_time,
--A.time_1,
MIN(A.value)
FROM table A
GROUP BY
A.subject_id,A.id,A.min_time,A.max_time
Finally, the best approach is if you can apply something like CAST(Time_1 AS DATE) on your time column. This will consider only the date part regardless of the time part. The query will be
SELECT
A.subject_id,A.id,A.min_time,A.max_time,
CAST(A.time_1 AS DATE) Time_1,
MIN(A.value)
FROM table A
GROUP BY
A.subject_id,A.id,A.min_time,A.max_time,
CAST(A.time_1 AS DATE)
-- Make sure the syntax of CAST AS DATE
-- in BigQuery is as I written here or bit different.
Below is for BigQuery Standard SQL and is most efficient way for such cases like in your question
#standardSQL
SELECT AS VALUE ARRAY_AGG(t ORDER BY value LIMIT 1)[OFFSET(0)]
FROM `project.dataset.table` t
GROUP BY subject_id
Using ROW_NUMBER is not efficient and in many cases lead to Resources exceeded error.
Note: self join is also very ineffective way of achieving your objective
A bit late to the party, but here is a cte-based approach which made sense to me:
with mins as (
select subject_id, id, min(value) as min_value
from table
group by subject_id, id
)
select distinct t.subject_id, t.id, t.time_1, t.min_time, t.max_time, m.min_value
from table t
join mins m on m.subject_id = t.subject_id and m.id = t.id
I have this table called item:
| PERSON_id | ITEM_id |
|------------------|----------------|
|------CP2---------|-----A03--------|
|------CP2---------|-----A02--------|
|------HB3---------|-----A02--------|
|------BW4---------|-----A01--------|
I need an SQL statement that would output the person with the most Items. Not really sure where to start either.
I advice you to use inner query for this purpose. the inner query is going to include group by and order by statement. and outer query will select the first statement which has the most items.
SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT PERSON_ID, COUNT(*) FROM TABLE1
GROUP BY PERSON_ID
ORDER BY 2 DESC
)
WHERE ROWNUM = 1
here is the fiddler link : http://sqlfiddle.com/#!4/4c4228/5
Locating the maximum of an aggregated column requires more than a single calculation, so here you can use a "common table expression" (cte) to hold the result and then re-use that result in a where clause:
with cte as (
select
person_id
, count(item_id) count_items
from mytable
group by
person_id
)
select
*
from cte
where count_items = (select max(count_items) from cte)
Note, if more than one person shares the same maximum count; more than one row will be returned bu this query.
I wrote SQL query in which I have one inner query and one outer query, My outer query produces the result on behalf of inner query, now I need to find the no of rows returning by my outer query, so what I did, I enclosed it inside another select statement and use count() function which produces the result, but i need to know more precise way to calculate the row count, please see my below query and suggest me the best way to do the same.
SELECT count(*) FROM (
SELECT
COUNT(*) NO_OF_EMP
,SUM(tbl.AMOUNT) TOTAL_AMOUNT
,tbl.YYYYMM
,tbl.DATA_PICKED_BY_NAME
,MIN(DATA_PICKED_DATE) DATA_PICKED_DATE
,ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY tbl.REFERENCE_ID) AS ROW_NUM
FROM (
SELECT
SALARY_REPORT_ID
,EMP_NAME
,EMP_CODE
,PAY_CODE
,PAY_CODE_NAME
,AMOUNT
,PAY_MODE
,PAY_CODE_DESC
,YYYYMM
,REMARK
,EMP_ID
,PRAN_NUMBER
,PF_NUMBER
,PRAN_NO
,ATTOFF_EMPCODE
,DATA_PICKED_DATE
,DATA_PICKED_BY
,DATA_PICKED_BY_NAME
,SUBSTR(REFERENCE_ID,0,3) REFERENCE_ID
FROM SALARY_DETAIL_REPORT_HISTORY
WHERE PAY_CODE=999
AND REFERENCE_ID LIKE '202%'
) tbl
GROUP BY tbl.REFERENCE_ID,tbl.YYYYMM,tbl.DATA_PICKED_BY_NAME
order by tbl.YYYYMM
)mytbl1
Select count distinct of the most abbreviated version of a single value of your group values from your original query:
SELECT count(distinct SUBSTR(REFERENCE_ID,0,3) || YYYYMM || DATA_PICKED_BY_NAME)
FROM SALARY_DETAIL_REPORT_HISTORY
WHERE PAY_CODE=999
AND REFERENCE_ID LIKE '202%'
Here's the query:
SELECT ID, Name, EventTime, State
FROM mytable as mm Where EventTime IN
(Select MAX(EventTime) from mytable mt where mt.id=mm.id)
Here is the fiddle:
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!3/9630c0/5
It comes from this S.O. question:
Select distinct rows whilst grouping by max value
I would like to hear in plain english how it works. I'm missing some fundamental understanding of part of it.
I don't really understand what the aliases are doing in the mt.id=mm.id part. It selects rows where the id is equal to the id?
The mt.id=mm.id part makes it a correlated subquery, hence the subquery is re-evaluated for each ID.
The query, then, selects the most recent event for each ID.
It is basically translated into "Get me the data for each id with maximum EventTime associated with."
You can also rewrite the code as
SELECT t1.ID, t1.Name, t1.EventTime, t1.State FROM mytable as t1
inner join
(
select id,max(EventTime) as EventTime from mytable group by id
) as t2 on t1.id=t2.id and t1.EventTime=t2.EventTime
I'm trying to implement pagination in a query that is built using information from a view, and I need to use the row_number() function over a column when I don't know which table it is from.
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT class.ID as ID, user.ID as USERID, row_number() over (ORDER BY
ID desc) as row_number FROM class, user
) out_q WHERE row_number > #startrow ORDER BY row_number
The problem is that I only have the result column name (ID or USERID) that came from a previous query. If I execute this query, it will raise the error 'Ambiguous column name "ID"'. Is there a way to specify that I'm referencing the column ID that is being selected and not from a different table?
Is it possible to specify an alias to the query result itself?
I have already tried the following,
SELECT TOP 30 * FROM (
SELECT *, row_number() over (ORDER BY ID desc) as row_number FROM(
SELECT class.ID as ID, user.ID as USERID FROM class, user
) in_q
) out_q WHERE row_number > #startrow ORDER BY row_number
It works, but the SGBD gets confused on which query plan it has to use, because of the small row goal present in the outer query and the big set of results returned by the inner query, when #startrow is a small number, the query executes in less than one second, when it is a big number the query takes minutes to execute.
Your problem is the id in the row_number itself. If you want a stable sort, then include both ids:
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT class.ID as ID, user.ID as USERID,
row_number() over (ORDER BY class.ID desc, user.id) as row_number
FROM class CROSS JOIN user
) out_q
WHERE row_number > #startrow
ORDER BY row_number;
I assume the cartesian product is intentional. Sometimes, this indicates an error in the query. In general, I would advise you to avoid using commas in the from clause. If you do want a cartesian product, then be explicit by using CROSS JOIN.
You could try using the option you already tried, then use the OPTIMIZE FOR hint.
OPTION ( OPTIMIZE FOR (#startrow = 100000) );
See a description of the hint in MSDN docs here: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms181714.aspx.