I am using a statistical facet (#see http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/search-facets-statistical-facet.html) to perform an aggregation on a few fields across the documents in my Elastic Search index.
I was wondering if anyone knew if the API provided a means to provide a default value if a particular field does not exist. For example, if a field does not exist use 0 (zero) as that fields value. By default it seems to give a null pointer exception when the aggregation is taking place.
My initial thoughts are to utilize a script field to test if the aggregation field is null and perform the default 0 logic there.
As you stated in your question, you could try a script field as defined here: http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/search-facets-statistical-facet.html#_script_field_2
For example: "script" : "_source.place == null ? null : 0"
I'll admit that I have not tried this on a statistical facet, but I have used a similar script on a terms stats facet and it worked fine.
Related
I have the following table schema:
+-----+---------+----------+
+ chn | INTEGER | NULLABLE |
+-----+---------+----------|
+ size| STRING | NULLABLE |
+-----+---------+----------|
+ char| REPEATED| NULLABLE |
+-----+---------+----------|
+ ped | INTEGER | NULLABLE |
+-----+---------+----------
When I click on 'preview' in the Google BigQuery Web UI, I get the following result:
But when I query my table, I get this result:
It seems like "preview" is interpreting my repeated field as an array, I would want to get the same result in a query to limit the number of rows.
I did try to uncheck "Use Legacy SQL" which gave me the same result but the problem is that with my table, a same query takes ~1.0 sec to execute with "Use Legacy SQL" checked and ~12 seconds when it's unchecked.
I am looking for speed here so unfortunately, not using Legacy SQL is not an option...
Is there another way to render my repeated field like it does in the "preview" ?
Thanks for the help :)
In legacy SQL, BigQuery flattens the result of queries by default. This means two things:
All child fields of RECORD fields are propagated to the top-level, with their names changed from record.subrecord.leaf to record_subrecord_leaf. Parent records are removed from the schema.
All repeated fields are converted to fields of optional mode, with each repeated value expanded into its own row. (As a side note, this step is very similar to the FLATTEN function exposed in legacy SQL.)
What you see here is a product of #2. Each repeated value is becoming its own row (as you can see by the row count on the left-hand side in your two images) and the values from the other columns are, well, repeated for each new row.
You can prevent this behavior and receive "unflattened results" in a couple ways.
Using standard SQL, as you note in your original question. All standard SQL queries return unflattened results.
While using legacy SQL, setting the flattenResults parameter to false. This requires also specifying a destination table and setting allowLargeResults to false. These can be found in the Show Options panel beneath the query editor if you want to set them within the UI. Mikhail has some good suggestions for managing the temporary-ness of destination tables if you aren't interested in keeping them around.
I should note that there are a number of corner cases with legacy SQL with flattenResults set to false which might trip you up if you start writing more complex queries. A prominent example is that you can't output more than one independently repeated field in query results using legacy SQL, but you can output multiple with standard SQL. These issues are unlikely to be resolved in legacy SQL, and going forward we're suggesting people use standard SQL when they run into them.
If you could provide more details about your much slower query using standard SQL (e.g. job ID in legacy SQL, job ID in standard SQL, for comparison), I, and the rest of the BigQuery team, would be very interested in investigating further.
Is there another way to render my repeated field like it does in the
"preview" ?
To see original not-flattened output in Web UI for Legacy SQL, i used to set respective options (click Show Options) to actually write output to table with checked Allow Large Results and unchecked Flatten Results.
This actually not only saves result into table but also shows result in the same way as preview does (because it is actually preview of that table). To make sure that table gets removed afterwards - i have "dedicated" dataset (temp) with default expiration set to 1 day (or hour - depends on how aggressive you want to be with your junk), so you don't need to worry of that table(s) - it will get deleted automatically for you. Wanted to note: this was quite a common pattern for us to deal with and having to do extra settings was boring, so we ended up with our own custom UI that does all this for user automatically
What you see is called Flatten.
By default the UI flattens the query output, there is currently no option to show query results like you want. In order to produce unflatten results you must write to a table, but that's different thing.
We have a scenario where we are trying to perform accurate name matching of Items using SOLR.
Query Parameter: Apple
SOLR Indexed Word: Apple-D
In our business case, "Apple" and "Apple-D" are totally different items and therefore SOLR shouldn't return the match.
Is there an option to achieve the same?
You need to change the fieldType used for the field. Use the String fieldType for the your field.
This String fieldType will make sure that the words will be stored as it is by solr.
It won't apply any analysis on the word. Or it won't create any tokes of it.
With the String type applied to it . The Apple and Apple-D are stored/indexed different token. As there won't be any tokenizing on the same. This will help you to achieve the exact match.
Once you change the fieldType. Re-index the same.
You can use the solr analysis tool to check how it is indexing and querying .
Note : Make sure whenever you ask question on it, Share your schema.xml
I am working on neo4j database version 2.0.I have following requirements :
Case 1. I want to fetch all records where name contains some string,for example if i am searching for Neo4j then all records having name Neo4j Data,Neo4j Database,Neo4jDatabase etc. should be returned.
Case 2. When i want to fire field less query,if a set of properties is having matching value then those records should be returned or it may also be global level instead of label level.
Case Sensitivity is also a point.
I have read multiple thing about like,index,full text search,legacy index etc.,so what will be the best fit for my case,or i have to use elastic search etc.
I am using spring-data-neo4j in my application,so provide some configuration for SDN
Annotate your name with #Indexed annotation:
#Indexed(indexName = "whateverIndexName", indexType = IndexType.FULLTEXT)
private String name;
Then query for it following way (example for method in SDN repository, you can use similar anywhere else you use cypher):
#Query("START n=node:whateverIndexName({query}) return n"
Set<Topic> findByName(#Param("query") String query);
Neo4j uses lucene as backend for indexing so the query value must be a valid lucene query, e.g. "name:neo4j" or "name:neo4j*".
There is an article that explains the confusion around various Neo4j indexes http://nigelsmall.com/neo4j/index-confusion.
I don't think you need to be using elastic search-- you can use the legacy indexes or the lucene indexes to do full text searches.
Check out Michael Hunger's blog: jexp.de/blog
thix post specifically: http://jexp.de/blog/2014/03/full-text-indexing-fts-in-neo4j-2-0/
I am using Solr 4.1.0 and I'm facing a strange issue. If I give a value to search for a field, even be it exact or involving a wildcard, it gives me 0 search results. On the other hand if I just give the field name and a * in place of value, I get all the results.
Also, if I search in the text field, i.e where I have copied values of all my fields, it gives me correct output. text is by default, my catch-all for all fields. feature is a field which has value Butter.
So now, what is happening here is that if I try to find in the actual field with the exact value or even with starting alphabet and a *, it doesn't give me a value while if I search in the text field, which is a catch-all field, I'm able to retrieve the value. Although if I try to find in the feature field using *, it gives me complete result list correctly.
You can view the logs for text:Butter here, logs for feature:Butter here, logs for feature:B* here and logs for feature:* here
I'm facing this issue with this particular field only. Any pointers to what could be the reason behind this strange problem?
If you search without the field name, Solr is going to search in the default search field.
So make sure you are marking the fields you want to search on as default.
If you are using dismax query handler, you can add them to the qf parameter.
Also, for Wildcard Queries check [Analyzers][1]
On wildcard and fuzzy searches, no text analysis is performed on the search word.
As no analysis is done at query time for wilcard searches and hence the lower casing, stemming would not be applied during query time but just the index time.
If I have a multiValued field type of text, and I put values [cat,dog,green,blue] in it. Is there a way to tell when I execute a query against that field for dog, that it was in the 1st element position for that multiValued field?
Assumption: client does not have any pre-knowledge of what the field type of the field being queried is. (i.e. Solr must provide the answer and the client can't post process the return doc to figure it out because it would not know how SOLR matched the query to the result).
Disclosure: I posted to solr-user list and am getting no traction so I post here now.
Currently, there's no out-of-the-box functionality provided in Solr which tells you the position of a value in a multiValue field.
Hopefully I understand your question correctly.
If you want to get field index or value there is an ugly workaround:
You could add the index directly in the value e.g. store "1; car", "2; test" and so on. Then use highlighting. When reading the returned fields simply skip the text before the semicolon.
But if you want to query only one type:
You can avoid the multivalue approach and simply store it as item_i and query via item_1. To query against all items regardless the type you need to use the copyField directive in the schema.xml
The Lucene API allows for this, but I'm not sure if Solr does out of the box. In Lucene you can use the IndexReader.termPositions(Term term) method.