Table 1:
TicketNumber | Rules
---------------------------
PR123 | rule_123
PR123 | rule_234
PR123 | rule_456
PR999 | rule_abc
PR999 | rule_xyz
Table2:
TicketNumber | Rules
---------------------------
PR123 | rule_123
PR123 | rule_234
PR999 | rule_abc
NOTE: Both tables have the same structure: same column names but different count.
NOTE: Both tables have same set of TicketNumber values
CASE 1:
If I need ticket and rules count of each ticket from table1, the query is:
Select [TicketNo], COUNT([TicketNo]) AS Rules_Count from [Table1] group by TicketNo
This will give me output in format :
ticketNumber | Rules_Count
---------------------------
PR123 | 3
PR999 | 9
CASE 2: (NEED HELP WITH THIS)
Now, the previous query gets the ticket and the count of the ticket of only 1 table. I need the count of the same ticket (since both have same set of tkt nos) in table2 also.
I need result in this way:
ticketNumber | Count(ticketNumber) of table1 | Count(ticketNumber) of table2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PR123 | 3 | 2
PR999 | 2 | 1
Both Table1 and table2 have the same set of ticket nos but different counts
How do i get the result as shown above?
A simpler solution from a "statement point of view" (without COALESCE that maybe it's not so easy to understand).
Pay attention to the performances:
Select T1.TicketNumber,T1.Rules_Count_1,T2.Rules_Count_2
FROM
(
Select [TicketNumber], COUNT([TicketNumber]) AS Rules_Count_1
from [Table1] T1
group by TicketNumber) T1
INNER JOIN
(
Select [TicketNumber], COUNT([TicketNumber]) AS Rules_Count_2
from [Table2] T2
group by TicketNumber
) T2
on T1.TicketNumber = T2.TicketNumber
SQL Fiddle Demo
You can do this with a full outer join after aggregation (or an inner join if you really know that both tables have the same tickets:
select coalesce(t1.TicketNo, t2.TicketNo) as TicketNo,
coalesce(t1.Rules_Count, 0) as t1_Rules_Count,
coalesce(t2.Rules_Count, 0) as t2_Rules_Count
from (Select [TicketNo], COUNT([TicketNo]) AS Rules_Count
from [Table1]
group by TicketNo
) t1 full outer join
(Select [TicketNo], COUNT([TicketNo]) AS Rules_Count
from [Table2]
group by TicketNo
) t2
on t1.TicketNo = t2.TicketNo;
SELECT A.center,
A.total_1st,
B.total_2nd
FROM (SELECT a.center,
Count (a.dose1) AS Total_1st
FROM table_1 a
GROUP BY a.center) A
INNER JOIN (SELECT b.center,
Count (b.dose2) AS Total_2nd
FROM table_2 b
GROUP BY b.center) B
ON a.center = b.center
ORDER BY A.center
Related
If I have two different tables in a SQL Server 2019 database as follows:
Table1
|id | name |
+-----+--------+
| 1 | rose |
| 2 | peter |
| 3 | ann |
| 4 | rose |
| 5 | ann |
Table2
| name2 |
+--------+
|rose |
|ann |
I would like to retrieve only the last tow ids from table1 (which in this case 4 and 5) that match name2 in table2. In other words, match happens only once on the last added names in table1, furthermore, the ids (4, 5) to be inserted in table2.
How to do that using SQL?
Thank you
You can use row_number()
select name,id from
(
select *, row_number() over(partition by t.name order by id desc) as rn
from table1 t join table2 t1 on t.name=t1.name2
)A where rn=1
Your question is vague, so there could be many answers here. My first thought is that you simply want an inner join. This will fetch ONLY the data that both tables share.
SELECT Table1.*
FROM Table1
INNER JOIN Table2 on Table1.name = Table2.name2
You seem to be describing:
select . . . -- whatever columns you want
from (select top (2) t1.*
from table1 t1
order by t1.id desc
) t1 join
table2 t2
on t2.name2 = t1.name;
This doesn't seem particularly useful for the data you have provided, but it does what you describe.
EDIT:
If you want only the most recent rows that match, use row_number():
select . . . -- whatever columns you want
from (select t1.*,
row_number() over (partition by name order by id desc) as seqnum
from table1 t1
) t1 join
table2 t2
on t2.name2 = t1.name and t1.seqnum = 1;
In my project I have a requirement where my select query return multiple column but for summation of the amount I have to group by a single column. Details is given below.
Example: This is just a example as my query is very big with multiple joins.
Table -tb1
---------------------------
CASE | Amount | Customer
---------------------------
CS001| 50 | 1
---------------------------
CS003| 100 | 2
---------------------------
CS001 | 2000 | 3
Table -tb2
---------------------------
Customer | Name| Age
---------------------------
1| John | 69
---------------------------
2| Robert| 23
---------------------------
3| Tammy| 23
---------------------------
Now I would like to fetch all the records by joining these 2 table but with a sum of the Amount. So, I would like to group by only though CASE
Thanks for the help in advance.
Is this what you want? I have used a join with group by. You can use a left or a right join to have more records if exists in either table1 or 2
Select
a.[case] -- CASE is a reservedkeyword
,a.customer,sum(amount),
b.name,b.age from table1 a
join -- or left join/right join
table2 b
on
a.customer=b.customer
group by a.case
Is this what you want?
select tb1.*, tb2.*, sum(amount) over (partition by case) as case_amount
from tb1 join
tb2
on tb1.customer = tb2.customer;
When grouping, every column appearing the the SELECT list must either be part of the GROUP BY list or must have an aggregate function applied to it (like COUNT, SUM, MAX etc.).
SELECT
t1."CASE", t2.Customer, t2.Name, t2.Age, SUM(t1.Amount) As TotalAmount
FROM
tbl1 t1
INNER JOIN tbl2 t2
ON t1.Customer = t2.Customer
GROUP BY
t1."CASE", t2.Customer, t2.Name, t2.Age
Since CASE is a reserved word in SQL, I escaped it the Oracle way by enclosing it in double quotes.
I am wondering what should I use in SQL Server 2016 or 2017 (CTE, LOOP, JOINS, CURSOR, REPLACE, etc) to match (replace) every value in every row in temp table? What is the best solution from performance perspective?
Source Table
|id |id2|
| 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 1 |
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 |
Mapping Table
|id |newid|
| 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 4 |
Expected result
|id |id2|
| 3 | 4 |
| 4 | 3 |
| 3 | 3 |
| 4 | 4 |
You may join the second table to the first table twice:
WITH cte AS (
SELECT
t1.id AS id_old,
t1.id2 AS id2_old,
t2a.newid AS id_new,
t2b.newid AS id2_new
FROM table1 t1
LEFT JOIN table2 t2a
ON t1.id = t2a.id
LEFT JOIN table2 t2b
ON t1.id2 = t2b.id
)
UPDATE cte
SET
id_old = id_new,
id2_old = id2_new;
Demo
Not sure if you want just a select here, or maybe an update, or an insert into another table. In any case, the core logic I gave above should work for all these cases.
You'd need to apply joins on update query. Something like this:
Update tblA set column1 = 'something', column2 = 'something'
from actualName tblA
inner join MappingTable tblB
on tblA.ID = tblB.ID
this query will compare eachrow with ids and if matched then it will update/replace the value of the column as you desire. :)
Do the self join only
SELECT t1.id2 as id, t2.id2
FROM table1 t
INNER JOIN table2 t1 on t1.id = t.id
INNER JOIN table2 t2 on t2.id = t.id2
This may have best performance from solutions posted here if you have indexes set appropriately:
select (select [newid] from MappingTable where id = [ST].[id]) [id],
(select [newid] from MappingTable where id = [ST].[id2]) [id2]
from SourecTable [ST]
Table 1:
| account_no | **other columns**...
+------------+-----------------------
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
Table 2:
| account_no | TX_No | Balance | History |
+------------+-------+---------+------------+
| 1 | 123 | 123 | 12.01.2011 |
| 1 | 234 | 2312 | 01.03.2011 |
| 3 | 232 | 212 | 19.02.2011 |
| 4 | 117 | 234 | 24.01.2011 |
I have multiple join query, one of the tables(Table 2) inside a query is problematic as it is a view which computes many other things, that is why each query to that table is costly. From Table 2, for each account_no in Table 1 I need the whole row with the greatest TX_NO, this is how I do it:
SELECT * FROM TABLE1 A LEFT JOIN
( SELECT
X.ACCOUNT_NO,
HISTORY,
X.BALANCE
FROM TABLE2 X INNER JOIN
(SELECT
ACCOUNT_NO,
MAX(TX_NO) AS TX_NO
FROM TABLE2
GROUP BY ACCOUNT_NO) Y ON X.ACCOUNT_NO = Y.ACCOUNT_NO) B
ON B.ACCOUNT_NO = A.ACCOUNT_NO
As I understand at first it will make the inner join for all the rows in Table2 and after that left join needed account_no's with Table1 which is what I would like to avoid.
My question: Is there a way to find the max(TX_NO) for only those accounts that are in Table1 instead of going through all? I think it will help to increase the speed of the query.
I think you are on the right track, but I don't think that you need to, and would not myself, nest the subqueries the way you have done. Instead, if you want to get each record from table 1 and the matching max record from table 2, you can try the following:
SELECT * FROM TABLE1 t1
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT t.*,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY account_no ORDER BY TX_No DESC) rn
FROM TABLE2 t
) t2
ON t1.account_no = t2.account_no AND
t2.rn = 1
If you want to continue with your original approach, this is how I would do it:
SELECT *
FROM TABLE1 t1
LEFT JOIN TABLE2 t2
ON t1.account_no = t2.account_no
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT account_no, MAX(TX_No) AS max_tx_no
FROM TABLE2
GROUP BY account_no
) t3
ON t2.account_no = t3.account_no AND
t2.TX_No = t3.max_tx_no
Instead of using a window function to find the greatest record per account in TABLE2, we use a second join to a subquery instead. I would expect the window function approach to perform better than this double join approach, and once you get used to it can even easier to read.
If table1 is comparatiely less expensive then you could think of doing a left outer join first which would considerable decrease the resultset and from that pick the latest transaction id records alone
select <required columns> from
(
select f.<required_columns),row_number() over (partition by account_no order by tx_id desc ) as rn
from
(
a.*,b.tx_id,b.balance,b.History
from table1 a left outer join table2 b
on a.account_no=b.account_no
)f
)g where g.rn=1
I am trying to join two tables one is a unique feature the seconds is readings taken on several dates that relate to the unique features. I want all of the records in the first table plus the most recent reading. I was able to get the results I was looking for before adding the shape field. By using the code
SELECT
Table1.Name, Table1.ID, Table1.Shape,
Max(Table2.DATE) as Date
FROM
Table1
LEFT OUTER JOIN
Table2 ON Table1.ID = table2.ID
GROUP BY
Table1.Name, Table1.ID, Table1.Shape
The shape field is a geometry type and I get the error
'The type "Geometry" is not comparable. It can not be use in the Group By Clause'
So I need to go about it a different way, but not sure how.
Below is a sample of the two tables and the desired results.
Table1
Name| ID |Shape
AA1 | 1 | X
BA2 | 2 | Y
CA1 | 3 | Z
CA2 | 4 | Q
Table2
ID | Date
1 | 5/27/2013
1 | 6/27/2014
2 | 5/27/2013
2 | 6/27/2014
3 | 5/27/2013
3 | 6/27/2014
My Desired Result is
Name| ID |Shape |Date
AA1 | 1 | X | 6/27/2014
BA2 | 2 | Y | 6/27/2014
CA1 | 3 | Z | 6/27/2014
CA2 | 4 | Q | Null
You can do the aggregation on Table2 in a CTE, finding the MAX(DATE) for each ID, and then join that result to Table1:
WITH AggregatedTable2(ID, MaxDate) AS
(
SELECT
ID, MAX(DATE)
FROM
Table2
GROUP BY
ID
)
SELECT
t1.ID, t1.Name, t1.Shape, t2.MaxDate
FROM
Table1 t1
LEFT JOIN
AggregatedTable2 t2 ON t1.ID = t2.ID
Try casting geometry as a varchar.
Select Table1.Name, Table1.ID, cast(Table1.Shape as varchar(1)) AS Shape, Max(Table2.DATE) as Date
FROM Table1 LEFT OUTER JOIN
Table2 ON Table1.ID = table2.ID
Group By Table1.Name, Table1.ID, cast(Table1.Shape as varchar(1))
Try this:
SELECT t1.Name
, t1.ID
, t1.Shape
, MAX(t2.Date) As Date
FROM Table1 AS t1
LEFT JOIN Table2 AS t2
ON t2.ID = t1.ID
GROUP
BY t1.Name
, t1.ID
, t1.Shape