On OS X there is a popular app called EasyFind that searches for strings inside of a files content or you can just do a name search. More importantly, it searches in hidden files and inside of package contents.
So my research with using the Spotlight API leads me to believe that it is not possible to do this. Should I assume EasyFind is doing this all manually without using any Cocoa search API?
If that is true, does anyone know of some code to get me started, even just pseudo?
Basically I want to build an app that will find every single image on the drive no matter where it is or what permissions it has. This also includes icon files.
One other thing I can't seem to find an answer to is whether or not you can do a search like this on the command line in OS X.
Thanks!
In the command line you can use the find command line tool. That gives you access to all the files in the filesystem if you run it with root permissions (sudo). You can pipe its results to grep to find for strings inside the files. You can also use the strings command line tool to look for strings inside binary files.
This is not very complicated to implement within a Cocoa App. Just Google for how to iterate through all the hard drive contents. NSFileManager could be a good place to start digging.
Also check out FindAnyFile. It is a nice app that does similar to EasyFind but just on file properties (name, dates, etc.). It doesn't read file contents.
Related
I have a text file. Now I have changed its file type from .txt to .abc. My VB.NET program loads the text into textboxes from that file. After changing the file type, however, other apps like NotePad and Word are able to open and read my .abc file.
Is there any way that only my application will be able to open/read from the file and no other app would be able to do so? What I mean is, suppose I have a PhotoShop document .psd file, no other app, rather that photoshop itself, can open it. How do I make my file unreadable by other apps?
There is no way to prevent an app that you don't develop from opening any file. The extensions are just there for helping us humans, and maybe a bit for the computer to know the default app you select for an extension.
Like you said, a .txt file can be opened by many many apps. You can open a .txt file with Notepad, Firefox, VSCode, and many others.
Same way, a .psd file can be opened by many many apps. You can open that .psd file with Photoshop, but also Notepad, Firefox, and VSCode, and probably the same apps as above.
The difference is which apps can read and understand the file.
In order to make a file not understandable by other apps, you need to make it into a format that cannot recognize, because you planned it "in secret".
Like Visual Vincent said above, you could encrypt the file in a way, or you can have a binary file, that basically only your app knows know to understand.
Since you dont own the app you want the file to be understood by, then you either have to accept that it can be opened by any app that can open files, or you can try to encrypt the file outside the app, or like zipping it with a password, and then decrypting or unzipping when you want to use it.
Firstly, any file can be read unless it is still open by a particular process or service. Even PhotoShop files can be 'read' by NotePad - try it!
So, an attempt at my first answer...
You can try a couple of methods to prevent opening the file, for instance, applying a file lock. As an example, SQL Server .mdf files are locked by the SQL Server service. This happens because the files are maintained in an open state, however; your application would have to remain running to keep these files open. Technically, though, the files can still be copied.
Another way is to set the hidden attribute for the file. This hides the file from the less savvy users, but it will be displayed if the user show's hidden files.
And my second answer: You refer to the format of files by saying only PhotoShop can read or write its own files (not true, but I know what you're saying).
The format of the file must be decided by yourself. You must determine how you are going to store the data that you output from your application. It looks like you have been attempting to write your application data into a text file. Perhaps you should try writing to binary files instead. Binary files, while not encrypted, as suggested by Visual Vincent in the comments to your question, still provide a more tailored approach to storing your data.
Binary files write raw binary data instead of humanised text. For instance, if you write an integer to the file it will appear as a string of four bytes, not your usual 123456789 textual format.
So, you really need to clarify what data you want to write to the file, decide on a set structure to your file (as you also have to be able to read it back in to your application) and then be able to write the information.
I want to do some bulk search/edit operation on the scripts embedded in our UrbanCode components and applications, and possibly on the flowcharts and blueprints. Unfortunately a lot of this is stored in UrbanCode's own repository, where it can only be access through the browser GUI and I can't do things like grep for common patterns across the whole set.
Is there any documented way to check out/check in, or at least download, a copy of an entire UCD environment as text files that I could analyze?
Thanks.
I think the closest documented way to get some of the things you are looking for is to export the application and to search through the json file. Component processes with all their steps are included in the application export.
I have a large batch of assorted files, all missing their file extension.
I'm currently using Windows 7 Pro. I am able to "open with" and experiment to determine what application opens these files, and rename manually to suit.
However I would like some method to identify the correct file type (typically PDF, others include JPG, HTML, DOC, XLS and PPT), and batch rename to add the appropriate file extension.
I am able to open some files with notepad and review the first four bytes, which in some cases shows "%PDF".
I figure a small script would be able to inspect these bytes, and rename as appropriate. However not all files give such an easy method. HTML, JPG, DOC etc do not appear to give such an easy identifier.
This Powershell method appears to be close: https://superuser.com/questions/186942/renaming-multiple-file-extensions-based-on-a-condition
Difficulty here is focusing the method to work on file types with no extension; and then what to do with the files that don't have the first four bytes identifier?
Appreciate any help!!
EDIT: Solution using TriD seen here: http://mark0.net/soft-trid-e.html
And recursive method using Powershell to execute TriD here: http://mark0.net/forum/index.php?topic=550.0
You could probably save some time by getting a file utility for Windows (see What is the equivalent to the Linux File command for windows?) and then writing a simple script that maps from file type to extension.
EDIT: Looks like the TriD utility that's mentioned on that page can do what you want out of the box; see the -ae and -ce options)
Use python3.
import os,re
fldrPth = "path/to/folder" # relative to My Documents
os.chdir(fldrPth)
for i in os.listdir():
with open(i,'r') as doc:
st = doc.read(4)
os.rename(i,i+'.'+re.search(r'\w+',st).group())
Hopefully this would work.
I don't have test files to check the code. Take a backup and then run it and let me know if it works.
It would be far to much for me to ask for a full solution. However, could you point me in the right direction in what I need to look up, learn etc as its the first time I am going to attempt something like this.
What I want to do, is in my Mac application, have a list of items which are files which I want to store online. Then from inside the application the user can download any of the items stored at that location online. If I add new items to download online I want the app to automatically add them to the list for download.
That make sense? Anyway, its the first time I have done anything like this using an online server and accessing it via an app, so any support would be hugely appreciated.
Sounds like you want an ftp type server, you can then get list of remote files, upload and download file, if you do search for Cocoa ftp I am sure you will find someone has written a nice wrapper class for ftp, there are even complete open source apps for ftp whose code you can examine, FileZilla, other you could just use NSTask, and call the ftp command line tool on all macs.
I'm building a Mac OS X application that can be used to create 'projects'. When a user saves a project, they will be saving many resources: image files, text files, sqlite files etc.
I can either create a folder in Documents for each project, and within that folder I can place all the project assets, and just include a single project file that is used to open the project.
I've read about NSBundle which I'd like to use. But I've only read about them in the context of application bundles. Is it possible to use NSBundle in this way? Where the user only sees a single file, and can move it wherever they like.
Does it make sense to do what I'm trying, using NSBundle? Or is there another way to do this?
(I'm fairly new to MacOS X programming)
UPDATE
I believe iPhoto uses this method to store the "iPhoto Library", this is what I'd like to do with my application, is NSBundle what I should be looking into?
Yes, it is possible and was used in quite a few apps in the past. The method is described in this document. Once it's clearly declared in your app's Info.plist, Finder will show the resulting bundle as one file.
However, I can't recommend you to do that. Apple's own Keynote was using the bundle approach in the past, but it no longer uses it any more. Similarly, OmniGraffle (which is a diagramming app on OS X with a long history) used bundles to save projects, but it stopped doing that, too.
The reason is that the bundle is still seen as a directory by the non-Apple email software, or any browser, etc, although the Finder shows it as a file. It would be a mess if a user wants to attach your document in the bundle format to an email s/he is composing in Gmail inside a browser, say. That confused a lot of people.
So, it's possible, but I don't recommend it. One way out is to use the zipped bundle as the user-visible file, and to unzip it when the user opens it into a temporary directory. Then you can use NSBundle and/or NSFileWrapper apis to access files inside it.
Apple's File Wrapper sample seems to be what you want:
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#samplecode/PersistentDocumentFileWrappers/Introduction/Intro.html
It also demonstrates how to save a Core Data persistent store in the bundle. You can leave that part out if you just want to store resources.
The NSBundle class represents the application bundle, and can be used to access resources within the applicationm but you would you it for application data, not user data.
For each of the resources you mention, there's a way of saving this type, for example, for image files, you could use NSData to save the image data to disk, and for text files you could use the method writeToFile:atomically:encoding:error:.
You may very well want to take a look at Core Data (http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/cocoa/conceptual/CoreData/cdProgrammingGuide.html), a very good framework for managing the user's data model, to see if this would fit your needs.