Today (10.00 AM GMT+2) the code deployed in a production environment, started throwing an increasing number of errors while requesting file lists from a Google Drive folder, the error was always 500 "No Individual Errors".
After 2 hours, all the request failed.
The code regarding the file list request is the following:
'Search for a specific file name
oListReq.Q = "mimeType = 'application/vnd.google-apps.folder' and title = '" + ParentFolder + "' and trashed=false"
oListReq.Fields = "items/id" 'MSO - 20130621 - only ID is needed
oListReq.MaxResults = 10 'Max 10 files (too many I Expect only 1)
'Get the results
oFileList = oListReq.Fetch()
Testing the same requests with the API Explorer there is no problem and only the ID is returned.
Going step by step trying to identify the problem, turns out that all the requests with the Fields field specified generated a 500 error (other requests in the code have "items(id,alternateLink)" but the result is the same as the code above).
Temporary fixed the code commenting those lines.
Could you please investigate why this filters are not working with the .Net Client Library anymore?
Sorry for that. This error has been reproduced and Google is investigating on this. For now, please turn off fields filter.
It seems the issue is now fixed. We had the same issue with one of our production application, we had to produce a hot fix, but I performed a test a few minutes ago and it looks like it works again.
Related
I was trying to change the use of "range.setvalues" on a google apps script, because it was slow and found the solution of using Google Sheets API V4 for this..
I could put it to good use on my simpler basic tests.. but when tried with a big data range (50k rows), I get a generic error "sheets.spreadsheets.values.batchUpdate failed with error: Empty response" .. I am thinking this has something to do with some timeout on the API Call, but can't know for sure.. can't find it documented nowhere..
Thanks in advance
Edit1:
I just made a few tests, and the issue is not the number of rows, rather the number of cells.. Also, I made a "hack" that if my list is really long, I just slice the array in half.. and do 2 distinct calls to "batchupdate" ..
Edit2:
Here is an example sheet
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nOkfvavBXovq4jezPpiEaWyr8hvDqCBx89nhUshlSLk/edit#gid=1762531043
On tab "1" you have data that I am copying to tab "2" just as an example..
The script is https://script.google.com/a/web-ideias.pt/d/M00DLl37KqCNrD96nt8GlLZJDjoEhHOGb/edit?mid=ACjPJvE45wbz2lcWpFBP6kGGBol53VgdXte-Y52ixCXY1NU29nPROED58L-wuBGtW27vYopq82wNZkwv3HNqxUxiR7vIOmvRKubzm0lDG9vXfbxnHzKuwI_nm2_m4IbGP0-TujMG8XV0ahJH&uiv=2 on the file "copy_1.gs"..
When trying to copy, there's the error:
enter image description here
I am trying to query and pull changelog details using python.
The below code returns the list of issues in the project.
issued = jira.search_issues('project= proj_a', maxResults=5)
for issue in issued:
print(issue)
I am trying to pass values obtained in the issue above
issues = jira.issue(issue,expand='changelog')
changelog = issues.changelog
projects = jira.project(project)
I get the below error on trying the above:
JIRAError: JiraError HTTP 404 url: https://abc.atlassian.net/rest/api/2/issue/issue?expand=changelog
text: Issue does not exist or you do not have permission to see it.
Could anyone advise as to where am I going wrong or what permissions do I need.
Please note, if I pass a specific issue_id in the above code it works just fine but I am trying to pass a list of issue_id
You can already receive all the changelog data in the search_issues() method so you don't have to get the changelog by iterating over each issue and making another API call for each issue. Check out the code below for examples on how to work with the changelog.
issues = jira.search_issues('project= proj_a', maxResults=5, expand='changelog')
for issue in issues:
print(f"Changes from issue: {issue.key} {issue.fields.summary}")
print(f"Number of Changelog entries found: {issue.changelog.total}") # number of changelog entries (careful, each entry can have multiple field changes)
for history in issue.changelog.histories:
print(f"Author: {history.author}") # person who did the change
print(f"Timestamp: {history.created}") # when did the change happen?
print("\nListing all items that changed:")
for item in history.items:
print(f"Field name: {item.field}") # field to which the change happened
print(f"Changed to: {item.toString}") # new value, item.to might be better in some cases depending on your needs.
print(f"Changed from: {item.fromString}") # old value, item.from might be better in some cases depending on your needs.
print()
print()
Just to explain what you did wrong before when iterating over each issue: you have to use the issue.key, not the issue-resource itself. When you simply pass the issue, it won't be handled correctly as a parameter in jira.issue(). Instead, pass issue.key:
for issue in issues:
print(issue.key)
myIssue = jira.issue(issue.key, expand='changelog')
I am new to S3 and need to use it for image storage. I found a half dozen versions of an s2wrapper for cf but it appears that the only one set of for v4 is one modified by Leigh
https://gist.github.com/Leigh-/26993ed79c956c9309a9dfe40f1fce29
Dropped in the com directory and created a "test" page that contains the following code:
s3 = createObject('component','com.S3Wrapper').init(application.s3.AccessKeyId,application.s3.SecretAccessKey);
but got the following error :
So I changed the line 37 from
variables.Sv4Util = createObject('component', 'Sv4').init(arguments.S3AccessKey, arguments.S3SecretAccessKey);
to
variables.Sv4Util = createObject('component', 'Sv4Util').init(arguments.S3AccessKey, arguments.S3SecretAccessKey);
Now I am getting:
I feel like going through Leigh code and start changing things is a bad idea since I have lurked here for year an know Leigh's code is solid.
Does any know if there are any examples on how to use this anywhere? If not what I am doing wrong. If it makes a difference I am using Lucee 5 and not Adobe's CF engine.
UPDATE :
I followed Leigh's directions and the error is now gone. I am addedsome more code to my test page which now looks like this :
<cfscript>
s3 = createObject('component','com.S3v4').init(application.s3.AccessKeyId,application.s3.SecretAccessKey);
bucket = "imgbkt.domain.com";
obj = "fake.ping";
region = "s3-us-west-1"
test = s3.getObject(bucket,obj,region);
writeDump(test);
test2 = s3.getObjectLink(bucket,obj,region);
writeDump(test2);
writeDump(s3);
</cfscript>
Regardless of what I put in for bucket, obj or region I get :
JIC I did go to AWS and get new keys:
Leigh if you are still around or anyone how has used one of the s3Wrappers any suggestions or guidance?
UPDATE #2:
Even after Alex's help I am not able to get this to work. The Link I receive from getObjectLink is not valid and getObject never does download an object. I thought I would try the putObject method
test3 = s3.putObject(bucketName=bucket,regionName=region,keyName="favicon.ico");
writeDump(test3);
to see if there is any additional information, I received this :
I did find this article https://shlomoswidler.com/2009/08/amazon-s3-gotcha-using-virtual-host.html but it is pretty old and since S3 specifically suggests using dots in bucketnames I don't that it is relevant any longer. There is obviously something I am doing wrong but I have spent hours trying to resolve this and I can't seem to figure out what it might be.
I will give you a rundown of what the code does:
getObjectLink returns a HTTP URL for the file fake.ping that is found looking in the bucket imgbkt.domain.com of region s3-us-west-1. This link is temporary and expires after 60 seconds by default.
getObject invokes getObjectLink and immediately requests the URL using HTTP GET. The response is then saved to the directory of the S3v4.cfc with the filename fake.ping by default. Finally the function returns the full path of the downloaded file: E:\wwwDevRoot\taa\fake.ping
To save the file in a different location, you would invoke:
downloadPath = 'E:\';
test = s3.getObject(bucket,obj,region,downloadPath);
writeDump(test);
The HTTP request is synchronous, meaning the file will be downloaded completely when the functions returns the filepath.
If you want to access the actual content of the file, you can do this:
test = s3.getObject(bucket,obj,region);
contentAsString = fileRead(test); // returns the file content as string
// or
contentAsBinary = fileReadBinary(test); // returns the content as binary (byte array)
writeDump(contentAsString);
writeDump(contentAsBinary);
(You might want to stream the content if the file is large since fileRead/fileReadBinary reads the whole file into buffer. Use fileOpen to stream the content.
Does that help you?
We have just changed our domain after protracted name change (the name actually happened two years ago!) and our DokuWiki installation has stopped being able to see any groups and memberships.
The config has been updated to reflect the new server and DCs and login is working correctly, it is only the groups that aren't working.
$conf['auth']['ldap']['server'] = 'ldap://MYDC.mydomain.co.uk:389';
$conf['auth']['ldap']['binddn'] = '%{user}#mydomain.co.uk';
$conf['auth']['ldap']['usertree'] = 'dc=mydomain,dc=co,dc=uk';
$conf['auth']['ldap']['userfilter'] = '(userPrincipalName=%{user}#mydomain.co.uk)';
$conf['auth']['ldap']['mapping']['name'] = 'displayname';
$conf['auth']['ldap']['mapping']['grps'] = 'array(\'memberof\' => \'/CN=(.+?),/i\')';
$conf['auth']['ldap']['grouptree'] = 'dc=mydomain,dc=co,dc=uk';
$conf['auth']['ldap']['groupfilter'] = '(&(cn=*)(Member=%{dn})(objectClass=group))';
$conf['auth']['ldap']['referrals'] = '0';
$conf['auth']['ldap']['version'] = '3';
$conf['auth']['ldap']['debug'] = 1;
Obviously I have edited the doain name there, but for the life of me I can't see what's wrong here, It all worked fine yesterday on the old domain.
I should also state that this is an old version of DokuWiki that for various reasons I can't actually update.
The debug line gives me a "ldap search: success" line, but if I add "?do=check" onto any url within the system I get "You are part of the groups"...... and nothing, it can't see any groups.
It's a massive pain as we have a pretty intricate ACL setup for the site, so it's not like I can just throw it open to all.
If anyone has any suggestions, no matter how obvious, please pass them on.
Solved it by changing the dokuwiki authentication plugin that was used, the 'authad' is more simple to use and just works with what I'm doing.
As a side bonus it also means that I have finally been able to get the install upgraded to the current version.
I am unable to write any records to my database using a web service. Service is set up OK and can access it via uri and also query my database via the service using a simple page i created.
When it comes to writing to the database, I am not getting any errors, and the instance of my WebClient which is populated with variables to write to the db is holding all the variables OK but when it comes to actually writing to the db (see below code) nothing seems to happen except that the Member ID of the last existing member added to the database is returned.
'assign all abMem fields to values within form to write to database
newMem.Title = ddTitle.SelectedValue
newMem.Initials = txtInitials.Text
newMem.Surname = txtSurname.Text
newMem.Address1 = txtAdd1.Text
newMem.Address2 = txtAdd2.Text
newMem.Address3 = txtAdd3.Text
'etc etc .... additional fields have been removed
Try
cc.Open()
cc.CreateMember(newMem)
returnMem = cc.GetMember(newMem)
MesgBox(returnMem.MemberID & " - Member Created")
cc.Close()
Catch cex As CommunicationException
MesgBox("CommEX - " & cex.Message)
cc.Abort()
Catch tex As TimeoutException
MesgBox("TimeEX - " & tex.Message)
cc.Abort()
Finally
MesgBox("Closed the Client")
End Try
When i run the above, I've noticed in the log file for the service (in the system32 folder on my server) that 2 requests are made each time - presumably one for where I am trying to add a record and the other I would think would be the request for the ID of this member (which isn't created, hence why I believe it it is simply returning the last successful entry in the table).
I know there isn't a problem with the actual web service as there is another user successfully able to add to the db via the service (unfortunately I am unable to simply copy their set-up as they are hitting it via a php page) so i know there is a problem somewhere in my code.
Is cc.CreateMember(newMem) the correct syntax for passing a member's details to the function in the webservice is what I am wondering?
I've re-wrote the code (seems identical to above) and republished the web service. Seems to be working OK now so I must have had some silly mistake somewhere!