I am building an app that accesses the QuickBooks API v2.
I am looking for a way to retrieve only data that has changed.
For example, from time to time want to be able to check to see if there have been any changes to the chart of accounts in the QB data. Is there a quick way to do this without parsing a large response body? Maybe something like requesting and comparing just a checksum, and then requesting the whole chart of accounts to compare and update if there is a change? Or even just requesting the changes that occurred after a certain date?
This need is not just limited to the chart of accounts. For example, I may want to update historic transaction data, but only with the changes (e.g., a change to an old transaction), not the entire db which can be quite large.
Answer
In further reading the API docs, I should be able to filter the response using the created_at and updated_at metadata.
The filter is called Change Data Capture (CDC)
https://developer.intuit.com/docs/0025_quickbooksapi/0050_data_services/v2/0500_quickbooks_windows/0100_calling_data_services/0015_retrieving_objects
<ItemReceiptQuery xmlns='http://www.intuit.com/sb/cdm/v2'>
<CDCAsOf>2010-12-04T09:30:47.0Z</CDCAsOf>
</ItemReceiptQuery>
thanks
Jarred
Related
I am developing an app with the Active Collab API using the What's New endpoint.
I am retrieving this regularly, so I have the latest information. I was wondering if there was a way to specify the activity by date to get the items since then?
For example, instead of getting 50 records and processing the 50 every time, if I could pass a from parameter (with a timestamp) to only collate activity since that time then that would help with both my processing and the size of the request (and knowing how many things have happened since)
Is this possible?
What's New API end point only has a daily filter:
/whats-new/daily/YYYY-MM-DD
Both global and daily What's new API end-points are paginated, so you can loop through responses by providing (and incrementing) page GET argument:
/whats-new?page=2
until you reach records that are older than the timestamp that you are looking for (or get an empty result). At that point, you just break and you have all the updates that were looking for.
I am trying to get the data to create the burned down chart from version one.
I came to know there is no standard api's for that.
Here i found that by making multiple call's to fetch todo value for a scope of timebox it is possible.
Is there any better way to do it?
and also let me know any good open source libraries(javascrpt/java) to plot such graph
i tried the way shown here but i am not able to make out what value i am getting.
i tried a get request like
"base URL"/rest-1.v1/Data/Timebox?where=State.Code='ACTV'&asof"11-25-2015"&sel=Name,EndDate,State,Workitems.ToDo.#Sum
but could only get present value but not the past ones.
Thanks in advance
You are using the rest-1.v1/Data endpoint. From this endpoint you will get the current state of assets in your VersionOne instance however, there is an attribute "Prior" which contains the previous state of a VersionOne asset (Timebox). The most robust way to access historical data is though the rest-1.v1/Hist endpoint. You can find details about Hist queries here.
Using your query
"base URL"/rest-1.v1/Hist/Timebox?where=State.Code='ACTV'&asof"2015-11-25T17:30:00.00"&sel=Name,EndDate,State,Workitems.ToDo.#Sum
The asof keyword will return the state of that Timebox at that instance in time. Observe the proper format of the date.
I've noticed when retrieving a story/defect after first updating it, sometimes the retrieve response returns the field values as if the update never happened. Retrying the retrieve after a short delay (~500ms) returns the updated field values as expected. Is this a known behaviour? Is there any way of avoiding this?
I'm using the Rally API 2.0 - https://rally1.rallydev.com/slm/webservice/v2.0/
The update is being performed using this URI:
POST /slm/webservice/v2.0/Defect/14173461229?key=<key> HTTP/1.1
I'm retrieving the story after update as follows:
GET /slm/webservice/v2.0/artifact?query=(ObjectId%20=%2014173461229)&start=1&pagesize=20&fetch=true HTTP/1.1
What is your integration doing that it needs to re-poll the artifact within < 1 second of POST'ing an update? Is there a second process that does polling that is revealing the latency for the updates? Does your integration run multiple threads? Does the response time vary at all depending on time of day, etc.? There are any number of factors that could be at play here, but 500 ms doesn't seem like an un-reasonable refresh rate given factors such as latency over HTTP/S as well as server-side database and cache updates. That said, for an in-depth look you may wish to inquire with Rally Support (rallysupport#rallydev.com) as they have tools that can help evaluate server-side response time corresponding to requests by specific UserID.
I'm trying to aggregate some information about the kanban states of my user stories. If query a PifTeam item, I get a summarized collection of UserStories associated with it.
Example query:
https://rally1.rallydev.com/slm/webservice/1.40/portfolioitem/pifteam/99999999999.js
However I then have to run a loop on the UserStories collection, individually querying each one to get at the information I need. This potentially results in a lot of web service calls.
Is there a way to return the full hierarchical requirement information in the original pifteam query so that there is only one webservice call which returns all sub-objects? I read the webservice api and was trying to play with the fetch parameter but had no success.
This functionality will be disabled in WSAPI 2.0 but will continue to be available in the 1.x versions. That said, you should be able to use a fetch the fields on story that you need like this:
/pifteam/9999.js?fetch=UserStories,FormattedID,Name,PlanEstimate,KanbanState
Fetch will hydrate the fields specified on sub objects even if the root object type doesn't have those fields. So by fetching UserStories the returned collection will populated with stories, each having the FormattedID, Name, PlanEstimate and KanbanState fields included.
There is no way to do it from Rally's standard Web Services API (WSAPI) but you can from the new Lookback API (LBAPI). The query would look something like this:
https://rally1.rallydev.com/analytics/v2.0/service/rally/workspace/<ObjectID_for_Workspace>/artifact/snapshot/query.js?find={__At:"current",_TypeHierarchy:"HierarchicalRequirement",Children:null,_ItemHierarchy:<ObjectID_for_PortfolioItem>}&fields=["Name"]
Fill in the ObjectIDs for your Workspace and PortfolioItem. The _ItemHierarchy field will cross work item type boundaries and goes all the way from PortfolioItems down through the Story hierarchy down to Defects and even Tasks, so I added _TypeHierarchy:"HierarchicalRequirement" to limit it to Stories. I have specified Children:null which means you'll only get back leaf Stories. The __At:"current" clause get's the current tree and values. Remember, it's the "Lookback" API, so you can retrieve the state of the object at any moment in history. __At:"current" says to get the current values and tree.
Note, the LBAPI is delayed from current values in the system by anywhere from seconds to minutes. Typically it's about 30 seconds behind. You can see how far behind it is by checking the ETLDate field in the response.
Details about the LBAPI can be found here. Note, that the LBAPI is available in preview now for almost all Rally customers. There are still a number of customers where it is not yet turned on. The best way to tell if it's working for your subscription is to try the query.
We're using the Shopify API to grab data from orders, but we're having some trouble with data validation on the fulfillment side. Is there any way we can add data validation to our checkout page? Even just Javascript validation would be a huge improvement. By the time we see an error, the customer is out of the loop, so we're having to make assumptions about our user's data which is potentially dangerous.
One example is that user typed in a phone number that began with a 1 e.g. (xxx)-1xx-xxxx, which is invalid. Another typed an address that was too long for the shipping API we send it to. We don't want to truncate arbitrary addresses so is there a way to present an error to the customer?
The checkout server is a black box as far as the API is concerned. This is mainly for security reasons.
Unfortunately, this prevents you from doing the kind of extra validation you're asking about during the checkout process.