Suddenly I've realized that while this works in groovy just like it is expeceted:
Sql.newInstance(connectionParams).rows("SELECT FROM ITEMS WHERE id = ?", [200])
this won't work
Sql.newInstance(connectionParams).rows("SELECT FROM ITEMS WHERE name LIKE '%?%'", ["some"])
All you can get is
Failed to execute: SELECT FROM ITEMS WHERE name LIKE '%?%' because:
The column index is out of range: 1, number of columns: 0.
My questions are:
Is it intentionally implemented this way? I've never needed to have a parametrized text search, so I'm not sure where this behaviour is typical or not.
How can I nevertheless safely parametrize statement with text search in it?
I believe you want to include the %'s in the parameter, like:
Sql.newInstance(connectionParams).rows("SELECT FROM ITEMS WHERE name LIKE ?", ["%some%"])
Related
I am building a report with Microsoft SSRS (2012) having a multi-value parameter #parCode for the user to filter for certain codes. This works perfectly fine. Generally, my query looks like this:
SELECT ...
FROM ...
WHERE
TblCode.Code IN (#Code)
ORDER BY...
The codes are of following type (just an excerpt):
C73.0
C73.1
...
C79.0
C79.1
C79.2
Now, in additon to filtering for multiple of these codes I would like to als be able to filter for sub-strings of the codes. Meaning, when the user enters (Example 1)
C79
for #parCodes The output should be
C79.0
C79.1
C79.2
So eventually the user should be able to enter (Example 2)
C73.0
C79
for #parCodes and the output would be
C73.0
C79.0
C79.1
C79.2
I managed to implement both functionalities seperately, so either filtering for multiple "complete" codes or filterting for sub-string of code, but not both simultaneously.
I tried to do something like
...
WHERE
TblCode.Code IN (#parCode +'%')
ORDER BY...
but this screws up the Example 2. On the other hand, if I try to work with LIKE or = instead of IN statement, then I won't be able to make the parameter multi-valued.
Does anyone have an idea how to realize such functionality or whether IN statement pared with multi-valued parameters simply doesn't allow for it?
Thank you very much!
Assuming you are using SQL server
WHERE (
TblCode.Code IN (#parCode)
OR
CASE
WHEN CHARINDEX('.', Code)>0 THEN LEFT(TblCode.Code, CHARINDEX('.', TblCode.Code)-1)
ELSE TblCode.Code
END IN (#parCode)
)
The first clause makes exact match so for your example matches C73.0
The second clause matches characters before the dot character so it would get values C79.0, C79.1, C79.2 etc
Warning: Filtering using expressions would invalidate the use of an index on TblCode.Code
I am attempting to write a query for an Altiris report. This query is looking for machine information. The query works fine, however the problem I am running into is with my parameters. I have set up multiple parameters within Altiris to allow me to filter and search through the report for multiple fields. Then, in my query, I add those parameters into the WHERE statements.
All of the parameters were working fine, until I added Make and Model parameters. We have quite a few machines that do not have information populated into these fields. So when I add in the WHERE xxxx LIKE N'%Make%', I lose about 500 machines based on it now only looking for machines with something in that field. I tried to fix this by adding lines like the following:
Where ((xxxx LIKE N'%Make%' OR xxxx is null))
This kind of worked, in that now the report shows all machines... But if I enter "HP" into the Make parameter field and then rerun the report... it shows all HP machines like I want, but also all of the null machines as well.
How can I rewrite my where statements so that they do not exclude machines in the report, and allow me to filter by all HP machines, without showing null values as well?
Hope this made sense, and thank you
In this snip of code, the last two lines make me lose about 500 machines in my total machine count of the report. It is omitting all machines that have null values.
WHERE
(dbo.OS_Version.[OS Name] LIKE N'%OSName%') AND
(dbo.OS_Version.[OS Version] LIKE N'%Build%') AND
(dbo.OS_Version.Name LIKE N'%Name%') AND
(dbo.Inv_AeX_AC_Identification.[Hardware Serial Number] LIKE N'%Serial%') AND
(dbo.vHWComputerSystem.Manufacturer LIKE N'%Make%') AND
(dbo.vHWComputerSystem.Model LIKE N'%Model%')
This is how I tried to fix it, and now I get all 20,000 machines. But my make/model fields report on null fields as well.
WHERE
(dbo.OS_Version.[OS Name] LIKE N'%OSName%') AND
(dbo.OS_Version.[OS Version] LIKE N'%Build%') AND
(dbo.OS_Version.Name LIKE N'%Name%') AND
(dbo.Inv_AeX_AC_Identification.[Hardware Serial Number] LIKE N'%Serial%') AND
((dbo.vHWComputerSystem.Manufacturer LIKE N'%Make%') OR (dbo.vHWComputerSystem.Manufacturer is null)) AND
((dbo.vHWComputerSystem.Model LIKE N'%Model%') OR (dbo.vHWComputerSystem.Model is null))
I'm guess that if you don't enter a value for a parameter, it's coming through as an empty string, and of course, every varchar is LIKE '%%'.
I'm not sure what RDBMS this is, but if the ISNULL function is available, try this:
where ((ISNULL(xxxx,'') LIKE N'%Make%')
This replaces nulls with the empty string before doing the LIKE comparison.
I think you want something like this:
(cs.Manufacturer LIKE N'%#Make%' OR #Make = '') AND
(cs.Model LIKE N'%#Model%' OR #Model = '')
I am using = '' rather than IS NULL because you are clearly not passing in the parameters as NULL values (the LIKE wouldn't work).
This does not provide a method for filtering to get only the NULL values, because you are using the "special value" for the parameter to mean "don't apply a filter here".
Note that cs is intended as a table alias. I also strongly recommend that you use table aliases so your queries are easier to write and to read.
I think you're looking for something like WHERE ISNULL(Model, '') LIKE '%Model%'. However, you should replace '%Model%' with a variable. The above example would literally match the word 'Model'
DECLARE #Model NVARCHAR(100) = 'T-800'
...
WHERE ISNULL(Model, '') LIKE '%' + #Model + '%'
^ This would not include rows with NULL Model values
Using Postman, I am forming a GET request query to my P21 database middleware to retrieve items with a specific value in a UserDefinedField.
I am able to query things on the top level of the item data, such as ItemID and ItemDesc like so:
http://[server]:[port]/api/inventory/parts?$query=ItemDesc eq 'CONTROL VALVE'
However, the values I would like to use in my query string are nested inside the UserDefinedFeilds element. I am specifically looking for items with:
http://[server]:[port]/api/inventory/parts?$query=UserDefinedFeilds/OnEbay eq 'Y'
But this is not the correct way to form this query string. Can anyone please explain how to specify a nested element inside a query string like this? Thanks.
In this situation, using P21 API, it is unnecessary to specify the parent field 'UserDefinedFields'. The actual ID of the column I was looking for was actually 'on_ebay', so I was able to query this user defined field simply:
http://[server]:[port]/api/inventory/parts?$query=on_ebay eq 'Y'
So I have a database with articles in them and the user should be able to search for a keyword they input and the search should find any articles with that word in it.
So for example if someone were to search for the word Alzheimer's I would want it to return articles with the word spell in any way regardless of the apostrophe so;
Alzheimer's
Alzheimers
results should all be returned. At the minute it is search for the exact way the word is spell and wont bring results back if it has punctuation.
So what I have at the minute for the query is:
private static final String QUERY_FIND_BY_SEARCH_TEXT = "SELECT o FROM EmailArticle o where UPPER(o.headline) LIKE :headline OR UPPER(o.implication) LIKE :implication OR UPPER(o.summary) LIKE :summary";
And the user's input is called 'searchText' which comes from the input box.
public static List<EmailArticle> findAllEmailArticlesByHeadlineOrSummaryOrImplication(String searchText) {
Query query = entityManager().createQuery(QUERY_FIND_BY_SEARCH_TEXT, EmailArticle.class);
String searchTextUpperCase = "%" + searchText.toUpperCase() + "%";
query.setParameter("headline", searchTextUpperCase);
query.setParameter("implication", searchTextUpperCase);
query.setParameter("summary", searchTextUpperCase);
List<EmailArticle> emailArticles = query.getResultList();
return emailArticles;
}
So I would like to bring back all results for alzheimer's regardless of weather their is an apostrophe or not. I think I have given enough information but if you need more just say. Not really sure where to go with it or how to do it, is it possible to just replace/remove all punctuation or just apostrophes from a user search?
In my point of view, you should change your query,
you should add alter your table and add a FULLTEXT index to your columns (headline, implication, summary).
You should also use MATCH-AGAINST rather than using LIKE query and most important, read about SOUNDEX() syntax, very beautiful syntax.
All I can give you is a native query example:
SELECT o.* FROM email_article o WHERE MATCH(o.headline, o.implication, o.summary) AGAINST('your-text') OR SOUNDEX(o.headline) LIKE SOUNDEX('your-text') OR SOUNDEX(o.implication) LIKE SOUNDEX('your-text') OR SOUNDEX(o.summary) LIKE SOUNDEX('your-text') ;
Though it won't give you results like Google search but it works to some extent. Let me know what you think.
I'm currently trying to create an Endeca query using the Java API for a URLENEQuery. The current query is:
collection()/record[CONTACT_ID = "xxxxx" and SALES_OFFICE = "yyyy"]
I need it to be:
collection()/record[(CONTACT_ID = "xxxxx" or CONTACT_ID = "zzzzz") and
SALES_OFFICE = "yyyy"]
Currently this is being done with an ERecSearchList with CONTACT_ID and the string I'm trying to match in an ERecSearch object, but I'm having difficulty figuring out how to get the UrlENEQuery to generate the or in the correct fashion as I have above. Does anyone know how I can do this?
One of us is confused on multiple levels:
Let me try to explain why I am confused:
If Contact_ID and Sales_Office are different dimensions, where Contact_ID is a multi-or dimension, then you don't need to use EQL (the xpath like language) to do anything. Just select the appropriate dimension values and your navigation state will reflect the query you are trying to build with XPATH. IE CONTACT_IDs "ORed together" with SALES_OFFICE "ANDed".
If you do have to use EQL, then the only way to modify it (provided that you have to modify it from the returned results) is via string manipulation.
ERecSearchList gives you ability to use "Search Within" functionality which functions completely different from the EQL filtering, though you can achieve similar results by using tricks like searching only specified field (which would be separate from the generic search interface") I am still not sure what's the connection between ERecSearchList and the EQL expression above?
Having expressed my confusion, I think what you need to do is to use String manipulation to dynamically build the EQL expression and add it to the Query.
A code example of what you are doing would be extremely helpful as well.