let's suppose we have shopify.com,a platform where everybody can create his e-shop and provide it under his domain,the user can add his domain in other words.
When somebody ads a domain,what's actually happening under the hood?
As far as i know,in apache2 a new VirtualHost is created for each new domain,pointing to the user's folder. But is this the best and most efficient solution to this?
I'm asking for curiosity reasons mainly and also i'd like how those systems work (like shopify.com or webs.com,where every user adds a domain)
Thank you in advance!!
You have a few options that I know of, mostly depending on whether traffic goes to the same ip or not.
When setting up DNS entries you can specify wildcard for subdomains. *.example.com which makes it so that any request for any subdomain that isn't match by another DNS record goes to example.com.
So, having:
*.example.com <ip A>
blog.example.com <ip B>
Would make blog.example.com go to < ip B> and example.com and all other subdomains go to < ip A>.
This means you could have the possibility of giving each new subdomain go to its own ip (very unlikely). You can also catch them all at the same ip and handle it there.
As you mentioned, you could add a new virtual host for each new sub domain created. However, that's kind of a heavy solution, and I think it would generally involve restarting your webserver program to reload the new configuration. Instead, you can use something like rewrites to achieve something similar to the virtual host.
Having a rewrite rule that does <subdomain>.example.com/<resource> => example.com/<subdomain>/<resource> would mean all that would be necessary is creating a new folder in the root of your served directories containing the user's content. No change to configuration. Also, I'm not sure if you're familiar with rewrites, but, they're invisible to the browser/user, so the user still sees <subdomain>.example.com/<resource> even though they're being served content from example.com/<subdomain/<resource>.
This isn't a definitive list of the possibilities, simply a couple possibilities. Any large or scalable solution is probably going to involve many layers of indirection allowing for more complex DNS directing, load balancing, and serving of content.
Related
I just removed some virtual hosts and restored them from backup.
I noticed that no matter what domain from the following i hit:
kidsclubpaidika.gr
ypsilandio.gr
varsa.gr
always my hit gets instantly redirected to domain kidsclubpaidika.grinstead.
Why is this happening?
I use Webmin/virtualmin btw.
here is my relevant httpd.conf https://pastebin.com/vzwbzTh8
There's a FAQ about this kind of problem: https://www.virtualmin.com/documentation/web/troubleshooting#toc-the-wrong-site-shows-up-V5JtxdKg
The short description of the problem is that when combining VirtualHosts that use IP addresses and *, the way Apache decides what to show is unintuitive (to put it mildly). Mixing * and IP-based VirtualHosts is, thus, not recommended. So, find the virtual hosts that use * and switch them to IPs, or find all the IPs and switch them to *. Don't mix and match. I usually recommend using IPs, but either works, as long as you only have one IP.
If you have a default site (e.g. 000-default on Ubuntu/Debian), disable it. In a virtual hosting environment, "default" doesn't really have the same meaning and can lead to confusing results. The Virtualmin installer will do that for you, but doing a dist upgrade will lead to config files being overwritten and that site being re-enabled.
I've been googling for a bit now, and I really cant seem to figure this out. I recently bought a domain name with google domains, that I wish to point to a sub domain on my web-server, (example) http://120.0.0.0/sub-folder/, while apearing as domain.com.
Right now I have mbektic.com forwarding to http://138.197.5.88/mbektic/ which kind of gets what I need done, but I wish for the URL to say mbektic.com, instead of the ip address of the server.
Now I've been looking around and I've found things mentioning things from creating records to .htaccess files, and honestly I'm completely lost.
If someone could point me to a straightforward guide or give me a list of steps to follow, I can do it myself, but currently I am just lost.
This really belongs on unix.se since it isn't programming...
That said, what you need to do is set up a DNS A record pointing your domain name to your IP address. Add a second one to handle www.example.com
Then, on the webserver, configure it to respond to that name and serve content out of the directory you specify (the apache webserver calls this the DocumentRoot - you may want to look up apache virtual hosts .... )
I have created a virtual server say aaa.com but when I access the site (via editing my hosts file on Windows 7, cos I have a live aaa.com running on the Internet), it brings me to my other virtual server's site I have, like bbb.com
Why is that? I don't have any redirection running. Not in my script files (like html or php) and no redirection set under "Server Configurations" -> "Website Redirects" and none at "Services" -> "Click Configure Website" -> "Aliases and Redirects." The only script files I have are fresh new WordPress installation files (under home/aaa/public_html).
How do I fix this?
Mullazman is right (thanks!). I have just had this problem after enabling the SSL on the domain A. Then, all the domains in the same installation were pointing to A.
I fixed it by editing the file located in /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/A.conf and changing the first line:
Wrong line -> <VirtualHost A.B.C.D:80>
Correct line -> <VirtualHost *:80>
Had the same issue. For anyone interested it's because I had at the header of my sites-enables/aaa.com.conf which was picking up all requests and send them to the first host.
Change it to and it started directing traffic to the correct virtual hosts.
It was triggered when I enabled SSL on aaa.com, it for some reason re-wrote the config file to use IP based filtering not domain name
Try to delete browser cache with CTRL+F5,
then try again. If that doesn't help, check virtualhost configuration files -maybe there lies the problem.
The solution I found
I had the same problem ...
And I ended up with a lot of doubts ...
And I searched for a SOLUTION for this case, I hope to help ...
1 - Should the BIND have an external or internal IP in the domain? I use only one IP for all servers, and in BIND all domains are with external IP. (The question is whether it should be external or internal IP).
R = Yes, you must configure the internal IP in Virtualmin, prefer to edit the file. Only in localhost you should have 127.0.0.1
2 - Would NGINX have any configuration? How to remove IP and just put (listen *: 80) instead of (listen 288.218.198.981:80)
R = This configuration was changed but then I had problems with DNS and I returned to use the INTERNAL IP (not the localhost) ... Normally this IP starts as: 10.1xx.xx.xx
But which configuration would work in general?
Restart these steps ...
If you still have an error ...
Back up ... And in Virtualmin settings ...
Edit Virtual Server >> Activate Features >>
Uncheck NGINX, BIND, NGINX SSL.
He will ask for confirmation and click to confirm.
After this process is completed, return to the same option and reschedule ...
This will make it delete the old ones and put a new one.
(This works great for those who changed hosting and has old settings).
If you are importing a backup. Do not select the DNS and NGINX option ...
One tip is to create Virtual Server {your domain / site} First of all ...
And only then only import directories and databases ...
So you will not have problems with DNS and wrong redirects ...
Update
This also occurs when the SSL certificate is not issued correctly.
Folder permissions are incorrect.
Chmod 0755 folders
0644 Files
SOLUTION!!!
Cheap workaround let us say our domain is domain.xyz
Under the BindDNS Master Zone for domain.xyz create a cname record I believe it is listed in webmin as Name Alias and name it 000.domain.xyz
Under apache create a virtual server with the name 000.domain.xyz and make sure it has the same directory as domain.xyz
After this is done you are golden all your websites will come up as they should!
Is it proper well maybe not.
Does it work well like a charm of course otherwise I wouldn't be sharing for some reason the way the severs are listed it defaults to the first on the list well that'll fix that there should be a method of pinning the servers or doing something to prevent such a thing from happening what a pain in the rear I spent a full day dumbfounded thinking what in the world is going on I am losing my touch.
If this helps give a like if its wrong apologies all I know is that it works.
Read the thread.
Many folks claim this is an SSL thing.
Zero people have eluded to the true method of fixing it or the proper directions to do so or if they did I'm too blind to see it.
The guy below me commenting hrmmm... Yeah browser caches for my website didn't exist on my devices I tried them on to verify that was not the problem. But yes this is a typical problem with a lot of things indeed. It is the only reason I have several browsers on my PC actually for that reason. For a while there there were pages that chrome would function with that IE wouldn't or Firefox would best them both. Not to mention cache is always a pita its always usually one of my steps in troubleshooting any issues with web pages. I'll even try openDNS or other DNS servers.
But holy cats I can't believe how fast DNS just updates once you got things set it makes me wonder if there is a lot of fudge in propigation when you purchase hosting being "24 -48 hours" I think there is a lot of fudge in those numbers after my experiences trying to figure out what was causing the issue here. Some servers struggle yes but for the most part it was pretty instant for me.
In my case it happened after creating SSL certificate, I forgot to do:
Edit Virtual Server -> Enable Apache SSL Website
My company has a LAMP server, and I am not an expert at web hosting but I manage basic tasks.
My server currently hosts about twelve different domains. Each domain has a .conf file in the sites-enabled directory, and they work fine. Let's say we have example1.com, example2.com, and example3.com, just to hopefully help explain this question.
Recently, a person I work with registered a bunch of new domains. With the domain registrar, they pointed the domains to our IP address. I believe this is called "parking" a domain. I have not set up a .conf file or enabled any of these new domains on our server yet. Let's say they are newsite1.com, newsite2.com, etc...
What's puzzling to me is that if one types one of the new domains into a browser, one of our existing domain shows up. Let's say it's example1.com. So, if you go to a browser and type in newsite1.com, or newsite2.com, you are taken to example1.com. Also, in the address bar at the top of the browser, it will be displayed as example1.com.
This is not the desired behaviour. For one thing, we did not choose, as far as I know, for example1.com to be the default, and it's not necessarily the website we would want to be the default. In any case, I don't know why the system is going to example1.com as opposed to example2.com or any of our other sites.
The desired behaviour would be for there to just be a general error, "this domain does not exist" or something like that. If there has to be a default website, we'd like to be able to choose it.
I've seen questions on Stack Oveflow that are similar, but they all presume one wants to set a default. When I look at the configuration files they reference, for example /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf, they are empty, so in my case, there is nothing to unset.
How do I stop browsers from being redirected to the website that they are currently being directed to? How can I set it so that Apache just returns a "site not found" error instead of serving up a website?
The easiest way to fix this is name your .conf files starting with a number.
If you look at the default apache configs, you'll notice a file called "000-default.conf". Apache will load the files in number order - so just make your default virtual host .conf file be 000-whatever.conf.
I suppose you're using name based virtual hosts and the <VirtualHost> directive and this is what docs have to say:
If no matching name-based virtual host is found, then the first listed virtual host that matched the IP address will be used. As a consequence, the first listed virtual host for a given IP address and port combination is the default virtual host for that IP and port combination.
So when you say:
I've seen questions on Stack Oveflow that are similar, but they all
presume one wants to set a default.
... all I can add is that that's the way Apache works. I don't think it's inherently wrong to have a default host that serves a this domain does not exist page. I always do so in my Windows development box, typically by commenting out the default hosts at conf/extra/httpd-vhosts.conf file and adding my default host there.
If you ask for my opinion, it's rather questionable that Apache basically serves an arbitrary site when there's no match, thus making this customisation mandatory—and I've seen lots of live sites that don't do it.
I currently host my company's website and blog on separate servers, reached by separate domain names - www.example.com and www.example.net. This is so I can give blog server access to our partners without compromising security on our main server. However, our SEO guy is now demanding that the blog be put on our main server, as www.example.com/blog.
I would like to maintain the current server separation rather than putting both on the same server. Is there any good way to keep them separated, but have them both under a single domain name? A subdomain would also be acceptable (blog.example.com).
My main website server is a Debian box running Apache 2, and I have full root access to it. The blog server is run by Hostgator, and I have limited access.
Edit: Thanks, all. In this particular situation I don't particularly want to transfer the blog again, and I don't have easy access to the DNS records, so i went with mod_proxy and it worked like a charm. I wish I could give you all "preferred answer" status, though, because all of your information was awesome.
A subdomain would be easy: just create an A record in DNS which maps blog.example.com to the IP address of the blog server, and have another A record in DNS which maps www.example.com to the main website server (this latter record probably already exists).
Would the SEO guy be happy with blog.example.com? It's not the same from an SEO perspective, but it might be good enough for him. I work at a company where SEO is at least 1/3 of what we do, and that's our setup: blog.example.com and www.example.com.
You could try to get fancy and proxy requests to /blog to the 2nd server, if you insist on keeping the blog off your box, but I think you can find a secure way to share space. Proxying like that could get annoying, and it basically doubles the latency to your blog.
Give the blog guys an account on your box; don't give them root/special privileges. If you can get away with it, don't even give them SSH access -- just give them a FTP login (make sure they can't access /var/www), and maybe a mysql account or something. (As you can see, this all depends on how much control/power the blog folks demand.)
Then, just make a symlink to the blog root, so they can write to a restricted area like /home/blog/www and still have it included in the website:
ln -s ~blog/www /var/www/blog
If a subdomain is for some reason not a possible way for you to go, you could use Apache's mod_proxy module to proxy requests to /blog to your second server.