okay you might say its a duplicate of this.
It might be but the answer is still yet to be found.
Isn't there any way we can make a RESTful web service without using jersey or for that matter any other libs?
I am searching for the past 5 days for the answer to this question!!
You should be able to accomplish this with servlets.
Create a servlet for each service or url that you expose to your service consumers.
Eg. For a user CRUD service, create a UserServlet and specify the mapping as /user/*.
Consumers of your service, will hit urls such as
http://yourdomain.com/user
http://yourdomain.com/user/23
for various RESTful operations.
Inside of the servlet, you should be able to extract the request parameters, form data, request headers and context information.
For a detailed discussion on how to design your restful api and best practices, search "Restful API Design". Here are a couple of links to get you started
https://blog.apigee.com/detail/api_design_third_edition_video_slides
https://blog.apigee.com/detail/slides_for_restful_api_design_second_edition_webinar/
If you want to use JAX-RS, which is a specification, you must use an implementation of this specification. Jersey is the Reference Implementation of JAX-RS but any other implementation is fine, too.
You can write a service with a RESTFul interface using plain Servlets. But why reinvent the wheel? You really don't want to do this. But if you must, read the Java EE Tutorial on Servlets. But a Servlet will not be RESTFul without further work. You can easily fall into the trap of writing a RPC-style service.
Related
I followed directions of other users to create a service that can run both REST and SOAP. At first glance I see no issues. Are there any concerns about running both concurrently?
There is no issue having a service that can process SOAP request and other more REST style requests. However, the resources that you create for SOAP will be completely different than the ones you create for REST. Also, it is rare to find a web framework that supports both styles effectively.
I wanted to know how to can i protect a resource on a webserver using REST API.Like for example i want to access http://www.xyz.com/folder/impresource.doc but before accessing that i have to be authenticated. The thing is i am try to create a simple mobile client to authenticate with a rest service and then be able to access the resource.
I would appreciate a good example explaining how it can be done Thanks :)
It would be nice if i could get an example in php.
You implement a web service (be it REST, or be it SOAP) in some programming language (for example, Java or C#) running in some "container" (for example, IIS/.Net or Tomcat).
The layer below REST (for example, the C# code you're using to implement your IIS/.Net/SOAP web service, or the Java code in your .war) is the layer where you want to write any custom access code.
Alternatively, some vendors (for example, Amazon S3) have already done this for you:
http://aws.amazon.com/s3/faqs/
Other vendors (such as Microsoft) give you a way to use their authentication infrastructure with your web service:
Secure REST Service Microsoft Azure AppFabric
In java you can use a servlet filter, which will send an error code if it does not find an authentication object in the user session and if authenticated let the request handling proceed. A very popular implementation of this approach is Spring security[http://static.springsource.org/spring-security/site/tutorial.html]
I have a third-party Java web service listening at three SOAP 1.1 WSDL endpoints. One of the endpoints is used to initiate the session and perform some high-level tasks, and the other endpoints are for subject-specific tasks reusing that initial authentication.
I'm building a C# WCF application to talk to the service, and I'd like to share the session cookie among the three client objects.
What's the VS2010 'best practices' way of sharing this cookie?
If this article is still the best answer, I can go with it, but I would appreciate some additional feedback, especially if .NET 4 introduced a simplification that I'm not finding on-line.
http://megakemp.wordpress.com/2009/02/06/managing-shared-cookies-in-wcf/
I can pretty easily create the first client and retain the session (new BasicHttpBinding myBinding; myBinding.AllowCookies = true), but I couldn't find an elegant way of saving off the cookie from the Connect response and reusing for the two auxiliary clients.
Any insights are appreciated.
I should note that I'm aware of CookieContainer and using Add Web Reference instead of Add Service Reference. That method is labeled as 'legacy' in most posts I've read, and I'd prefer to stay current...or as current as possible when working with SOAP 1.1.
The mentioned article is still valid. You have to use OperationContextScope and access message properties to get protocol specific data. This complexity is based on the fact that WCF architecture is protocol independent whereas ASMX architecture was HTTP protocol dependent.
It is true that ASMX (WebReference) is legacy technology but it is still present in .NET framework so if you know that you will never need nothing more the basic SOAP messaging without any advanced WS-* standard you can still use it and make your life little bit simple. Once you need anything more you can still refactor your code and use WCF with mentioned code to work with cookies.
I'm new to WCF RESTFull services developpment and I'm looking for some usefull information and your experience feedback about using webHttpBinding compared to the new WCF Web API http://wcf.codeplex.com/.
What I'm looking for is to know about the shortcomings of webHttpBinding and therefore why to use the new Web api and especially what problems the new API resolves.
If you could point me to some blog posts comparing both of them or just talking about the problems when using webHttpBinding I would appreciate. Thank you in advance.
Main shortcomings I would say is that the webhttpbinding makes it difficult to handle HTTP specific concerns. It works great if all you are doing is passing an object over HTTP that is serialized into XML or JSON and which may be transported over different formats.
HTTP is much more than a simple transport protocol for XML and JSON, it is an application layer protocol with rich semantics. Web API is specifically targetting folks that want to build systems over HTTP that fully levergage HTTP's richness.
Web API embraces that HTTP Resources can have a multitude of representations based on the needs of different clients. One end of the spectrum could be a dumb browser that just talks to a service using a Form url encoded post and a GET, while the other end could be a more rich client that uses Atom/OData or a hypermedia based media type.
Web API embraces that there are other HTTP specific concerns like conneg, etags, etc which allow better leveraging intermediary web servers.
Web API is designed with more testability in mind, thus you can address working with HTTP messages or other concerns in a more testable manner.
Web API has a more simplified configuration story.
You can read more about the rationale here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/endpoint/archive/2010/11/01/wcf-web-apis-http-your-way.aspx
The most significant difference for me is the change in programming model. You no longer write 'services' which expose 'operations' bound to HTTP idioms (GET, POST etc.). With Web APIs you create 'resources' (POCOs) with which your clients can interact.
Web APIs seem to be better at handling various custom media types (like PNG images for example).
Last but not least, Web APIs are far better suited for automated testing. For instance, you no longer have to use static context classes to access HTTP concepts such as response codes. You use POCO request and response classes which can be easily instantiated in automated tests using old-style new() operator.
I agree with Ladislav that Web APIs are just a preview now and building application on top of it can be both risky and forbidden by the means of license agreement (but I haven't checked that).
Have you considered #serialseb's OpenRasta? It is stable and offers very nice programming model for building RESTful services.
The Web API is something like possible future of REST development in WCF. It is just preview which can significantly change before final release (probably in next version of .NET framework). So if you want to build production REST service you should use webHttpBinding.
Available information about Web Api can be found for example on .NET Connected Framework team's blog and on the site you mentioned. It is simplification and extension of current REST API.
Web API provides a REST-friendly HTTP based API. Web API uses the patterns of MVC and is going to be very familiar to ASP.NET MVC developers. Web API can leverage the capabilities of HTTP as an application layer protocol, returning resources in multiple representations (XML, JSON, HTML etc.) according the the client's request headers.
On the other hand WCF webHttpBinding uses the patterns of WCF, and is going to appeal more to the WCF developer - ServiceContracts, OperationContracts, comprehensive (or overweight, depending how you look at it, config file), ability to self-host outside of IIS.
One of the things I like about Web API is the ability to use dynamic types to escape the constraints of the type system. I also like the default exception behavior in Web API - contrast WCF webHttpBinding where, by default, exceptions bubble up as HTTP 500 + an HTML payload (yuk!).
Its nice to have the choice between two excellent technologies here. I wouldn't describe Web API as 'newer' or 'better' that WCF, as this implies its a replacement technology and that WCF webHttpBinding is legacy, which I don't believe is true.
I chose to use WCF webHttpBinding recently to expose a JSON API for an existing WCF SOAP service. I believe it was a good choice because it fitted that style of that existing solution and minimized the amount of change required.
Folks,
I'm building a pretty standard workflow that I want exposed via a WCF endpoint - I'm using the "WCF Service Application" project template and I've got a .xamlx service. This is a very simple document interchange workflow service - I want consumers to POST me a blob of XML as the body of an HTTP post (with HTTP headers containing authentication tokens). In response, these consumers will get a blob of XML containing the reply. 2 goals for me using REST/POX here are the document/message-based nature of the interaction AND I want to make client development easy for non-.NET environments (especially limited environments like Silverlight and iPhone).
I don't really see how to make this possible using out of the box features (unless I'm missing something). Does anybody know how to create a RESTful (or even REST-ish, I'm not picky) endpoint for a WF4 service-hosted workflow? Any info leading in the right direction here would be great.
There is an unreleased item on CodePlex to cover this, which includes source code. Also see this SO answer which contains another idea for achieving this.
If you'd like to see the CodePlex activity released, please up-vote the UserVoice request.
Using a REST Pass-Through Service
As #Maurice mentions, you can also treat the WF service as a back-end service and expose a REST service that simply calls through to the WF service.
This method is a bit clumsy, but has the advantage that it doesn't use anything unreleased or really complicated.
If the back-end service runs on the same machine as the REST service (which is probably what you'd do), you should expose the WF service using the named pipes binding. This binding is fast, but only works when the caller and callee are on the same box.
A further thought: your REST pass-through service is blocked while the back-end service is being called. If your WF service is not very fast, you'd benefit from making your REST service asynchronous so it doesn't block a thread pool thread while the WF service is being called.
There are no out of the box activities that will allow you to use REST with WF, the Receice is pure SOAP.
You can either build a custom REST Receive activity and use that with your workflow. Depending on your needs this is going to be quite a handful to a lot of work. The easy option is use use a standard REST WCF endpoint and convert the REST data to SOAP, pass rhe request on to the workflow, and do the reverse on the result message.