2 different condition on one SQL query - sql

I have 2 tables. I need to pick some ids from table one and based one condition and insert into table 2. The second column again must come from tableA but based on a different condition
Table A
NC 1
NC 2
SC 3
SC 4
Table B
1 100
1 200
2 100
2 200
I want to insert rows to table B so it would look like this....
1 100
1 200
2 100
2 200
3 100
3 200
4 100
4 200
I am picking 3 and 4 from table A based on the state condtion = 'SC'and now I want to know how to pick the values of 100 and 200 which NC has...
Sorry if I havent worded it correctly

-- sample data
create table tbla (code char(2), id int);
insert into tbla values ('NC', 1);
insert into tbla values ('NC', 2);
insert into tbla values ('SC', 3);
insert into tbla values ('SC', 4);
create table tblb (id int, value int);
insert into tblb values (1, 100);
insert into tblb values (1, 200);
insert into tblb values (2, 100);
insert into tblb values (2, 200);
-- your query to INSERT the new rows into tblb
insert into tblb
select x.id, y.value
from
(
select distinct a.id
from tbla a
where a.code = 'SC'
) x
cross join
(
select distinct b.value
from tbla a
join tblb b on a.id = b.id
where a.code = 'NC'
) y
left join tblb b on b.id = x.id and b.value = y.value
where b.id is null;

You can do it by a query like :
Select a.id, b.value
from "Table A" a
join "Table B" b
on b.id=1 --This condition pick the two first rows on table B.
where a.condtion = 'SC'
This is not a elegant solution, but it work.

Related

is there a syntactic shortcut similar to coalesce for union?

What I'm trying to do is:
select
A.Fuzz
,A.Fizz
,B.Whiz
from A
left outer join B
on A.Fuzzy B=Wuzzy
To replace:
select
A.Fuzz
,A.Fizz
,B.Whiz
from A
left outer join B
on A.Fuzzy B=Wuzzy
UNION ALL
select
B.wuzz
,A.Fizz
,B.Whiz
from A
left outer join B
on A.Fuzzy B=Wuzzy
May be this is something "near" what you think (done on MSSQL)?. Pls in every question post sample data, expected result, etc.
CREATE TABLE A (ID INT, DESC_A VARCHAR(10));
INSERT INTO A VALUES (1,'A');
INSERT INTO A VALUES (2,'B');
CREATE TABLE B (ID INT, DESC_B VARCHAR(10));
INSERT INTO B VALUES (2,'Z');
INSERT INTO B VALUES (3,'Y');
SELECT COALESCE(A.ID, B.ID) AS ID
, A.DESC_A
, B.DESC_B
FROM A
FULL JOIN B ON A.ID = B.ID
Output:
ID DESC_A DESC_B
1 A NULL
2 B Z
3 NULL Y

How to use a bunch of clause in a having statement. Oracle

assume i have a query like this:
SELECT table1.id
FROM (
SELECT id, sum(column) as A
FROM table1
GROUP BY id
) a1
Left join (
SELECT id,
sum(column) as B
FROM table 2
GROUP BY Id
) a2
on table1.id=table2.id
.
.
.
.
Left join (
SELECT id, sum(column) as G
FROM table 7
GROUP BY id
) g1
on table1.id=table7.id
Having or where A+B - (C+D+E+F+G) >0
I tried both, none works.
Having return error on there's no group by in the first select and where doesn't return any rows.
First your question have some issues.
I'm going to guess you mean put alias a, b, c, d ....
instead of a1, a2, g1.
Also your left join should be something like a.id = b.id at the moment you create a subquery you have to use the alias instead of tablename.
If you fix that you should add a WHERE, I also guess you mean use the SUM() result
WHERE a.A + b.B - (c.C+ d.D+ e.E+ f.F+ g.G) > 0
.
SELECT a.id
FROM (
SELECT id, sum(column) as sumA
FROM table1
GROUP BY id
) a
Left join
(
SELECT id, sum(column) as sumB
FROM table 2
GROUP BY Id
) b
on a.id = b.id
.
.
.
.
Left join
(
SELECT id, sum(column) as sumG
FROM table 2
GROUP BY id
) g
on f.id = g.id
WHERE a.sumA + b.sumB - (c.sumC + d.sumD + e.sumE + f.sumF + g.sumG) >0
Juan has the right answer. I am just adding a SQLFiddle to help strengthen his answer. Please look at a smaller instance of the same solution here: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!4/81c275/1
Tables
create table table1(id int, col int);
insert into table1 values (1, 10);
insert into table1 values (2, 20);
insert into table1 values (2, 30);
create table table2(id int, col int);
insert into table2 values (1, 5);
insert into table2 values (2, 3);
insert into table2 values (2, 2);
create table table3(id int, col int);
insert into table3 values (1, 100);
insert into table3 values (2, 20);
insert into table3 values (2, 3);
SQL
select a1.id
from (select id, sum(col) as A from table1 group by id) a1
left join (select id, sum(col) as B from table2 group by id) a2
on a1.id = a2.id
left join (select id, sum(col) as C from table3 group by id) a3
on a1.id = a3.id
where A + B - (C) > 0
You can add more tables in the SQLFiddle with whatever values you please, and change the SQL accordingly by appending D, E, F, G etc after C in (C).
The above example will result in output of 2 since ID 2's A+B = 55 and C = 23. A+B-C > 0 for this record and therefore the output will be 2.
I believe that you need to take out the 'where' and move it up if you still need it.
So that it would look something like this,
select table1.id from(
...
...
...)
Having ((A+B)-(C+D+R+F+G)>0)
According to this site:
http://www.w3schools.com/sql/sql_having.asp

SQL joining on >=

I have a table like this in ORACLE
a b
-- --
1000 1
100 2
10 3
1 4
My other table has numbers like '67' or '112' in a column called numbers for example.
How can I join to this table using those values and get the correct result where >=1000 would be 1 and >= 100 would be 2 >=10 would be 3 etc.
I tried to do a
select g.b
from table o
join table2 g on o.column >= g.a
when I do this say 1002 was the value of g I would get the back these results.
1
2
3
4
when I just want 1
Easiest would be if your lookup table had ranges instead of just one number, such as row 1 = 1000,9999,1 and row 2 = 100,999,2 etc.
Then your join might be
SELECT OtherTable.n, lookup.b
from OtherTable
LEFT JOIN lookup on OtherTable.n between lookup.low and lookup.high
But, if you really want to use your original table, then on SQL Server, do this:
/*CREATE TABLE #A (a int,b int)
INSERT INTO #A VALUES (1000,1),(100,2),(10,3),(1,4)
CREATE TABLE #B (n INT)
INSERT INTO #B VALUES (67),(112),(4),(2001)
*/
SELECT B.n, A1.b
FROM #B B OUTER APPLY (SELECT TOP 1 a,b FROM #A A WHERE A.a<B.n ORDER BY A.a DESC) A1
Here's one way to do it using a subquery to get the MAX of column a, and then rejoining on the same table to get b:
select t.numericvalue, t2.b
from (
select t.numericvalue, max(t2.a) maxb
from table1 t
join table2 t2 on t.numericvalue >= t2.a
group by numericvalue
) t join table2 t2 on t.maxb = t2.a
SQL Fiddle Demo

Parent Child Query without using SubQuery

Let say I have two tables,
Table A
ID Name
-- ----
1 A
2 B
Table B
AID Date
-- ----
1 1/1/2000
1 1/2/2000
2 1/1/2005
2 1/2/2005
Now I need this result without using sub query,
ID Name Date
-- ---- ----
1 A 1/2/2000
2 B 1/2/2005
I know how to do this using sub query but I want to avoid using sub query for some reason?
If I got your meaning right and you need the latest date from TableB, then the query below should do it:
select a.id,a.name,max(b.date)
from TableA a
join TableB b on b.aid = a.id
group by a.id,a.name
SELECT a.ID, a.Name, MAX(B.Date)
FROM TableA A
INNER JOIN TableB B
ON B.ID = A.ID
GROUP BY A.id, A.name
It's a simple aggregation. Looks like you want the highest date per id/name combo.
create table #t1 (id int, Name varchar(10))
create table #t2 (Aid int, Dt date)
insert #t1 values (1, 'A'), (2, 'B')
insert #t2 values (1, '1/1/2000'), (1, '1/2/2000'), (2, '1/1/2005'), (2, '1/2/2005')
;WITH cte (AId, MDt)
as
(
select Aid, MAX(Dt) from #t2 group by AiD
)
select #t1.Id, #t1.Name, cte.MDt
from #t1
join cte
on cte.AId = #t1.Id

write a query in sql

I have two tables that have following rows:
Table1
ID Name Number
=====================
1 a 100
2 b 200
3 c 300
Table2
ID Number Check
=====================
1 100 0
2 200 1
3 300 null
Now I want the following table:
table
---------------------
Name Number check
=====================
a 100 0
c 300 null
What query I must to write.
*You notice that the column of check in the row of 'c' in final table is null.
Thanks.
Left outer join is your friend:
select table1.name, table1.nmber, table2.check from table1 left outer join table2 on table1.nmber = table2.number
Assuming that the nmber column in table1 = number column in table2
SELECT a.name, a.nmber, b.check
FROM table1 a JOIN table2 b ON a.nmber = b.number
I believe your looking for
select a.Name, a.Nmber, b.Check
from Table1 a join table2 b
on a.Nmber = b.Number
can also add a where clase e.g.
where a.Name is not b
where b.check is not 1
etc
Hard to tell from your question how you want your results to exclude b
Set up test data.
create table table1(ID int, Name char(1), Number int)
create table table2(ID int, Number int, [Check] int)
insert into table1 values (1, 'a', 100)
insert into table1 values (2, 'b', 200)
insert into table1 values (3, 'c', 300)
insert into table2 values (1, 100, 0)
insert into table2 values (2, 200, 1)
insert into table2 values (3, 300, null)
The query
select
table1.Name,
table1.Number,
table2.[Check]
from table1
inner join table2
on table1.ID = table2.ID
where Name <> 'b'
Result
a 100 0
c 300 NULL
You must use square brackets around column name [check] because check is a reserved word. in SQL Server.
This question has been edited a lot. I believe that the answer to the original question differ from the answer to the current question.
Here is the setup for version 1 one of the question.
create table table1(ID int, Name char(1), Number int)
create table table2(ID int, Number int, [Check] int)
insert into table1 values (1, 'a', 100)
insert into table1 values (2, 'b', 200)
insert into table1 values (3, 'c', 300)
insert into table2 values (1, 100, 0)
insert into table2 values (2, 200, 1)
To get c from table1 when joined to table2 you need to use a left outer join.
select
table1.Name,
table1.Number,
table2.[Check]
from table1
left outer join table2
on table1.ID = table2.ID
where table1.Name <> 'b'
Even in this version you need the square brackets around check.