I am using a Form & List module in DotNetNuke and would like to set up a query that filters the result set and returns the records submitted only by the user(without displaying everyone else)
I am not all familiar with the DNN tables and I think it would be something like below but I am not sure what goes into the WHERE clause...
I think it'd be
SELECT * FROM ---tablename--- WHERE ...
Thanks in advance.
EDIT:
Solution: insert a filter statement into the List Settings of the module:
[Created by_UDT_Original] = ‘[User:UserName]’
The FNL module uses it's own table structure, so querying against it will be fairly complex, and will vary based on the columns and types you created when configuring the module.
That being said, it is possible to have the module only display an individual user's data, that is either configured through the Module Settings, or within the FnL configuration itself.
Related
I have Created a Student Information Report using Jasper report (SQL database). I need to filter the report using different parameters. e.g
Branch Wise
Gender Wise
Class Wise
Section Wise and some more
I'm using Java Swing as a front end application.
My question is for each filter i have to write separate query?? or is there a way in jasper to manage different filter for example.
You can manage your query based on the parameter you got using a different expression which is $P!{}.
Follow below steps to achieve your needs,
Create a parameter, say $P{BranchWise}.
In the expression of that parameter, write something like
$P{Branch} != null ? "and branch = '"+$P{Branch}+"'" : ""
Likewise create parameter for different filters.
Now use these parameters in your query as below
select * from table1 where 1=1 $P!{BranchWise} $P!{GenderWise} $P!{ClassWise} ....
Hope this should solve your problem.
I read about createCriteria, and kind of interested on how these works, and its usability in providing values for dropdown box.
So say, i have a table in the database, Resource table, where i have defined the table in the domain class called Resource.groovy. Resource table has a total of 10 columns, where 5 of it are
Material Id
Material description
Resource
Resource Id
Product Code
So using the createCriteria, and i can use just like a query to return the items that i want to
def resList = Resource.createCriteria().list {
and {
eq('resource', resourceInstance)
ne('materialId', '-')
}
}
Where in the above, i want to get the data that matches the resource = resourceInstance, and none of the materialId is equal to '-'.
I want to use the returned data from createCriteria above on my form, where i want to use some of the column on my select dropdown. Below is the code i used for my select dropdown.
<g:select id="resourceId" name="resourceId"
from="${resList}"
disabled="${actionName != 'show' ? false : true}" />
How do i make it so that in a dropdown, it only shows the values taken from column Product Code? I believe the list created using createCriteria returns all 10 columns based on the createCriteria's specification. But i only want to use the Product Column values on my dropdown.
How do i customize the data if in one of the select dropdown in my form, i wanted to show the values as "Resource Id - Resource Description"? The values are combination of more than 1 columns for one select dropdown but i don't know how to combine both in a single select dropdown.
I read that hql and GORM query are better ways of fetching data from table than using createCriteria. Is this true?
Thanks
First of all refer to the document for using select in Grails. To answer all questions:
Yes, the list to select from in the dropdown can be customized. In this case it should be something like from="${resList*.productCode}"
Yes, this can be customized as well with something like
from="${resList.collect { \"${it.resourceId} - ${it.resourceDesc}\" } }"
It depends. If there are associations involved in a domain then using Criteria will lead to eager fetches which might not be required. But with HQL one gets the flexibility of tailoring the query as needed. With latest version of Grails those boundries are minimized a lot. Usage of DetachedCriteria, where queries etc are recommended whereever possible. So it is kind of mixing and matching to the scenario under consideration.
I'm a bit of a newbie with the workings of phpmyadmin. I have a database and now there are 2 parts within it - the original tables jos_ and the same again but with a different prefix, say let's ****_ that will be the finished database.
This has come about because I am upgrading my Joomla 1.5 site to 2.5. I used a migration tool for the bulk of the new database but one particular piece of information did not transfer because the new database has a different structure.
I want to copy the entire contents of jos_content, attribs, keyref= across to ****_content, metadata, "xreference"."VALUE" if that makes sense. This will save manually typing in the information contained within 1000s of articles.
jos_content, attribs currently contains
show_title=
link_titles=
show_intro=
show_section=
link_section=
show_category=
link_category=
show_vote=
show_author=
show_create_date=
show_modify_date=
show_pdf_icon=
show_print_icon=
show_email_icon=
language=
keyref=41.126815,0.732623
readmore=
****_content, metadata currently contains
{"robots":"all","author":""}
but I want it to end up like this
{"robots":"","author":"","rights":"","xreference":"41.126815,0.732623","marker":""}
Could anyone tell me the SQL string that I would need to run to achieve this please?
If it makes any difference I have manually changed about 300 of these articles already and thought there must be a better way.
Edit: Being nervous of trying this I would like to try and find the exact syntax (if that's the right word) for the SQL Query to run.
The value I want to extract from the source table is just, and only, the numbers next to keyref= and I want them to turn up in the destination table prefixed by "xreference". - so it shows "xreference"."VALUE" with VALUE being the required numbers. There is also an entry - ,"marker":"" that is in the destination table so I guess the Query needs to produce that as well?
Sorry for labouring this but if I get it wrong, maybe by guessing what to put, I don't really have the knowledge to put it all right again....
Thanks.
Please Try it
insert into tableone(column1,column2) select column1,column2 from Tablesecond
if You have not Table another Daabase Then This query
select * into anyname_Table from tablesource
I have this little project that I'm working and I got to a part where I want to do something specific but can't seem to figure out a solution that works. Basically I've created a Web Service in Visual Studio that is used for a mobile app and we wanted to add a new piece of functionality that allows the retrieval of clients from multiple users. To do this I need to be able to pass an array of values to a WHERE IN clause, which I've been finding out is pretty much not possible but the other solutions I've read (that have no real example of the process) is to create a table of the Array values and then to a WHERE IN (SELECT * from TEMPTABLE) type of scenario.
So this is where I'm stuck, how do I go about passing an array of values to my SQL statement that will then create a temp table of those values (can range from 1 to 30 values) so then I can run other queries against those values. Most of the examples I've seen have the temp table hard coded with values, but I need to be able to pass an random amount of values for that table, so if it's easier to pass them as one single string with commas is fine or if they need to be passed in a specific format I can do that as well on the iOS side before calling the Web Service, I just can't seem to figure out how to do this dynamic type of table to move on to the next portion.
EDIT (Adding some information based on Comment)
So some background information on the system and purpose to help get a better understanding of what I'm doing. The Database is a SQL Server (2008) with already existing tables and data since what I'm working on is a Mobile Application port of an existing Web Application. Two tables that I can use for example are an Agent table (for employees) and a Customer Table (for their client) and so in some cases we have Teams that can view each other's clients. So normally if I wanted to pull a list of clients from a group of agents I would use the WHERE IN statement, but for the Web Service it would need to take that group as a Variable since the Rep may want to see only a few team members or all team members (this would be an option set in the iOS App).
I don't really have code that works, and most of what I have tried I know doesn't really work so I'll put some pseudo code to explain what I want to do. At first I thought I could just do this:
SELECT C.first_name + ' ' + C.last_name as [Client Name]
FROM dbo.agent as A INNER JOIN
dbo.contact as C ON C.agent_id = A.id
WHERE (A.id IN (#RepList))
In this example, #RepList would be a string passed from the iOS App to the Web Service that contained all the ID's that were selected within the Application. As I've looked into this, I can't have a variable in a WHERE IN statement but I've read that if I create a Temp Table with the variables then I could reference it like this:
CREATE TABLE #TempTable (TempID VARCHAR(MAX))
INSERT INTO #TempTable (TempID)
VALUES (#RepList)
SELECT C.first_name + ' ' + C.last_name AS [Client Name]
FROM dbo.agent AS A INNER JOIN
dbo.contact AS C ON A.id = C.agent_id
WHERE (A.id IN (SELECT #TempTable.* FROM #TempTable))
So again, #RepList would be the list of ID's that are passed from the iOS Application over to the Web Service that will run this query. This is where I'm stuck, since I can't seem to figure out how I can pass a list of values as a Variable into the TempTable. This may end up just being an issue in Visual Studio (since I've had issues with the SQL Query Designer and it not accepting certain things that end up working in the WebService) but I want to be sure this is the right format of doing so before moving forward. In the end, the WebService needs to be able to return a list of Clients based on however many Agents the person wants to see (this can range from just 1 agent to 20 agents).
Since you are on SQL Server 2008 and VS2010, probably the best solution is to use a Table-Valued parameter. This link (here) describes how to use them from a .Net client.
The basic idea is, your webservice code will call a procedure, function or parametized query on SQL Server, where one of the parameters is a table of values. Then the SQL code will use that table-valued parameter as its source matching table instead of a temporary table.
Just as some background, I intend to write an Excel add-in with .NET that can execute queries from an SAP system.
Thus, I'm looking for a list of function modules for SAP's SQVI transaction. I can't seem to find much information about them; the few forum posts I had found before seem to have gone into the internet oblivion.
Specifically, I want to be able to look up the queries created by a user and then display the results in Excel. I can manage the Excel manipulation as well as remotely executing SAP function modules; I simply can't find which SQVI function modules I need to execute.
Update: I did find this post which directed me to search for function modules in the AQGF group (function modules starting with RSAQ*)
Try RSAQ_REMOTE_QUERY_CALL_CATALOG, it seems to do the trick for me.
As told already by tomdemuyt, you have now found the function to get the required data.
To browse around and get more further data, goto transaction SE93, enter Transaction id SQVI, go to development class or package SQUE, then browse this package with SE80 / have a look at the hierarchy of objects, function groups in special.
Then you see many function groups, but one of them is AQRC to which the mentioned function module RSAQ_REMOTE_QUERY_CALL_CATALOG belongs.
A list of SQVI Queries by User can be found simply using the following selections in transaction SE16N for table AQLTS.
AQLTS-CLAS = ‘SYSTQV*’
AQLTS-HEAD = ‘X’
It is not the ideal way to retrieve the data, because a single field (AQLTS-TEXT) must be parsed for the userID:reportID, but it brings what is needed together in one table.