Problem
My controller is not being found when I create the controller using module.controller(). I get the following exception:
Error: Argument 'HelpCtrl' is not a function, got undefined
Detail
I am refactoring my controllers.js file, breaking out each controller into its own separate file. I'm doing this by doing the following:
A typical controller
'use strict';
angular.module('idalinkApp')
.controller('HelpCtrl', function(){
//insert awesome controlling code here
});
My application.js's bootstrap module is the same as the module name above' idalinkApp:
var idalinkModule = angular.module('idalinkApp', [ 'idalinkResources', 'idalinkFilters',
'idalinkDirectives', 'ngSanitize','ui','memberService', 'formStatusService' ]);...
And here's my ng-app declaration in my index.html page:
... <body id="ng-app" data-ng-app="idalinkApp" class=" login idalink-todo idalink-hide idalink-altnav releaseOne"> ...
I've also confirmed that the help.js file containing my HelpCtrl is being loaded in the browser.
Plea
Any ideas?
Related
I'm a total beginner with Vue.js and struggling to find the answer to what I feel is a fairly basic need.
I have a JavaScript library that cannot be installed locally and must be imported via script tag in the index.html file in the old-fashioned way:
<script src="https://foo.bar/scriptyscripts.js"></script>
This library has a bunch of methods in it that I need to use in various spots throughout my app, so it's not going to be a problem to load it globally. The issue I'm facing is that it's loading fine, but the methods are not being recognised in components.
I can use the methods and whatnot if I put them all in a script tag in the index.html however doing that rather defeats the whole point of having components.
Can anyone help me with the step that I'm missing to register all of the methods in this loaded js file so my components don't get mad?
Specifically, the script contains require.js and a collection of other things including JQuery.
Including the library makes the method 'require' available, which is used to load other modules on demand - the example being "js/qlik" in the below snippet. "js/qlik" loads JQuery and a stack of stuff associated with "qlik".
//async login method here. not relevant to this problem
login().then(() => {
require.config({
baseUrl:
(config.isSecure ? "https://" : "http://") +
config.host +
(config.port ? ":" + config.port : "") +
config.prefix +
"resources",
webIntegrationId: config.webIntegrationId,
});
//Load js/qlik after authentication is successful
require(["js/qlik"], function (qlik) {
qlik.on("error", function (error) {
$("#popupText").append(error.message + "<br>");
$("#popup").fadeIn(1000);
});
$("#closePopup").click(function () {
$("#popup").hide();
});
var app = qlik.openApp("caa866be-c8e1-44c8-b67b-dac9d24421fa", config);
});
});
The problem I have is that if I load this library in the index.html file and then try to execute the methods in the snippet above in any component, it does not know that the methods are available.
I see:
'Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'js/qlik'
66:11 error '$' is not defined
which indicates that the components are unaware of the methods because they're not registered like they would be if I were importing a packaged afterinstalling it locally via NPM
i.e. Your original js code: function abc(){// sth...}
What you need: window.abc = ()=>{// sth...}
Even if you want it in Vue dom.
You should add vue.prototype.abc = ()=>{//sth...}
I am working chrome extension which uses vue. I have found that google can take a while to publish updates, so there is some content that I would like to be able to edit with a json that is called by the extension via a $.getJSON https request. So far, that has worked pretty well for getting raw text. But I have problems when I try to add a span tag with a v-if statement such as the following:
Thank you for meeting. We have prepared the following <span v-if='docCount.length > 0'>documents</span><span v-else>document</span> for you today:
What happens is that it just says "prepared the following 'documentsdDocuments'" as if it takes all to be true.
I have gotten this result after putting the above JSON text in a v-html as follows:
<p v-html="coverLetterContent['p1']"></p>
I have gotten the same result after trying the following:
.bind(this)).then( function (result){
$(".letter-body").append("<p>"+result["letter"]["p1"]+"</p>")
});
I also tried creating a dynamic component as follows but was getting an error and nothing was rendered:
dynamicComponent: function() {
return {
template: `<p>${coverLetterContent["p1"]}</p>`,
methods: {
someAction() {
console.log("Action!");
}
}
}
}
The error I got on this was: "ReferenceError: coverLetterContent is not defined." coverLetterContent is defined in the vue app data and is accessible via the v-html call described above.
I am composing my web app as a number of Aurelia "feature" apps - although I'm not using Aurelia features as such. Consequently in my html markup I have two entry points pointing to different apps:
<!-- Top Navigation Bar -->
<div aurelia-app="topnav"></div>
<!-- Main App-->
<div aurelia-app="main"></div>
I am using webpack and everything works perfectly using the single "main" app. Webpack generates a JS file "main.bundle.js" which I include in the src tag.
Things are not so straightforward when I added the "topnav" app. In webpack I tell the plugin to use a different aureliaApp name:
new AureliaPlugin({ aureliaApp: "topnav"}),
and, as you can see my HTML entrypoint also calls "topnav". Webpack generates a JS file "topnav.bundle.js" which I also include. I have a file called "topnav.ts" which contains the aurelia Cionfigure function which ends:
aurelia.start().then(() => aurelia.setRoot(PLATFORM.moduleName("nav")));
And a pair of files "nav.ts", "nav.html" which constitute my viewmodel and view.
When I run the app aurelia loads and the "nav" module code executes. But I then get an error - see below.
The module which it reports that it cannot find is the one entered into the HTML markup.
Should this work? Have I missed something?
I should add, everything seems to work. I can create and update properties in the viewmodel and these are bound to the view. It's just that this error is thrown.
You are doing nothing wrong, just unsupported scenario. Per official doc-wiki: https://github.com/aurelia/webpack-plugin/wiki/AureliaPlugin-options#aureliaapp
You can have only 1 auto entry module with aureliaApp configuration. To solve this, you just need to add PLATFORM.moduleName('topnav') to your main.ts (and put it on root level)
Another way to do is to bootstrap manually:
// in your index.ts
import { bootstrap } from 'aurelia-bootstrapper';
// bootstrap top nav application, with one instance of Aurelia
bootstrap(aurelia => {
// do your configuration
aurelia
.start()
.then(() => aurelia.setRoot(
PLATFORM.moduleName('topnav'),
document.querySelector('#topnav')
);
});
// bootstrap main application, with another instance of Aurelia
bootstrap(aurelia => {
// aurelia.use.standardConfiguration();
// ...
aurelia
.start()
.then(() => aurelia.setRoot(
PLATFORM.moduleName('app'),
document.querySelector('app')
)
});
I have a package, defined in dojoConfig like this:
packages: [
{ name: 'Widget', location: '/widgets/Widget' }
]
The /widgets/Widget/main.js file defines my main module. With this config, in Javascript i can require the module Widget/main directly by its package name like this:
require(["Widget"], function(Widget){
var widget = new Widget();
// all is well
});
But doing the same using declarative syntax throws a Unable to resolve constructor for: 'Widget' error:
<div data-dojo-type="Widget"></div>
Am I doing something wrong, or is this expected behaviour?
It would be easier to see how widget is created, but the complaint is that you have no constructor.
a constructor is required for a widget. If you extend WidgetBase its done for you.
check the doc:
http://dojotoolkit.org/reference-guide/1.9/quickstart/writingWidgets.html
You need to add the
require(["Widget"], function(Widget){});
part in a script tag in the HTML document you are using
<div data-dojo-type="Widget"></div>
It should look like something:
<script> require(["Widget"], function(Widget){}); </script>
You have to require the module/widget before you can call it in an HTML page the same way you need to do it in a script tag.
I'm using Rails. I just installed the backbone-rails gem and followed the instructions here.
When I try to do Backbone.history.start(), I get this error:
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'start' of undefined
I understand that Backbone.history.start() can't be called until after you create at least one route, according to this other SO question. That doesn't seem to be my problem, though, since I do have multiple routes, defined in this CoffeeScript file:
class Lunchhub.Routers.RestaurantLocationsRouter extends Backbone.Router
initialize: (options) ->
#restaurantLocations = new Lunchhub.Collections.RestaurantLocationsCollection()
#restaurantLocations.reset options.restaurantLocations
routes:
"new" : "newRestaurantLocation"
"index" : "index"
":id/edit" : "edit"
":id" : "show"
".*" : "index"
Why am I getting this error?
Edit: here's my code:
<div id="restaurant_locations"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(function() {
window.router = new Lunchhub.Routers.RestaurantLocationsRouter({restaurantLocations: <%= #restaurant_locations.to_json.html_safe -%>});
Backbone.history.start();
});
</script>
Try creating an instance of the router with the new keyword before calling Backbone.history.start.
EDIT: Backbone.history must be undefined, which as others have said is typically because there needs to be a router with at least one route active before Backbone creates this object.
Backbone.js creates an instance of Backbone.History (upper case ‘H’)
called Backbone.history (lower case ‘h’) once a controller has been
created that has at least one route specified on it
I see you're creating a new instance of the router but it's possible that a bad Router instance is still the issue, just a different flavor than discussed in other issues -- check the typeof your window.router object router before your Backbone.history.start() call. Does it return what you'd expect?
EDIT: As confirmed in the comments below, the RestaurantLocationsRouter is somehow bad. We've yet to figure out why, but creating a new router works as expected and indicates that indeed something has gone awry with your router instance.