I maintains two branches master and pathogen for my vim scripts. Both of them have their respective vimrc files. Now I want to merge both of them together and save it as vimrc of branch pathogen.
What I am doing now is checking-out vimrc from master branch and append it to the vimrc of pathogen. Is there a cooler way to do it?
$ git pull origin pathogen
Should do the trick
Related
I am running Odoo 13. I created a new staging branch and used the Odoo.sh web editor to make changes to primary_variables.scss (/src/odoo/addons/web/static/src/scss/primary_variables.scss). However I can't figure out how to commit these changes and push them to my staging branch and merge with the production branch. If I navigate to /src/user and git branch -r I can see all my staging branches however if I navigate to /src/odoo and run git branch -r I can see two branches origin/HEAD and origin/13.0. What am I doing wrong?
No, you can't do that.
Your instance is made up of 4 git repositories. /src/odoo is from https://github.com/odoo/odoo You can change only /src/user
You have to write your own module. That overwrites some CSS values or replaces it fully.
The next link speaks how to load your CSS file. I think you can load your modified file. As it is loaded later the original then it should overwrite original CSS.
https://www.odoo.com/documentation/13.0/reference/javascript_reference.html#assets-management
I'd like to move over a branch from an svn location and use it as the master in the github location. Can anyone tell how to do this?
You can follow this process by Tiago Rodrigues (trodrigues)
If you want to clone an svn repository with git-svn but don't want it to push all the existing branches, here's what you should do.
Clone with git-svn using the -T parameter to define your trunk path inside the svnrepo, at the same time instructing it to clone only the trunk:
git svn clone -T trunk http://example.com/PROJECT
If instead of cloning trunk you just want to clone a certain branch, do the same thing but change the path given to -T:
git svn clone -T branches/somefeature http://example.com/PROJECT
This way, git svn will think that branch is the trunk and generate the following config on your .git/config file:
[svn-remote "svn"]
url = https://example.com/
fetch = PROJECT/branches/somefeature:refs/remotes/trunk
If at any point after this you want to checkout additional branches, you first need to add it on your configuration file:
[svn-remote "svn"]
url = https://example.com/
fetch = PROJECT/branches/somefeature:refs/remotes/trunk
branches = PROJECT/branches/{anotherfeature}:refs/remotes/*
The branches config always needs a glob. In this case, we're just specifying just one branch but we could specify more, comma separating them, or all with a *.
After this, issue the following command:
git svn fetch
Sit back. It's gonna take a while, and on large repos it might even fail. Sometimes just hitting CTRL+C and starting over solves it. Some dark magic here.
After this, if you issue a git branch -r you can see your remote branch definitions:
git branch -r
anotherfeature
From there you can define a master branch, and push it to a GitHub repo:
git checkout -b master anotherfeature
git remote add origin https://github.com/user/arepo.git
git push -u origin master
If you insist on using git-svn, VonC already provided a good answer.
But for a one-time migration git-svn is not the right tool for conversions of repositories or parts of repositories. It is a great tool if you want to use Git as frontend for an existing SVN server, but for one-time conversions you should not use git-svn, but svn2git which is much more suited for this use-case.
There are plenty tools called svn2git, the probably best one is the KDE one from https://github.com/svn-all-fast-export/svn2git. I strongly recommend using that svn2git tool. It is the best I know available out there and it is very flexible in what you can do with its rules files.
You will be easily able to configure svn2gits rule file to produce the result you want from your current SVN layout, including any complex histories like yours that might exist and including producing several Git repos out of one SVN repo or combining different SVN repos into one Git repo cleanly in one run if you like.
If you are not 100% about the history of your repository, svneverever from http://blog.hartwork.org/?p=763 is a great tool to investigate the history of an SVN repository when migrating it to Git.
Even though git-svn or the nirvdrum svn2git is easier to start with, here are some further reasons why using the KDE svn2git instead of git-svn is superior, besides its flexibility:
the history is rebuilt much better and cleaner by svn2git (if the correct one is used), this is especially the case for more complex histories with branches and merges and so on
the tags are real tags and not branches in Git
with git-svn the tags contain an extra empty commit which also makes them not part of the branches, so a normal fetch will not get them until you give --tags to the command as by default only tags pointing to fetched branches are fetched also. With the proper svn2git tags are where they belong
if you changed layout in SVN you can easily configure this with svn2git, with git-svn you will loose history eventually
with svn2git you can also split one SVN repository into multiple Git repositories easily
or combine multiple SVN repositories in the same SVN root into one Git repository easily
the conversion is a gazillion times faster with the correct svn2git than with git-svn
You see, there are many reasons why git-svn is worse and the KDE svn2git is superior. :-)
In Git, during a merge, is there a way that we can tell git to discard local changes in case of a conflict and apply the changes from the merged branch?
I mean if there is a way, then we can do merges like branch merges without conflicts.
Before trying to merge, you can discard the local changes yourself git reset --hard HEAD.
You can replace HEAD by whatever commit hash you want.
This will bring you the the clean state of the commit you're actually on, and you'd lose all your changes.
If you want to keep them, you can stash them before with git stash, or move them to another branch:
git checkout -b new_branch
git add .
git commit -m "My awesome commit"
git checkout - # will bring you back to the last branch you were in
If you want to ignore all local changes, and an additional merge commit you want to just move your branch to the remote HEAD.
git log --oneline origin/master
# assume the first sha is bbdfa17
git reset --hard bbdfa17
Now you are at the tip of the tree with no merge commits.
It sounds like you want to read about the merge strategies 'theirs' and 'ours'. When merging you can specify that either your current branch (ours) or the remote branch (theirs) is the correct one.
I am trying to use git svn to connect to our company repository. We have a slightly non-standard branches directory. How to access this using git svn has been discussed before, however, we seem to have a slight twist in our branch names that seems to keep me from getting them all.
Let's consider an example svn repo:
trunk/
tags/
branches/
rootbranch/
tku/subbranch
We have branches at the root level of the branches directory. But we have branches in nested folders, as well. The same goes for the tags dir, but I think that is just a second example of the same problem.
If I use git svn clone file:///tmp/gitsvn/svnrepo git-clone -s, I get only the root branches, as expected:
/tmp/gitsvn/git-clone$ git branch -r
rootbranch
tku
trunk
But if I clone using _git svn clone file:///tmp/gitsvn/svnrepo git-clone2 -b branches//_, I get only the sub-branches:
/tmp/gitsvn/git-clone2$ git branch -r
tku/subbranch
Is there a way to have both?
Additional branches can be accessed by adding multiple branches lines to the git-svn config.
In the .git/config file, there will be a section similar to the following:
[svn-remote "svn"]
url = http://server/svn
fetch = trunk:refs/remotes/trunk
branches = branches/*:refs/remotes/branches/*
tags = tags/*:refs/remotes/tags/*
Simply add another entry for the extra directory of branches. For example:
branches = branches/tku/*:refs/remotes/branches/tku/*
Then run git svn fetch to retrieve the branches from the svn repository.
I believe it's also possible to create this setup when constructing the git repository, using multiple -b options to the clone command.
git svn clone http://svn.foo.org/project -T trunk -b branches -b branches/tku -t tags
For anyone else who stumbles over this: it seems that having both is not possible. Subversion allows a mixed setup of branches, but it is discouraged, and so it seems okay that git does not support this. My solution was to bring all branches to the same level, then forget about the issue and move on. Having only one level of branches seems better anyway.
I have a number of locally committed patches in my git-svn repo which I haven't yet commited to our svn repo. A normal "git svn dcommit" will commit all of these patches to svn. I would like to commit only some of my patches (simple bug fixes), but not others (untested major changes). How can I do this with git svn?
I've been following the procedure here:
http://fredericiana.com/2009/12/31/partial-svn-dcommit-with-git/
If you're comfortable rebasing, it works pretty well.
Here's what I ended up doing. The starting point is the "master" branch synced with svn, with all of my local patches on top.
Create a new branch (wip = Work In Progress).
git branch wip
This makes a copy of the current branch, including all patches not yet committed to svn. The current branch will stay as "master" and will not be changed.
Remove the unwanted local patches from "master" with a rebase:
git rebase -i HEAD~10
Now the "master" branch has patches you can safely commit:
git svn dcommit
The "wip" branch now has the major changes which aren't yet ready for sharing. Actually, I want them to stay there and this is where I would stop. It's possible to do the svn dcommit from the "wip" branch once everything is finalized. But for completess' sake, and to answer the original question, there's a final step:
Pull the uncommitted changes back to the "master" branch using git cherry-pick and finally remove the useless branch with git branch -d wip.
With git, you're not actually supposed to operate on single changesets. The best approach I know is to create local branches for any non-trivial work. This way, your untested major changes will end up in different branches of your git repository, and you'll be able to differ them quite easily.
If this is the problem you have at the moment you can probably create create a new branch from the point you last updated from svn and then use git-cherry-pick to transfer your simple bug fixes to this new branch, from which you can then dcommit to svn.
From a more long-term point of view it's best to have your own "master" branch made from subversion trunk, and then either:
Rebase all your branches every time you update from svn, then merge those you want to get to svn to your master and dcommit from there.
Merge stuff from svn using regular git-merge, and then merge stuff to your master for dcommits by git diff ..my_branch | patch -p1, which will eliminate history that git-svn can't handle. This approach is more complicated for the final merging but allows you to merge stuff between branches (and possibly other people) in git itself.