I'm looking to get the maximum value of a column from an instance of a com.isomorphic.datasource.DataSource. Is this possible?
A general "run this sql against this datasource" would be particularly helpful, as later I'll be looking to do more, including getting a row "count" for some criteria.
I could technically fetch ALL records and iterate through them myself, though this is clearly less than optimal. I can't seem to find anything related in the SmartGWT docs.
I'm using:
SmartGWT Power v3.0.p20121127
In DataSource, applyFilter() methods with different different arguments are there you can use one of them and using Criteria and AdvancedCriteria you can do.
Related
I want to know if it's possible to pass in a list as a parameter in native queries.
When search up online, an article in Baeldung has exactly what I want to do:
Collection-Valued Positional Parameters usage
I did the exact same thing, except that in the article, they used "createQuery" and I used "createNativeQuery". Not sure if this is the reason why mine is not working.
CreateQuery means JPQL was passed in which is parsed and modified into SQL, which allows it to break the collection parameter into its components to pass each into the SQL statement. CreateNativeQuery uses your SQL which isn't modified, and JDBC doesn't understand collections so requires parameters broken up into individual arguments in the SQL. You have to do it yourself and dynamically build the SQL based on the number of parameters in the collection.
There are other questions with solutions that touch on other options, such as using SQL within criteria or JPQL queries that can let you get the best of both.
I have a Microsoft Access 2010 form with dropboxes and a checkbox which represent certain parameters. I need to run a query with conditions based on these parameters. It should also be a possibility for no criteria from the dropdown boxes and checkbox in order to pull all data.
I have two working ways of implementing this:
I build a query with IIf statements in the WHERE clause, nesting statements until I have accounted for every combination of criteria. I reference the criteria in the SQL logic by using Forms!frmMyFrm!checkbox1 for example or by using a function FormFieldValue(formName,fieldName) which returns the value of a control with the input of the form and control name (This is because of previous issues). I set this query to run with the press of the form's button.
I set a vba sub to run with the press of the button. I check the conditions and set the query SQL to a predetermined SQL string based on the control criteria (referenced in the same way as the previous method). This also involves many If...Else statements, but is a little easier to read than a giant query.
What is the preferred method? Which is more efficient?
I don't believe you would find one way is more efficient over the other, at least not noticeably. For the most part it is simply personal preference.
I generally use VBA and check the value of each dropdown/checkbox and build pieces of the SQL query then put together at the end. The issue that you may run into with this method though is that if you have a large number of dropdowns and checkboxes the code is easy to get "lost" in.
If time to run is very key though you could always use some of the tips How do you test running time of VBA code? to see which way is faster.
After a lot of experimentation, and a bit of new information indicating having a pre-built query is faster than having SQL compiled in VBA, the most efficient and clear solution in the context of Microsoft Access is to build and save a number of dependent queries beforehand.
Essentially, build a string of queries each with an IIf dependent on a different criterium. Then you only need to run the final query. The only case where you would have to incorporate a VBA If...Else is if you need to query something more complicated than SELECT...WHERE(IIf(...)).
This has a few advantages:
The SQL is already compiled in the saved query, speeding things up.
No more getting lost in code:
There is no giant, nearly-impossible-to-edit query with way too many IIfs.
The minimal VBA code is even easier to follow.
At least for me, who's not an expert in SQL, it's convenient that I can often use the MS Access visual query builder for each part.
I've looked at plenty of examples on this site, but I'm still not sure how to do this:
For illustration, let's say I have persistent Venues, each of which has a collection of Events, where each Event has ReservationDate. If I want to get all the Venues whose next Event is of type "Wedding", how would I go about it? It requires selecting based on a value of a specific element (in this case the first ReservationDate > Today) in the child collection, that element being determined by a different restriction (Type == "Wedding").
I've looked at various queries using CreateCriteria, QueryOver, DetachedCriteria, JoinOver and the whole gamut of NH query options (I don't want to use HQL), but I'm still at a loss.
Your help is appreciated.
Michael
I've created very detailed example how to handle these situations. Please see all the details here:
Query on HasMany reference
The point is to create few Subqueries represented as DetachedCriteria. Using aliasing we can communicate among them (passing the ID).
At the end, we can SELECT clean/flat structure of the ROOT entity... while having full power of filtering based on referenced collecitons.
This approach has the biggest advantage in the fact, that we can apply the paging (Take(), Skip()) because the final select is on top of the root table
I'm trying to get a list of Change Requests that match certain conditions, some of these conditions are met by using functions like has_attr().
I would like to ask is it at all possible, I need for instance to use such function has_associated_task(cvtype="task") is it possible to do that?
For queries I'm using the following pattern:
http://ip[:port]/change/oslc/db/dbURI/role/User/cr?oslc_cm.query=change:cvtype="problem" and request_type="Change_Request" and has_associated_task(cvtype="task")&oslc_cm.properties=problem_synopsis
this does work without the function term but I would like to extend the search criteria further, is there any other way besides doing a predefined query in change? Is there somewhere a list of terms? like change:cvtype (I've tried to see this [http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/rational/change/1.0/][1] but I got a "whoops" from the web server)
There are some ways you could solve this:
OSLC Resource Shapes - some OSLC providers associate shapes (like schemas) that describe what you can expect from an OSLC Query Capability.
There isn't a way in the simple query syntax to test for null (or not null), assuming you want to have some condition such as (cvtype="task" and linkedTask != NULL). To get around this you can simply query based on cvtype="task" and locally filter the results using tools such as XPath or Jena. Alternatively you can do is look for extensions to the tool you are working with to see if they provide any extensions to the query syntax to support your use case, I don't have this information off hand.
I am changing the command text for a data set inside the .rdl ffile:
I would like to know how can I update the resulting fields that are returned by the select statement:
I know that these fields must be automatically generated, so I was wondering if it's possible to update them right after editing the SQL code inline??
Usually when someone wants to have a look at the data in command text they are wanting it for reference to an end user(from what I have seen). You may want to amend it but ultimately with reporting your first goal should be: "What am I doing this for?" If your goal is dynamic creation at runtime then I would avoid this and offer a few other suggestions:
Procertize it. Making a stored procedure if you have the know how in SQL Server is a convenient and fast way to get what you want and you can optimize it if you know what you are doing with your SQL FU to get good results. The downside would be if you work with multiple environments you have to deploy your code for the TSQL as well as the RDL file.
Use an expression to build the dataset at runtime. In cases where I have been told that the query itself was not properly optimized by other developers they have mentioned doing this. I myself do not always see the advantage of doing this versus just having your predicate construction work well with good indexing on the source engine. Regardless you can build your dataset at runtime. It would be similar to hitting 'fx' next to the text and then putting in something like this(assuming you have a variable named #Start):
="Select thing
from table
Where >= " & Parameters!Start.Value
Again I have not really seen if this is really that much faster than:
Select thing
from table
Where >= #Start
But it is there if you just want to build it dynamically.
You can try to build your expression dynamically from parameters being PART of the select statement. SSRS is all about the 'expressions' and what you can do with them. Once you jump in and learn how they apply to everything you can go nuts so to speak on using them. A general rule though is the more of them you use and rely on the slower your reports will become.
I hope some of this may help, I would ask first is something dynamic due to a need to be event driven or is performance related.