We have convention to turn snake-case db columns to pascal case in our entities:
Map(x => x.ProjectName).Column("project_name");
The mapping is always exactly this. How can we tell FNH to do the work rather than typing them all?
implement IPropertyConvention and use
// in Apply (maybe filter out some special cases)
instance.Column(ToSnakeCase(instance.Name));
private string ToSnakeCase(string name)
{
var result = new Stringbuilder(name.Length);
for (int i = 0; i < name.Length; i++)
{
if (i > 0 && char.IsUpper(name[i]))
result.Append('_').Append(char.ToLower(name[i]));
else
result.Append(char.ToLower(name[i]));
}
return result.ToString();
}
Related
Assuming i have an parent class that I filter on various properties, one of which is a property that is an array of items .
Now say that i want to only return the parent item if my array of items as above a min value and below a max value ...that's fine i can work that bit out;
What if i then want to then sort on the filtered result set of those items
I made a c# fiddle example to show what im trying to achieve :
https://dotnetfiddle.net/mV4d28
(note that foo2 is returned first even though foo1 has items in its array that are less that those in foo2)
As i need to do this using a index i need the index to be able to compute the order by based on the filter criteria used in my query.
I know elasticsearch has an inner hits function that dose this and mongo has pipelines which also dose this so im sure Raven must have a way of doing this too ?
I was hoping using just index and a transform with prams i could achieve this so I tried it:
my index and transform look like this
public class familyTransfrom : AbstractTransformerCreationTask<ParentItem>
{
public class Result : ParentItem{
public double[] ChildItemValuesFiltered { get; set; }
}
public familyTransfrom(){
TransformResults = parents => from parent in parents
let filterMinValue = Convert.ToDouble(ParameterOrDefault("FilterMinValue", Convert.ToDouble(0)).Value<double>())
let filterMaxValue = Convert.ToDouble(ParameterOrDefault("FilterMaxValue", Convert.ToDouble(9999)).Value<double>())
select new Result{
ParentItemId = parent.ParentItemId,
ParentItemName = parent.ParentItemName,
ParentItemValue = parent.ParentItemValue,
//ChildItemValuesFiltered = parent.ChildItems.Where(p => p.ChildItemValues.Any(y => Convert.ToDouble(y) >= Convert.ToDouble(filterMinValue) && Convert.ToDouble(y) <= Convert.ToDouble(filterMaxValue))).SelectMany(t => t.ChildItemValues).ToArray<double>(),
ChildItemValuesFiltered = parent.ChildItems.SelectMany(p => p.ChildItemValues.Where(y => Convert.ToDouble(y) >= Convert.ToDouble(filterMinValue) && Convert.ToDouble(y) <= Convert.ToDouble(filterMaxValue))).ToArray<double>(),
ChildItems = Recurse(parent, x => x.ChildItems).Select(y => y).ToArray()
};
}
}
public class familyIndex : AbstractIndexCreationTask<ParentItem>{
public class Result : ParentItem {
public double[] ChildItemValues { get; set; }
}
public familyIndex(){
Map = parents => from parent in parents
select new Result{
ParentItemId = parent.ParentItemId,
ParentItemName = parent.ParentItemName,
ParentItemValue = parent.ParentItemValue,
ChildItemValues = parent.ChildItems.SelectMany(p => p.ChildItemValues.Select(y => y)).ToArray(),
ChildItems = Recurse(parent, x => x.ChildItems).Select(y => y).ToArray()
};
Index("ParentItemId", FieldIndexing.Analyzed);
Index("ParentItemName", FieldIndexing.Analyzed);
Index("ParentItemValue", FieldIndexing.Analyzed);
Index("ChildItemValues", FieldIndexing.Analyzed);
Index("ChildItems", FieldIndexing.Analyzed);
}
}
my query is as follows , (this is using the live raven playground so this should just work out of the box it you want to use it)
using (IDocumentStore store = new DocumentStore { Url = "http://live-test.ravendb.net/", DefaultDatabase = "altha" })
{
store.Initialize();
using (IDocumentSession session = store.OpenSession())
{
if(1 == 2){
//foreach (ParentItem element in data.OfType<ParentItem>()) {
// session.Store((ParentItem)element);
// session.SaveChanges();
//}
new familyIndex().Execute(store);
new familyTransfrom().Execute(store);
}else{
double filterMinValue = 3.0;
double filterMaxValue = 4.0;
var results = session
.Advanced
.DocumentQuery<familyIndex.Result,familyIndex>()
.WhereBetweenOrEqual("ChildItemValues", filterMinValue, filterMaxValue)
.SetResultTransformer<familyTransfrom, familyTransfrom.Result>()
.SetTransformerParameters(new Dictionary<string, RavenJToken> {
{ "FilterMinValue", filterMinValue },
{ "FilterMaxValue", filterMaxValue } })
.OrderBy("ChildItemValues")
.OfType<ParentItem>().ToList();
results.Dump();
}}
}
What i found was i cant use "ChildItemValuesFiltered" from the transform result as its not index. So unless i can order by the result of a transform ? i couldn't get this to work as although it filters it dosnt order correctly.
Is there another to achieve what i want using projections or intersection or rank or reduce try method ?
I was thinking if i had to perhaps i could use https://ravendb.net/docs/article-page/3.5/csharp/indexes/querying/sorting#custom-sorting
and do something like this:
public class SortByNumberOfCharactersFromEnd : IndexEntriesToComparablesGenerator
{
private readonly double filterMinValue;
private readonly double filterMinValue;
public SortByNumberOfCharactersFromEnd(IndexQuery indexQuery)
: base(indexQuery)
{
filterMinValue = IndexQuery.TransformerParameters["FilterMinValue"].Value<double>(); // using transformer parameters to pass the length explicitly
filterMaxValue = IndexQuery.TransformerParameters["FilterMaxValue"].Value<double>();
}
public override IComparable Generate(IndexReader reader, int doc)
{
var document = reader.Document(doc);
double[] childItemValues = (double[])document.GetValues("ChildItemValuesFiltered").Select(double.Parse).ToArray(); // this field is stored in index
return childItemValues.Where(x => x >= min && x <= max).Min();
}
}
then do a where filter and order by clause using index and transform passing in the same prams that i use in the where filter . however im not sure if this would work ?
More importantly im not sure how i go about getting the sort dll into the plugins ie what name space should the class go under, what name spaces dose it need to import, what assembly name dose it need to use etc
According to https://ravendb.net/docs/article-page/3.5/csharp/server/plugins/what-are-plugins i just need to drop the dll in and raven will this this up , however i cant seem to find what name space i need to reference for IndexEntriesToComparablesGenerator ?
im using linqpad 5 to test my stuff ...so in order to use the custom order i have to reference the class
any tips or advice or how to guild/examples welcome
so it didn't occur to me that i could do the filtering in the transform
TransformResults = parents => from parent in parents
let filterMinValue = Convert.ToDouble(ParameterOrDefault("FilterMinValue", Convert.ToDouble(0)).Value<double>())
let filterMaxValue = Convert.ToDouble(ParameterOrDefault("FilterMaxValue", Convert.ToDouble(9999)).Value<double>())
select new {
ParentItemId = parent.ParentItemId,
ParentItemName = parent.ParentItemName,
ParentItemValue = parent.ParentItemValue,
//ChildItemValuesFiltered = parent.ChildItems.Where(p => p.ChildItemValues.Any(y => Convert.ToDouble(y) >= Convert.ToDouble(filterMinValue) && Convert.ToDouble(y) <= Convert.ToDouble(filterMaxValue))).SelectMany(t => t.ChildItemValues).ToArray<double>(),
ChildItemValuesFiltered = parent.ChildItems.SelectMany(p => p.ChildItemValues.Where(y => Convert.ToDouble(y) >= Convert.ToDouble(filterMinValue) && Convert.ToDouble(y) <= Convert.ToDouble(filterMaxValue))).ToArray<double>(),
ChildItems = Recurse(parent, x => x.ChildItems).Select(y => y).ToArray()
} into r
where r.ChildItemValuesFiltered.Length > 0
orderby r.ChildItemValuesFiltered.Min()
select r;
This gives me what i wanted, here are the sample query:
http://live-test.ravendb.net/databases/altha/indexes/familyIndex?start=0&pageSize=25&resultsTransformer=familyTransfrom&tp-FilterMinValue=3&tp-FilterMaxValue=4
i cant take credit for this as guys at raven helped me but sharing the knowledge for others
I need add And && Or same query
This is my code
var predicate = PredicateBuilder.True<Summon>();
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(param.id))
{
predicate = predicate.And(m => m.id== param.id);
}
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(param.subjects))
{
var subjectsPredicate = PredicateBuilder.False<Summon>();
string[] subjects = param.subjects.Split(',');
for (int i = 0; i < subjects.Length; i++)
{
subjectsPredicate = subjectsPredicate.Or(m => m.SubjectId ==subjects[i]);
}
predicate = predicate.And(subjectsPredicate);
}
My Problem is that when the subjects exist I got an error, all other queries work good just this "sub-query" make the query to fail.
This is my error, If subjects exist.
The solution is simple - Not using the array on the search query
subjects[i] - Does not work
instead of write
for (int i = 0; i < subjects.Length; i++)
{
subjectsPredicate = subjectsPredicate.Or(m => m.SubjectId ==subjects[i]);
}
Neet to write
foreach (string key in subjects)
{
subjectsPredicate = subjectsPredicate.Or(m => m.SubjectId == key);
}
I am working on After Effects scripts and using AE scripting guide as a base of learning.
I have one After Effect project which includes two AE projects in it and each of the project having multiple items in it.
I want to fetch the composition from the master project having specific name but without looping through all items in the project. For example,
var myComp = app.project.comp("Composition Name");
Is this possible ? Is there any other way around ?
You can get the comp in this way:
var myComp;
for (var i = 1; i <= app.project.numItems; i ++) {
if ((app.project.item(i) instanceof CompItem) && (app.project.item(i).name === 'Comp Name')) {
myComp = app.project.item(i);
break;
}
}
Be aware that if you want to check if there's no more comp with the same name you should write it like this:
var myComp;
for (var i = 1; i <= app.project.numItems; i ++) {
if ((app.project.item(i) instanceof CompItem) && (app.project.item(i).name === 'Comp Name')) {
if (myComp) {
throw new Error();//or something else
}
myComp = app.project.item(i);
}
}
And if you want you can put it in array and check if it's the only return myComp[0] and if not do womething like throw error
My website went down for a few days, therefore I am trying to produce some error handling while the MVC app doesnt have access to certain resources so if something doesnt become unavailable again the WHOLE THING doesnt have to go down.
At the moment a controller is trying to access viewbag.moreNewProducts that isnt available.
public ActionResult Index(string search)
{
string[] newProductLines = this.getMoreNewProducts();
string[] newNews = this.getMoreNews();
string[] newPromotions = this.getMorePromotions();
string[] fewerProductLines = this.getLessNewProducts(newProductLines);
ViewBag.moreNewProducts = newProductLines;
ViewBag.moreNews = newNews;
ViewBag.morePromotions = newPromotions;
ViewBag.lessNewProducts = fewerProductLines;
bool disableShowMore = false;
This is where I run into an error: " foreach (string line in newProductLines)"
public string[] getLessNewProducts(string[] newProductLines)
{
int charCount = 0;
int arrayCount = 0;
string[] displayProductLines = new string[6];
bool continueWriting;
if (newProductLines == null)
{
foreach (string line in newProductLines)
{
continueWriting = false;
for (int i = 0; charCount < 250 && i < line.Length && arrayCount < 5; i++)
{
string index = newProductLines[arrayCount].Substring(i, 1);
displayProductLines[arrayCount] += index;
charCount++;
continueWriting = true;
}
if (continueWriting == true)
{
arrayCount++;
}
}
string[] LessNewProducts = new string[arrayCount];
for (int d = 0; d < arrayCount; d++)
{
LessNewProducts[d] = displayProductLines[d];
}
return LessNewProducts;
}
else
{
return null;
}
}
how do I get around an if else statement so the whole thing doesnt have to crash?
Two things.
Your if (newProductLines == null) statement has the wrong condition on it. I don't believe that you want to enter that if newProductLines is null. You can inverse this condition to get the desired result(if (newProductLines != null)).
If you run into another situation later where you need to catch an error, you can always use the try-catch block to catch exceptions that you are expecting.
try
{
//code that could cause the error here
}
catch(NullReferenceException nullRefExcep)
{
//what you want it to do if the null reference exception occurs
}
if (newProductLines == null)
should be replaced with if (newProductLines != null) so you don't have to handle the code with newProductLines as null. Basically, with this condition you will always have the NullReferenceException unless you manage your exception with a try catch block.
The real question to ask yourself is:
Why would newProductLines be null?
Presumably getMoreNewProducts() found a situation where it thought it would be appropriate to return a null value.
If this is happening because the system has an error that would make your page meaningless, then you may just want to change getMoreNewProducts() so that it throws an exception when that error state occurs. Typically it's safest and easiest to debug programs that fail as soon as they run into an unexpected situation.
If this is happening because there are no new products, then you should just return an empty collection, rather than null. All your code should work just fine after that, without the need for an if/else statement: it will return an empty array for LessNewProducts, which is probably correct.
However, let's assume that there's a situation that you're anticipating will occur from time to time, which will make it impossible for you to retrieve newProductLines at that time, but which you would like the system to handle gracefully otherwise. You could just use null to indicate that the value isn't there, but it's really hard to know which variables might be null and which never should be. It may be wiser to use an optional type to represent that getMoreNewProducts() might not return anything at all, so you can force any consuming code to recognize this possibility and figure out how to deal with it before the project will even compile:
public ActionResult Index(string search)
{
Maybe<string[]> newProductLines = this.getMoreNewProducts();
string[] newNews = this.getMoreNews();
string[] newPromotions = this.getMorePromotions();
Maybe<string[]> fewerProductLines = newProductLines.Select(this.getLessNewProducts);
Disclaimer: I am the author of the Maybe<> class referenced above.
Here are some additional improvements I'd suggest:
Don't use ViewBag. Instead, create a strongly-typed ViewModel so that you can catch errors in your code at compile-time more often:
var viewModel = new ReportModel {
newProductLines = this.getMoreNewProducts(),
newNews = this.getMoreNews(),
...
};
...
return View(viewModel);
Learn to use LINQ. It will simplify a lot of your very complicated code. For example, instead of:
string[] LessNewProducts = new string[arrayCount];
for (int d = 0; d < arrayCount; d++)
{
LessNewProducts[d] = displayProductLines[d];
}
return LessNewProducts;
... you can say:
string[] LessNewProducts = displayProductLines.Take(arrayCount).ToArray();
In fact, I think your entire getLessNewProducts() method can be replaced with this:
return newProductLines
.Where(line => line.Length > 0)
.Select(line => line.Substring(0, Math.Min(line.Length, 250)))
.Take(5);
I know that I should break down the method by condition, and implement interface to each subclass, but I do not know how does the client class use it, can you give me simple sample?
public void buildInfoItemUpdater() {
for (int i = 0; i < this.projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.size(); i++) {
if (this.projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.get(i) instanceof ComboBoxUpdater) {
ComboBoxUpdater tempItem = (ComboBoxUpdater) this.projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.get(i);
projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.get(i).setAnswer(tempItem.getUserAnswer());
} else if (this.projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.get(i) instanceof TextBoxUpdater) {
TextBoxUpdater tempItem = (TextBoxUpdater) this.projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.get(i);
projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.get(i).setAnswer(tempItem.getUserAnswer());
} else if (this.projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.get(i) instanceof TextFieldUpdater) {
TextFieldUpdater tempItem = (TextFieldUpdater) this.projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.get(i);
projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.get(i).setAnswer(tempItem.getUserAnswer());
}
}
}
Thank you in advance.
As suggested by #SirPentor, if the Updater classes have a common base class (lets call it UpdaterBase), then define the getUserAnswer() method there, most likely as abstract.
Then you could simplify buildInfoItemUpdater() as follows:
public void buildInfoItemUpdater() {
for (int i = 0; i < this.projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.size(); i++) {
UpdaterBase tempItem =
(UpdaterBase) this.projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.get(i);
projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.get(i).setAnswer(tempItem.getUserAnswer());
}
}
Additionally, whats the difference between this.projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.get(i) and projectInfoInputItemUpdaters.get(i)? Seems like your calling get() twice on the same object, right? You may be able to simplify this part as well.