I would like to use ProGuard to just rename variable and functions. I want the resultant class files to be identical to the source jar in every regard except for the names. Is there an option to do this?
My attempts at using dontoptimize and dontshrink are not working.
Just put the following in your .pro file, and make sure that you don't use the "-keep" option to prevent other things from being obfuscated.
# Don't keep the local variables attributes (LocalVariableTable and LocalVariableTypeTable are dropped).
-keepattributes Exceptions,Signature,Deprecated,SourceFile,SourceDir,LineNumberTable,Synthetic,EnclosingMethod,RuntimeVisibleAnnotations,RuntimeInvisibleAnnotations,RuntimeVisibleParameterAnnotations,RuntimeInvisibleParameterAnnotations,AnnotationDefault,InnerClasses,*Annotation*
In other words, make sure that you don't have the following in your options
-keepattributes LocalVariableTable,LocalVariableTypeTable
Related
Questions
Main question: Can we use/define a placeholder like <CMAKE_MYDUMMYLANGUAGE_LINKER> for CMAKE_MYDUMMYLANGUAGE_LINK_EXECUTABLE the same way we may define CMAKE_MYDUMMYLANGUAGE_COMPILE_OBJECT with <CMAKE_MYDUMMYLANGUAGE_COMPILER>?
If you can elaborate or share good links on placeholders and custom languages, it would be appreciated too. Particularly:
Is there a list of placeholders somewhere or do we need to read the code to get them?
Can we define our own ones? And if yes, is it a recommended practice?
What is the usual way of finding and defining a custom linker?
What should we place into CMakeInformation.cmake, CMakeDetermineCompiler.cmake, and is there a standardized way of setting them?
Speaking of placeholder and tokens, what is the purpose of apparent redundant set with "#MYVAR#"? Is there any non-trivial usage outside packaging? Example in /usr/share/cmake-3.16/Modules/FindCUDA/run_nvcc.cmake
# Set these up as variables to make reading the generated file easier
set(CMAKE_COMMAND "#CMAKE_COMMAND#") # path
set(source_file "#source_file#") # path
(This question is in the continuity of How do CMake placeholders work?)
Context
When doing cross-compilation or intermediate compilations, I know we can use custom commands (for example to pre-compile a ragel file .rl into .cpp). But when browsing CMake available languages in a standard Linux distribution, there are custom *Information.cmake, *DetermineCompiler.cmake etc. files, defining custom languages.
I tried to make a custom one too, but got stuck with the linker, and it made me realize I don't understand placeholder stuff and the standard way of define custom languages (if any). Why can't we use the same logic as for the compiler?
CMakeMyDummyLanguageInformation.txt
set( CMAKE_MYDUMMYLANGUAGE_COMPILE_OBJECT
"<CMAKE_MYDUMMYLANGUAGE_COMPILER> ..."
)
# placeholder CMAKE_MYDUMMYLANGUAGE_LINKER unkown, resulting in `CMAKE_MYDUMMYLANGUAGE_LINKER ...` command to be attempted at link stage
set( CMAKE_MYDUMMYLANGUAGE_LINK_EXECUTABLE
"<CMAKE_MYDUMMYLANGUAGE_LINKER> ..."
)
CMakeMyDummyLanguageDetermineCompiler.txt
find_program(
CMAKE_MYDUMMYLANGUAGE_COMPILER
NAMES "dummycc"
HINTS "${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}"
DOC "dummy cc"
)
mark_as_advanced(CMAKE_MYDUMMYLANGUAGE_COMPILER)
find_program(
CMAKE_MYDUMMYLANGUAGE_LINKER
NAMES "dummyld"
HINTS "${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}"
DOC "dummy ld"
)
mark_as_advanced(CMAKE_MYDUMMYLANGUAGE_LINKER)
Some links related (more or less)
How do CMake placeholders work?
https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/commit/677c091b8140a0655f512b8283c5b120fbd0f99c?view=parallel
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/module/CMakePackageConfigHelpers.html
In my project, the CMakeLists includes other cmake files from a library and those dependencies need some cache variables to be configured by user values.
It is all working well if I define those values from the command line with the cmake command:
-DTHIRDPARTY_FRAMEWORK_ROOT="$thirdpartyFrameworkPath"
But can I define (= hardcode) such values in my own CMakeLists file?
To avoid my own users to do it when they configure my project (some values of the 3d party configuration are constant in my project), and make my own cmake interface simpler.
I tried to simply set the variable with a value, but it is both defined and used in the included cmake so it gets overwritten with their default value just before being used.
Using set(... FORCE) seems to work but it does not look clean to me, and might lead to confusing errors if they rename or change the type of the variables on their side. It also forces me to add a type and a doc string because of the set(... CACHE ...) syntax.
Is there a better way to do this?
Setting CACHE INTERNAL variable is a proper way for hardcode a parameter of the inner project in the outer one:
set(THIRDPARTY_FRAMEWORK_ROOT CACHE INTERNAL "Hardcoded root for 'thirdparty'" <value>)
INTERNAL type makes sure that this setting will overwrite the option (FORCE doesn't need) and makes sure that the option won't be shown for a "normal" user.
Since the parameter is not intended to be changed by a user, its real type is meaningless, so there is no needs for it to coincide with the one set in the inner project.
As for description, you could set it to be empty (the parameter is not shown to the normal user, remember?). Alternatively, in the description you could explain why do you set the variable in the outer project. So an "advanced" user will see your description.
I have 4 files all in the same directory: main.rakumod, infix_ops.rakumod, prefix_ops.rakumod and script.raku:
main module has a class definition (class A)
*_ops modules have some operator routine definitions to write, e.g., $a1 + $a2 in an overloaded way.
script.raku tries to instantaniate A object(s) and use those user-defined operators.
Why 3 files not 1? Since class definition might be long and separating overloaded operator definitions in files seemed like a good idea for writing tidier code (easier to manage).
e.g.,
# main.rakumod
class A {
has $.x is rw;
}
# prefix_ops.rakumod
use lib ".";
use main;
multi prefix:<++>(A:D $obj) {
++$obj.x;
$obj;
}
and similar routines in infix_ops.rakumod. Now, in script.raku, my aim is to import main module only and see the overloaded operators also available:
# script.raku
use lib ".";
use main;
my $a = A.new(x => -1);
++$a;
but it naturally doesn't see ++ multi for A objects because main.rakumod doesn't know the *_ops.rakumod files as it stands. Is there a way I can achieve this? If I use prefix_ops in main.rakumod, it says 'use lib' may not be pre-compiled perhaps because of circular dependentness
it says 'use lib' may not be pre-compiled
The word "may" is ambiguous. Actually it cannot be precompiled.
The message would be better if it said something to the effect of "Don't put use lib in a module."
This has now been fixed per #codesections++'s comment below.
perhaps because of circular dependentness
No. use lib can only be used by the main program file, the one directly run by Rakudo.
Is there a way I can achieve this?
Here's one way.
We introduce a new file that's used by the other packages to eliminate the circularity. So now we have four files (I've rationalized the naming to stick to A or variants of it for the packages that contribute to the type A):
A-sawn.rakumod that's a role or class or similar:
unit role A-sawn;
Other packages that are to be separated out into their own files use the new "sawn" package and does or is it as appropriate:
use A-sawn;
unit class A-Ops does A-sawn;
multi prefix:<++>(A-sawn:D $obj) is export { ++($obj.x) }
multi postfix:<++>(A-sawn:D $obj) is export { ($obj.x)++ }
The A.rakumod file for the A type does the same thing. It also uses whatever other packages are to be pulled into the same A namespace; this will import symbols from it according to Raku's standard importing rules. And then relevant symbols are explicitly exported:
use A-sawn;
use A-Ops;
sub EXPORT { Map.new: OUTER:: .grep: /'fix:<'/ }
unit class A does A-sawn;
has $.x is rw;
Finally, with this setup in place, the main program can just use A;:
use lib '.';
use A;
my $a = A.new(x => -1);
say $a++; # A.new(x => -1)
say ++$a; # A.new(x => 1)
say ++$a; # A.new(x => 2)
The two main things here are:
Introducing an (empty) A-sawn package
This type eliminates circularity using the technique shown in #codesection's answer to Best Way to Resolve Circular Module Loading.
Raku culture has a fun generic term/meme for techniques that cut through circular problems: "circular saws". So I've used a -sawn suffix of the "sawn" typename as a convention when using this technique.[1]
Importing symbols into a package and then re-exporting them
This is done via sub EXPORT { Map.new: ... }.[2] See the doc for sub EXPORT.
The Map must contain a list of symbols (Pairs). For this case I've grepped through keys from the OUTER:: pseudopackage that refers to the symbol table of the lexical scope immediately outside the sub EXPORT the OUTER:: appears in. This is of course the lexical scope into which some symbols (for operators) have just been imported by the use Ops; statement. I then grep that symbol table for keys containing fix:<; this will catch all symbol keys with that string in their name (so infix:<..., prefix:<... etc.). Alter this code as needed to suit your needs.[3]
Footnotes
[1] As things stands this technique means coming up with a new name that's different from the one used by the consumer of the new type, one that won't conflict with any other packages. This suggests a suffix. I think -sawn is a reasonable choice for an unusual and distinctive and mnemonic suffix. That said, I imagine someone will eventually package this process up into a new language construct that does the work behind the scenes, generating the name and automating away the manual changes one has to make to packages with the shown technique.
[2] A critically important point is that, if a sub EXPORT is to do what you want, it must be placed outside the package definition to which it applies. And that in turn means it must be before a unit package declaration. And that in turn means any use statement relied on by that sub EXPORT must appear within the same or outer lexical scope. (This is explained in the doc but I think it bears summarizing here to try head off much head scratching because there's no error message if it's in the wrong place.)
[3] As with the circularity saw aspect discussed in footnote 1, I imagine someone will also eventually package up this import-and-export mechanism into a new construct, or, perhaps even better, an enhancement of Raku's built in use statement.
Hi #hanselmann here is how I would write this (in 3 files / same dir):
Define my class(es):
# MyClass.rakumod
unit module MyClass;
class A is export {
has $.x is rw;
}
Define my operators:
# Prefix_Ops.rakumod
unit module Prefix_Ops;
use MyClass;
multi prefix:<++>(A:D $obj) is export {
++$obj.x;
$obj;
}
Run my code:
# script.raku
use lib ".";
use MyClass;
use Prefix_Ops;
my $a = A.new(x => -1);
++$a;
say $a.x; #0
Taking my cue from the Module docs there are a couple of things I am doing different:
Avoiding the use of main (or Main, or MAIN) --- I am wary that MAIN is a reserved name and just want to keep clear of engaging any of that (cool) machinery
Bringing in the unit module declaration at the top of each 'rakumod' file ... it may be possible to use bare files in Raku ... but I have never tried this and would say that it is not obvious from the docs that it is even possible, or supported
Now since I wanted this to work first time you will note that I use the same file name and module name ... again it may be possible to do that differently (multiple modules in one file and so on) ... but I have not tried that either
Using the 'is export' trait where I want my script to be able to use these definitions ... as you will know from close study of the docs ;-) is that each module has it's own namespace (the "stash") and we need export to shove the exported definitions into the namespace of the script
As #raiph mentions you only need the script to define the module library location
Since you want your prefix multi to "know" about class A then you also need to use MyClass in the Prefix_Ops module
Anyway, all-in-all, I think that the raku module system exemplifies the unique combination of "easy things easy and hard thinks doable" ... all I had to do with your code (which was very close) was tweak a few filenames and sprinkle in some concise concepts like 'unit module' and 'is export' and it really does not look much different since raku keeps all the import/export machinery under the surface like the swan gliding over the river...
As explained here, I like to create file objects in subdirs, and library / executables in the top-level file. However, since all the variables end up in global scope, two subdir files could accidentally use the same variable names. For example:
# Top-level meson.build
subdir('src/abc')
subdir('src/def')
# src/abc/meson.build
my_files=files('1.c','2.c')
# src/def/meson.build
my_files=files('3.c','4.c')
I want meson to throw an error when src/def/meson.build tries to assign a value to my_files. Is this possible in Meson 0.50?
Reassigning variables is rather legitimate operation in meson, so it looks as it is not possible to generate error in standard way. One way of avoiding this problem is following some naming rules e.g. according to folders/sub-folders' names (abc_files, def_files in your case).
But if you really need to have variables with the same name and make sure they are not reassigned, you can use is_variable() function which returns true if variable with given name has been assigned. So, place the following assert before each assignment:
assert(not is_variable('my_files'), 'my_files already assigned!!!')
my_files=files('3.c','4.c')
I have a two sub directories from root on which one has the line:
set(${LIBNAME}_publicheaders
LocalizeResource.h
)
I want to be able to access this variable from the other subdirectory. How can I do this?
#JoakimGebart's answer is probably the more common way to go about this. However, you can also use get_directory_property directly from within the second subdir to achieve what you're after.
I see that in your comment, you've used ${LIB_NAME}_publicheaders, but in your question you have ${LIBNAME}_publicheaders. This could be the cause of your problems, since the command should work like this:
get_directory_property(MyVar
DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/abc
DEFINITION ${LIBNAME}_publicheaders)
However, there are a couple of provisos:
This has to be called after setting the variable in the subdir. i.e. you'd have to ensure add_subdirectory(abc) was called before the add_subdirectory for the one where this will be used.
If LIBNAME is also set inside the same subdir (abc), you'll need to retrieve the value for that first.
So, while this is probably a less common solution, it has the advantage that it doesn't "pollute" the global namespace with subdir-specific variables - this works from with a subdir referring to another subdir.
You can set the variable in the parent scope using the PARENT_SCOPE option to set()
Example:
set(${LIBNAME}_publicheaders
LocalizeResource.h
PARENT_SCOPE
)
See http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v2.8.10/cmake.html#command:set
This, however, means that the variable is available not only in the other subdirectory, but in any other subdirectories on the same level as well.