I would like to bind some TextBlock components to local settings data. Is this possible and, if so, how is the LocalSettings object referenced in XAML?
Related
Example:
<DataTemplate x:DataType="FooEntity">
<Grid Background="{x:Bind MyClass.MyStaticBindingMethod(???)}" />
</DataTemplate>
It’s easy enough to pass in properties of the entity, but I can’t see a way to pass in the instance itself. Is this feature not supported? I could store a reference to this in FooEntity with a property called Instance (for example), and then go MyClass.MyStaticBindingMethod(Instance), but just want to make sure there isn't a cleaner way.
Relevant docs: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/xaml-platform/x-bind-markup-extension
You cannot pass the instance itself onto a DataTemplate.
The DataTemplate is only responsible for describing the visual structure of a data object and therefore its not part of its job to hold a explicit reference to any CLR object.
DataTemplate is defined to extend the visual structure of data objects, such as GridView/ListView, and those already handle the possibility of referencing to Collections, by setting the ItemsSource dependency property. Taking advantage of this, the DataTemplate simply exposes the customization of your visual structure. However this visual structure should be followed with the necessary bindings, to achieve your desired custom behavior.
If you are dealing with x:Bind, you will have to set the x:DataType, to the type of the Collection which you are setting as the Control ItemsSource, because the compiler needs that information at compile-time.
That is not a problem for Binding because those are evaluated at runtime, with the help of reflection.
I am not sure if I understand correctly, but to bind this, meaning the entity directly, you can just use empty binding:
Background="{x:Bind}"
or
Background="{Binding}"
This however means that FooEntity should derive from Brush so that it is compatible with Background type.
I would like to map a placeholder in a SCADA widget to a custom property that I put in my device via UpdateManagedObject. I can see the property using the API but it doesn't appear along native properties when I configure the widget.
This is possible, although this feature to add non-native properties from managed objects was implemented in version 7.27.0.
I'm using a global .resx file for all of the strings in my project to simplify providing all of the translations we will need. So for each of my forms instead of setting Localizable to true, I instead create a global Resourcemanager manager in my constructor like this:
GlobalObjects::rm1 = gcnew System::Resources::ResourceManager(L"Hycal_PC_Software.AppLocalization", Assembly::GetExecutingAssembly());
InitializeComponent();
And then I set the Text values of various form elements like this:
this->fileToolStripMenuItem->Text = GlobalObjects::rm1->GetString(L"File");
Works fine when running the app, but now when I go to design view for a form I get the horrible error page instead of my form because it doesn't like the rm1->. In hindsight it seems obvious it wouldn't but what is the correct way to deal with this? I really don't want to have to have individual .resx files for each form, particularly because they will also contain all sorts of things I don't want to localize.
I have a TextBlock and its Text property is bound to a ViewModel property. The binding is Oneway.
When I change the Text property of the Control from the xaml.cs the binding gets broken. If the binding is TwoWay I don't have this problem but the source property is updated too. Is it possible to have OneWay binding and change the target property value without braking the binding?
I suggest a workaround, like setting the Binding to TwoWay and ignore the update in the property. Something like this:
private string textValue;
public string TextValue
{
get { return textValue; }
set
{
:
}
}
Now the Property can no longer be set by the view.
Although no code is provided, this scenario typically occurs when you have bound a control to a view model and at a later stage your logic tries to update the value in the control programmatically.
You should not try to do this, that is define multiple sources of the value for a control. If you bind the control to a property on the view model, then to update the value in the control you should update the field in the view model.
If you were to set the value of a bound control programmatically at runtime so that it no longer matched the bound object value, when some other event causes the control binding to be re-evaluated, the value that you have provided programmatically would be overwritten again, you could easily end up with a scenario where the value you provided programmatically is never visible to the user.
In this scenario you should either:
Add a new property to the view model, bind this value to the control, then your program logic can set this value equal to the original property when the data is loaded, and updated when you need to
Not use bindings at all, always write to the control programatically that way you tightly control when the value is updated.
There is a workaround to this if you absolutely must have one. if you are using compiled bindings (x:Bind), then because the bindings are compiled it is possible to call SetValue on the bound dependency property at runtime and the previously compiled bindings will still be evaluated. However I advise against exploiting this because it makes your code a lot harder to follow and debug, when bindings are used, we tend not to look for code that directly addresses and sets control values.
I have created an application by using Silverlight 5. There are many two-way databind in it. I want to retore a change in UI by restoring the object behind. For example:
I have an object behind which contains properties double Left, Right, I inherited it from INotifyPropertyChanged. In UI, I created tow button (ButtonLeft and ButtonRight) and their parent a Canvas Control, ButtonLeft bind Left property in two-way mode and ButtonRight bind Right property in two-way mode. It works very well, if I drag ButtonLeft, then the Left property will be updated with the new Left Value, same for ButtonRight.
Is there any way to restore the old value after the change of UI. Actually, the relation of class in my application is very complicated, I have already knew that retore the value of property in object will restore the UI, so is there any way (more general and loose-coupling) to restore all the objects that need to be restored.
I have thought of creating an interface IRestorable (inside Store(), Restore()) for objects that need to save and restore state. An attribute Restorable for property which need to be restored. For me, the use of AOP could be a good idea, each time when an instance of IRestorable is created, AOP will call a method for saving the current state (properties which is marked an [Restorable]) of object. I don't know if I was on the right way. If not, any advice will be appreciated.
Use of memeno design pattern.
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/18025/Generic-Memento-Pattern-for-Undo-Redo-in-C