Is there a way to tell CMake to compile .pas source files with standard add_executable and target_link_libraries calls (like for c and c++ projects)?
Currently, we just list the files and use add_custom_command / add_custom_target and manually set the linker flags, but it would be nice to have something more integrated.
Source file: http://code.google.com/p/hedgewars/source/browse/hedgewars/CMakeLists.txt
According to the CMake docs for the enable_language() command and this question: What are the possible values for the LANGUAGE variable in CMAKE, it looks like the answer is no, there is currently no such way to build Pascal source code with the standard add_executable and target_link_libraries.
You can open up an issue ticket on Kitware's CMake GitLab repo requesting such functionality be added. If you do so, add a link to it here.
Related
I have an existing CMake project which is used to build a native library (supporting a few Linux platforms as well as Windows). This library will soon be integrated into a Kotlin app, for which I need to create a .def file, as stated here
Conceptually, I could create this using FILE and other native CMake tools, but if there's a "proper" way to do this, I'd prefer to use that!
Is that file something you have to write yourself? I can't tell just from reading the docs, but that's the impression I'm getting. If each .def corresponds to a CMake target, you could create a build event custom command by using the build events signature of add_custom_command to run the cinterop command.
If you want to script the process of writing the .def file so it's more automatically-robust to you renaming things in the future,
As for putting things like target compile options in a file, you could use the $<TARGET_GENEX_EVAL:> and $<TARGET_PROPERTY:> generator expressions and the COMPILE_OPTIONS target property and the CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS (and similar) variables in a file(GENERATE) command call.
Simliar for compile definitions (see the COMPILE_DEFINITIONS target property).
For a list of all properties supported on targets, see https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/manual/cmake-properties.7.html#properties-on-targets
I'm currently changing the build system on my project, from gnu makefiles to cmake (that generate makefiles).
My project generates several libraries (.lib), and several executables (.exe).
Currently i generate the makefiles using the following command :
cmake -G "Unix Makefiles" .. -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
The generated makefiles contain an all target, as well as a target for every executable (compiled as such with the add_executable cmake directive), so i can compile a subset of the project (which saves a lot of time) : make executable_1; make executable_2 and so on.
However, there is no target for the libraries (compiled as such with the add_library cmake directive) so i cannot do make library_1 for example. I want to do this because it would save a lot of time.
I tried to add a dummy executable in the library's cmake, and link the library to this executable (which only contains a main without actually using library_1's code).
add_library(library_1 test.cpp)
add_executable(dummy_exe dummy_main.cpp)
target_link_library(dummy_exe library_1)
It does add a target for dummy_exe but does not build the library because it does not actually need to link any of the library_1's code.
This was a workaround attempt anyway, and i'd rather just call make library_1 after all. Is there any way to add a makefile target for a library using cmake ?
As answered by w-m and Fred, CMAKE indeed create a target for libraries in the Makefile.
I was trying to build the library with the cmake subproject name of the library instead of the library name.
make help was indeed of big help to find this issue, as it lists everything that can be built.
I have a CMake configuration file building two libraries:
a third-party library (here called ThirdPartyLib) containing a real-time OS / board support package from a supplier. It is built outside CMake using the autotools toolchain.
an extended version of the former library (here called ExtendedThirdPartyLib)
Unfortunately, some source code that I need (various tools) are not built in the ordinary build script for (1). Since I don't want to mess with the suppliers build script I want to add another library (2), building the missing files and thus extending the library from the supplier.
I want to able to do something like this in CMakeFiles.txt:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.2)
project(bsp)
include(ExternalProject)
ExternalProject_Add(
ThirdPartyLib
URL <http://some.url/bsp.tar.bz2
BUILD_COMMAND make -C ../external/ThirdPartyLib/src
)
set_target_properties(ThirdPartyLib PROPERTIES EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL TRUE)
add_library(ExtendedThirdPartyLib
${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/some/path/missing_file1.c
${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/some/path/missing_file2.c
)
add_dependencies(ExtendedThirdPartyLib ThirdPartyLib)
target_include_directories(ExtendedThirdPartyLib PUBLIC
${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/some/path/include
)
target_link_libraries(ExtendedThirdPartyLib ThirdPartyLib)
The problem here is that the path to missing_file1.c and missing_file2.c are not valid when CMake is generating the build files (they are extracted from the tarball from the supplier). CMake exits with an error output saying: "Cannot find source file".
Is there a neat way to make this work? I.e. is it possible to convince CMake that certain non-existant input files will exist when building of the library begins? Or is there any other recommended way to solve this issue?
(I have temporary made local copies of the files I need to build from the suppliers tarball, but that is of course not a good solution. If those files are changed in future versions of the suppliers package and I forget to overwrite my local copies it could be a horrible mess...
Another "solution" would be to create a small makefile outside CMake and use another ExternalProject_Add in the CMakeFiles.txt somehow. But that's not a good solution either, e.g. if compile and linker flags are modified I need to remember to change the makefile too.)
Personally, I dislike the ExternalProject_Add command, because it does way too many things for my taste, but I've digressed.
What if you do something like this, where bar is simulating your ExtendedThirdPartyLib target, since it depends on generated files
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.11)
project(lol C)
set(SOURCES lol.c) # only this file exists
add_library(lol ${SOURCES})
set(FOO_FILES "foo1.c" "foo2.c")
add_custom_command(OUTPUT ${FOO_FILES}
COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} -E touch ${FOO_FILES}
WORKING_DIRECTORY "${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}"
COMMENT "Creating ${FOO_FILES}"
VERBATIM)
add_custom_target(foo DEPENDS ${FOO_FILES})
add_library(bar ${FOO_FILES})
add_dependencies(bar foo)
target_link_libraries(lol bar)
The whole approach hinges on the fact that the method, where produced/generated files are procured, is explicitly defined via the custom command and associated custom target.
You should modify the custom command to extract the required files (e.g. could even call some external script) from the tarball (which might require downloading with curl or something similar).
I have a huge project managed with CMake and this project has hundreds of components each of them having own source files and each of them linking to a list of libraries, specified with target_link_libraries(${project} some_libraries, some_other_libraries)
Now, what I am aiming for is that:
Without actually modifying any of the CMakeLists.txt I want ALL the projects's target executable to link to some specific libraries.
Is there a way of achieving this? Since this is a one time trial, I don't want to manually hunt down all the CMakeLists.txt files and modify them (yes, this is the other alternative). Just a note, I compile the entire project from command line, using cmake (no cmake gui).
This is kind of a hack, but for a C++ project, you can use CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_LIBRARIES. For a C project, I think you would use CMAKE_C_STANDARD_LIRBARIES.
Example for C++ that links to libbar and libfoo:
cmake ... -DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_LIBRARIES="-lbar -lfoo"
See the documentation here:
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.6/variable/CMAKE_LANG_STANDARD_LIBRARIES.html
This won't be available for older versions of CMake; it was added some time after version 3.0.
This is a dirty, dirty hack, so please only use it for testing.
You can actually overload the add_executable command by defining a function of the same name. Do this close to the top of the top-level CMakeLists.txt:
function (add_executable name)
message("Added executable: " ${name})
_add_executable(${name} ${ARGN})
target_link_libraries(${name$} your_additional_lib)
endfunction()
Note that _add_executable is an internal CMake name that may break in future CMake versions. As of now (version 3.0) it seems to work with all versions though.
You can overload add_library the same way if required.
For more fine-grained control over what is linked, instead of calling target_link_libraries you can also mess with the LINK_LIBRARIES and INTERFACE_LINK_LIBRARIES target properties directly.
I'm currently building a compiler/interpreter in C/C++.
When I noticed LLVM I thought it would fit greatly to what I needed and so I'm trying to integrate LLVM in my existing build system (I use CMake).
I read this bout integration of LLVM in CMake. I copy and pasted the example CMakeLists.txt, changed the LLVM_ROOT to ~/.llvm/ (that's where I downloaded and build LLVM and clang) and it says it isn't a valid LLVM-install. Best result I could achieve was the error message "Can't find LLVMConfig" by changing LLVM_ROOT to ~/.llvm/llvm.
My ~/.llvm/ folder looks like this:
~/.llvm/llvm # this folder contains source files
~/.llvm/build # this folder contains object, executable and library files
I downloaded LLVM and clang via SVN. I did not build it with CMake.
Is it just me or is something wrong with the CMakeLists.txt?
This CMake documentation page got rotted, but setting up CMake for LLVM developing isn't different from any other project. If your headers/libs are installed into non-standard prefix, there is no way for CMake to guess it.
You need to set CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH to the LLVM installation prefix or CMAKE_MODULE_PATH to prefix/share/llvm/cmake to make it work.
And yes, use the second code snippet from documentation (under Alternativaly, you can utilize CMake’s find_package functionality. line).