In the latest version V.4.42.14, user can directly edit data in the grids mode, which is awesome. Every time I edit one row data and move my cursor to next, the edited data automatic commit to database. The automatic commit is very dangerous without I click a save button. Sometimes I edit a data just for demonstration purpose, actually I don't want it commit when I move my cursor to next line. Does anybody can help how to avoid edited data automatic commit in LinqPad Edit Mode?
LINQPad behaves this way to be consistent with SSMS, and to avoid the possiblity of losing large number of edits should you close the query or hit F5 (or close LINQPad) without saving.
It wouldn't be hard to offer the option of table-level buffering if there's enough demand. It would require, though, an enhancement to the extensibility model to allow queries to signal to the host that they have unsaved data, so that LINQPad can offer "Abandon Changes" prompt to avoid the scenario described above.
Related
I have an SQL file containing several commands, when I need to make a correction to my application database that the application can't yet do, I use DBVis to select and execute the command I need (e.g. to delete an incorrect entry). Problem is, the button to run the whole page is right next to the button to run a selected command. So I just dropped and re-created my table, losing all my data. Is there a way to undo this?
I'm looking to either 'undo' each command until I get back to the right place, or revert back to yesterday, where I know everything was correct.
Thanks!
Yes, you can if...
your administration tool did set autocommit=OFF by default, you can
just execute a ROLLBACK (or just shutdown your administration tool)
If latter doesn't work, check if your binary log was enabled, and restore with mysqlbin log tool
If none of the above mentioned solution works, use your (probably not existent) backup for restoring
I need to log the last time the user signed in using my node.js server. I am looking into three options. The persistence requirement is not super high, meaning that the margin of error of this record being recorded is open.
Use SQL DB and whenever the user logs in it modifies their profile account.
Record it in a server text file. So whenever the user logs on, this file will be opened and updated. The opening, recording and closing of the file will all be done asynchronously.
I'm thinking that the second option is the better on because I'm using SQL for many other operations so I prefer to not interrupting my DB as much as possible.
One concern I have for the second option is the performance hit on the server that will be caused by the frequently read and write to a local text file.
I'm curious what other people who have gone through this path thought about my thought process. Any opinions or tips are highly welcomed. Thank you.
Normally you should use a SQL database, it is a much more better way than the plain text.
The main problem with a text file is that when you log in, you can simply append a line (but what about a couple of user loggin in at the same moment ? You have not any warranty that all the access are logged), but when you want to extact the last login for a user, you should read (and then load) all the file from the start (or the end), which can cause a really worst problem than the access to the DB.
Naturally you can work out all the problems with a text file, but then you have written a lot of code to avoid a simple update query.
I don't think that, with the information you give, you should be worried about the performance of a database access in this case.
I'm doing a db in access 2002 and I've had some problems with the locking shared mode. I have an app that has a lot of programs and almost 10 users logged on. And one of things that the app do is open a report, that user choose the program and the number (usually has 4 numbers for each program), and before the report open, I open it in hidden mode and I edit the report for current program/number, with this rotine I just have one report that may turn in hundreds... saving memory and optimizing it. Then I save it and open it again in view mode.
But the problem is when has other person using the app, so the access can't edit and save report... just in exclusive mode!
Has a cmd in vba to allow momentarily changes in shared mode? I don't know, like freeze all user, save and then unfreeze them?
Or any other suggestion?
About create a Front-End/Back-End I think that is impracticable, cause is a beta version and I have to update it often and I already tried to do this also, but it's became too slow... I splitted then in a database(just tables) into network and front-end with all querys, forms, reports and linked tables in local PC, but it really became tooo slow. If someone can help me let it faster would solve my problems too
I splitted the db and I'm trying optimize it. I read a lot about it on the web and I changed all Access setting that I saw that need to be changed and now I get a faster program. But slower than with a single app.
But now there are just fell Forms that making my app slow.
For example I have some Forms that always when I close it I spends a long time waiting it to close ;(
So I realised that this Forms are always saving before close. And always that a form need to save(with linked tables taht are in the network) waste a lot of time, so I need to avoid this.
But I didn't get it so far...
I realise that this forms are saving because in form_open I hidde some columns(that are different for each program) and edit it caption. And then if I need to close form, it saves and waste this such time!
How could I hidde/edit this columns withou need to save form? Or how could I close form without save structure changes?
I know how to do that with just a button, but these forms are datasheets and I can close it only in "X" Form button. And unfortunattely Access dont have BeforeClose event, and in a OnClose event it save before go to this sub!
See if you can make use of a WhereCondition with the DoCmd.OpenReport Method to avoid the need to modify your report's design at run time.
The WhereCondition is applied to your report's existing record source query as if it where written into that query's WHERE clause.
So if the record source for YourReport is ...
SELECT program_id, some_number, another_field
FROM YourTable;
... then this ...
DoCmd.OpenReport "YourReport", _
WhereCondition:="program_id = 7 AND some_number = 22"
would give you the same set of rows as would revising the record source to this ...
SELECT program_id, some_number, another_field
FROM YourTable
WHERE
program_id = 7
AND some_number = 22;
This advantage of this approach, if you can make it work for your situation, is that you would no longer need exclusive access to the db since you're not actually changing the report's design.
The related issue about beta status making it impractical to split the application is something you should re-consider carefully. Splitting ensures you can easily preserve the data in the BE when you roll out changes to the FE application. Even if you've come up with another method to avoid losing data when you change versions, that method can not be simpler than segregating the data into a BE file.
And when you split the application, each user should get their own copy of the FE file which is stored locally on their machine's hard drive; those FE files will contain links to the tables in the BE file which is stored on a file share.
Keeping the users' FE applications updated as you release new versions is a problem which has been solved. For example, see Tony Toews' Auto FE Updater. And you can find other approaches by searching the web.
If your concern is performance with a split application, check Tony's Microsoft Access Performance FAQ.
I altered a stored procedure and unknowingly overwrote some changes that were made to it by another developer. Is there a way to undo the changes and get the old script back?
Unfortunately I do not have a backup of that database, so that option is ruled out.
The answer is YES, you can get it back, but it's not easy. All databases log every change made to it. You need to:
Shutdown the server (or at least put it into read-only mode)
Take a full back up of the server
Get a copy of all the db log files going back to before when the accident happened
Restore the back up onto another server
Using db admin tools, roll back through the log files until you "undo" the accident
Examine the restored code in the stored proc and code it back into your current version
And most importantly: GET YOUR STORED PROCEDURE CODE UNDER SOURCE CONTROL
Many people don't grok this concept: You can only make changes to a database; you can't roll back the stored proc version like you can with application code by replacing files with their previous versions. To "roll back", you must make more changes that drop/define your stored proc.
Note to nitpickers: By "roll back" I do not mean "transaction roll back". I mean you've made your changes and decide once the server is back up that the change is no good.
"Is there a way to undo the changes and get the old script back?"
Short answer: Nope.
:-(
In addition to the sound advice to either use a backup or recover from source control (and if you're doing neither of those things, you need to start), you could also consider getting SSMS Tools Pack from #MladenPrajdic. His Management Studio add-in allows you to keep a running history of all the queries you've worked on or executed, so it is very easy to go back in time and see previous versions. While that doesn't help you if someone else worked on the last known good version, if your entire team is using it, anyone can go back and see any version that was executed. You can dictate where it is saved (to your own file system, a network share, or a database), and fine-tune how often auto-save kicks in. Really priceless functionality, especially if you're lazy about backups and/or source control (though again, I stress, you should be doing these things before you touch your production server again).
You could look through the cached execution plans and try to find the one where your colleague made his changes and run the relevant parts again.
EDIT
Although Bohemian looks to have a good answer if you've got the changes in the TL, this is what I'm talking about. Review the SQL text for the plan.
SELECT cached.*,
sqltext.*
FROM sys.dm_exec_cached_plans cached
CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_sql_text (cached.plan_handle) AS sqltext
But as squillman points out, there is no execution plan for DDL.
You won't be able to get it back from the database side of things. Your options at this point are pretty much limited to 1) recover from backup, 2) go to source control or 3) hope that someone else has a copy still up in an editor somewhere or saved to a file.
If neither of these are an option for you, then here's the obligatory "you should take regular backups and use source control"....
I'm way late to the game on this but I did this same thing this morning and found I had forgot to save my script at some point in the past and needed to recover it. (It will be in source control after I get done fixing this!!!)
Some people mentioned restoring from a backup but no one really mentioned how easy this is if you have a back up. Moreover, you aren't locked into rolling back the production database. I think this is key and assuming you have a back up I would say this is a much better alternative to what has been voted up to the best answer.
All you have to do is take your back up and restore it to a new database. Pull out the sp you are looking for and voila, you've recovered the missing code.
Don't forget to drop the newly created database after you've recovered the missing file.
I had the same problem, and I don't have the confidence to go restoring from log files to another server. I was pretty distraught until I realised the solution was very simple...
Press Ctrl-Z over and over until I had undone my changes and the run the ALTER PROCEDURE again.
Admittedly I was pretty lucky that I still had it there to revert to but it really is the easiest fix. Probably a bit late now though.
If you have scripted the stored procedure out from management studio object explorer this will work.
Before expand and collapse the object explorer just scroll and point to the stored procedure you have opened. Script the stored procedure as create or alter to then you can get the previous version of the proc since the object explorer doesn't refreshed yet. This is always my life saver.
I have got a database of ms-sql server 2005 named mydb, which is being accessed by 7 applications from different location.
i have created its copy named mydbNew and tuned it by applying primary keys, indexes and changing queries in stored procedure.
now i wants to replace old db "mydb" from new db "mydbnew"
please tell me what is the best approach to do it. i though to do changes in web.config but all those application accessing it are not accessible to me, cant go for it.
please provide me experts opinion, so that i can do replace database in minimum time without affecting other db and all its application.
my meaning of saying replace old db by new db is that i wants to rename old db "mydb" to "mydbold" and then wants to remname my new db "mydbnew" to "mydb"
thanks
Your plan will work but it does carry a high risk, especially since I'm assuming this is a system that has users actively changing data, which means your copy won't have the same level of updated content in it unless you do a cut right before go-live. Your best bet is to migrate your changes carefully into the live system during a low traffic / maintenance period and extensively test it once your done. Prior to doing this, or the method you mentioned previously, backup everything.
All of the changes you described above can be made to an online database without the need to actually bring it down. However, some of those activities will change the way in which the data is affected by certain actions (changes to stored procs), that means that during the transition the behaviour of the system or systems may be unpredicatable and therefore you should either complete this update at a low point in day to day operations or take it down for a maintenance window.
Sql Server comes with a function to make a script file out of you database, you can also do this manually but clicking on the object you want to script and selecting the Script -> CREATE option. Depending on the amount of changes you have to make it may be worthwhile to script your whole new database (By clicking on the new database and selecting Tasks -> Generate Scripts... and selecting the items needed).
If you want to just script out the new things you need to add individually then you simply click on the object you want to script, select the Script <object> as -> then select DROP and CREATE to if you want to kill the original version (like replacing a stored proc) or select CREATE to if your adding new stuff.
Once you have all the things you want to add/update as a script your then ready to execute that against the new database. This would be the part where you backup everything. Once your happy everything is backed up and the system is in maintenance or a low traqffic period, you execute the script. There may be a few problems when you do this, you will need to fix these as quickly as possible (usually mostly just 'already exisits' errors, thats why drop and create scripts are good) and if anything goes really wrong restore your backups and try again (after figuring out what happened and how to fix it).
Make no mistake if you have a lot of changes to make this could be a long process, or it could take mere minutes, you just need to adapt if things go wrong and be sure to cover yourself with backups/extensive prayer. Good Luck!