I'm attaching a event receiver to a single list (Web scope). But the ER runs for all lists in the Web. This question says that the feature, the ER is deployed in, have to be Web scope. This is the case.
The Feature is activated programmatically bound to an ER of a list in the TLS.
newProjectWeb.Features.Add(new Guid("57e21870-6285-4e0a-b9a0-067f774492ae"));
Please see my code below. Am I missing an Update or anything?
Thanks for your help in advance.
public void AddEventReceiverToMemberList()
{
try
{
_clsLists.AddEventReceiverToList(Web, ProjectMemberList.LIST_INTERNAL_NAME, typeof(SCMUProjectMemberList), SPEventReceiverType.ItemAdded);
_clsLists.AddEventReceiverToList(Web, ProjectMemberList.LIST_INTERNAL_NAME, typeof(SCMUProjectMemberList), SPEventReceiverType.ItemDeleting);
_clsLists.AddEventReceiverToList(Web, ProjectMemberList.LIST_INTERNAL_NAME, typeof(SCMUProjectMemberList), SPEventReceiverType.ItemUpdated);
Web.Update();
}
catch (Exception)
{
throw;
}
}
public void AddEventReceiverToList(SPWeb web, string listName, Type eventReceiverClass, SPEventReceiverType eventType)
{
SPList list = this.GetListByName(web, listName);
string className = eventReceiverClass.FullName;
string assemblyName = Assembly.GetAssembly(eventReceiverClass).FullName;
list.EventReceivers.Add(eventType, assemblyName, className);
}
If you want to run the event receiver for a single list..
Refer Here
Check the end of the post, Changing the attribute to "ListTemplateId" to "ListURL" in Elements.xml
In the Elements.xml file replace:
<Receivers ListTemplateId="100">
by
<Receivers ListUrl="Lists/Your List Name">
Related
Let's say I have a domain object Customer. On this object I have an address to an external site.
#PropertyLayout(named = "Link", describedAs = "Clickable link to customer")
public String getLink() {
return "http://www.customer.com";
}
In this case this will be shown as just text on the webpage. How do I create a clickable link in the wicket viewer from this?
There is a third-party extension: https://github.com/kev-m/isis-wicket-url/
This was done by Kevin Meyer, one of our committers.
I've raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1616 to incorporate this into the framework "proper".
Meantime, you can add an action to open the link easily enough
#Action(semantics=SemanticsOf.SAFE)
#MemberOrder(named="link", sequence="1")
public java.net.URL openLink() throws MalformedURLException {
return new java.net.URL(getLink());
}
and just to finish it off, you could add this guard:
public String disableOpenLink() {
if(getLink() == null) { return "no link to open."; }
try {
openLink();
} catch(MalformedURLException ex) {
return "Bad link";
}
return null;
}
I don't think there is out of the box solution in Apache Isis for this.
You will need to roll your own Wicket component for it. For example, annotate this property with custom annotation #ExternalLink and then register a ComponentFactory that creates Wicket ExternalLink component for this property. See https://github.com/isisaddons/isis-wicket-summernote/blob/master/cpt/src/main/java/META-INF/services/org.apache.isis.viewer.wicket.ui.ComponentFactory for example.
I have some custom logging in my plugin and want to include the contents of my tracingService in my custom logging (which is called within a catch block, before the plugin finishes).
I cant seem to access the content of tracingService. I wonder if it is accessible at all?
I tried tracingService.ToString() just incase the devs had provided a useful overload, alas as expected I get name of the class "Microsoft.Crm.Sandbox.SandboxTracingService".
Obviously Dynamics CRM makes use of the tracingService content towards the end of the pipeline if it needs to.
Anybody have any ideas on this?
Kind Regards,
Gary
The tracing service does not provide access to the trace text during execution but that can be overcome by creating your own implementation of ITracingService. Note, you cannot get any text that was written to the trace log prior to the Execute method of your plugin being called - meaning if you have multiple plugins firing you won't get their trace output in the plugin that throws the exception.
public class CrmTracing : ITracingService
{
ITracingService _tracingService;
StringBuilder _internalTrace;
public CrmTracing(ITracingService tracingService)
{
_tracingService = tracingService;
_internalTrace = new StringBuilder();
}
public void Trace(string format, params object[] args)
{
if (_tracingService != null) _tracingService.Trace(format, args);
_internalTrace.AppendFormat(format, args).AppendLine();
}
public string GetTraceBuffer()
{
return _internalTrace.ToString();
}
}
Just instantiate it in your plugin passing in the CRM provided ITracingService. Since it is the same interface it works the same if you pass it to other classes and methods.
public class MyPlugin : IPlugin
{
public void Execute(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
var tracingService = new CrmTracing((ITracingService)serviceProvider.GetService(typeof(ITracingService)));
tracingService.Trace("Works same as always.");
var trace = tracingService.GetTraceBuffer();
}
}
To get the traceInfo string from traceService at runtime I used debugger to interrogate the tracingService contents.
So the trace string is accessible from these expressions...
for Plugins
((Microsoft.Crm.Extensibility.PipelineTracingService)(tracingService)).TraceInfo
for CWA
((Microsoft.Crm.Workflow.WorkflowTracingService)(tracingService)).TraceInfo
You can drill into the tracing service by debugging and extract the expression.
However, at design time neither of these expressions seem to be accessible from any of the standard CRM 2011 SDK dlls... so not sure if its possible as yet.
I am trying to create a few lists using features so that these custom lists are created automatically as soon as the feature is activated on a team site. The feature is scoped at a site level.
Is it possible to check weather a list already exists in a site collection before adding a new list using feature? I tried to do this check on feature activated event which gave me error saying list with same name already exists. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks
public static class SPWebHelper
{
public static bool IsListExistByTitle(this SPWeb web, string title)
{
return web.Lists.Cast<SPList>().FirstOrDefault(
list => list.Title == title) != null;
}
public static bool IsListExistByInternalName(this SPWeb web, string internalName)
{
return web.Lists.Cast<SPList>().FirstOrDefault(
list => list.RootFolder.Name == internalName)!=null;
}
}
call extension function
bool existlist = SPContext.Current.Web.IsListExistByTitle("YourListTitle");
I'm trying to implement a customization in SharePoint 2010 so that when a document is uploaded to a library, the file name is changed to include the Document ID in the name. (I know that people shouldn't worry about file names as much any more, but we have a lot of legacy files already named and users who like to have local copies).
I was able to implement a custom Event Receiver on the ItemAdded event that renames the file by adding the Document ID before the file name. This works correctly from the web Upload.
The problem is with the Explorer View. When I try to add the file using WebDAV in the Explorer View, I get two copies of the file. It seems that when a file is uploaded via the Web the events that fire are
ItemAdding
ItemAdded
But when I copy/paste a file into Explorer View I see the following events:
ItemAdding
ItemAdded
ItemAdding
ItemAdded
ItemUpdating
ItemUpdated
The result is I have two files with different names (since the Document IDs are different).
I've found a lot of people talking about this issue online (this is the best article I found). Anyone have any other ideas? Would it make more sense to do this in a workflow instead of an event receiver? I could use a scheduled job instead, but that might be confusing to the user if the document name changed a few minutes later.
This is my code that works great when using the Web upload but not when using Explorer View:
public override void ItemAdded(SPItemEventProperties properties)
{
try
{
SPListItem currentItem = properties.ListItem;
if (currentItem["_dlc_DocId"] != null)
{
string docId = currentItem["_dlc_DocId"].ToString();
if (!currentItem["BaseName"].ToString().StartsWith(docId))
{
EventFiringEnabled = false;
currentItem["BaseName"] = docId + currentItem["BaseName"];
currentItem.SystemUpdate();
EventFiringEnabled = true;
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
//Probably should log an error here
}
base.ItemAdded(properties);
}
I have found that using a Visual Studio workflow allows me the most flexibility to do this. A SharePoint Designer Workflow would be simpler, but would be harder to deploy to different sites and libraries.
After reading some good articles including this and this I have come up with this code which seems to work. It starts a workflow and waits until the document is not in a LockState and then processes the filename.
The workflow looks like this:
And here is the code behind:
namespace ControlledDocuments.RenameWorkflow
{
public sealed partial class RenameWorkflow : SequentialWorkflowActivity
{
public RenameWorkflow()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public Guid workflowId = default(System.Guid);
public SPWorkflowActivationProperties workflowProperties = new SPWorkflowActivationProperties();
Boolean continueWaiting = true;
private void onWorkflowActivated1_Invoked(object sender, ExternalDataEventArgs e)
{
CheckFileStatus();
}
private void whileActivity(object sender, ConditionalEventArgs e)
{
e.Result = continueWaiting;
}
private void onWorkflowItemChanged(object sender, ExternalDataEventArgs e)
{
CheckFileStatus();
}
private void CheckFileStatus()
{
if (workflowProperties.Item.File.LockType == SPFile.SPLockType.None)
{
continueWaiting = false;
}
}
private void renameFile(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
try
{
SPListItem currentItem = workflowProperties.Item;
if (currentItem["_dlc_DocId"] != null)
{
string docId = currentItem["_dlc_DocId"].ToString();
if (!currentItem["BaseName"].ToString().StartsWith(docId))
{
currentItem["BaseName"] = docId + currentItem["BaseName"];
currentItem.SystemUpdate();
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
//Should do something useful here
}
}
}
}
Hope this helps someone else if they have the same problem.
Well i'd go for the workflow workaround... there are 2 options imo:
1) Create a boolean fied in your document library, then create a SPD workflow that fires when the item is added and set that field to "Changed" or something. In the EventReceiver you then check whether that field has been set..
2) Do everything with the SPD workflow - changing the title like in this example should be no problem.
I am having a minor problem with WCF service proxies where the message contains List<string> as a parameter.
I am using the 'Add Service reference' in Visual Studio to generate a reference to my service.
// portion of my web service message
public List<SubscribeInfo> Subscribe { get; set; }
public List<string> Unsubscribe { get; set; }
These are the generated properties on my MsgIn for one of my web methods.
You can see it used ArrayOfString when I am using List<string>, and the other takes List<SubscribeInfo> - which matches my original C# object above.
[System.Runtime.Serialization.DataMemberAttribute(EmitDefaultValue=false)]
public System.Collections.Generic.List<DataAccess.MailingListWSReference.SubscribeInfo> Subscribe {
get {
return this.SubscribeField;
}
set {
if ((object.ReferenceEquals(this.SubscribeField, value) != true)) {
this.SubscribeField = value;
this.RaisePropertyChanged("Subscribe");
}
}
}
[System.Runtime.Serialization.DataMemberAttribute(EmitDefaultValue=false)]
publicDataAccess.MailingListWSReference.ArrayOfString Unsubscribe {
get {
return this.UnsubscribeField;
}
set {
if ((object.ReferenceEquals(this.UnsubscribeField, value) != true)) {
this.UnsubscribeField = value;
this.RaisePropertyChanged("Unsubscribe");
}
}
}
The ArrayOfString class generated looks like this. This is a class generated in my code - its not a .NET class. It actually generated me a class that inherits from List, but didn't have the 'decency' to create me any constructors.
[System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThroughAttribute()]
[System.CodeDom.Compiler.GeneratedCodeAttribute("System.Runtime.Serialization", "3.0.0.0")]
[System.Runtime.Serialization.CollectionDataContractAttribute(Name="ArrayOfString", Namespace="http://www.example.com/", ItemName="string")]
[System.SerializableAttribute()]
public class ArrayOfString : System.Collections.Generic.List<string> {
}
The problem is that I often create my message like this :
client.UpdateMailingList(new UpdateMailingListMsgIn()
{
Email = model.Email,
Name = model.Name,
Source = Request.Url.ToString(),
Subscribe = subscribeTo.ToList(),
Unsubscribe = unsubscribeFrom.ToList()
});
I really like the clean look this gives me.
Now for the actual problem :
I cant assign a List<string> to the Unsubscribe property which is an ArrayOfString - even though it inherits from List. In fact I cant seem to find ANY way to assign it without extra statements.
I've tried the following :
new ArrayOfString(unsubscribeFrom.ToList()) - this constructor doesn't exist :-(
changing the type of the array used by the code generator - doesn't work - it always gives me ArrayOfString (!?)
try to cast List<string> to ArrayOfString - fails with 'unable to cast', even though it compiles just fine
create new ArrayOfString() and then AddRange(unsubscribeFrom.ToList()) - works, but I cant do it all in one statement
create a conversion function ToArrayOfString(List<string>), which works but isn't as clean as I want.
Its only doing this for string, which is annoying.
Am i missing something? Is there a way to tell it not to generate ArrayOfString - or some other trick to assign it ?
Any .NET object that implements a method named "Add" can be initialized just like arrays or dictionaries.
As ArrayOfString does implement an "Add" method, you can initialize it like this:
var a = new ArrayOfString { "string one", "string two" };
But, if you really want to initialize it based on another collection, you can write a extension method for that:
public static class U
{
public static T To<T>(this IEnumerable<string> strings)
where T : IList<string>, new()
{
var newList = new T();
foreach (var s in strings)
newList.Add(s);
return newList;
}
}
Usage:
client.UpdateMailingList(new UpdateMailingListMsgIn()
{
Email = model.Email,
Name = model.Name,
Source = Request.Url.ToString(),
Subscribe = subscribeTo.ToList(),
Unsubscribe = unsubscribeFrom.To<ArrayOfString>()
});
I prefer not to return generic types across a service boundary in the first place. Instead return Unsubscribe as a string[], and SubscriptionInfo as SubscriptionInfo[]. If necessary, an array can easily be converted to a generic list on the client, as follows:
Unsubscribe = new List<string>(unsubscribeFrom);
Subscribe = new List<SubscriptionInfo>(subscribeTo);
Too late but can help people in the future...
Use the svcutil and explicitly inform the command line util that you want the proxy class to be serialized by the XmlSerializer and not the DataContractSerializer (default). Here's the sample:
svcutil /out:c:\Path\Proxy.cs /config:c:\Path\Proxy.config /async /serializer:XmlSerializer /namespace:*,YourNamespace http://www.domain.com/service/serviceURL.asmx
Note that the web service is an ASP.NET web service ok?!
If you are using VS 2008 to consume service then there is an easy solution.
Click on the "Advanced..." button on the proxy dialog that is displayed when you add a Service Reference. In the Collection Type drop down you can select System.Generic.List. The methods returning List should now work properly.
(Hope this is what you were asking for, I'm a little tired and the question was a tad difficult for me to read.)