Related
I'm interested in learning some (ideally) database agnostic ways of selecting the nth row from a database table. It would also be interesting to see how this can be achieved using the native functionality of the following databases:
SQL Server
MySQL
PostgreSQL
SQLite
Oracle
I am currently doing something like the following in SQL Server 2005, but I'd be interested in seeing other's more agnostic approaches:
WITH Ordered AS (
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY OrderID) AS RowNumber, OrderID, OrderDate
FROM Orders)
SELECT *
FROM Ordered
WHERE RowNumber = 1000000
Credit for the above SQL: Firoz Ansari's Weblog
Update: See Troels Arvin's answer regarding the SQL standard. Troels, have you got any links we can cite?
There are ways of doing this in optional parts of the standard, but a lot of databases support their own way of doing it.
A really good site that talks about this and other things is http://troels.arvin.dk/db/rdbms/#select-limit.
Basically, PostgreSQL and MySQL supports the non-standard:
SELECT...
LIMIT y OFFSET x
Oracle, DB2 and MSSQL supports the standard windowing functions:
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY key ASC) AS rownumber,
columns
FROM tablename
) AS foo
WHERE rownumber <= n
(which I just copied from the site linked above since I never use those DBs)
Update: As of PostgreSQL 8.4 the standard windowing functions are supported, so expect the second example to work for PostgreSQL as well.
Update: SQLite added window functions support in version 3.25.0 on 2018-09-15 so both forms also work in SQLite.
PostgreSQL supports windowing functions as defined by the SQL standard, but they're awkward, so most people use (the non-standard) LIMIT / OFFSET:
SELECT
*
FROM
mytable
ORDER BY
somefield
LIMIT 1 OFFSET 20;
This example selects the 21st row. OFFSET 20 is telling Postgres to skip the first 20 records. If you don't specify an ORDER BY clause, there's no guarantee which record you will get back, which is rarely useful.
I'm not sure about any of the rest, but I know SQLite and MySQL don't have any "default" row ordering. In those two dialects, at least, the following snippet grabs the 15th entry from the_table, sorting by the date/time it was added:
SELECT *
FROM the_table
ORDER BY added DESC
LIMIT 1,15
(of course, you'd need to have an added DATETIME field, and set it to the date/time that entry was added...)
SQL 2005 and above has this feature built-in. Use the ROW_NUMBER() function. It is excellent for web-pages with a << Prev and Next >> style browsing:
Syntax:
SELECT
*
FROM
(
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER () OVER (ORDER BY MyColumnToOrderBy) AS RowNum,
*
FROM
Table_1
) sub
WHERE
RowNum = 23
I suspect this is wildly inefficient but is quite a simple approach, which worked on a small dataset that I tried it on.
select top 1 field
from table
where field in (select top 5 field from table order by field asc)
order by field desc
This would get the 5th item, change the second top number to get a different nth item
SQL server only (I think) but should work on older versions that do not support ROW_NUMBER().
Verify it on SQL Server:
Select top 10 * From emp
EXCEPT
Select top 9 * From emp
This will give you 10th ROW of emp table!
Contrary to what some of the answers claim, the SQL standard is not silent regarding this subject.
Since SQL:2003, you have been able to use "window functions" to skip rows and limit result sets.
And in SQL:2008, a slightly simpler approach had been added, using
OFFSET skip ROWS
FETCH FIRST n ROWS ONLY
Personally, I don't think that SQL:2008's addition was really needed, so if I were ISO, I would have kept it out of an already rather large standard.
1 small change: n-1 instead of n.
select *
from thetable
limit n-1, 1
SQL SERVER
Select n' th record from top
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ID, NAME, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY ID) AS ROW
FROM TABLE
) AS TMP
WHERE ROW = n
select n' th record from bottom
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ID, NAME, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY ID DESC) AS ROW
FROM TABLE
) AS TMP
WHERE ROW = n
When we used to work in MSSQL 2000, we did what we called the "triple-flip":
EDITED
DECLARE #InnerPageSize int
DECLARE #OuterPageSize int
DECLARE #Count int
SELECT #Count = COUNT(<column>) FROM <TABLE>
SET #InnerPageSize = #PageNum * #PageSize
SET #OuterPageSize = #Count - ((#PageNum - 1) * #PageSize)
IF (#OuterPageSize < 0)
SET #OuterPageSize = 0
ELSE IF (#OuterPageSize > #PageSize)
SET #OuterPageSize = #PageSize
DECLARE #sql NVARCHAR(8000)
SET #sql = 'SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT TOP ' + CAST(#OuterPageSize AS nvarchar(5)) + ' * FROM
(
SELECT TOP ' + CAST(#InnerPageSize AS nvarchar(5)) + ' * FROM <TABLE> ORDER BY <column> ASC
) AS t1 ORDER BY <column> DESC
) AS t2 ORDER BY <column> ASC'
PRINT #sql
EXECUTE sp_executesql #sql
It wasn't elegant, and it wasn't fast, but it worked.
In Oracle 12c, You may use OFFSET..FETCH..ROWS option with ORDER BY
For example, to get the 3rd record from top:
SELECT *
FROM sometable
ORDER BY column_name
OFFSET 2 ROWS FETCH NEXT 1 ROWS ONLY;
Here is a fast solution of your confusion.
SELECT * FROM table ORDER BY `id` DESC LIMIT N, 1
Here You may get Last row by Filling N=0, Second last by N=1, Fourth Last By Filling N=3 and so on.
This is very common question over the interview and this is Very simple ans of it.
Further If you want Amount, ID or some Numeric Sorting Order than u may go for CAST function in MySQL.
SELECT DISTINCT (`amount`)
FROM cart
ORDER BY CAST( `amount` AS SIGNED ) DESC
LIMIT 4 , 1
Here By filling N = 4 You will be able to get Fifth Last Record of Highest Amount from CART table. You can fit your field and table name and come up with solution.
ADD:
LIMIT n,1
That will limit the results to one result starting at result n.
Oracle:
select * from (select foo from bar order by foo) where ROWNUM = x
For example, if you want to select every 10th row in MSSQL, you can use;
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ColumnName1 ASC) AS rownumber, ColumnName1, ColumnName2
FROM TableName
) AS foo
WHERE rownumber % 10 = 0
Just take the MOD and change number 10 here any number you want.
For SQL Server, a generic way to go by row number is as such:
SET ROWCOUNT #row --#row = the row number you wish to work on.
For Example:
set rowcount 20 --sets row to 20th row
select meat, cheese from dbo.sandwich --select columns from table at 20th row
set rowcount 0 --sets rowcount back to all rows
This will return the 20th row's information. Be sure to put in the rowcount 0 afterward.
Here's a generic version of a sproc I recently wrote for Oracle that allows for dynamic paging/sorting - HTH
-- p_LowerBound = first row # in the returned set; if second page of 10 rows,
-- this would be 11 (-1 for unbounded/not set)
-- p_UpperBound = last row # in the returned set; if second page of 10 rows,
-- this would be 20 (-1 for unbounded/not set)
OPEN o_Cursor FOR
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
Column1,
Column2
rownum AS rn
FROM
(
SELECT
tbl.Column1,
tbl.column2
FROM MyTable tbl
WHERE
tbl.Column1 = p_PKParam OR
tbl.Column1 = -1
ORDER BY
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'A', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 1, Column1, 'X'),'X'),
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'D', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 1, Column1, 'X'),'X') DESC,
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'A', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 2, Column2, sysdate),sysdate),
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'D', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 2, Column2, sysdate),sysdate) DESC
))
WHERE
(rn >= p_lowerBound OR p_lowerBound = -1) AND
(rn <= p_upperBound OR p_upperBound = -1);
But really, isn't all this really just parlor tricks for good database design in the first place? The few times I needed functionality like this it was for a simple one off query to make a quick report. For any real work, using tricks like these is inviting trouble. If selecting a particular row is needed then just have a column with a sequential value and be done with it.
Nothing fancy, no special functions, in case you use Caché like I do...
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM (
SELECT TOP n * FROM <table>
ORDER BY ID Desc
)
ORDER BY ID ASC
Given that you have an ID column or a datestamp column you can trust.
For SQL server, the following will return the first row from giving table.
declare #rowNumber int = 1;
select TOP(#rowNumber) * from [dbo].[someTable];
EXCEPT
select TOP(#rowNumber - 1) * from [dbo].[someTable];
You can loop through the values with something like this:
WHILE #constVar > 0
BEGIN
declare #rowNumber int = #consVar;
select TOP(#rowNumber) * from [dbo].[someTable];
EXCEPT
select TOP(#rowNumber - 1) * from [dbo].[someTable];
SET #constVar = #constVar - 1;
END;
LIMIT n,1 doesn't work in MS SQL Server. I think it's just about the only major database that doesn't support that syntax. To be fair, it isn't part of the SQL standard, although it is so widely supported that it should be. In everything except SQL server LIMIT works great. For SQL server, I haven't been able to find an elegant solution.
In Sybase SQL Anywhere:
SELECT TOP 1 START AT n * from table ORDER BY whatever
Don't forget the ORDER BY or it's meaningless.
T-SQL - Selecting N'th RecordNumber from a Table
select * from
(select row_number() over (order by Rand() desc) as Rno,* from TableName) T where T.Rno = RecordNumber
Where RecordNumber --> Record Number to Select
TableName --> To be Replaced with your Table Name
For e.g. to select 5 th record from a table Employee, your query should be
select * from
(select row_number() over (order by Rand() desc) as Rno,* from Employee) T where T.Rno = 5
SELECT
top 1 *
FROM
table_name
WHERE
column_name IN (
SELECT
top N column_name
FROM
TABLE
ORDER BY
column_name
)
ORDER BY
column_name DESC
I've written this query for finding Nth row.
Example with this query would be
SELECT
top 1 *
FROM
Employee
WHERE
emp_id IN (
SELECT
top 7 emp_id
FROM
Employee
ORDER BY
emp_id
)
ORDER BY
emp_id DESC
I'm a bit late to the party here but I have done this without the need for windowing or using
WHERE x IN (...)
SELECT TOP 1
--select the value needed from t1
[col2]
FROM
(
SELECT TOP 2 --the Nth row, alter this to taste
UE2.[col1],
UE2.[col2],
UE2.[date],
UE2.[time],
UE2.[UID]
FROM
[table1] AS UE2
WHERE
UE2.[col1] = ID --this is a subquery
AND
UE2.[col2] IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY
UE2.[date] DESC, UE2.[time] DESC --sorting by date and time newest first
) AS t1
ORDER BY t1.[date] ASC, t1.[time] ASC --this reverses the order of the sort in t1
It seems to work fairly fast although to be fair I only have around 500 rows of data
This works in MSSQL
SELECT * FROM emp a
WHERE n = (
SELECT COUNT( _rowid)
FROM emp b
WHERE a. _rowid >= b. _rowid
);
unbelievable that you can find a SQL engine executing this one ...
WITH sentence AS
(SELECT
stuff,
row = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Id)
FROM
SentenceType
)
SELECT
sen.stuff
FROM sentence sen
WHERE sen.row = (ABS(CHECKSUM(NEWID())) % 100) + 1
select * from
(select * from ordered order by order_id limit 100) x order by
x.order_id desc limit 1;
First select top 100 rows by ordering in ascending and then select last row by ordering in descending and limit to 1. However this is a very expensive statement as it access the data twice.
It seems to me that, to be efficient, you need to 1) generate a random number between 0 and one less than the number of database records, and 2) be able to select the row at that position. Unfortunately, different databases have different random number generators and different ways to select a row at a position in a result set - usually you specify how many rows to skip and how many rows you want, but it's done differently for different databases. Here is something that works for me in SQLite:
select *
from Table
limit abs(random()) % (select count(*) from Words), 1;
It does depend on being able to use a subquery in the limit clause (which in SQLite is LIMIT <recs to skip>,<recs to take>) Selecting the number of records in a table should be particularly efficient, being part of the database's meta data, but that depends on the database's implementation. Also, I don't know if the query will actually build the result set before retrieving the Nth record, but I would hope that it doesn't need to. Note that I'm not specifying an "order by" clause. It might be better to "order by" something like the primary key, which will have an index - getting the Nth record from an index might be faster if the database can't get the Nth record from the database itself without building the result set.
Most suitable answer I have seen on this article for sql server
WITH myTableWithRows AS (
SELECT (ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY myTable.SomeField)) as row,*
FROM myTable)
SELECT * FROM myTableWithRows WHERE row = 3
I'm interested in learning some (ideally) database agnostic ways of selecting the nth row from a database table. It would also be interesting to see how this can be achieved using the native functionality of the following databases:
SQL Server
MySQL
PostgreSQL
SQLite
Oracle
I am currently doing something like the following in SQL Server 2005, but I'd be interested in seeing other's more agnostic approaches:
WITH Ordered AS (
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY OrderID) AS RowNumber, OrderID, OrderDate
FROM Orders)
SELECT *
FROM Ordered
WHERE RowNumber = 1000000
Credit for the above SQL: Firoz Ansari's Weblog
Update: See Troels Arvin's answer regarding the SQL standard. Troels, have you got any links we can cite?
There are ways of doing this in optional parts of the standard, but a lot of databases support their own way of doing it.
A really good site that talks about this and other things is http://troels.arvin.dk/db/rdbms/#select-limit.
Basically, PostgreSQL and MySQL supports the non-standard:
SELECT...
LIMIT y OFFSET x
Oracle, DB2 and MSSQL supports the standard windowing functions:
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY key ASC) AS rownumber,
columns
FROM tablename
) AS foo
WHERE rownumber <= n
(which I just copied from the site linked above since I never use those DBs)
Update: As of PostgreSQL 8.4 the standard windowing functions are supported, so expect the second example to work for PostgreSQL as well.
Update: SQLite added window functions support in version 3.25.0 on 2018-09-15 so both forms also work in SQLite.
PostgreSQL supports windowing functions as defined by the SQL standard, but they're awkward, so most people use (the non-standard) LIMIT / OFFSET:
SELECT
*
FROM
mytable
ORDER BY
somefield
LIMIT 1 OFFSET 20;
This example selects the 21st row. OFFSET 20 is telling Postgres to skip the first 20 records. If you don't specify an ORDER BY clause, there's no guarantee which record you will get back, which is rarely useful.
I'm not sure about any of the rest, but I know SQLite and MySQL don't have any "default" row ordering. In those two dialects, at least, the following snippet grabs the 15th entry from the_table, sorting by the date/time it was added:
SELECT *
FROM the_table
ORDER BY added DESC
LIMIT 1,15
(of course, you'd need to have an added DATETIME field, and set it to the date/time that entry was added...)
SQL 2005 and above has this feature built-in. Use the ROW_NUMBER() function. It is excellent for web-pages with a << Prev and Next >> style browsing:
Syntax:
SELECT
*
FROM
(
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER () OVER (ORDER BY MyColumnToOrderBy) AS RowNum,
*
FROM
Table_1
) sub
WHERE
RowNum = 23
I suspect this is wildly inefficient but is quite a simple approach, which worked on a small dataset that I tried it on.
select top 1 field
from table
where field in (select top 5 field from table order by field asc)
order by field desc
This would get the 5th item, change the second top number to get a different nth item
SQL server only (I think) but should work on older versions that do not support ROW_NUMBER().
Verify it on SQL Server:
Select top 10 * From emp
EXCEPT
Select top 9 * From emp
This will give you 10th ROW of emp table!
Contrary to what some of the answers claim, the SQL standard is not silent regarding this subject.
Since SQL:2003, you have been able to use "window functions" to skip rows and limit result sets.
And in SQL:2008, a slightly simpler approach had been added, using
OFFSET skip ROWS
FETCH FIRST n ROWS ONLY
Personally, I don't think that SQL:2008's addition was really needed, so if I were ISO, I would have kept it out of an already rather large standard.
1 small change: n-1 instead of n.
select *
from thetable
limit n-1, 1
SQL SERVER
Select n' th record from top
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ID, NAME, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY ID) AS ROW
FROM TABLE
) AS TMP
WHERE ROW = n
select n' th record from bottom
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ID, NAME, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY ID DESC) AS ROW
FROM TABLE
) AS TMP
WHERE ROW = n
When we used to work in MSSQL 2000, we did what we called the "triple-flip":
EDITED
DECLARE #InnerPageSize int
DECLARE #OuterPageSize int
DECLARE #Count int
SELECT #Count = COUNT(<column>) FROM <TABLE>
SET #InnerPageSize = #PageNum * #PageSize
SET #OuterPageSize = #Count - ((#PageNum - 1) * #PageSize)
IF (#OuterPageSize < 0)
SET #OuterPageSize = 0
ELSE IF (#OuterPageSize > #PageSize)
SET #OuterPageSize = #PageSize
DECLARE #sql NVARCHAR(8000)
SET #sql = 'SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT TOP ' + CAST(#OuterPageSize AS nvarchar(5)) + ' * FROM
(
SELECT TOP ' + CAST(#InnerPageSize AS nvarchar(5)) + ' * FROM <TABLE> ORDER BY <column> ASC
) AS t1 ORDER BY <column> DESC
) AS t2 ORDER BY <column> ASC'
PRINT #sql
EXECUTE sp_executesql #sql
It wasn't elegant, and it wasn't fast, but it worked.
In Oracle 12c, You may use OFFSET..FETCH..ROWS option with ORDER BY
For example, to get the 3rd record from top:
SELECT *
FROM sometable
ORDER BY column_name
OFFSET 2 ROWS FETCH NEXT 1 ROWS ONLY;
Here is a fast solution of your confusion.
SELECT * FROM table ORDER BY `id` DESC LIMIT N, 1
Here You may get Last row by Filling N=0, Second last by N=1, Fourth Last By Filling N=3 and so on.
This is very common question over the interview and this is Very simple ans of it.
Further If you want Amount, ID or some Numeric Sorting Order than u may go for CAST function in MySQL.
SELECT DISTINCT (`amount`)
FROM cart
ORDER BY CAST( `amount` AS SIGNED ) DESC
LIMIT 4 , 1
Here By filling N = 4 You will be able to get Fifth Last Record of Highest Amount from CART table. You can fit your field and table name and come up with solution.
ADD:
LIMIT n,1
That will limit the results to one result starting at result n.
Oracle:
select * from (select foo from bar order by foo) where ROWNUM = x
For example, if you want to select every 10th row in MSSQL, you can use;
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ColumnName1 ASC) AS rownumber, ColumnName1, ColumnName2
FROM TableName
) AS foo
WHERE rownumber % 10 = 0
Just take the MOD and change number 10 here any number you want.
For SQL Server, a generic way to go by row number is as such:
SET ROWCOUNT #row --#row = the row number you wish to work on.
For Example:
set rowcount 20 --sets row to 20th row
select meat, cheese from dbo.sandwich --select columns from table at 20th row
set rowcount 0 --sets rowcount back to all rows
This will return the 20th row's information. Be sure to put in the rowcount 0 afterward.
Here's a generic version of a sproc I recently wrote for Oracle that allows for dynamic paging/sorting - HTH
-- p_LowerBound = first row # in the returned set; if second page of 10 rows,
-- this would be 11 (-1 for unbounded/not set)
-- p_UpperBound = last row # in the returned set; if second page of 10 rows,
-- this would be 20 (-1 for unbounded/not set)
OPEN o_Cursor FOR
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT
Column1,
Column2
rownum AS rn
FROM
(
SELECT
tbl.Column1,
tbl.column2
FROM MyTable tbl
WHERE
tbl.Column1 = p_PKParam OR
tbl.Column1 = -1
ORDER BY
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'A', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 1, Column1, 'X'),'X'),
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'D', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 1, Column1, 'X'),'X') DESC,
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'A', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 2, Column2, sysdate),sysdate),
DECODE(p_sortOrder, 'D', DECODE(p_sortColumn, 2, Column2, sysdate),sysdate) DESC
))
WHERE
(rn >= p_lowerBound OR p_lowerBound = -1) AND
(rn <= p_upperBound OR p_upperBound = -1);
But really, isn't all this really just parlor tricks for good database design in the first place? The few times I needed functionality like this it was for a simple one off query to make a quick report. For any real work, using tricks like these is inviting trouble. If selecting a particular row is needed then just have a column with a sequential value and be done with it.
Nothing fancy, no special functions, in case you use Caché like I do...
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM (
SELECT TOP n * FROM <table>
ORDER BY ID Desc
)
ORDER BY ID ASC
Given that you have an ID column or a datestamp column you can trust.
For SQL server, the following will return the first row from giving table.
declare #rowNumber int = 1;
select TOP(#rowNumber) * from [dbo].[someTable];
EXCEPT
select TOP(#rowNumber - 1) * from [dbo].[someTable];
You can loop through the values with something like this:
WHILE #constVar > 0
BEGIN
declare #rowNumber int = #consVar;
select TOP(#rowNumber) * from [dbo].[someTable];
EXCEPT
select TOP(#rowNumber - 1) * from [dbo].[someTable];
SET #constVar = #constVar - 1;
END;
LIMIT n,1 doesn't work in MS SQL Server. I think it's just about the only major database that doesn't support that syntax. To be fair, it isn't part of the SQL standard, although it is so widely supported that it should be. In everything except SQL server LIMIT works great. For SQL server, I haven't been able to find an elegant solution.
In Sybase SQL Anywhere:
SELECT TOP 1 START AT n * from table ORDER BY whatever
Don't forget the ORDER BY or it's meaningless.
T-SQL - Selecting N'th RecordNumber from a Table
select * from
(select row_number() over (order by Rand() desc) as Rno,* from TableName) T where T.Rno = RecordNumber
Where RecordNumber --> Record Number to Select
TableName --> To be Replaced with your Table Name
For e.g. to select 5 th record from a table Employee, your query should be
select * from
(select row_number() over (order by Rand() desc) as Rno,* from Employee) T where T.Rno = 5
SELECT
top 1 *
FROM
table_name
WHERE
column_name IN (
SELECT
top N column_name
FROM
TABLE
ORDER BY
column_name
)
ORDER BY
column_name DESC
I've written this query for finding Nth row.
Example with this query would be
SELECT
top 1 *
FROM
Employee
WHERE
emp_id IN (
SELECT
top 7 emp_id
FROM
Employee
ORDER BY
emp_id
)
ORDER BY
emp_id DESC
I'm a bit late to the party here but I have done this without the need for windowing or using
WHERE x IN (...)
SELECT TOP 1
--select the value needed from t1
[col2]
FROM
(
SELECT TOP 2 --the Nth row, alter this to taste
UE2.[col1],
UE2.[col2],
UE2.[date],
UE2.[time],
UE2.[UID]
FROM
[table1] AS UE2
WHERE
UE2.[col1] = ID --this is a subquery
AND
UE2.[col2] IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY
UE2.[date] DESC, UE2.[time] DESC --sorting by date and time newest first
) AS t1
ORDER BY t1.[date] ASC, t1.[time] ASC --this reverses the order of the sort in t1
It seems to work fairly fast although to be fair I only have around 500 rows of data
This works in MSSQL
SELECT * FROM emp a
WHERE n = (
SELECT COUNT( _rowid)
FROM emp b
WHERE a. _rowid >= b. _rowid
);
unbelievable that you can find a SQL engine executing this one ...
WITH sentence AS
(SELECT
stuff,
row = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Id)
FROM
SentenceType
)
SELECT
sen.stuff
FROM sentence sen
WHERE sen.row = (ABS(CHECKSUM(NEWID())) % 100) + 1
select * from
(select * from ordered order by order_id limit 100) x order by
x.order_id desc limit 1;
First select top 100 rows by ordering in ascending and then select last row by ordering in descending and limit to 1. However this is a very expensive statement as it access the data twice.
It seems to me that, to be efficient, you need to 1) generate a random number between 0 and one less than the number of database records, and 2) be able to select the row at that position. Unfortunately, different databases have different random number generators and different ways to select a row at a position in a result set - usually you specify how many rows to skip and how many rows you want, but it's done differently for different databases. Here is something that works for me in SQLite:
select *
from Table
limit abs(random()) % (select count(*) from Words), 1;
It does depend on being able to use a subquery in the limit clause (which in SQLite is LIMIT <recs to skip>,<recs to take>) Selecting the number of records in a table should be particularly efficient, being part of the database's meta data, but that depends on the database's implementation. Also, I don't know if the query will actually build the result set before retrieving the Nth record, but I would hope that it doesn't need to. Note that I'm not specifying an "order by" clause. It might be better to "order by" something like the primary key, which will have an index - getting the Nth record from an index might be faster if the database can't get the Nth record from the database itself without building the result set.
Most suitable answer I have seen on this article for sql server
WITH myTableWithRows AS (
SELECT (ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY myTable.SomeField)) as row,*
FROM myTable)
SELECT * FROM myTableWithRows WHERE row = 3
I am writing a very simple query for an Oracle DB (version 9).
Somehow I can get first 5 rows:
select * from cities where rownum <= 5
But skipping 5 rows returns an empty result:
select * from cities where rownum >= 5
Using:
Oracle SQL Developer
Oracle DB version 9
Why is the second query returning an empty result?
In Oracle Database 12c (release 1) and above, you can do this very simple, for skip 5 rows:
SELECT * FROM T OFFSET 5 ROWS
and for skip 5 rows and take 15 rows:
SELECT * FROM T OFFSET 5 ROWS FETCH NEXT 15 ROWS ONLY
You can use the following query to skip the first not n of rows.
select * from (
select rslts.*, rownum as rec_no from (
<<Query with proper order by (If you don't have proper order by you will see weird results)>>
) rslts
) where rec_no > <<startRowNum - n>>
The above query is similar to pagination query below.
select * from (
select rslts.*, rownum as rec_no from (
<<Query with proper order by (If you don't have proper order by you will see weird results)>>
) rslts where rownum <= <<endRowNum>>
) where rec_no > <<startRowNum>>
Your cities query:
select * from (
select rslts.*, rownum as rec_no from (
select * from cities order by 1
) rslts
) where rec_no > 5 <<startRowNum>>
Note: Assume first column in cities table is unique key
Oracle increments rownum each time it adds a row to the result set. So saying rownum < 5 is fine; as it adds each of the first 5 rows it increments rownum, but then once ruwnum = 5 the WHERE clause stops matching, no more rows are added to the result, and though you don't notice this rownum stops incrementing.
But if you say WHERE rownum > 5 then right off the bat, the WHERE clause doesn't match; and since, say, the first row isn't added to the result set, rownum isn't incremented... so rownum can never reach a value greater than 5 and the WHERE clause can never match.
To get the result you want, you can use row_number() over() in a subquery, like
select *
from (select row_number() over() rn, -- other values
from table
where -- ...)
where rn > 5
Update - As noted by others, this kind of query only makes sense if you can
control the order of the row numbering, so you should really use row_number() over(order bysomething) where something is a useful ordering key in deciding which records are "the first 5 records".
rownum is being increased only when a row is being output, so this type of condition won't work.
In any case, you are not ordering your rows, so what's the point?
Used row_number() over (order by id):
select * from
(select row_number() over (order by id) rn, c.* from countries c)
where rn > 5
Used ROWNUM:
select * from
(select rownum rn, c.* from countries c)
where rn > 5
Important note:
Using alias as countries c instead of countries is required! Without, it gives an error "missing expression"
Even better would be:
select * from mytab sample(5) fetch next 1 rows only;
Sample clause indicates the probability of each row getting picked up in the sampling process. FETCH NEXT clause indicates the number of rows you want to select.
With this code, you can query your table with skip and take.
select * from (
select a.*, rownum rnum from (
select * from cities
) a
) WHERE rnum >= :skip + 1 AND rnum <= :skip + :take
This code works with Oracle 11g. With Oracle 12, there is already a better way to perform this queries with offset and fetch
I have to select n number of rows from an oracle database from sap using native sql. In open sql the query would be like
select * from myDB where size > 2000 upto n rows.
what I learnt from other posts the equivalent native sql query would be
SELECT * FROM myDB WHERE SIZE > 2000 AND rownum <= 100
is this correct?
Do I need to have rownum as one of the fields in the DB table?
SELECT *
FROM myDB
WHERE SIZE > 2000
AND ROWNUM <= 100
Is a syntactically correct query.
Do I need to have rownum as one of the fields in the DB table?
No, the ROWNUM pseudocolumn assigns, for each row returned by a query, a number indicating the order in which Oracle selects the row from a table or set of joined rows. The first row selected has a ROWNUM of 1, the second has 2, and so on.
Note that ROWNUM is applied before any ORDER BY clauses.
So:
SELECT *
FROM myDB
WHERE ROWNUM <= 10
ORDER BY column_name
Will select 10 rows (it could be any 10 rows and not necessarily the 10 rows which are first in the desired ordering) and then will order those 10 rows by the desired column.
If you want to get the rows with the top-N values for a column then you need to apply the ORDER BY first and then restrict the number of rows:
SELECT *
FROM ( SELECT *
FROM myDB
ORDER BY column_name )
WHERE ROWNUM <= 10
If you are using Oracle 12 then they have implemented a new syntax for TOP-N queries:
SELECT *
FROM myDB
ORDER BY column_name
FETCH FIRST 10 ROWS ONLY;
ROWNUM is a pseudocolumn generated by Oracle whenever you perform a SELECT. The assignment of the value to ROWNUM is the last thing done before the query returns a row - thus, the first row emitted by the query is given ROWNUM = 1, the second row emitted by the query is given ROWNUM = 2, and so on. Notice: this means that a statement like the following WILL RETURN NO ROWS:
SELECT *
FROM SOME_TABLE
WHERE ROWNUM >= 2
Why does this return no rows? It's because the first row which would be emitted by the query is always given ROWNUM = 1, and since the query is looking only for rows with ROWNUM >= 2 no rows will be selected because the first ROWNUM value of 1 is applied to the first row emitted.
HOWEVER - if you really want to get all rows EXCEPT the first (or the first 10, or what have you) you can do it like this:
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT *, ROWNUM AS INNER_ROWNUM
FROM SOME_TABLE
WHERE SOMETHING = SOMETHING_ELSE
ORDER BY WHATEVER) i
WHERE i.INNER_ROWNUM IN (1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19);
Here we use an inner SELECT which gets ALL rows for the given condition (SOMETHING = SOMETHING_ELSE) and assigns the ROWNUM from the INNER query to a computed column named INNER_ROWNUM, which we can then use as a normal column in the outer query.
Use rownum concept it is a pseudo column in oracle by using this concept we can achieve the TOP keyword functionality.
select col1,col2,col3..coln from
(
select rownum rn,e.* from mydb where size>2000
)
where rn>N
Note: Col1 to coln are column names of your table.
If I say:
select * from table order by col1 where rownum < 100
If the table has 10 million records, will Oracle bring all 10 million, sort it and then show me the first 10? Or is there a way it will optimise it?
If you do this
select * from table order by col1 where rownum < 100
then Oracle will throw an error as the WHERE clause comes before the ORDER BY.
If you do this
select * from table where rownum < 100 order by col1
then Oracle will return a random 99 records as the WHERE clause comes before the ORDER BY.
If you want to return a the first 100 records, ordered by a column, you must put the order by in a sub-select.
select *
from ( select * from table order by col1 )
where rownum <= 100
Oracle will do the sort, how else will it know the records you want? However, it will be a sort with a stopkey because of the ROWNUM. Oracle doesn't actually sort the entire result set, as some optimisation goes on under the hood, but this is what you can assume takes place.
Please see this article by Tom Kyte.