I have a native DLL (x64) built with VC++ 2008 that I'm trying to use in an azure project. The code runs fine in a standalone executable, but when I try to run it in the Compute Emulator, I receive a DLL not found exception.
For several days I've been assuming the issue is with the VC++ redistributables not being present, but that shouldn't be an issue with dll's built using VS 2008.
Using ProcMon, I discovered something odd -- the DLL is not being found anywhere on the path. Further poking around showed that the DLL is not being copied to the approot folder, despite the fact that it is set to Build Action = none + Copy Always.
I manually copied the DLL to the Compute Emulator's path in the SDK and now it runs. But why does VS not copy the DLL along with my project files into the approot when I press F5?
Related
I have the same problem as described here:
https://github.com/NLua/NLua/issues/33
Though I have followed the instructions to create a console application...
http://www.screencast.com/t/M12TqePQxW
...which works just fine, when I create a library project and reference it from another project (in this case, a Web API project) the following error occurs:
Unable to load DLL 'lua52': The specified module could not be found.
At this line:
using (var lua = new Lua())
How can a library project be made with the NLua nuget package without failing?
It is the exact same issue as described in the GitHub issue, the Nuget package is missing two DLLs that you need to use lua52.dll. One small difference, the current package (version 1.3.2.1) includes a newer version of lua52.dll that was built with VS2013. And therefore has a dependency on msvcr120.dll and msvp120.dll.
Beware that this may change in the future when Nuget updates your project.
As-is, you need to download and install the Visual C++ redistributable package for VS2013. Run both vcredist_x64.exe and vcredist_x86.exe so your project can run either in 32-bit or 64-bit mode.
To avoid having to do this on the machine on which you want to deploy your program, I recommend you copy the two DLLs from the c:\windows\system32 (64-bit) or c:\windows\syswow64 (32-bit) directories into the same directory as your EXE.
The package author could have done a better job putting this package together. Short from including the DLLs in the package, the better solution would be for him to rebuild lua52.dll with the /MT option so these dependencies are linked in. Consider clicking the New Issue button to let him know.
I'm developing a C++ application that dynamically link against Qt, boost and Assimp. I compiled it in Release mode with /MD and it works fine on my computer. However, if I try to run it on another machine I get the 0xc000007b error (The application was unable to start correctly). I use Windows 8.1 on both machines but Qt5.3 and VisualStudio2013 are only installed on the 1st machine.
I built boost with
bootstrap.bat
b2 variant=release
I then used Cmake GUI to configure/generate a solution for Assimp that I later built using Visual Studio 2013.
Qt (32-bit version) was installed via the online installer. So everything (including my application) is built with a target 32-bit.
The folder that I copy to the other machine includes:
MyApp.exe
platform/
accessible/
assimp.dll
icudt52.dll
icuint52.dll
icuuc52.dll
kernel32.dll
opengl32.dll
libEGL.dll (cannot be found in Qt/5.3/msvc2012_opengl/)
libGLESv2.dll (same)
msvcp1XX.dll
msvcr1XX.dll
The Qt libs that I need (Core, GUI, Widgets, OpenGL)
If I copy these .dll/folders from Qt/5.3/msvc2012_opengl/, the app requires msvcp110.dll to start. If I add it and run it, I get the 0xc000007b error. But why msvcp110.dll instead of msvcp120.dll???
And if I copy the files from Qt/tools/QtCreator the app actually needs msvcp120.dll to run. But when it runs, it crashes at the beginning with:
QEGLplatformContext::init: eglError: 3005, this: 0x2e806b0
Which I guess is normal as you're not supposed to copy them from this location.
Does anyone know what I am doing wrong?
PS: I also ran vcredist_x86.exe on the machine without VS2013 before running my app. It installed successfully but nothing changed.
Thanks for your time and your help!
I'm not very experienced with deploying applications and i'm having an issue with my very small screen scrape application.
I use a project that handles all screen scrapes and i just call the functions from the dll(on dev machines at least). When i reference that dll from the directory, it works fine on my machine but installing and launching on another machine without the project crashes it immediately when it tries to access the class to instantiate the screen scrape object.
Perhaps my assumption of dll is incorrect but doesn't having the dll mean it incapsulates all the classes/references/etc in that project so it can be used elswhere without having to lug the whole project with it?
What could be going on with this dll?
The dll assembly encapsulates the project, but not its references. Anything that the project needs to reference must be available in the new environment as well, whether in the GAC (global assembly cache), the local directory, in a reference path, or wherever.
If you are using Visual Studio 2010 or earlier, you can use Setup Projects to nicely gather all necessary references and package them into an install package for you. There may still be complications that you will need to troubleshoot sometimes, but it simplifies your deployment effort. In Visual Studio 2012 and later, Setup Projects were dropped, but there are other options, like WIX and Install Shield. And that is a whole other topic with plenty of Q&A on this site.
I am currently developing a Windows Store App that will eventually be targeted at the ARM devices when they are available. For now, I have been developing and testing from Visual Studio on my desktop computer and everything works fine. However, when I try to create an app package that I can pass along to others within my company for testing purposes, the application will not run properly.
The solution includes two projects. The first is a C++ project that is set to build a dll file. The purpose for this is to expose the Direct2D and DirectWrite libraries that seem to be unaccessible to a C# project. The second project is the C# project that references this dll for drawing functions and includes a XAML interface and most of the program logic. All of this works flawlessly on my development machine from within Visual Studio (and also when installing the package).
When I send the package files to other individuals within the company, the installation appears to work fine by installing with the PowerShell script. The tile appears in the start screen and the program will launch for a few seconds. The C# and XAML interface appears, but the DirectX portion of the application is not visible and the entire application shuts down within a few seconds. This makes me believe that the dll may not be installing or referenced correctly upon installation. I have checked the package file, and the dll file is included in the package after the build process is complete.
I have packaged a few different test programs (MSDN Samples) that have all installed on their machines, but we get the same results that they will not run (again, all samples run fine on my development machine when building them). The only test project that worked properly was a simple C# project that did not use DirectX at all. Any of the DirectX samples that I tried have all failed (including the native C++ samples that do not use C# at all).
To be clear, the process I use for building is going to Project -> Store -> Create App Packages and choosing the No option for uploading to the Windows Store.
Does anyone have any ideas on what might be going wrong with the build or installation process?
Thanks in advance for any help!
Does it work with the Metro Sideloader? I am not sure if it just adds a UI to the Powershell script, but it works for my team and me for testing...
Good luck!
Are you side loading a Debug version of your DirectX app onto a machine that does not have the Windows SDK installed? Visual Studio's default DirectX projects and the samples on MSDN both request the D3D11_CREATE_DEVICE_DEBUG flag when creating the D3D Device. Device creation will fail if the Windows SDK is not installed on the machine running the code.
Here are a few different options that will allow you to unblock yourself. Any one of these should give you the desired result:
Create a Release package and deploy that instead of a Debug package.
or - Go to DirectXBase.cpp and remove the D3D11_CREATE_DEVICE_DEBUG flag from the code.
or - Install the Remote Debugging tools for Visual Studio on the target machines. This will install the necessary SDK components to allow creation of D3D Debug devices. The other cool thing about this option is that once you're set up you won't have to create packages manually and side load them anymore. Just tell Visual Studio the name of your ARM machine and press F5 to deploy it remotely. More information here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/bt727f1t.aspx
How are you deploying the native DLL with your project? Are you using project-to-project references? Can you verify that your DLL is ending up in the final package, in the root of the package application directory?
I recommend using Sysinternals Procmon to watch your application load on the target machine. If it crashes or fails, you can look in the log history for which DLL it is trying to load and failing. Typically this will show up as a repeated series of DLL load probes (it will try and load the dll from the application directory, and then proceed to try a number of other paths).
I'm trying to add a .NET 4.0 .dll to the GAC. I am attempting to do this because it is published by a 3rd party company as both a 32 and 64bit .dll which I must use from different apps on different platforms in both formats.
At any rate, I am having trouble registering this dll to the GAC on a Windows Server 2008 environment.
I have tried copying gacutil.exe (and supporting file) found at "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\bin\NETFX 4.0 Tools" on my local machine to the "C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319" folder on the target production server per the suggestions found here.
I then tried copying them to "C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319".
Running from both locations indicated successful installation. And indeed, the registration appears successful:
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\assembly\GAC_64\ChilkatDotNet4\v4.0_9.0.8.0__eb5fc1fc52ef09bd\ChilkatDotNet4.dll
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\assembly\GAC_32\ChilkatDotNet4\v4.0_9.0.8.0__eb5fc1fc52ef09bd\ChilkatDotNet4.dll
However, running a console app that refers to the (64bit) version of the dll errors out with the following message:
System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could
not load file or assembly
'ChilkatDotNet4.dll' or one of its
dependencies. The specified module
could not be found. File name:
'ChilkatDotNet4.dll'
So, I have now manually created the following GAC entries using mkdir and copy from a command prompt (which may or may not actually work. I have no clue what is so special about gacutil.exe):
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\assembly\GAC_MSIL\ChilkatDotNet4\v4.0_9.0.8.0__eb5fc1fc52ef09bd\ChilkatDotNet4.dll (using the 64bit version of the dll)
C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_64\ChilkatDotNet4\v4.0_9.0.8.0__eb5fc1fc52ef09bd\ChilkatDotNet4.dll
C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_32\ChilkatDotNet4\v4.0_9.0.8.0__eb5fc1fc52ef09bd\ChilkatDotNet4.dll
After each "install" of the dll, I tested and received the same error. Any ideas welcome!
EDIT: the GAC issue above may not actually be the culprit. Turns out, even when I create a brand new Console App project and add the .dll directly (so that it lives in the bin), I still can't run it on the sever. Also, I've noted that Console apps are created targeting the .NET 4.0 Client Profile rather than the .NET Framework 4. When I try to run it targeting the client profile, it appears that none of the System.Web* libraries are available. However, I tried running a very simple test app targeting both and neither would run on the server while referencing the bad .dll.
Is there a special kind of install that was to occur to run .NET 4.0 Console Apps?
For anyone else who may have trouble with this in the future. It was not a generalized problem with the way I was registering the dll to the GAC or how I was referring to it from my projects.
ChilkatDotNet4.dll (and the other versions I'm sure) was built in Visual C++. So, the server it is being deployed to has to have the Visual C++ Runtime installed for the appropriate processor architecture.
For 2010 (.NET 4.0):
x86
x64
If you're running an x86 app on a 64-bit platform. Make sure to mark the application pool with "Enable 32-bit applications" = true.