I'm trying to add a .NET 4.0 .dll to the GAC. I am attempting to do this because it is published by a 3rd party company as both a 32 and 64bit .dll which I must use from different apps on different platforms in both formats.
At any rate, I am having trouble registering this dll to the GAC on a Windows Server 2008 environment.
I have tried copying gacutil.exe (and supporting file) found at "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\bin\NETFX 4.0 Tools" on my local machine to the "C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319" folder on the target production server per the suggestions found here.
I then tried copying them to "C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319".
Running from both locations indicated successful installation. And indeed, the registration appears successful:
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\assembly\GAC_64\ChilkatDotNet4\v4.0_9.0.8.0__eb5fc1fc52ef09bd\ChilkatDotNet4.dll
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\assembly\GAC_32\ChilkatDotNet4\v4.0_9.0.8.0__eb5fc1fc52ef09bd\ChilkatDotNet4.dll
However, running a console app that refers to the (64bit) version of the dll errors out with the following message:
System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could
not load file or assembly
'ChilkatDotNet4.dll' or one of its
dependencies. The specified module
could not be found. File name:
'ChilkatDotNet4.dll'
So, I have now manually created the following GAC entries using mkdir and copy from a command prompt (which may or may not actually work. I have no clue what is so special about gacutil.exe):
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\assembly\GAC_MSIL\ChilkatDotNet4\v4.0_9.0.8.0__eb5fc1fc52ef09bd\ChilkatDotNet4.dll (using the 64bit version of the dll)
C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_64\ChilkatDotNet4\v4.0_9.0.8.0__eb5fc1fc52ef09bd\ChilkatDotNet4.dll
C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_32\ChilkatDotNet4\v4.0_9.0.8.0__eb5fc1fc52ef09bd\ChilkatDotNet4.dll
After each "install" of the dll, I tested and received the same error. Any ideas welcome!
EDIT: the GAC issue above may not actually be the culprit. Turns out, even when I create a brand new Console App project and add the .dll directly (so that it lives in the bin), I still can't run it on the sever. Also, I've noted that Console apps are created targeting the .NET 4.0 Client Profile rather than the .NET Framework 4. When I try to run it targeting the client profile, it appears that none of the System.Web* libraries are available. However, I tried running a very simple test app targeting both and neither would run on the server while referencing the bad .dll.
Is there a special kind of install that was to occur to run .NET 4.0 Console Apps?
For anyone else who may have trouble with this in the future. It was not a generalized problem with the way I was registering the dll to the GAC or how I was referring to it from my projects.
ChilkatDotNet4.dll (and the other versions I'm sure) was built in Visual C++. So, the server it is being deployed to has to have the Visual C++ Runtime installed for the appropriate processor architecture.
For 2010 (.NET 4.0):
x86
x64
If you're running an x86 app on a 64-bit platform. Make sure to mark the application pool with "Enable 32-bit applications" = true.
Related
This is Edited from the OP. This is a VB .NET 4.0 WinForms application. There is a mysql datasource involved with this project. The target CPU is set to any. Problem: When running this application on any computer that has VS 2010 installed along with the mysql connector it runs flawlessly. When installing on a virgin system(ie. No developer environment installed) but that machine does have .net framework 4.0 installed and a mysql server without the connector installed the application falls immediately. So to fix the issue I install the mysql connector MSI. This immediately fixes the issue on the client system and it runs. The problems is that as you can see below from my Installer setup that the 2 needed DLL files for MYSQL are actually included in the installation package so should not need to be installed separately. So Why is it that using that installer from the images do I need to install the mysql connector? Any Ideas? Below is a screen shot of the References the program uses and from what I believe I do not need to deploy any of those DLL files with my application other than the 2 MYSQL DLL files. So why is this failing?? Below are images showing the project references as well as the Installer Files that are being installed in the applicaiton folder. As shown in the image the 2 mysql dll files are to be put in the application folder. There is also a screen shot showing each dll's properties for in application folder.
You answered your own question.
but that machine does have .net framework 4.0 installed and a mysql server without the connector installed the application falls immediately.
You don't need to install the connector msi package, but you do need to include the two DLL files in the application's directory. Anytime you have some dependency, you need to deploy it with your application.
Edit solution quoted from my comment:
From your update it sounds like you have a version mismatch on the
assemblies, and the references are set to Specific Version = True.
Check the version number of the assemblies on your developer machine
in the output directory, and check the version you are installing on
the client system. (You can just hover over the DLL to read the
version on the ToolTip). You can try to set Specific Version to false
by right clicking your reference and selecting properties, or simply
ensure you deploy the same version of assemblies. Your program is
looking for the versions its compiled against
I am using the namespace System.Windows.Forms.DataVisualization.Charting to create a Chart object on a form. This DLL is not a part of the basic Windows install, so I shall need to include it in my package when I distribute my application.
I am aware of the new version of GacUtil.exe and also that Gacutil.exe is only for development purposes and should not be used to install production assemblies into the global assembly cache. Let's just assume that I have no choice in the matter and have to do it this way due to the use of a proprietary package distribution system. =)
Edit/Update: In the 2.0 runtime, even though some PC's did not have GacUtil.exe present on the intended installation PC, I could drop GacUtil.exe (2.0 version) on the PC and I could then GAC whatever extra assemblies I needed. This appears to be a problem in the 4.0 runtime. Even though I have copied GacUtil.exe (4.0) to the destination PC, I get no feedback when running it against the needed assembly. End Edit/Update
Now, on my PC (the development PC), I can add the DLL to the GAC without any problems:
However, on a clean Windows 7 PC, with the same DLL and the same version of GacUtil.exe I get this:
Why the discrepancy? Does the new GacUtil.exe depend upon something that this PC doesn't have?
Ok, I ended up having two problems, one of them being a moot point in the end.
Problem #1: GacUtil.exe (for the 4.0 CLR) has Dependencies
When i copy over the folder in which GacUtil.exe resides, the problem of adding the assembly vanishes:
This ended up being a moot point, however, because even though the file was in the 4.0 GAC on the client machine, I still had the crash. I realized at that point that the problem was that I am not targeting the 4.0 GAC - I'm targeting the 2.0 GAC. The file I was trying to add to the GAC this whole time was a 4.0 version of the file. This was the piece I wasn't understanding.
Problem #2: There are separate 4.0 and 2.0 versions of "GACable" DLL's, and they are not backwards compatible
I simply went back to my development machine and grabbed the 3.5 version of the DLL in question (System.Windows.Forms.DataVisualization), added it to the 2.0 GAC on the client PC, and crisis averted.
You can run the 4.0 Gacutil from your own folder if you add a "1033" subfolder and include the file, gacutlrc.dll, which can be found in the same subfolder in the standard location.
I'm getting an 'AccessViolationException' 'Attempted to read or write protected memory' when calling a method in an x86 dll when running on an x64 platform (Windows 7). Everything works great on x86 platforms.
I've read many, many posts about similar problems but haven't been able to get my code to work.
I'm in the process of trying to make our old x86 app work happily on Windows 7 (x64) and Server 2008 R2 (x64). The app is an assortment of VB6 , VB.Net, C#, MicroFocus COBOL and C++. (We couldn't think of any other languages to throw in at the time). The DotNet code was originally written in Visual Studio 2003 for DotNet 1.1. I've ported the code up to Visual Studio 2010 and DotNet 4.0. I've set the target for all the projects to x86. When I call into un-managed 32 bit dll's I get the above error.
Our InstallShield setup routine is installing the x86 dll's into C:\Windows\sysWOW64 instead of C:\Windows\System32. This behavior seems correct. The dll's are some COBOL object code and runtime components linked together into a 'C Style' dll. I don't think the problem has to do with COBOL or the linking process as I also ported up a sample app from Code Project with a VB.Net WinForms app that calls a simple C++ dll, all targeted to x86. I get the same error there. I've also tried building a C++ command line app to call the dll. The Load Library succeeds. GetProcAddress succeeds. Calling the function pointer for the particular method fails. Our VB6 apps can call the dll's just fine when running on Windows 7 x64. I've also tried turning off UAC and setting the requestedExecutionLevel in the manifest to the highestAvailable. I've tried running as administrator.
Seems like this should work, but not sure what to try next. Any ideas?
On x64 .net programs will be run as 64-bit programs and cannot call 32bit-dlls.
Try compiling the application with target x86 instead of "Any Target". You can also force the
target of the built .exe with the .Net CorFlags.exe utility to run in 32bit-mode.
Of course your program will then run in the 32bit environment, especially it will only have a maximum of 2gb of RAM.
Good news,
We investigated DEP as a possible cause of the problem as we saw that even our VB6 code will fail when DEP is turned on. We noticed that the VB.Net code was failing in the same way as VB6 when DEP was on. Apparently our COBOL dll's do something that DEP isn't happy with. Unfortunately the DotNet assemblies don't seem to respect the operating system DEP setting, so you have to turn off DEP with using editbin.exe:
editbin.exe /nxnocompat:no
I still have to test it on our full application, but it looks like we have a solution!
I am having a strange problem since installing the latest version of ODAC, 11.2.0.2.1. I installed both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions because I develop applications for both architectures. My computer is Win 7 64-bit.
Since installing ODAC and referencing the new 64-bit version of ODP.NET, one of my web application projects in Visual Studio 2010 gives the following warning for all aspx pages and masterpages when I view them in Markup View.
ASP.NET runtime error: Could not load file or assembly 'Oracle.DataAccess' or one of its dependencies. An attempt was made to load a program with an incorrect format.
The warning is limited to Markup View. The web application builds and runs fine. I tried cleaning the VS Temporary ASP.NET Files, but that did not fix the issue. I removed all references to Oracle.DataAccess throughout my application, and then readded them to be sure that all the references were correct. The web app is compiled to 'Any CPU' but it uses the 64-bit Oracle.DataAccess. I created a new project, and referenced the same projects and dlls, and I do not get the warning, so it appears to be specific to this project file.
Any ideas why I would get the warning when in Markup View?
Expressly set the "Platform target" to "x86" or "x64" in the project properties --> Build tab.
Do NOT set it to "Any CPU." This is one of many common conditions which causes this driver of typical Oracle software quality to have a nervous breakdown.
Turns out the ODAC 11.2.0.2 xcopy installer doesn't correctly register all of the dlls (See bottom answer). As a result, Oracle.DataAccess.dll (64bit) was being copied into the BIN directory, and VS was trying to load it when in Markup View causing the warning. After manually registering the missing DLLs and rebooting, I am no longer having the problem.
Ideas you can check:
Check the Oracle.DataAccess reference in your Visual Studio project has the 'Specific Version' property set to 'False' (this is not the default).
Use the Fuslogvw.exe to determine what are the locations the .NET Framework is trying
i've made an assembly in the .net framework that I intend to publish to the GAC but I can't find the gacutil utlity.
I've been googling a while and I've found a lot of suggestions, but nothing works:
Copy the assemby to %window%\assemby [DOES NOT WORK]
Copy the assemby to %window%\Microsoft.NET\assembly [DOES NOT
WORK]
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.0A\Bin\gacutil.exe /i
"assembly" [returns an error: this assembly is built by a runtime newer
than the currently loaded runtime and cannot be loaded]
Does anyone have idea to solve this?
If you've got VS2010 installed, you ought to find a .NET 4.0 gacutil at
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\bin\NETFX 4.0 Tools
The 7.0A Windows SDK should have been installed alongside VS2010 - 6.0A will have been installed with VS2008, and hence won't have .NET 4.0 support.
VS 2012/13 Win 7 64 bit
gacutil.exe is located in
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v8.0A\bin\NETFX 4.0 Tools
There is no Gacutil included in the .net 4.0 standard installation. They have moved the GAC too, from %Windir%\assembly to %Windir%\Microsoft.NET\Assembly.
They havent' even bothered adding a "special view" for the folder in Windows explorer, as they have for the .net 1.0/2.0 GAC.
Gacutil is part of the Windows SDK, so if you want to use it on your developement machine, just install the Windows SDK for your current platform. Then you will find it somewhere like this (depending on your SDK version):
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\bin\NETFX 4.0 Tools
There is a discussion on the new GAC here: .NET 4.0 has a new GAC, why?
If you want to install something in GAC on a production machine, you need to do it the "proper" way (gacutil was never meant as a tool for installing stuff on production servers, only as a development tool), with a Windows Installer, or with other tools. You can e.g. do it with PowerShell and the System.EnterpriseServices dll.
On a general note, and coming from several years of experience, I would personally strongly recommend against using GAC at all. Your application will always work if you deploy the DLL with each application in its bin folder as well. Yes, you will get multiple copies of the DLL on your server if you have e.g. multiple web apps on one server, but it's definitely worth the flexibility of being able to upgrade one application without breaking the others (by introducing an incompatible version of the shared DLL in the GAC).
There actually is now a GAC Utility for .NET 4.0. It is found in the Microsoft Windows 7 and .NET 4.0 SDK (the SDK supports multiple OSs -- not just Windows 7 -- so if you are using a later OS from Microsoft the odds are good that it's supported).
This is the SDK. You can download the ISO or do a Web install. Kind-of overkill to download the entire thing if all you want is the GAC Util; however, it does work.