Using an existing WCF service - wcf

I am very new at programming WCF services, so I hope that if you answer my question - you will take that into account and explain it to me as if I was a kid (wcf services for dummies :). I have an existing WCF service which I need to connect to. I am supposed to make my own WCF service that will communicate with the existing one and share some request and response objects which are already defined in the existing service. Can anyone tell me how to do that (establish the communication between the two and use the same type of object in the service which I need to make as it is in the existing one), step by step? I have tried to find the answer online but it is all a bit confusing (referencing, using contracts...). As I said, you are free to explain as if you would to a real beginner. Any help is more than welcome...

"I am supposed to make my own WCF service that will communicate with the existing one and share some request and response objects which are already defined in the existing service." - This sounds like you need to create a client to connect to the service (see below how to create client). You can create WCF service to communicate with another service but you would need bit more background than this format allows.
You can get up to speed with WCF through WCF examples. Under WF_WCF_Samples\WCF\Basic in the examples you can find many Service/Client setups that you should go through first. MSDN Magazine has tons of articles on this topic.
In a 10,000 foot view of things:
Client - To consume service create a test console application. Add Service Reference in your project (when you right click references you will see that option). Point the address of the Service Reference dialog to the service you would like to consume and lot of stuff will happen. Final result is that you can call service methods on your service with something like below (where Service1 will be replaced with what ever service you are calling)
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var proxy = new ServiceReference1.Service1Client();
var test = proxy.GetData(1);
}
Service - you would create an interface with methods and types then decorate this interface with attributes for example:
[ServiceContract]
public interface IService1
{
[OperationContract]
string GetData(int value);
[OperationContract]
CompositeType GetDataUsingDataContract(CompositeType composite);
// TODO: Add your service operations here
}
These are operations (OperationContract) that your serive can perform. Service methods can return primitive or complex type (string vs. CompositeType) as well as take parameters that are complex or primitive.
You would implement this contract:
public class Service1 : IService1
{
public string GetData(int value)
{
throw new ApplicationException("Boom");
return string.Format("You entered: {0}", value);
}
public CompositeType GetDataUsingDataContract(CompositeType composite)
{
if (composite == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("composite");
}
if (composite.BoolValue)
{
composite.StringValue += "Suffix";
}
return composite;
}
}
Next you need to host your service. You have many options to accomplish this depending on your hosting requirements. The simplest hosting you can do is using Console application:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var host = new ServiceHost(typeof(Service1), new Uri("http://localhost:8999/"));
host.AddServiceEndpoint(typeof(IService1), new BasicHttpBinding(), "");
var metadataBehavior = host.Description.Behaviors.Find<ServiceMetadataBehavior>();
if (metadataBehavior == null)
{
metadataBehavior = new ServiceMetadataBehavior();
metadataBehavior.HttpGetEnabled = true;
host.Description.Behaviors.Add(metadataBehavior);
}
host.Open();
Console.WriteLine("Running..");
Console.ReadLine();
}
}

Related

Adding service reference wcf

The issue has already discussed here, but it did not addressed it quite the way I am looking for.
I have already created a service reference from a client console app in visual studio, but I want to do it programmatically with the following contraint:
From Microsoft Docs - wcf, it obvious that we have to have the service interface reference available to the client. In my case I do have the reference available, instead I have the address where the service is hosted and this address is a dynamic one.
So I want to define a customized client class that will have its object declared with the host address only. Lets take the following snippet as an example:
public partial class CalculatorServiceClient : System.ServiceModel.ClientBase<ICalculatorService>, ICalculatorService
{
}
As you can see that ICalculatorService is available while defining the class. What to do if the interface to the service is not available while defining the class.
You can connect to the WCF service pragmatically without having to use the generated class methods, but note that this can have issues if the service changes in future
The idea is simple .
Create a service contract that matches your service implementation
[DataContract]
public class SomeDataContarctClass
{
[DataMember]
public string SomeMember{get;set;}
etc....
}
Create the interface
public IServiceInterface
{
[OperationContract]
List<SomeDataContarctClass> GetSomeData();
...etc
}
Now this is where you start to Glue things together,
Then create the service
public IServiceInterface CreateIService()
{
EndpointAddress myEndpoint = new EndpointAddress("SERVICE URL");
BasicHttpBinding binding= new BasicHttpBinding();
defaultBinding.MaxReceivedMessageSize = 2147483647;
defaultBinding.MaxBufferPoolSize = 2147483647;
defaultBinding.MaxBufferSize = 2147483647;
defaultBinding.ReaderQuotas.MaxArrayLength = 2147483647;
defaultBinding.ReaderQuotas.MaxStringContentLength = 2147483647;
ChannelFactory<IUpdaterService> myChannelFactory = new ChannelFactory<IServiceInterface>(binding, myEndpoint);
myChannelFactory.Endpoint.EndpointBehaviors.Add(new ServiceInterceptionBehavior());
// Create a channel.
return myChannelFactory.CreateChannel();
}
Then you can call the service using
var myserviceImp = CreateIService();
var data = myserviceImp.GetSomeData();

How to implement an async wcf client for a synchronous service

Is there a way to create an async client for a synchronous WCF service without adding a service reference? This is for a .NET 4 client.
A service reference in Visual Studio is nothing else than a code generator that creates a proxy class with corresponding data elements necessary to call your web service. Of course you can hand build a proxy if you really want to go over tedious and boring work.
Maybe start by decompiling System.ServiceModel.ClientBase using .net reflector?
Do some research on ChannelFactory: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.servicemodel.channelfactory.aspx
Even when implementing my own client by wrapping a ChannelFactory, I am still using the Add Service reference in another project to create the class definitions and move them into the real project. That's a good compromise.
Here's a simple async service interface:
[ServiceContract(Name = "IService")]
public interface IServiceAsync
{
[OperationContract(AsyncPattern = true)]
IAsyncResult BeginGetStuff(string someData, AsyncCallback callback, object state);
IEnumerable<Stuff> EndGetStuff(IAsyncResult result);
}
The .NET contract might look like this:
[ServiceContract]
public interface IService
{
[OperationContract]
IEnumerable<Stuff> GetStuff(string someData);
}
Then in code, assuming you use HTTP, No security and binary message encoding, something like this (Sorry I haven't compiled any of this, just typed it using some of the code I have written for projects):
//Create a binding for the proxy to use
HttpTransportBindingElement httpTransportBindingElement;
httpTransportBindingElement = new HttpTransportBindingElement();
absoluteServiceUri = new Uri(absoluteServiceUri.OriginalString + BinaryEndpointUri, UriKind.Absolute);
}
//Create the message encoding binding element - we'll specify binary encoding
var binaryMessageEncoding = new BinaryMessageEncodingBindingElement();
//Add the binding elements into a Custom Binding
var customBinding = new CustomBinding(binaryMessageEncoding, httpTransportBindingElement);
// Set send timeout
customBinding.SendTimeout = this.SendTimeout;
var factory = new ChannelFactory<IServiceAsync>(customBinding, new EndpointAddress(absoluteServiceUri, new AddressHeader[0]));
var channel = factory.CreateChannel();
channel.BeginGetStuff(Bla, results => { // Do something }, null);

Providing workflow extensions to a workflow service - WF 4.0

Greetings one and all!
I'm new to WF 4.0 and WWF in general so forgive me if this seems like a newbie type of question, but believe me I've scoured the depths of the Internet for a solution to this problem, but to no avail.
I have created a sample WF application with a custom CodeActivity that requires an extension be provided, as per below:
public sealed class PreparePizza : CodeActivity
{
public InArgument<Order> Order { get; set; }
protected override void CacheMetadata(CodeActivityMetadata metadata)
{
base.CacheMetadata(metadata);
if (this.Order == null)
metadata.AddValidationError("You must supply an Order.");
metadata.RequireExtension<IPreparePizzaExtension>();
}
// If your activity returns a value, derive from CodeActivity<TResult>
// and return the value from the Execute method.
protected override void Execute(CodeActivityContext context)
{
// Obtain the runtime value of the Text input argument
Order order = context.GetValue(this.Order);
var extension = context.GetExtension<IPreparePizzaExtension>();
extension.Prepare(order);
}
}
public interface IPreparePizzaExtension
{
void Prepare(Order order);
}
I then slot this activity into a workflow service and attempt to consume via my web app by adding a service reference. However, when I add the reference I get:
System.Activities.ValidationException: An extension of type 'PizzaMan.ActivityLibrary.IPreparePizzaExtension' must be configured in order to run this workflow.
Fair enough - of course my activity requires that I pass it an implementation of IPreparePizzaExtension - after all, I've told it to!
So my question is, how on earth do I pass this to the service? I can manage this easily enough in a console app scenario, using the WorkflowInvoker, but I cannot see any obvious way to do this via the service approach. I would assume that obviously a programmatic approach to adding the reference is what's needed, but again I'm at a loss as to precisely how to go about this.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards
Ian
The WorkflowServiceHost has a WorkflowExtensions property where you can add the workflow extenstion. There are several ways you can do that. If you are self hosting this is easy as you create the WorkflowServiceHost. If you are usign IIS you need to create a ServiceHostFactory to configure you WorkflowServiceHost. Finally there is an option to add the workflow extension in the CacheMetadata of your activity using the metadata.AddDefaultExtensionProvider() function.
Solved it as follows, self-hosting style:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Workflow1 workflow = new Workflow1();
// Provide some default values; note: these will be overriden once method on the service is called.
workflow.productID = -1;
Uri address = new Uri("http://localhost:1234/WorkflowService1");
WorkflowServiceHost host = new WorkflowServiceHost(workflow, address);
// Behaviours
host.Description.Behaviors.Add(new ServiceMetadataBehavior { HttpGetEnabled = true });
host.Description.Behaviors.Remove(typeof(ServiceDebugBehavior));
host.Description.Behaviors.Add(new ServiceDebugBehavior { IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults = true });
// Persistence
var connStr = #"";
var behavior = new SqlWorkflowInstanceStoreBehavior(connStr);
behavior.InstanceCompletionAction = InstanceCompletionAction.DeleteNothing;
behavior.InstanceLockedExceptionAction = InstanceLockedExceptionAction.AggressiveRetry;
behavior.InstanceEncodingOption = InstanceEncodingOption.None;
host.Description.Behaviors.Add(behavior);
// Add extension implementations
if (!TEST_MODE)
{
host.WorkflowExtensions.Add(new MyExtension());
}
else
{
host.WorkflowExtensions.Add(new MyExtensionTest());
}
host.Faulted += new EventHandler(host_Faulted);
host.Open();
foreach (System.ServiceModel.Description.ServiceEndpoint endpoint in host.Description.Endpoints)
{
Console.WriteLine(endpoint.Address);
}
Console.WriteLine("Listening...");
Console.ReadLine();
host.Close();
}
My toolkit has configuration support for this. See http://neovolve.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Neovolve.Toolkit.Workflow.dll%20-%201.1
There is also this method of doing things:
http://wf.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=How%20do%20I%20add%20an%20extension%20to%20a%20WCF%20Workflow%20Service?

Can we host a Workflow Service as a Windows Service?

I am working on a logging application that requires me to have a Workflow that is exposed as a Service (Workflow Service). We want to host it as a Windows Service (don't want to host workflow service as .svc file in IIS). Another reason for having it as windows service is to be able to communicate with the service through the Named pipes.
Can we expose a Workflow Service through Named Pipes without hosting it in IIS?
Yep bep, you sure can. At least, I have accomplished as much with Workflow 4 Release Candidate.
Consider,
// a generic self-hosted workflow service hosting thingy. Actual
// implementation should contain more logging and thread safety, this
// is an abbreviated version ;)
public class WorkflowHost
{
// NOTE: with Workflow, it helps to maintain a concept of
// Workflow definition [the Activity or WorkflowService from
// a designer] and a Workflow instance [what is running within
// WorkflowInvoker, WorkflowApplication, WorkflowServiceHost].
// a definition may be used to generate an instance. an instance
// contains run-time state and cannot be recycled into a new
// instance. therefore, to repeatedly re-host a WorkflowService
// we need to maintain references to original definitions and
// actual instances. ergo services and hosts maps
//
// if you are special purpose and require support for one and
// only one service and endpoint\uri, then you may reduce this
// to a simple tuple of Uri, WorkflowService, WorkflowServiceHost
// services represents a definition of hosted services
private readonly Dictionary<Uri, WorkflowService> _services =
new Dictionary<Uri, WorkflowService> ();
// hosts represents actual running instances of services
private readonly Dictionary<Uri, WorkflowServiceHost> _hosts =
new Dictionary<Uri, WorkflowServiceHost> ();
// constructor accepts a map of Uris (ie service endpoints) to
// workflow service definitions
public WorkflowHost (IDictionary<Uri, WorkflowService> services)
{
foreach (KeyValuePair<Uri, WorkflowService> servicePair in services)
{
_services.Add (servicePair.Key, servicePair.Value);
}
}
// have your windows service invoke this to start hosting
public void Start ()
{
if (_hosts.Count > 0)
{
Stop ();
}
foreach (KeyValuePair<Uri, WorkflowService> servicePair in _services)
{
WorkflowService service = servicePair.Value;
Uri uri = servicePair.Key;
WorkflowServiceHost host = new WorkflowServiceHost (service, uri);
host.Open ();
_hosts.Add (uri, host);
}
}
// have your windows service invoke this to stop hosting
public void Stop ()
{
if (_hosts.Count > 0)
{
foreach (KeyValuePair<Uri, WorkflowService> servicePair in
_services)
{
WorkflowService service = servicePair.Value;
Uri uri = servicePair.Key;
IDisposable host = _hosts[uri];
host.Dispose ();
}
_hosts.Clear ();
}
}
}
I believe endpoint configuration may be set via standard Wcf service configuration sections in App.config. I have not personally attempted a change to default transport layer in my experiments with Workflow.
The above represents a generic pure hosting class [ie it self-hosts WorkflowServices]. This allows us to re-use this hosting functionality within a console, WinForm, WPF, or yes, even a WindowsService application. Below is a WindowsService that leverages our host class
// windows service. personally i would abstract service behind
// an interface and inject it, but again, for brevity ;)
public partial class WorkflowWindowsService : ServiceBase
{
WorkflowHost _host;
public WorkflowWindowsService ()
{
InitializeComponent();
Dictionary<Uri, WorkflowService> services =
new Dictionary<Uri, WorkflowService> ();
// do your service loading ...
// create host
_host = new WorkflowHost (services);
}
protected override void OnStart(string[] args)
{
_host.Start ();
}
protected override void OnStop()
{
_host.Stop ();
}
}
If you have fiddled with WorkflowServices in VS2010RC, then you may already know that WorkflowServices are not first class Xaml classes like their Workflow cousins. Instead, they are saved as loose Xaml files with the .xamlx extension. There is no design-time intellisense support for WorkflowServices [as far as I know] and are not recognized as declared types, so our only options to load a WorkflowService at run-time are
Read pure Xaml markup from .xamlx file directly
Read pure Xaml markup from some other source [embedded string, resource, or other source]
Either way, we must interpret markup and create a WorkflowService definition. The following will transform a string [that may be a filename or markup] into a WorkflowService. Keeners may also note that there is a difference between this process and the process for transforming Workflow markup to Workflow definitions.
// converts a string value [either pure xaml or filename] to a
// WorkflowService definition
public WorkflowService ToWorkflowService (string value)
{
WorkflowService service = null;
// 1. assume value is Xaml
string xaml = value;
// 2. if value is file path,
if (File.Exists (value))
{
// 2a. read contents to xaml
xaml = File.ReadAllText (value);
}
// 3. build service
using (StringReader xamlReader = new StringReader (xaml))
{
object untypedService = null;
// NOTE: XamlServices, NOT ActivityXamlServices
untypedService = XamlServices.Load (xamlReader);
if (untypedService is WorkflowService)
{
service = (WorkflowService)(untypedService);
}
else
{
throw new ArgumentException (
string.Format (
"Unexpected error reading WorkflowService from " +
"value [{0}] and Xaml [{1}]. Xaml does not define a " +
"WorkflowService, but an instance of [{2}].",
value,
xaml,
untypedService.GetType ()));
}
}
return service;
}
Yes it is possible. You will have to create your own service. See Hosting and Consuming WCF Services on MSDN, especially the section Hosting in Windows Services.

How to implement IsOneWay=true in WCF nettcpBinding

How can I implement one way WCF operations?
I just tried using IsOneWay attribute as:
[OperationContract(IsOneWay=true)]
void MethodName(string param1, int param2)
Is there any other change I need to make or any specific change in app.config?
FYI, my WCF service implements netTcpBinding, though I think that shouldn't make any difference.
As shown, your code looks ok. There should be no problem with doing one-way calls with netTcpBinding.
If you're interested, chapter 5 in Juval Lowy's awesome Programming WCF Services 2nd Edition contains a good bit of information about one-way services.
From what you've shown, so far though I don't see anything wrong. Please give us some more details.
We had a problem with one-way calls not returning immediately using the NetTcpBinding. This blog post identifies the problem and provides a solution.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/distributedservices/archive/2009/02/12/client-proxy-close-method-call-does-not-finish-immediately-in-one-way-wcf-calls.aspx
From the article:
Problem: Clients calling a one-way method in WCF Service and then close method on proxy does not return until the call is actually finished or call times out. Ever wonder why this happens?
Cause: When you specify “One-Way” on your interface, the underlying channel operation is still two-way since the one way binding element is not in the channel stack. Thus, the close operation gets blocked until the one way operation completes.
This is by design and the development team is working to change it in future versions of .Net framework.
...
Solution (Work around):
Layer the OneWayBindingElement on top of netTcpBinding as shown in the below code. This way, close call on proxy will return immediately and eventually the one-way call will return in fire and forget fashion.
[ServiceContract]
public interface IService1
{
[OperationContract(IsOneWay = true)]
void SetData(int value);
}
public class Service1 : IService1
{
public void SetData(int value)
{
//Application specific code
}
}
Service Host code:
Form1ServiceHost = new ServiceHost(this, new Uri("net.tcp://localhost:8091/WindowsFormApp/Form1/"), new Uri("http://localhost:8090/WindowsFormApp/Form1/"));
Binding binding = new NetTcpBinding();
BindingElementCollection oldBindingElements = binding.CreateBindingElements();
BindingElementCollection bindingElements = new BindingElementCollection();
bindingElements.Add(new OneWayBindingElement());
foreach (BindingElement bindingElement in oldBindingElements)
{
bindingElements.Add(bindingElement);
}
binding = new CustomBinding(bindingElements);
Form1ServiceHost.AddServiceEndpoint("WCFServiceLibrary.IService1", binding, "");
Form1ServiceHost.Open();
Client Code:
Binding binding = new NetTcpBinding();
BindingElementCollection oldBindingElements = binding.CreateBindingElements();
BindingElementCollection bindingElements = new BindingElementCollection();
bindingElements.Add(new OneWayBindingElement());
foreach (BindingElement bindingElement in oldBindingElements)
{
bindingElements.Add(bindingElement);
}
binding = new CustomBinding(bindingElements);
Service1Client client = new Service1Client(binding, new EndpointAddress("net.tcp://localhost:8091/WindowsFormApp/Form1/"));
client.SetData(10);
Console.WriteLine("set data");
Console.WriteLine("Now closing the channel,Before close, current time is {0}", DateTime.Now.ToString() + " " + DateTime.Now.Millisecond.ToString());
client.Close();
Console.WriteLine("Now closing the channel,After close, current time is {0}", DateTime.Now.ToString() + " " + DateTime.Now.Millisecond.ToString());`