How To Get Multi-Part Form Data Boundary Type - httpwebrequest

I am posting data to a website & need to generate the boundary. When I post manually the boundary is like this:
1 - 23281168279961
2 - 491299511942
3 - 4827543632391
(In order of time that I posted).
How is such a boundary generated?

The boundary could be randomly generated. See http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1341/7_2_Multipart.html for discussion on what boundary is constituted of and Generating multipart boundary for it's sample implementation in Java.

Related

Using an API to Extract All Comments from a Reddit Post

I am using the Reddit API (Pushshift) : https://github.com/pushshift/api
Using the documentation, I understand how I can use this to extract every comment containing the word "covid" that was left in a certain time period:
https://api.pushshift.io/reddit/search/comment?q=covid&after=3h&before=2h&size=1
The output looks something like this:
{"data":[{"subreddit_id":"t5_2qh6p","author_is_blocked":false,"comment_type":null,"edited":false,"author_flair_type":"richtext","total_awards_received":0,"subreddit":"Conservative","author_flair_template_id":null,"id":"j98zf27","gilded":0,"archived":false,"collapsed_reason_code":null,"no_follow":false,"author":"VamboRoolOkay","send_replies":true,"parent_id":41917615743,"score":1,"author_fullname":"t2_7uxkru5f","all_awardings":[],"body":"I will never believe that election fraud wasn't a significant factor. Go ahead - call it a conspiracy theory. But I also maintained that Covid was lab-created. Truth is the Daughter of Time.","top_awarded_type":null,"author_flair_css_class":null,"author_patreon_flair":false,"collapsed":false,"author_flair_richtext":[{"e":"text","t":"Conservative"}],"is_submitter":false,"gildings":{},"collapsed_reason":null,"associated_award":null,"stickied":false,"author_premium":false,"can_gild":true,"link_id":"t3_116l7ct","unrepliable_reason":null,"author_flair_text_color":"dark","score_hidden":true,"permalink":"/r/Conservative/comments/116l7ct/kamala_harris_plans_on_running_with_biden_in_2024/j98zf27/","subreddit_type":"public","locked":false,"author_flair_text":"Conservative","treatment_tags":[],"created_utc":1676866031,"subreddit_name_prefixed":"r/Conservative","controversiality":0,"author_flair_background_color":"","collapsed_because_crowd_control":null,"distinguished":null,"retrieved_utc":1676866047,"updated_utc":1676866048,"body_sha1":"328df3784d15f77b98a84418c4ce720822227cfe","utc_datetime_str":"2023-02-20 04:07:11"}],"error":null,"metadata":{"es":{"took":98,"timed_out":false,"_shards":{"total":828,"successful":828,"skipped":824,"failed":0},"hits":{"total":{"value":573,"relation":"eq"},"max_score":null}},"es_query":{"size":1,"query":{"bool":{"must":[{"bool":{"must":[{"simple_query_string":{"fields":["body"],"query":"covid","default_operator":"and"}},{"range":{"created_utc":{"gte":1676862433000}}},{"range":{"created_utc":{"lt":1676866033000}}}]}}]}},"aggs":{},"sort":{"created_utc":"desc"}},"es_query2":"{\"size\":1,\"query\":{\"bool\":{\"must\":[{\"bool\":{\"must\":[{\"simple_query_string\":{\"fields\":[\"body\"],\"query\":\"covid\",\"default_operator\":\"and\"}},{\"range\":{\"created_utc\":{\"gte\":1676862433000}}},{\"range\":{\"created_utc\":{\"lt\":1676866033000}}}]}}]}},\"aggs\":{},\"sort\":{\"created_utc\":\"desc\"}}","api_launch_time":1673017478.254743,"api_request_start":1676873233.6143198,"api_request_end":1676873233.7406816,"api_total_time":0.12636184692382812}}
My Question: Suppose I identify a post that contains the word "covid" - now, I want to retrieve every comment on this post : Is this possible to do?
For instance, based on the output of these results, I see that :
link_id: t3_116l7ct
parent_id:41917615743
Can I somehow use this information to write an API query to retrieve all comments from this post?
I tried the following query but got an empty result: https://api.pushshift.io/reddit/comment/search/?link_id=t3_116cjib
Thanks!

Jmeter :- ArrayList Handling in Parameters tab

Case: Select 100 records and mark them verified.
Steps:
Getting 25-100 records based on IDs via JSON extractor.
Posting verified on 25-100 records selected.
Actual Result: (Getting 500 Error)
Expected Result: (How it is working in application)
How can I handle the above case?
Your format is not correct, you need to send the data like:
The request body can be generated dynamically using JSR223 PreProcessor and some Groovy scripting, check out HTTPSamplerBase.addArgument() function for more details.

Retry until with dynamic path or params [duplicate]

I have a use-case where I need to first call an API to get a list of ID's. From this response a random ID is chosen. Next I call a 2nd API which uses the random ID as a component in the path.
It's possible the 2nd API call can return an empty response, therefore I want to utilize retry until but use a different random ID in the path per retry iteration.
I've tried a couple of things:
First "in-lining" the JS function in the path to get a random ID:
Given path firstPart, myGetRandomId(idList), lastPart
And retry until response.length > 1
Second, tried putting the JS function in a Examples: as part of a Scenario Outline:
Given path firstPart, <ID>, lastPart
And retry until response.length > 1
Examples:
| ID |
| myGetRandomId(idList) |
The general issue I can't figure out is how to get the JS function to evaluate in either of this "in-line" kind of approaches.
And ideas/suggestions appreciated.
The way that the Karate retry until works is that it will re-play the request as-is and you can't modify it.
So you have to take a different approach. Use a JS loop. Look at this example in the demos:
https://github.com/intuit/karate/blob/master/karate-demo/src/test/java/demo/polling/polling.feature

Karate Automation: Is there any way we can set the Scenario name dynamically from a json file [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Can we parameterize the request file name to the Read method in Karate?
(2 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
I am using a JSON file which act as a test case document for my API testing. The JSON contain Test Case ID, Test case Description, Header and Request body details, which should be the driving factor of Automation
Currently i am looping a feature over this json file to set different header and body validations. However it will be helpful if i can set the Scenario name from JSON file while its iterating
Something like
serverpost.feature
Feature:re-usable feature to publish data
Scenario: TC_NAME # TC_NAME is avaliable in the JSON data passed to this feature. However, CURRENTLY ITS NOT TAKING THIS DATA FROM JSON FILE.
Given path TC_ID # TC ID is taken from JSON
Given url 'http://myappurl.com:8080/mytestapp/Servers/Data/uploadServer/'
And request { some: '#(BODY)' } # Request Body Details is taken from JSON
Please suggest
In my honest opinion, you are asking for a very un-necessary feature. Please refer to the demo examples, look for it in the documentation.
Specifically, look at this one: dynamic-params.feature. There are multiple ways to create / use a data table. Instead of trying to maintain 2 files - think of Karate as being both - your data table AND the test execution. There is no need to complicate things further.
If you really really want to re-use some JSON lying around, it is up to you but you won't be able to update the scenario name, sorry. What I suggest is just use the print statement to dump the name to the log and it will appear in the HTML report (refer to the doc). Note that when calling a feature in a loop using a JSON array, the call argument is ALREADY included the report, so you may not need to do anything.
Just an observation - your questions seem to be very basic, do you mind reading the doc and the examples a bit more thoroughly, thanks.

docx4j Differencer Showing More Differences Than Expected

I have two documents:
Document 1 (input)
Document 2 (output)
Document 2 is the result of passing Document 1 through a transformation process which leaves any content and formatting intact (verified by side-by-side compare in Word).
However, the process removes many id numbers from the .docx files.
For example,
<w:p w:rsidP="00B600D6" w:rsidR="00F55D78" w:rsidRDefault="00B600D6">
becomes
<w:p>
according to a dump of each document via the following code:
Body body = ((Document)newerPackage.getMainDocumentPart().getJaxbElement()).getBody();
Node node = org.docx4j.XmlUtils.marshaltoW3CDomDocument(body).getDocumentElement();
TransformerFactory tf = TransformerFactory.newInstance();
Transformer transformer = tf.newTransformer();
transformer.setOutputProperty(OutputKeys.OMIT_XML_DECLARATION, "no");
transformer.setOutputProperty(OutputKeys.METHOD, "xml");
transformer.setOutputProperty(OutputKeys.INDENT, "yes");
transformer.setOutputProperty(OutputKeys.ENCODING, "UTF-8");
transformer.setOutputProperty("{http://xml.apache.org/xslt}indent-amount", "4");
transformer.transform(new DOMSource(node),
new StreamResult(new OutputStreamWriter(System.out, "UTF-8")));
Using the docx4j Differencer comparison method recommended here, everything (except the first line which has no formatting applied) is shown as a modification.
Question is: Are the diffs a result of the missing id's, the formatting or something else?
In case it's important, we're using docx4j in this context to perform automated sanity/regression tests on our round-tripping proceess (i.e. apply the "loss-less" process and expect no differences)
Disclosure: I work on docx4j
If the only difference between paragraphs is the rsid attributes, they will still be detected as different.
You could "clean" the documents before performing the comparison, so that neither docx has rsid attributes. See the Filter sample.
By the way, an easier way to see the XML for an object (eg a single paragraph, or the entire body) is to use XmlUtils.marshaltoString