I am pulling a userid from a database named people and have given it a variable of $userid. That same userid is associated with another table named info, sometimes. Sometimes there is a matching userid, sometimes that userid is not associated with the info table. When I do the following query, the function is skipped when the userid in the people table does not have a matching userid in the info table. Is there a way to get a result back when no match is found?
$club_query = $wpdb->get_results( $wpdb->prepare("SELECT clubs FROM info WHERE userid = '$userid' LIMIT 1") );
If the club is in the results, then perform a function.
Any help is appreciated.
There are a few dirty hacks I've used for this sort of thing. One is to use MIN(clubs) instead of clubs, since if there are no rows, then MIN(...) returns NULL:
SELECT MIN(clubs) clubs FROM info WHERE userid = ...
Another is to use a RIGHT JOIN (SELECT 1) t:
SELECT info.clubs FROM info RIGHT JOIN (SELECT 1) t ON info.userid = ...
Both approaches work, but have some drawbacks/limitations.
Edited to add: another approach that just occurred to me right now is to use a subquery in the field-list:
SELECT (SELECT clubs FROM info WHERE userid = ...) clubs;
which also converts an empty result-set into NULL. This, too, has some limitations.
Related
I shall link my database down below.
I have a query called 'TestMonday1' and what this does is return the student with the fewest 'NoOfFrees' and insert the result of the query into the lesson table. Running the query should help explain what i mean. The problem im having is my SQL code has 'SELECT TOP 1' yet if the query returns two students who have the same number of frees it returns both these records. Wit this being a timetable planner, it should only ever return one result, i shall also put the code below,
Many thanks
Code:
INSERT INTO Lesson ( StudentID, LessonStart, LessonEnd, DayOfWeek )
SELECT TOP 1 Availability.StudentID, Availability.StartTime,
Availability.EndTime, Availability.DayOfWeek
FROM Availability
WHERE
Availability.StartTime='16:00:00' AND
Availability.EndTime='18:00:00' AND
Availability.DayOfWeek='Monday' AND
LessonTaken IS NULL
ORDER BY
Availability.NoOfFrees;
This happens because Access returns all records in case of ties in ORDER BY (all records returned have the same values of fields used in ORDER BY).
You can add another field to ORDER BY to make sure there's no ties. StudentID looks like a good candidate (though I don't know your schema, replace with something else if it suits better):
ORDER BY
Availability.NoOfFrees, Availability.StudentID;
Hello I have a question regarding a query I am trying to create. I want to create a query that will List members'name for who ever checked out one oe more books and have returned ALL of them. I have a query (shown below that finds the entries if there Return Date is no NULL but I can't figure out how to now show the Names if they have a returned book but still have another book they have no returned (Return Date = NULL). Below is my script if anybody can give me some advice. Thank you.
SELECT MemName
FROM MEMBER, CHECK_OUT
WHERE MEMBER.ID = CHECK_OUT.MemID
AND CHECK_OUT.DateRet IS NOT NULL
If I understand what you are asking, you want a query that will return all members who currently have a book checked out, correct?
Something like this might be what you want:
SELECT
M.MemName
FROM
MEMBER AS M
INNER JOIN CHECK_OUT AS C ON (C.MemID = M.ID)
WHERE
C.DateRet IS NULL
This will list all member names that have something checked out, but will not remove duplicates. To list each name only one, use SELECT DISTINT. To get the names who do NOT have anything checked out anymore (but did at one point) use either your query or modify mine to say C.DateRet IS NOT NULL. I personally just like using INNER JOINS in this situation.
I want to create a query that will List members' names for who ever checked out one or more books and have returned ALL of them.
SELECT MEMBER.MemName
FROM MEMBER, CHECK_OUT
WHERE MEMBER.ID = CHECK_OUT.MemID
group by MEMBER.ID, MEMBER.MemName
having max(nvl2(CHECK_OUT.DateRet, 0, 1)) = 0
The query I am trying to perform is
With getusers As
(Select userID from userprofspecinst_v where institutionID IN
(select institutionID, professionID from userprofspecinst_v where userID=#UserID)
and professionID IN
(select institutionID, professionID from userprofspecinst_v where userID=#UserID))
select username from user where userID IN (select userID from getusers)
Here's what I'm trying to do. Given a userID and a view which contains the userID and the ID of their institution and profession, I want to get the list of other userID's who also have the same institutionID and and professionID. Then with that list of userIDs I want to get the usernames that correspond to each userID from another table (user). The error I am getting when I try to create the procedure is, "Only one expression can be specified in the select list when the subquery is not introduced with EXISTS.". Am I taking the correct approach to how I should build this query?
The following query should do what you want to do:
SELECT u.username
FROM user AS u
INNER JOIN userprofspecinst_v AS up ON u.userID = up.userID
INNER JOIN (SELECT institutionID, professionID FROM userprofspecinst_v
WHERE userID = #userID) AS ProInsts
ON (up.institutionID = ProInsts.institutionID
AND up.professionID = ProInsts.professionID)
Effectively the crucial part is the last INNER JOIN statement - this creates a table constituting the insitutionsids and professsionids the user id belongs to. We then get all matching items in the view with the same institution id and profession id (the ON condition) and then link these back to the user table on the corresponding userids (the first JOIN).
You can either run this for each user id you are interested in, or JOIN onto the result of a query (your getusers) (it depends on what database engine you are running).
If you aren't familiar with JOIN's, Jeff Atwood's introductory post is a good starting place.
The JOIN statement effectively allows you to explot the logical links between your tables - the userId, institutionID and professionID are all examples of candidates for foreign keys - so, rather than having to constantly subquery each table and piece the results together, you can link all the tables together and filter down to the rows you want. It's usually a cleaner, more maintainable approach (although that is opinion).
Downloads table:
id (primary key)
user_id
item_id
created_at
updated_at
The user_id and item_id in this case are both incorrect, however, they're properly stored in the users and items table, respectively (import_id for in each table). Here's what I'm trying to script:
downloads.each do |download|
user = User.find_by_import_id(download.user_id)
item = item.find_by_import_id(download.item_id)
if user && item
download.update_attributes(:user_id => user.id, :item.id => item.id)
end
end
So,
look up the user and item based on
their respective "import_id"'s. Then
update those values in the download record
This takes forever with a ton of rows. Anyway to do this in SQL?
If I understand you correctly, you simply need to add two sub-querys in your SELECT statement to lookup the correct IDs. For example:
SELECT id,
(SELECT correct_id FROM User WHERE import_id=user_id) AS UserID,
(SELECT correct_id FROM Item WHERE import_id=item_id) AS ItemID,
created_at,
updated_at
FROM Downloads
This will translate your incorrect user_ids to whatever ID you want to come from the User table and it will do the same for your item_ids. The information coming from SQL will now be correct.
If, however, you want to update the tables with the correct information, you could write this like so:
UPDATE Downloads
SET user_id = User.user_id,
item_id = Item.item_id
FROM Downloads
INNER JOIN User ON Downloads.user_id = User.import_id
INNER JOIN Item ON Downloads.item_id = Item.import_id
WHERE ...
Make sure to put something in the WHERE clause so you don't update every record in the Downloads table (unless that is the plan). I rewrote the above statement to be a bit more optimized since the original version had two SELECT statements per row, which is a bit intense.
Edit:
Since this is PostgreSQL, you can't have the table name in both the UPDATE and the FROM section. Instead, the tables in the FROM section are joined to the table being updated. Here is a quote about this from the PostgreSQL website:
When a FROM clause is present, what essentially happens is that the target table is joined to the tables mentioned in the fromlist, and each output row of the join represents an update operation for the target table. When using FROM you should ensure that the join produces at most one output row for each row to be modified. In other words, a target row shouldn't join to more than one row from the other table(s). If it does, then only one of the join rows will be used to update the target row, but which one will be used is not readily predictable.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/sql-update.html
With this in mind, here is an example that I think should work (can't test it, sorry):
UPDATE Downloads
SET user_id = User.user_id,
item_id = Item.item_id
FROM User, Item
WHERE Downloads.user_id = User.import_id AND
Downloads.item_id = Item.import_id
That is the basic idea. Don't forget you will still need to add extra criteria to the WHERE section to limit the rows that are updated.
i'm totally guessing from your question, but you have some kind of lookup table that will match an import user_id with the real user_id, and similarly from items. i.e. the assumption is your line of code:
User.find_by_import_id(download.user_id)
hits the database to do the lookup. the import_users / import_items tables are just the names i've given to the lookup tables to do this.
UPDATE downloads
SET downloads.user_id = users.user_id
, downloads.item_id = items.items_id
FROM downloads
INNER JOIN import_users ON downloads.user_id = import_users.import_user_id
INNER JOIN import_items ON downloads.item_id = import_items.import_item_id
Either way (lookup is in DB, or it's derived from code), would it not just be easier to insert the information correctly in the first place? this would mean you can't have any FK's on your table since sometimes they point to one table, and others they point to another. seems a bit odd.
Scenario: A sampling survey needs to be performed on membership of 20,000 individuals. Survey sample size is 3500 of the total 20000 members. All membership individuals are in table tblMember. Same survey was performed the previous year and members whom were surveyed are in tblSurvey08. Membership data can change over the year (e.g. new email address, etc.) but the MemberID data stays the same.
How do I remove the MemberID/records contained tblSurvey08 from tblMember to create a new table of potential members to be surveyed (lets call it tblPotentialSurvey09). Again the record for a individual member may not match from the different tables but the MemberID field will remain constant.
I am fairly new at this stuff but I seem to be having a problem Googling a solution - I could use the EXCEPT function but the records for the individuals members are not necessarily the same from one table to next - just the MemberID may be the same.
Thanks
SELECT
* (replace with column list)
FROM
member m
LEFT JOIN
tblSurvey08 s08
ON m.member_id = s08.member_id
WHERE
s08.member_id IS NULL
will give you only members not in the 08 survey. This join is more efficient than a NOT IN construct.
A new table is not such a great idea, since you are duplicating data. A view with the above query would be a better choice.
I apologize in advance if I didn't understand your question but I think this is what you're asking for. You can use the insert into statement.
insert into tblPotentialSurvey09
select your_criteria from tblMember where tblMember.MemberId not in (
select MemberId from tblSurvey08
)
First of all, I wouldn't create a new table just for selecting potential members. Instead, I would create a new true/false (1/0) field telling if they are eligible.
However, if you'd still want to copy data to the new table, here's how you can do it:
INSERT INTO tblSurvey00 (MemberID)
SELECT MemberID
FROM tblMember m
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM tblSurvey09 s WHERE s.MemberID = m.MemberID)
If you just want to create a new field as I suggested, a similar query would do the job.
An outer join should do:
select m_09.MemberID
from tblMembers m_09 left outer join
tblSurvey08 m_08 on m_09.MemberID = m_08.MemberID
where
m_08.MemberID is null