I have a question regarding to primary key for Oracle Table with Period.
I have created two tables like following:
create table el_temporal_try( -- Parent Table
id number(10) not null,
ColumnA varchar(10),
constraint el_temporal_try_pk primary key (id),
period for valid_period
);
create table el_temporal_try_son( -- Son Table
id number(10) not null,
ColumnA varchar(10),
parent_id number(10),
constraint el_temporal_try_FY foreign key (parent_id) references el_temporal_try(id),
period for valid_period
);
This script gone through successfully. However I have problem with inserting data:
I have executed following two insert statements into the parent table:
1st: statement
insert into el_temporal_try
(id, columnA,valid_period_start, valid_period_end)
values
(1,'A',sysdate - 10, sysdate - 9);
Result:
1 row inserted.
2nd: statement
insert into el_temporal_try
(id, columnA,valid_period_start, valid_period_end)
values
(1,'B',sysdate - 8, sysdate - 7);
Result
ORA-00001: unique constraint (PBSVW.EL_TEMPORAL_TRY_PK) violated
I understand it is because of the "ID" column. However, my issues because this two rows are for a different period, should it be allowed?
I was intended to use this period for feature to capture the change history of a record as an alternative to flashback. However, does it means that I should not use primary key at this situation?
Thanks in advance!
The problem is related to the id column like you said. it's not possible to add the registry because the primary key is unique, then your second insert statement references the same ID from the first. You need to change the ID always you insert a line.
On Oracle 12c, you can use the identity like this link.
https://www.oracletutorial.com/oracle-basics/oracle-identity-column/
in another version, you can use sequence and trigger to do this.
https://chartio.com/resources/tutorials/how-to-define-an-auto-increment-primary-key-in-oracle/
Thanks for everyone's help on this. This most likely means I cannot use Primary Key/Foreign Key to maintain the referential integrity between the parent and son for my situation within a particular timestamp, but I have to go for something else.
Thanks a lot!
I have a table, TBL_1, with the following fields:
TBL_ID NUMBER (pk),
CREATE_DATE DATE (pk),
TBL_IND VARCHAR2(1)
The primary key is on TBL_ID and CREATE_DATE, I am trying to perform an insert statement but getting an error ORA-00001: unique constraint (primary key) violated.
There is a before insert trigger setting the NEW.CREATE_DATE as SYSDATE. The insert statement looks like:
INSERT INTO TBL_1 (tbl_id,tbl_ind)
SELECT tbl_id,'Y'
FROM tbl_info;
The actual query is a little more complex but I just wanted to point out it is a INSERT INTO SELECT statement. Is it possible if there is a duplicate tbl_id the trigger used the same exact date for both rows thus causing a duplicate error? How can I avoid this?
I don't think it is a good idea to have create_date as part of the primary key. I would suggest that you use a sequence value instead.
If you don't mind reducing the number of rows, you can do:
INSERT INTO TBL_1 (tbl_id,tbl_ind)
SELECT DISTINCT tbl_id, 'Y'
FROM tbl_info;
Or, if you still want all rows inserted, then restructure your data to use a sequence instead of the creation date.
I Have table three tables:
The first one is emps:
create table emps (id number primary key , name nvarchar2(20));
The second one is cars:
create table cars (id number primary key , car_name varchar2(20));
The third one is accounts:
create table accounts (acc_id number primary key, woner_table nvarchar2(20) ,
woner_id number references emps(id) references cars(id));
Now I Have these values for selected tables:
Emps:
ID Name
-------------------
1 Ali
2 Ahmed
Cars:
ID Name
------------------------
107 Camery 2016
108 Ford 2012
I Want to
Insert values in accounts table so its data should be like this:
Accounts:
Acc_no Woner_Table Woner_ID
------------------------------------------
11013 EMPS 1
12010 CARS 107
I tried to perform this SQL statement:
Insert into accounts (acc_id , woner_table , woner_id) values (11013,'EMPS',1);
BUT I get this error:
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02291: integrity constraint (HR.SYS_C0016548) violated - parent key not found.
This error occurs because the value of woner_id column doesn't exist in cars table.
My work require link tables in this way.
How Can I Solve This Problem Please ?!..
Mean: How can I reference tables in previous way and Insert values without this problem ?..
One-of relationships are tricky in SQL. With your data structure here is one possibility:
create table accounts (
acc_id number primary key,
emp_id number references emps(id),
car_id number references car(id),
id as (coalesce(emp_id, car_id)),
woner_table as (case when emp_id is not null then 'Emps'
when car_id is not null then 'Cars'
end),
constraint chk_accounts_car_emp check (emp_id is null or car_id is null)
);
You can fetch the id in a select. However, for the insert, you need to be explicit:
Insert into accounts (acc_id , emp_id)
values (11013, 1);
Note: Earlier versions of Oracle do not support virtual columns, but you can do almost the same thing using a view.
Your approach should be changed such that your Account table contains two foreign key fields - one for each foreign table. Like this:
create table accounts (acc_id number primary key,
empsId number references emps(id),
carsId number references cars(id));
The easiest, most straightforward method to do this is as STLDeveloper says, add additional FK columns, one for each table. This also bring along with it the benefit of the database being able to enforce Referential Integrity.
BUT, if you choose not to do, then the next option is to use one FK column for the the FK values and a second column to indicate what table the value refers to. This keeps the number of columns small = 2 max, regardless of number of tables with FKs. But, this significantly increases the programming burden for the application logic and/or PL/SQL, SQL. And, of course, you completely lose Database enforcement of RI.
Why does add a foreign key to the tblDomare table result in this error?
The ALTER TABLE statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FK__tblDomare__PersN__5F7E2DAC". The conflict occurred in database "almu0004", table "dbo.tblBana", column 'BanNR'.
Code
CREATE TABLE tblDomare
(PersNR VARCHAR (15) NOT NULL,
fNamn VARCHAR (15) NOT NULL,
eNamn VARCHAR (20) NOT NULL,
Erfarenhet VARCHAR (5),
PRIMARY KEY (PersNR));
INSERT INTO tblDomare (PersNR,fNamn,eNamn,Erfarenhet)
Values (6811034679,'Bengt','Carlberg',10);
INSERT INTO tblDomare (PersNR,fNamn,eNamn,Erfarenhet)
Values (7606091347,'Josefin','Backman',4);
INSERT INTO tblDomare (PersNR,fNamn,eNamn,Erfarenhet)
Values (8508284163,'Johanna','Backman',1);
CREATE TABLE tblBana
(BanNR VARCHAR (15) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (BanNR));
INSERT INTO tblBana (BanNR)
Values (1);
INSERT INTO tblBana (BanNR)
Values (2);
INSERT INTO tblBana (BanNR)
Values (3);
ALTER TABLE tblDomare
ADD FOREIGN KEY (PersNR)
REFERENCES tblBana(BanNR);
It occurred because you tried to create a foreign key from tblDomare.PersNR to tblBana.BanNR but/and the values in tblDomare.PersNR didn't match with any of the values in tblBana.BanNR. You cannot create a relation which violates referential integrity.
This query was very useful for me. It shows all values that don't have any matches
select FK_column from FK_table
WHERE FK_column NOT IN
(SELECT PK_column from PK_table)
Try this solution:
There is a data item in your table whose associated value doesn't exist in the table you want to use it as a primary key table.
Make your table empty or add the associated value to the second table.
It is possible to create the foreign key using ALTER TABLE tablename WITH NOCHECK ..., which will allow data that violates the foreign key.
"ALTER TABLE tablename WITH NOCHECK ..." option to add the FK -- This solution worked for me.
Remove all existing data from your tables and then make a relation between the tables.
Before You add Foreign key to the table, do the following
Make sure the table must empty or The column data should match.
Make sure it is not null.
If the table contains do not go to design and change, do it manually.
alter table Table 1 add foreign key (Column Name) references Table 2 (Column Name)
alter table Table 1 alter column Column Name attribute not null
I guess, a column value in a foreign key table should match with the column value of the primary key table. If we are trying to create a foreign key constraint between two tables where the value inside one column(going to be the foreign key) is different from the column value of the primary key table then it will throw the message.
So it is always recommended to insert only those values in the Foreign key column which are present in the Primary key table column.
For ex. If the Primary table column has values 1, 2, 3 and in Foreign key column the values inserted are different, then the query would not be executed as it expects the values to be between 1 & 3.
In very simple words your table already has data present in it and the table you are trying to create relationship with does have that Primary key set for the values that are already present.
Either delete all the values of the existing table.
Add all the values of foreign key reference in the new table.
Try DELETE the current datas from tblDomare.PersNR . Because the values in tblDomare.PersNR didn't match with any of the values in tblBana.BanNR.
When you define a Foreign Key in table B referencing the Primary Key of table A it means that when a value is in B, it must be in A. This is to prevent unconsistent modifications to the tables.
In your example, your tables contain:
tblDomare with PRIMARY KEY (PersNR):
PersNR |fNamn |eNamn |Erfarenhet
-----------|----------|-----------|----------
6811034679 |'Bengt' |'Carlberg' |10
7606091347 |'Josefin' |'Backman' |4
8508284163 |'Johanna' |'Backman' |1
---------------------------------------------
tblBana:
BanNR
-----
1
2
3
-----
This statement:
ALTER TABLE tblDomare
ADD FOREIGN KEY (PersNR)
REFERENCES tblBana(BanNR);
says that any line in tblDomare with key PersNR must have a correspondence in table tblBana on key BanNR. Your error is because you have lines inserted in tblDomare with no correspondence in tblBana.
2 solutions to fix your issue:
either add lines in tblBana with BanNR in (6811034679, 7606091347, 8508284163)
or remove all lines in tblDomare that have no correspondence in tblBana (but your table would be empty)
General advice: you should have the Foreign Key constraint before populating the tables. Foreign keys are here to prevent the user of the table from filling the tables with inconsistencies.
i had this error too
as Smutje reffered make sure that you have not a value in foreign key column of your base foreign key table that is not in your reference table i.e(every value in your base foreign key table(value of a column that is foreign key) must also be in your reference table column)
its good to empty your base foreign key table first then set foreign keys
the data you have entered a table(tbldomare) aren't match a data you have assigned primary key table. write between tbldomare and add this word (with nocheck) then execute your code.
for example you entered a table tbldomar this data
INSERT INTO tblDomare (PersNR,fNamn,eNamn,Erfarenhet)
Values (6811034679,'Bengt','Carlberg',10);
and you assigned a foreign key table to accept only 1,2,3.
you have two solutions one is delete the data you have entered a table then execute the code. another is write this word (with nocheck) put it between your table name and add
like this
ALTER TABLE tblDomare with nocheck
ADD FOREIGN KEY (PersNR)
REFERENCES tblBana(BanNR);
Smutje is correct and Chad HedgeCock offered a great layman's example.
Id like to build on Chad's example by offering a way to find/delete those records.
We will use Customer as the Parent and Order as the child. CustomerId is the common field.
select * from Order Child
left join Customer Parent on Child.CustomerId = Parent.CustomerId
where Parent.CustomerId is null
if you are reading this thread... you will get results. These are orphaned children. select * from Order Child
left join Customer Parent on Child.CustomerId = Parent.CustomerId
where Parent.CustomerId is null Note the row count in the bottom right.
Go verify w/ whomever you need to that you are going to delete these rows!
begin tran
delete Order
from Order Child
left join Customer Parent on Child.CustomerId = Parent.CustomerId
where Parent.CustomerId is null
Run the first bit.
Check that row count = what you expected
commit the tran
commit tran
Be careful. Someone's sloppy programming got you into this mess. Make sure you understand the why before you delete the orphans. Maybe the parent needs to be restored.
From our end, this is the scenario:
We have an existing table in the database with records.
Then I introduces a NOT nullable foreign key
After executing the update i got this error.
How did i solve you ask?
SOLUTION: I just removed all the records of the table, then tried to update the database and it was successful.
This happens to me, since I am designing my database, I notice that I change my seed on my main table, now the relational table has no foreign key on the main table.
So I need to truncate both tables, and it now works!
You should see if your tables has any data on the rows. If "yes" then you should truncate the table(s) or else you can make them to have the same number of data at tblDomare.PersNR to tblBana.BanNR and vise-verse.
In my scenario, using EF, upon trying to create this new Foreign Key on existing data, I was wrongly trying to populate the data (make the links) AFTER creating the foreign key.
The fix is to populate your data before creating the foreign key since it checks all of them to see if the links are indeed valid. So it couldn't possibly work if you haven't populated it yet.
I encounter some issue in my project.
In child table, there isn't any record Id equals 1 and 11
I inserted DEAL_ITEM_THIRD_PARTY_PO table which Id equals 1 and 11 then I can create FK
Please first delete data from that table and then run the migration again. You will get success
I had the same problem.
My issue was having nullable: true in column (migration file):
AddColumn("dbo.table", "column", c => c.Int(nullable: true));
Possible Solutions:
Change nullable 'false' to 'true'. (Not Recommended)
Change property type from int to int? (Recommended)
And if required, change this later after adding column > then missing field data in previous records
If you've changed an existing property from nullable to non-nullable:
3) Fill the column data in database records
A foreign key constraint in a child table must have a parent table with a primary key. The primary key must be unique. The foreign key value must match a value in the patent table primary key
When you alter table column from nullable to not nullable column where this column is foreign key, you must :
Firstly, initialize this column with value (because it is foreign
key not nullable).
After that you can alter your table column normally.
Please try below query:
CREATE TABLE tblBana
(BanNR VARCHAR (15) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
);
CREATE TABLE tblDomare
(PersNR VARCHAR (15) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
fNamn VARCHAR (15) NOT NULL,
eNamn VARCHAR (20) NOT NULL,
Erfarenhet VARCHAR (5),
FK_tblBana_Id VARCHAR (15) references tblBana (BanNR)
);
INSERT INTO tblBana (BanNR)
Values (3);
INSERT INTO tblDomare (PersNR,fNamn,eNamn,Erfarenhet,FK_tblBana_Id)
Values (8508284173,'Johanna','Backman',1,3);
or you can use this
SELECT fk_id FROM dbo.tableA
Except
SELECT fk_id From dbo.tableB
and just FYI, in case you do all of your data reference checks and find no bad data...apparently it is not possible to create a foreign key constraint between two tables and fields where those fields are the primary key in both tables! Do not ask me how I know this.
I am working with a SQL Server 2005 database and I am facing a problem.
I am creating a table like this:
CREATE TABLE CONT_UNIQUE
(
NUM INT,
BRANCH VARCHAR(10),
PIN INT,
CONSTRAINT CON UNIQUE(NUM,BRANCH,PIN)
)
means I am adding a unique constraint to all columns present in my table. But while inserting values in table, it is considering only NUM to be as UNIQUE, but allowing duplicate values for branch and PIN.
Below are my two insert queries.
INSERT INTO CONT_UNIQUE VALUES(1, 'MP', 123) -> Working fine
INSERT INTO CONT_UNIQUE VALUES(2, 'MP', 123) -> Should throw error since MP, and 123 are present.
Note:
CREATE TABLE CONT_UNIQUE
(
NUM INT UNIQUE ,
BRANCH VARCHAR(10), UNIQUE,
PIN INT UNIQUE
)
this works perfectly as expected.
Kindly let me know what is the problem with my queries.
You have created a single constraint that ensures no two rows have the same values in all 3 columns.
You want three separate constraints, one on NUM, one on BRANCH and one on PIN.
CREATE TABLE CONT_UNIQUE
(
NUM INT,
BRANCH VARCHAR(10),
PIN INT,
CONSTRAINT CON UNIQUE(NUM),
CONSTRAINT CON2 UNIQUE(BRANCH),
CONSTRAINT CON3 UNIQUE(PIN)
)
You have created unique constraint on the combination of 3 columns but not 2 columns, what I mean is you can not insert 1,'MP',123 value again into the table, but you can insert 1,'MP',12 or 1,'MP',13 into the table.
That won't throw an error because the unique constraint is on all 3 columns.
I think you want this as well / instead:
... CONSTRAINT only_two_columns UNIQUE (branch, pin) ...
From all of your replies i learnt that,
1)Unique key works with Unique combination rather than focusing on individual uniqueness...
Ex: unique(Column1, Column2) means column1 and column2 combination should not repeat, but individual values can repeat.
2)If we want unique value on each column then we need to mention the "unique" to each column while creating table.
Ex:Num int unique, Branch varchar(10) unique...etc so that each column will have unique values.
Previously i thought Unique(Col1, col2) is same as "col1 int unique, col2 int unique". So i asked the question.
ONCE AGAIN THANKS TO ALL OF YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT IN SOLVING MY QUERY.. :)
Thanks
Mahesh