I'm new to EMR and just had a few questions i have been struggling with the past few days. The first of which is the logs that i want to process are already compressed as .gz and i was wondering if these types of files are able to be split by emr so that more then one mapper will work on a file. Also i have been reading that input files will not be split unless they are 5gb, my files are not that large so does that mean they will only be processed by one instance?
My other question might seem relatively dumb but is it possible to use emr+streaming and have an input someplace other then s3? It seems redundant to have to download the logs from the CDN, then upload them to my s3 bucket to run mapreduce on them. Right now i have them downloading onto my server then my server is uploading them to s3, is there a way to cut out the middle man and have it go straight to s3, or run the inputs off my server?
are already compressed as .gz and i was wondering if these types of files are able to be split by emr so that more then one mapper will work on a file
Alas, no, straight gzip files are not splittable. One option is to just roll your log files more frequently; this very simple solution works for some people though it's a bit clumsy.
Also i have been reading that input files will not be split unless they are 5gb,
This is definitely not the case. If a file is splittable you have lots of options on how you want to split it, eg configuring mapred.max.split.size. I found [1] to be a good description of the options available.
is it possible to use emr+streaming and have an input someplace other then s3?
Yes. Elastic MapReduce now supports VPC so you could connect directly to your CDN [2]
[1] http://www.scribd.com/doc/23046928/Hadoop-Performance-Tuning
[2] http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/ElasticMapReduce/latest/DeveloperGuide/EnvironmentConfig_VPC.html?r=146
Related
I need to download a big number of files (around 400k) files from an S3 bucket. I have the paths stored in a csv file. Some of the paths may not exist.
The two options i see are:
Use the foreach activity and somehow pass the contents of the file there. But i think that this would flood my monitor pane with a huge number of runs, and it feels like it is meant to be for smaller pipelines.
Use the listOfFiles option which is supported in the S3 source. The problem with this approach is that the list must be in the S3 bucket and cannot be loaded from Azure Datalake Gen2 (anybody knows why, please let me know as well).
I have tried using the listOfFiles way, but the pipeline fails once it finds the first missing file. The fault tolerance options contain a "skip missing file" option but it is defined as "Skip the files if it is being deleted from source store during the data movement", so it is of no use to me.
I don't want to download more files than needed, so copying the bucket as-is is not an option. How can i approach this issue with ADF? I'm looking for a solution that uses the predefined transformations, ideally i would like to not involve Azure Batch or Azure Functions for such a simple task.
I have a project in AWS to insert data from some files, which will be in S3, to Redshift. The point is that the ETL has to be scheduled each day to find new files in S3 and then check if those files are correct. However, this has to be done with custom code as the files can have different formats depending of their kind, provider, etc.
I see that AWS Glue allows to schedule, crawl and do the ETL. However I'm lost at how to one can create its own code for the ETL and parse the files to check the correctness before ending up doing the copy instruction from S3 to Redshift. Do you know if that can be done and how?
Another issue is that if the correctness is OK then, the system should upload the data from S3 to a web via some API. But if it's not the file should be left into an ftp email. Here again, do you know if that can be done as well with the AWS Glue and how?
many thanks!
You can write your glue/spark code, upload it to s3 and create a glue job referring to this script/library. Anything you want to write in python can be done in glue. its just a wrapper around spark which in turn uses python....
I'm using Marklogic 8.0.6 and we also have JSON documents in it. I need to extract a lot of data from Marklogic and store them in AWS S3. We tried to run "mlcp" locally and them upload the data to AWS S3 but it's very slow because it's generating a lot of files.
Our Marklogic platform is already connected to S3 to perform backup. Is there a way to extract a specific database in aws s3 ?
It can be OK for me if I have one big file with one JSON document per line
Thanks,
Romain.
I don't know about getting it to s3, but you can use CORB2 to extract MarkLogic documents to one big file with one JSON document per line.
S3:// is a native file type in MarkLogic. So you can also iterate through all your docs and export them with xdmp:save("s3://...).
If you want to make agrigates, then You may want to marry this idea into Sam's suggestion of CORB2 to control the process and assist in grouping your whole database into multiple manageable aggregate documents. Then use a post-back task to run xdmp-save
Thanks guys for your answers. I do not know about CORB2, this is a great solution! But unfortunately, due to bad I/O I prefer a solution to write directly on s3.
I can use a basic Ml query and dump to s3:// with native connector but I always face memory error even launching with the "spawn" function to generate a background process.
Do you have any xquey example to extract each document on s3 one by one without memory permission?
Thanks
The documentation for the Redshift COPY command specifies two ways to choose files to load from S3, you either provide a base path and it loads all the files under that path, or you specify a manifest file with specific files to load.
However in our case, which I imagine is pretty common, the S3 bucket periodically receives new files with more recent data. We'd like to be able to load only the files that haven't already been loaded.
Given that there is a table stl_file_scan that logs all the files that have been loaded from S3, it would be nice to somehow exclude those that have successfully been loaded. This seems like a fairly obvious feature, but I can't find anything in the docs or online about how to do this.
Even the Redshift S3 loading template in AWS Data Pipeline appears to manage this scenario by loading all the data -- new and old -- to a staging table, and then comparing/upserting to the target table. This seems like an insane amount of overhead when we can tell up front from the filenames that a file has already been loaded.
I know we could probably move the files that have already been loaded out of the bucket, however we can't do that, this bucket is the final storage place for another process which is not our own.
The only alternative I can think of is to have some other process running that tracks files that have been successfully loaded to redshift, and then periodically compares that to the s3 bucket to determine the differences, and then writes the manifest file somewhere before triggering the copy process. But what a pain! We'd need a separate ec2 instance to run the process which would have it's own management and operational overhead.
There must be a better way!
This is how I solved the problem,
S3 -- (Lambda Trigger on newly created Logs) -- Lambda -- Firehose -- Redshift
It works at any scale. With more load, more calls to Lambda, more data to firehose and everything taken care automatically.
If there are issues with the format of the file, you can configure dead letter queues, events will be sent there and you can reprocess once you fix lambda.
Here I would like to mention some steps that includes process that how to load data in redshift.
Export local RDBMS data to flat files (Make sure you remove invalid
characters, apply escape sequence during export).
Split files into 10-15 MB each to get optimal performance during
upload and final Data load.
Compress files to *.gz format so you don’t end up with $1000
surprise bill :) .. In my case Text files were compressed 10-20
times.
List all file names to manifest file so when you issue COPY command
to Redshift its treated as one unit of load.
Upload manifest file to Amazon S3 bucket.
Upload local *.gz files to Amazon S3 bucket.
Issue Redshift COPY command with different options.
Schedule file archiving from on-premises and S3 Staging area on AWS.
Capturing Errors, setting up restart ability if something fails
Doing it easy way you can follow this link.
In general compare of loaded files to existing on S3 files is a bad but possible practice. The common "industrial" practice is to use message queue between data producer and data consumer that actually loads the data. Take a look on RabbitMQ vs Amazon SQS and etc..
We are experiencing problems with files produced by Java code which are written locally and then copied by the Data Pipeline to S3. The error mentions file size.
I would have thought that if multipart uploads is required, then the Pipeline would figure that out. I wonder if there is a way of configuring the Pipeline so that it indeed uses multipart uploading. Because otherwise the current Java code which is agnostic about S3 has to write directly to S3 or has to do what it used to and then use multipart uploading -- in fact, I would think the code would just directly write to S3 and not worry about uploading.
Can anyone tell me if Pipelines can use multipart uploading and if not, can you suggest whether the correct approach is to have the program write directly to S3 or to continue to write to local storage and then perhaps have a separate program be invoked within the same Pipeline which will do the multipart uploading?
The answer, based on AWS support, is that indeed 5 gig files can't be uploaded directly to S3. And there is no way currently for a Data Pipeline to say, "You are trying to upload a large file, so I will do something special to handle this." It simply fails.
This may change in the future.
Data Pipeline CopyActivity does not support files larger than 4GB. http://docs.aws.amazon.com/datapipeline/latest/DeveloperGuide/dp-object-copyactivity.html
This is below the 5GB limit imposed by S3 for each file-part put.
You need to write your own script wrapping AWS CLI or S3cmd (older). This script may be executed as a shell activity.
Writing directly to S3 may be an issue as S3 does not support append operations - unless you can somehow write multiple smaller objects in a folder.