In the context of a WCF project, I need to handle in the same way xml and non-xml messages (eg. Standard SOAP, WS-Attachments, etc..). The normal flow of WCF creates a Message object which can handle an Xml message, this is done by the encoder, so if one wants to handle different messages, it's needed to implement different kind of message-handling...
My needs is to create a message derivation class, which represent the concept of "received message" but not "handled" in the form of special data handling, but , about real data-handling, deferred in a secondary step.
so in the catch-all service I will get a Message messageObject as parameter, so the signature of the service will be Message Accept(Message messageObject)
Any idea?
thanks in advance
There is only single base Message type in WCF. This is a core type which is used by WCF infrastructure. The type is abstract so generally you can create your custom implementation but in such case you will probably have to replace some WCF channels to correctly use your new type.
If you need to transport message in custom format you are probably not looking for replacing Message type but either replacing encoder, serializer or both.
Related
I have a consumer with generic argument IEvent. This type is a base interface for all messages, and child interfaces of IEvent have some other properties. I'd like to have access to the raw message with all properties of nested types instead of only IEvent scope. These properties can be seen through RMQ admin dashboard and I think there should be a way to put them out.
You could use context.TryGetMessage<T>() to request the specific type, which essentially attempts to deserialize the message into the specified type (as long as it is in the list of messageTypes serialized into the header).
Otherwise, you can use context.TryGetMessage<JToken>(), and get the JToken from JSON.NET, which can be used to navigate the message body.
Honestly, this isn't the best approach to properly handling events, etc., so I'd refer to the documentation to see how to properly consume the various message types (and let MassTransit do the hard work).
I am still confused when it is appropriate to use the Message type in WCF like below
[ServiceContract]
public interface IMyService
{
[OperationContract]
Message GetData();
[OperationContract]
void PutData(Message m);
}
Why would you want to use it?
Can you use it for streaming?
Thanks
MSDN lists the follow reasons for using the message class directly:
When you need an alternative way of creating outgoing message contents (for example, creating a message directly from a file on disk) instead of serializing .NET Framework objects.
When you need an alternative way of using incoming message contents (for example, when you want to apply an XSLT transformation to the raw XML contents) instead of deserializing into .NET Framework objects.
When you need to deal with messages in a general way regardless of message contents (for example, when routing or forwarding messages when building a router, load-balancer, or a publish-subscribe system).
See Using the Message Class for more detailed information.
Edit to address the streaming question
I didn't find a definitive answer in my quick scan via google, but the article above states "All communication between clients and services ultimately results in Message instances being sent and received" - so I would assume it could be used directly in streaming.
While the reasons listed by Tim are valid, we use messages directly in our services to create one uber routing service.
we have one service that can take any method call you throw at it, Clients are generated by wsdls supplied from multiple sources.
This service would take the message, examine its content and route it accordingly.
So in my opinion if you want to get closer to the wire, or when you dont know the type of incoming messages, you can use the message in the signature directly.
Streaming is a separate concept than message signature, streaming is supported by wcf under very specific bindings and security mechanism and the method signature has to be very specific (i.e it should return/accept stream). Also in streaming the actual stream of data travels outside the scope of soap message.
What's the use of action/reply action for service operation in WCF. So far, what I've understood is; action is used by WSDL to identify the service operation to which the message from the client belongs and in return reply action is used by service operation to identify the caller to which reply message belong --> Please correct me if I am wrong with this!
Now, I want to understand; what's the real use (apart from handling anonymous messages by using aster ix [*]), I mean this could well be handled internally by WCF instead of exposing it to the developer.
Also, why is action and replyaction required at all? I mean, we already have a name property for the service operation to identify the method and when I call Proxy.SomeMethod() then somemethod is already mapped to the Name property and it should be enough to identify the destination method for the message and similarly the replyaction. Please clarify.
Can I please get a simple real world scenario/or link to that to understand Action/ReplyAction in real life.
Many Thanks.
Actions are part of the various SOAP and WS-* specifcations.
So the first point is that this is not something unique to WCF it is a standard part of the specification you need to support if you want to have interoperable web services. They are used for message routing and other message handling functions.
Second, WCF DOES manage these by default. You only need to specify them yourself if you wish to customise or manage them in some other way. E.g. WCF will automatically generate them into the WSDL for you. WCF will also use them by default when it is selecting which operation to invoke for an incoming message. Again, WCF provides extension points to customise this behavior if you require.
Consider this scenario that two WCF clients connect to one WCF service(server), this service will receive an object from one client and send it to the other one through some operation contract and client callbacks, both clients have the type for this object but we do not want the WCF service(server) to be dependent on this type.
The project is much bigger than this, but I wonder if you can send an object with an unknown type to a service and somehow receive it back on the other client. I saw this but it does not help me at all: Can WCF service transmit type (client doesn't know this type) information?
Thanks in advance.
You can do certain things with the "raw" Message data type - but it's really not pretty programming...
Read about it here:
How to pass arbitrary data in a Message object using WCF
WCF : Untyped messages on WCF operations.
Sending an "object" with unknown type is not possible in WCF because WCF requires a full compatibility with WSDL - and WSDL requires transparent type definition.
Having said that, if you use a type of object I believe there is a way for this to be loaded as a string and in WSDL it is defined as xs:anyType.
I personally would prefer defining the type as string and passing an XML which can be serialised using plain XML Serialization. I have used this in our company and it works really well, especially since we will be storing the XML as document in database.
I'm looking to use the MsmqIntegrationBinding to integrate with a legacy queue which has a serialized object as the message body. Has anyone come up with a way to obtain the "metadata" of the message body and create a service side class to use within the service?
For example, if I put in a serialized Product object from System A and my service needs to consume it, how do I provide MsmqMessage the type if I do not have the Product class on my side? I was thinking of reading off a message in a separate program, deserializing, and then emitting via the code dom. Ideas?
I wholeheartedly recommend against attempting to emit the deserialized type at runtime in the message destination. Either work with the XML at the destination to obtain the data you desire, or build data contracts that both the source and destination can adhere to.
Hmm... in WCF, you can define service methods which take (and optionally return) an untyped Message type. This seems to fit your bill quite nicely.
Other than with strongly typed messages, you'll have to do all the putting together of the message on the client and the taking apart on the server by means of reading the raw XML - but that seems to be what you're looking for, right?
Find more information and samples here:
WCF - Handling Generic Messages
How to pass a generic object through WCF
Untyped messages on WCF
Untyped messages have some restrictions, e.g. you can only read them once on the server, but you should be able to manage your scenario with this, I think.
Marc