I am looking for a command line tool which can generate function flow diagrams from some textual description (any sort of markup language would do).
The idea is to document the data connections between some components. The resulting diagrams shall resemble the following. This is mostly for own internal doc. so it doesn't really need to generate fancy diagrams. Blocks with annotation, connections with annotation and maybe some notes is definitely sufficient.
http://www.automation.com/images/article/mathworks/MathWorks_Simulink_robot_arm_simulation_model.png
http://www.randservice.com/images/screen2.jpg
Thanks a lot in advance,
Paul
Check out: GraphViz -- It generates graphs out of a list of vertices and edge definitions
Also, check out IPE, a vector drawing program that can create exactly what you want, but it will be a manual process.
Related
I have some doubts. I'm doing a BI for my company, and I needed to develop a data converter in ETL because the database to which it's connected (PostgreSQL) is bringing me some negative values within the time CSV. It doesn't make much sense to bring from the database (to which we don't have many accesses) negative data like this:
The solution I found so that I don't need to rely exclusively on dealing directly with the database would be to perform a conversion within the cloudconnect. I verified in my researches that the one that most contemplates would be the normalizer, but there are not many explanations available. Could you give me a hand? because I couldn't parameterize how I could convert this data from 00:00:-50 to 00:00:50 with the normalizer.
It might help you to review our CC documentation: https://help.gooddata.com/cloudconnect/manual/normalizer.html
However, I am not sure if normalizer would be able to process timestamps.
Normalizer is basically a generic transform component with a normalization template. You might as well use reformat component that is more universal.
However, what you are trying to do would require some very custom transform script, written in CTL (CloudConnect transformation language) or java.
You can find some templates and examples in the documentation: https://help.gooddata.com/cloudconnect/manual/ctl-templates-for-transformers.html
I am interested in importing a Fixed Width file using Pentaho PDI.
I have used its main GUI tool that sets the widths graphically in Spoon.
BUT if the number of fields is very large, like a few hundred fields, it would be prone to error and take a lot of time.
In other ETL tools, I am able to import a meta-file that describes the column properties, such as name, size etc.
I see that pentaho has this thing calls Meta-Data Injection, but there is not much tutorials at all, just a couple, and either the use cases are really complex and make use of Javascript for scripting or they describe it in very abstract ways.
So hope someone who is familiar can explain my particular use case of Fixed Width files.
Yes, You can use metadata injection step for applying dynamic properties like filename, fields, length datatype etc..
For that,
You need to create one transformation with file input step.
Create another transformation with the metadata injection step and where
you can add a transformation that created in step1.
In inject Metadata tab of metadata injection step you can add length from the input step.
I know that there are a lot of packages around which allow you to create or read e.g. PDF, Word and other files.
What I'm interested in (and never learned at the university) is how you create such a package? Are you always relying on source code being given by the original company (such as Adobe or Microsoft), or is there another clever way of working around it? Should I analyze the individual bytes I see in e.g. PDF files?
It varies.
Some companies provide an SDK ("Software Development Kit") for their own data format, others only a specification (i.e., Adobe for PDF, Microsoft for Word and it's up to the software developer to make sure to write a correct implementation.
Since that can be a lot of work – the PDF specification, for example, runs to over 700 pages and doesn't go deep into practically required material such as LZW, JPEG/JPEG2000, color theory, and math transformations – and you need a huge set of data to test against, it's way easier to use the work that others have done on it.
If you are interested in writing a support library for a certain file format which
is not legally protected,
has no, or only sparse (official) documentation,
and is not already under deconstruction elsewhere,a
then yes: you need to
gather as many possible different files;
from as many possible sources;
(ideally, you should have at least one program that can both read and create the files)
inspect them on the byte level;
create a 'reader' which works on all of the test files;
if possible, interesting, and/or required, create a 'writer' that can create a new file in that format from scratch or can convert data in another format to this one.
There is 'cleverness' involved, mainly in #3, as you need to be very well versed in how data representation works in general. You should be able to tell code from data, and string data from floating point, and UTF8 encoded strings from MacRoman-encoded strings (and so on).
I've done this a couple of times, primarily to inspect the data of various games, mainly because it's huge fun! (Fair warning: it can also be incredibly frustrating.) See Reverse Engineering's Reverse engineering file containing sprites for an example approach; notably, at the bottom of my answer in there I admit defeat and start using the phrases "possibly" and "may" and "probably", which is an indication I did not get any further on that.
a Not necessarily of course. You can cooperate with other whose expertise lies elsewhere, or even do "grunt work" for existing projects – finding out and codifying fairly trivial subcases.
There are also advantages of working independently on existing projects. For example, with the experience of my own PDF reader (written from scratch), I was able to point out a bug in PDFBox.
Requirement:
I am trying to develop a language application using antlr4. The language in question is not important. The important thing is that the grammar is very vast (easily >2000 rules!!!). I want to do a number of operations
Extract bunch of informations. These can be call graphs, variable names. constant expressions etc.
Any number of transformations:
if a loop can be expanded, we go ahead and expand it
If we can eliminate dead code we might choose to do that
we might choose to rename all variable names to conform to some norms.
Each of these operations can be applied independent of each other. And after application of these steps I want the rewrite the input as close as possible to the original input.
e.g. So we might want to eliminate loops and rename the variable and then output the result in the original language format.
Questions:
I see a need to build a custom Tree (read AST) for this. So that I can modify the tree with each of the transformations. However when I want to generate the output, I lose the nice abilities of the TokenStreamRewriter. I have to specify how to write each of the nodes of the tree and I lose the original input formatting for the places I didn't do any transformations. Does antlr4 provide a good way to get around this problem?
Is AST the best way to go? Or do I build my own object representation? If so how do I create that object efficiently? Creating object representation is very big pain for such a vast language. But may be better in the long run. Again how do I get back the original formatting?
Is it possible to work just on the parse tree?
Are there similar language applications which do the same thing? If so what strategy do they use?
Any input is welcome.
Thanks in advance.
In general, what you want is called a Program Transformation System (PTS).
PTSs generally have parsers, build ASTs, can prettyprint the ASTs to recover compilable source text. More importantly, they have standard ways to navigate/inspect/modify the ASTs so that you can change them programmatically.
Many offer these capabilities in the form of pattern-matching code fragments written in the surface syntax of the language being transformed; this avoids the need to forever having to know excruciatingly fine details about which nodes are in your AST and how they are related to children. This is incredibly useful when you big complex grammars, as most of our modern (and our legacy languages) all seem to have.
More sophisticated PTSs (very few) provide additional facilities for teasing out the semantics of the source code. It is pretty hard to analyze/transform most code without knowing what scopes individual symbols belong to, or their type, and many other details such as data flow. Full disclosure: I build one of these.
I'm about to release a FOSS data generator that can generate random yet meaningful data in CSV format. Rather belatedly, I guess, I need to poll the state of the art for such products - because if there is a well known and useful existing tool, I can write my work off to experience. I am aware of of a couple of SQL Server specific tools, but mine is not database specific.
So, links? And if you have used such a product,
what features did you find it was missing?
Edit: To add a bit more info on my tool (Ooh, Matron!) it is intended to allow generation of any kind of random data from existing data files, and
supports weighting. It is XML based (sorry, folks) and lets you say things like:
<pick distribute="20,80" >
<datafile file="femalenames.dat"/>
<datafile file="malenames.dat"/>
<pick/>
to select female names about 20% of the time and male names 80% of the time.
But the purpose of this question is not to describe my product but to get info on other tools.
Latest: If anyone is interested, they can get the alpha of my data generator at http://code.google.com/p/csvtest
That can be a one-liner in R where I use the littler scripting front-end:
# generate the data as a one-liner from the command-line
# we set the RNG seed, and draw from a bunch of distributions
# indented just to fit the box here
edd#ron:~$ r -e'set.seed(42); write.csv(data.frame(y=runif(10), x1=rnorm(10),
x2=rt(10,4), x3=rpois(10, 0.4)), file="/tmp/neil.csv",
quote=FALSE, row.names=FALSE)'
edd#ron:~$ cat /tmp/neil.csv
y,x1,x2,x3
0.914806043496355,-0.106124516091484,0.830735621223563,0
0.937075413297862,1.51152199743894,1.6707628713402,0
0.286139534786344,-0.0946590384130976,-0.282485683052060,0
0.830447626067325,2.01842371387704,0.714442314565005,0
0.641745518893003,-0.062714099052421,-1.08008578470128,0
0.519095949130133,1.30486965422349,2.28674786332467,0
0.736588314641267,2.28664539270111,-0.73270267483628,1
0.134666597237810,-1.38886070111234,-1.45317770550920,1
0.656992290401831,-0.278788766817371,-1.01676025893376,1
0.70506478403695,-0.133321336393658,0.404860813371462,0
edd#ron:~$
You have not said anything about your data-generating process, but rest assured that R can probably cope with just about any requirement, including multivariate normal, t, skew-t, and more. The (six different) random-number generators in R are also of very high quality.
R can also write to DBs, or read parameters from it, and if it needs to be on Windoze then the Rscript front-end could be used instead of littler.
I asked a similar question some months ago:
Tools for Generating Mock Data?
I got some sincere suggestions, but most were not suitable for my needs. Either expensive (non-free) software, or else not flexible enough w.r.t. data types and database structure, or range of mock data, or way too slow (e.g. the Rails ActiveRecord solution).
Features I was looking for were:
Generate mock data to fill existing database tables
Quick to generate > 1 million rows
Produce either SQL script format or flat file suitable for importing
Scriptable command-line interface, not a GUI
Not dependent on Microsoft Windows environment
Nice-to-have features:
Extensible/configurable
Open-source, free license
Written in a dynamic language like Perl/PHP/Python
Point it at a database and let it "discover" the metadata
Integrated with testing tools (e.g. DbUnit)
Option to fill directly into the database as it generates data
The answer I accepted as Databene Benerator. Though since asking the question, I admit I haven't used it very much.
I was surprised that even when asking the community, the range of tools for generating mock data was so thin. This seems like a niche waiting to be filled! I'll be interested to see what you release.